Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CHEMISTRY
0 1988 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Carbohydrate binding properties of a new plant lectin (GNA) isolated from snowdrop bulbs were studied
using the technique of quantitative precipitation, hapten inhibition, and affinity chromatographyonimmobilized lectin. Purified GNA precipitated highly
branched yeast mannans but did not react with most
glucans. Hapten inhibition experiments showed that Dmannose is an inhibitor of GNA-mannan interaction
but neither N-acetyl-D-mannosamine nor D-glucose is
an inhibitor. Hapten inhibition with various sugars
showed that GNA requires the presence of equatorial
hydroxyl groups at the C-3 and C-4 positions and an
axial group at the C-2 position of the D-pyranose ring.
A nonreducing terminal D-mannose residue is necessary for the interaction of oligosaccharides, and oligosaccharides with terminal Man(cr-1-3)Man units
showed the highest inhibitory potency (10-30 times
greater than D-mannose) among the manno-oligosaccharides tested. The presence of the hydrophobic p nitrophenyl aglycone increased the affinity of D-mannose only slightly. Immobilized GNA boundyeast mannan but did not bind glycogen. The behavior of glycoproteins with high mannose type glycan chains depended onthe density and the structure of their glycan
chains. Glycopeptides which carry Man(cr1-3)Man
units were retarded on the immobilized GNA column
whereas those lacking this unit or with hybrid type
glycan chains were not retarded on the column.
Plant lectinsof established carbohydrate binding
specificity
have proved to be valuable reagents for the detection, isolation, and characterization of glycoconjugates (1, 2). Although
most well characterized plant lectinshave been isolated from
seeds, especially those of legumes, the numberof plant lectins
isolated from the other partsof the plant hasbeen increasing
(3-12). These nonseed lectins have been studied principally
for the interest regarding their physiological role in plants,
but they may also be a good source of new plant lectins of
unique carbohydrate-binding properties. For example, we recently showed that a lectin obtained fromelderberry bark
* This work was supported in partby National Institutes of Health
Grant GM 29470 and grants from the National Fund for Scientific
Research (Belgium), of which W. J. P.is a Senior ResearchAssociate.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of pagecharges. Thisarticlemusttherefore
be hereby
marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734
solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: National Food Research Institute, Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry, andFisheries, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Yatabe-machi,
Ibaraki 305, Japan.
11 Recipient of a fellowship fromthe Belgian Instituut totAanmoediging van het Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek in Nijverheid en Landbouw.
(10) has a unique carbohydrate binding specificity, recognizing Neu5Ac(a2-6)Gal/GalNAc sequences (13, 14). Also, a
lectin isolated from stinging nettle rhizomes (12) is an extremely small molecule ( M , = 8,500),and itstwo carbohydrate
binding sites exhibit negative cooperativity or are nonequiN,N,N,Nvalent with regard to their affinity toward
tetraacetylchitotetritol, contrary to most plant lectins (15).
Thus,these nonseed plantlectinsshould
be regarded as
unique and useful new carbohydrate binding proteins.
Snowdropbulbs (Galanthus niualis) accumulate alectin
(GNA) which agglutinates rabbit, but not human erythrocytes (16). GNA consists of four identical subunits witha
molecular weight of 50,000; it is devoid of carbohydrate. We
report herein thedetailed carbohydrate binding propertiesof
this new lectin, as examined by quantitative precipitation,
hapten inhibition, and affinity chromatography of its immobilized form.
MATERIALS ANDMETHODS
728
729
2o
15
IO
20
40
60
80
100
20
40
60
80
100
POLYSACCHARIDE
ADDED
(pg)
.,
mannoside
730
!F 5
O
Iw
1 20!
40
#
s 60 5 80s
1i00
.,
POLYSACCHARIDE ADDED ( r u g )
FIG. 2. Quantitative precipitation of glucans by GNA. Varying amountsof glucans were allowed to react with20 pg of GNA and
analyzed as in Fig. 1. A, elsinan; pullulan; 0, glycogen or dextran.
TABLE
I
Inhibition of GNA-H. capsulata mannan precipitation by methyl and
p-nitrophenyl glycosides
There was no inhibition by 100 mM D-glucose (C-2 epimer), Daltrose (C-3 epimer),D-talose (C-4 epimer), D-galactose, D-fucose, Lrhamnose, L-arabinose, D-XylOSe, 2-deoxy-~-mannose,2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-mannose,3-deoxy-D-mannose, N-acetyl-D-mannosamine, N acetyl-D-glucosamine, N-acetyl-D-galactosamineand D-mannitol.
Concentration for
50% inhibition
Sugar
mM
D-Mannose
D-Lyxose
6-Deoxy-D-mannose
17
12% inhibition a t 100 mM
Methyl
Methyl 8-D-mannoside
p-Nitrophenyl a-D-mannoside
p-Nitrophenyl p-D-mannoside
p-Nitrophenyl a-D-glucoside
p-Nitrophenyl P-D-glucoside
p-Nitrophenyl a-D-galactoside
p-Nitrophenyl 8-D-galactoside
p-Nitrophenyl2-O-methyl-aD-mannoside
11
21
No
No
No
No
No
6
9
inhibition at 15mM
inhibition at 25 mM
inhibition a t 25 mM
inhibition a t 25 mM
inhibition a t 15 mM
Carbohydrate
Binding
Properties
of Snowdrop
Lectin
731
TABLEI1
Inhibition of GNA-H. capsuluta mannan precipitation by oligosaccharides
Oligosaccharide
Concentration for
50% inhibition
mM
Man(a1-2)Man
Man(al-2)Man(al-2)Man
Man(p1-2)Man
Man((31-2)Man@l-2)Man
Man(a1-3)Man
Man(a1-3)Man-a-0-Me
Man(a1-3)Man-a-0-allyl
Man(al-3)Man(pl-4)GlcNAc
Man(a1-3)Man(al-2)Man(al-2)Man
Man(a1-4)Man(S-benzylglycoside)
Man(p1-4)Man
Man(/31-4)Man(@l-4)Man
Man(a1-6)Man
Man(al-G)Man(al-G)Man
Man(a1-6)Glc
8
5
68
42
1.4
1.2
1.4
0.6
1.6
9
18
27
4
3
9
Glc(a1-2)Man
Glc(B1-4)Man
Gal(al-2)Man(a1-2)Man
Glc(c~l-3)Glc
Glc(al-4)Glc
Gal(a1-6)Glc
No inhibition at 20 rnM
No inhibition at 30 m M
No inhibition at 10 mM
No inhibition at 40 mM
No inhibition at 100 mM
No inhibition at 100 mM
a-1,3-MannooligomeP
Oxidized a-1,3-Mannooligomerb
3.6
No inhibition a t 2 mM
Man(al-2)Man(al-3)Man-R
Man(al-2)Man(al-6)Man-R
2.8
3.5
Man(al-2)Man(a1-3)
Man-R
10% inhibition at 1 mM
Man(al-2)Man(al-6)
Man(a1-4)
\
Man-a-0-Me
24% inhibition at 4 mM
Man(a1-2)
Man(a1-6)
\
Man-a-0-Me
0.6
Man(a1-3)
Man(a1-6)
\
Man(a1-6)
Man(a1-3)
0.6
Man(@l-4)GlcNAc(@l-4)GlcNAc-Asn
Man(a1-3)
Man(a1-6)
\
Man(a1-6)
Man(a1-3)
0.55
Man(/31-4)GlcNAc(@l-4)GlcNAc-Asn
/
Man(al-P)Man(al-3)
D.P. = 10 (Ref. 39).
Periodate-oxidized and NaBH4-reduced.
e R = -O-(CH,),-COOCH,.
732
S. cerevisiae mannan
TABLE
111
Structure
Man9GlcNAcs Man(a1,2)Man(al,G)
Man(a1,G)
Man(@l,4)R
Man(al,P)Man(al,B)
Man(al,2)Man(a1,2)Man(al,3)
FRACTION NUMBER
(30 drops /tube)
GP-IIIA
GlcNAc((31,4)
Man(a1,G)
Man(a1,G)
Man(al,3)
Man(/31,4)R
GlcNAc(Bl,Z)Man(al,3)
GP-IIIC
GlcNAc(B1,4)
Man(al,3)Man(al,G)
Ovalbumin
GlcNAc(o1,4)
Me u -E-mannoside
Man(pl,4)R
Man(al,3)
GlcNAc(B1,2)
GP-IIIB
Man(a1,2)Man(al,G)
Man(a1,G)
Man(al,3)
Man(al,B)Man(a1,3)
GP-IV
co
Man(a1,G)
(u
Man(a1,G)
/
Man(@l,4)R
Man(B1,4)R
Man(al,3)
Man(a1,2)Man(al,3)
GP-V
Man(a1,G)
Man(a1,G)
Man(pl,4)R
Man(al,3)
Man(al,3)
10
20
30
40
50
FRACTION NUMBER
FtG. 4. Elution profile of some glycoproteins on GNA-Seph-
The preference of GNA for 1,3-linkages was also demonstrated by the affinity chromatographic analysis of several
high mannose type glycosyl asparagine compounds in which
glycopeptides containing Man(a1-3)Manlinkages showed retardation on GNA-Sepharose(Fig. 5 ) . It is interesting to note
that the degree of retardation was significantly different depending on the numberof these disaccharide units, although
the inhibition potency
of these glycosyl asparagines estimated
from hapten inhibition experiments showed no significant
differences in their affinity for GNA. There may be some
differences inthe binding mechanism
between the interaction
of the lectin with the glycopeptides in solution (hapten inhibition) and ona solid surface (affinity chromatography).
Thus, GNA is a unique plantlectin recognizing terminal D-
Carbohydrate Binding
Properties
of Snowdrop
Lectin
733
4
2
REFERENCES
2
rr)
0
*
E
Q
V
1. Lis, H., and Sharon, N. (1984) in Biology of Carbohydrate (Ginsburg, V., and Robbins, P., eds) Vol.2, pp. 1-85, John Wiley
and Sons, New York
2. Goldstein, I. J., and Poretz, R. D. (1986) in The Lectins (Goldstein, I. J., and Sharon, N., eds) pp. 33-247, Academic Press,
Orlando, FL
3. Talbot, C. F., and Etzler, M. E. (1978) Biochemistry 17, 14741479
4. Lamb. J. E.. Shibata.. S.,. and Goldstein, I. J. (1983) Plant Physiol.
7 1,'879-887
5. Kiluatrick. D. C. (1980) Biochem. J . 185. 269-272
6. Allen, A. K., and'Neuberger, A. (1973) Biochemistry 135, 307314
7. Dazzo,F. B., Yanke, W. E., and Brill, W. J. (1978) Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 539,267-286
8. Peumans, W. J., Nsimba-Lubaki, M., Carlier, A. R., and Van
Driessche, E. (1984) Planta 160, 222-228
9. Horejsi, V., Haskovec, C., and Kokourek, J. (1978) Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 532,98-104
10. Broekaert, W. F., Nsimba-Lubaki, M., Peeters, B., and Peumans,
J. (1984) Biochem. J. 2 2 1 , 163-169
11. Peumans. W. J.. Nsimba-Lubaki, M., Peeters, B., and Broekaert,
W. F. (1984) Planta 164, 75-82
12. Peumans. W. J.. DeLev. M.. and Broekaert. W. F. (1984) FEBS
Lett. -177,99-103
13. Shibuya, N., Goldstein, I. J., Broekaert, W. F., Nsimba-Lubaki,
M.. Peeters,. B... and Peumans, W. J. (1987) J . Biol. Chem. 262,
1596-1601
14. Shibuva. N.. Goldstein. I. J.. Broekaert. W. F., Nsimba-Lubaki.
M.,"Peeters, B., a n d Peumans, W. J. (1987) Arch. Biochem:
Biophys. 254, 1-8
15. Shibuya, N.,Goldstein, I. J., Shafer, J. A,, Peumans, W. J., and
Broekaert, W. F. (1986) Arch. Biochem. Bzophys. 249,215-224
16. Van Damme, E. J. M., Allen, A. K., and Peumans, W. J. (1987)
FEBS Lett. 215,140-144
17. March, S. C., Parikh, I., and Cuatrecasas, P. (1974) Anal.
Biochem. 60, 149-152
18. Means, G.E., and Feeney, R. E. (1968) Biochemistry 7,21922201
19. Ohyama, Y., Kasai, K., Nomoto, H., and Inoue, Y. (1985)J. Biol.
Chem. 260,6882-6887
20. So, L. L., and Goldstein, I. J. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. 2 4 2 , 16171622
21. Lowry, 0. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J.
(1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275
22. Goldstein, I. J., and So, L. L. (1965) Arch. Biochem.Biophys.
111,407-414
23. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., and
Smith, F. (1956) Anal. Chem. 28, 350-356
24. Gorin. P. A. J.. and SDencer. J . F. T. (1967) Can. J. Chem. 45,
1543-1549 '
25. Gorin, P. A. J., Spencer, J. F. T., and Magus, R. J. (1969) Can.
J. Chem. 47,3569-3576
26. Gorin, P. A. J., and Spencer, J. F. T. (1972) Can. J. Microbiol.
18,1709-1715
27. Tsumuraya, Y., Misaki, A., Takaya, S., andTorii, M. (1978)
Carbohydr. Res. 66,53-65
28. Crowley, J. F., Goldstein, I. J., Arnarp, J., and Lonngren, J.
~"
~
4
2
0.5
I
"
10
20
30
FRACTION NUMBER
(20dropsltube)
FIG. 5. Elution profile of glycosylasparagines on GNASepharose. Conditions were the same as those of Fig. 3. The arrow
indicates the addition of 0.5 M methyl a-D-mannopyranoside in the
eluent. Structures of the glycosylasparagine glycopeptides are shown
in Table 111. The dashed line indicates the elution position of D mannose.
~~~~
734
Carbohydrate
Binding
Properties
of Snowdrop
Lectin
34. Tai, T., Yamashita, K., Ogata-Arakawa, M., Koide, N., Muramatsu, T., Iwashita, S., Inoue, Y., and Kobata, A. (1975) J.
Bioi. Chem. 250,8569-8575
35. Tai, T., Yamashita, K., Ito, S., and Kobata, A. (1977) J. Biol.
Chem. 252,6687-6694
36. Yamashka, K., Tachibana, Y., and Kobata, A. (1978) J. Biol.
Chem. 253,3862-3869
37. Oda, Y., and Minami, K. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 159, 239-245
38. Lis, H., and Sharon, N. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55,35-67
39. Kong, F., and Schuerch, C. (1984) Macromolecules 17,983-989