Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
t'
- 't'',
'
'
| ,'**.''
tt
.a. , -'"
IlepLrblic ol' thc
Ph
ilippines
LEGAL SERVICE
DILG OPINION NO. T32
sEP o 200
S-
2OIO
This Office was in receipt of a Memorandum from Regional Director (RD) Quirino M.
Libunao of DILG Regional Office No. XI, Davao City, in response to your query
which was earlier referred to the said office for appropriate action.
The query centers on the propriety of your act as City Legal Officer when you
notarized a contract between the winning bidder and the City Government of Digos
as represented by the city Mayor, when at the same time, you occupy a
concurrent position as Chairperson of the Bid and Awards Committee (BAC) who
approved the contract of the same winning bidder.
Attached to the said Memorandum is the position maintained by our Regional Office
in Davao City, signed by RD Libunao himself, and in gist, we quote the Pertinent
portion therdof:
"The law is clear that public officials and employees are generally
prohibited from engaging in the private practice of their profession
unless authorized by the Constitution or law. As opined by the
Supreme Court, the only exceptions are as follows: first, the private
practice is authorized by the Constitution or the law; and second, the
to
conflict with officiat function of the Legal Officer as BAC Chair if such
act of notarization is atlowed' It bears to stress that the functions of
BAC are so encompassing on procurement activities of the LGU'xxx"'
(emphasis and underscoring supplied )
We are
order.
while the documents under review by this office did not mention of any issue as to
the existence or absence of your authority to practice your profession as a lawyer,
the same shall be discussed as an integral part of this office's additional legal
a
on the matter of engaging in notarial practice without the written authoritv from
the Department Head, we cite the case of Abetta vs Atty. cruzabra, a.b. lto.
5688, 04 June 2oo9 wherein said respondent was reprimanded with stern
warning by the supreme court for engaging in notarial practice without authority
from the Department Secretarv:
n, ice Rt t lcs,
ttl
ricl t p rot,idc s:
of
it is emphasized by this Office that your notarial practice must have a prior
written authorization from the City Mayor of Digos, Davao who has control and
supervision over your position. Absent such authority, then the notarial act subject
Thus,
prohibitive act.
Assuming arguendo that you have a standing authority to practice your profession,
the act of notarizing the contract which you approved as Chairperson of the BAC of
Digos City was contrary to the norms of conduct expected of public officials.
Republic Act No. 6713, otherwise known as the Code of Conduct and Ethicat
Standards for Public Officials and Employees, commitment to public interest and
professionalism:
rlt.tties:
offcas
In cfosing, we cite the case of Lorenzana vs Fajardo, A.C, No, 5712, 29 June
2005:
"A I.AWYER SHALL LLPHOLD TI-IE CONSTITUTION, OBEY THE LAWS
OF THE LAND, PROMOT E RESPECT ]TOR LAW
AN
D LEG A L
P ROCESS ES,
Tlrcse clutics nre t'urtfu:r ensluined in tlrc Attontey,s OtttlL rohiclt ez,ery
lmoyer in
s jurisdiction lms to tnke hcfore lrc is nllotpcd to
ltrncticc lntp. TIic
tl
Attorney's Ontlt stntes in pnrt tlnt ez,ery lntpyL,r "shall support the
Constitution anil obey tlrc laus as zuell as the legal orders of the ih y
c onstitltt e tl authorit i e s ...,,
trplnld tfu
lnzus,
*-'..'-.- (
I e. oolue rv
\
DIR. QUIRINO M. LIBUNAO, CESO
Regional Director, DILG Region XI
Matina, Davao City
File
t'
t'
III