Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 2 December 2011
Received in revised form 3 January 2012
Accepted 4 January 2012
Available online 9 February 2012
Keywords:
Internal combustion engines
Efciency
Emissions
Thermodynamics
a b s t r a c t
Recent advancements have demonstrated new combustion modes for internal combustion engines that
exhibit low nitric oxide emissions and high thermal efciencies. These new combustion modes involve
various combinations of stratication, lean mixtures, high levels of EGR, multiple injections, variable
valve timings, two fuels, and other such features. Although the exact combination of these features that
provides the best design is not yet clear, the results (low emissions with high efciencies) are of major
interest.
The current work is directed at determining some of the fundamental thermodynamic reasons for the
relatively high efciencies and to quantify these factors. Both the rst and second laws are used in this
assessment. An automotive engine (5.7 l) which included some of the features mentioned above (e.g.,
high compression ratios, lean mixtures, and high EGR) was evaluated using a thermodynamic cycle simulation. These features were examined for a moderate load (bmep = 900 kPa), moderate speed (2000 rpm)
condition. By the use of lean operation, high EGR levels, high compression ratio and other features, the
net indicated thermal efciency increased from 37.0% to 53.9%. These increases are explained in a
step-by-step fashion. The major reasons for these improvements include the higher compression ratio
and the dilute charge (lean mixture, high EGR). The dilute charge resulted in lower temperatures which
in turn resulted in lower heat loss. In addition, the lower temperatures resulted in higher ratios of the
specic heats which account for a more effective conversion of thermal energy to work. Other thermodynamic features are described.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
85
strategy to minimize emissions while attaining a relatively high efciency. They reported net indicated thermal efciencies of 45% and
50% for two cases.
Some investigators have shown that a combination of lean mixtures and high EGR levels works better than either alone. For
example, Tabata et al. [5] have shown that for a moderate load
and speed condition, the highest efciencies were obtained with
a lean mixture (u 0.75) and an EGR level of about 30%.
As an example of more recent work, Eichmeier et al. [6] reported on the use of a small amount of pilot diesel to ignite a highly
diluted gasolineair mixture. They found successful operation for a
heavily boosted engine, and reported a net indicated specic fuel
consumption of about 190 g/kW h (44.6% net indicated efciency)
for one operating condition with a 10 bar imepnet.
The above work suggests that high efciencies are possible for
certain combustion modes. These combustion modes are often attained with some combination of lean mixtures, high EGR levels,
high boost, and high compression ratio. These combustion modes
often result in rapid combustion. With this in mind, the purpose
of the current work is to complete a systematic assessment of engine operation with high levels of EGR, lean mixtures, high compression ratios, and rapid combustion. By considering each
feature in a step-by-step fashion, the impact of each feature will
be quantied. The resulting thermal efciencies will be reported,
and the reasons for the high efciencies will be determined.
2. Engine cycle simulation description
The cycle simulation used in this work has been described in
detail elsewhere (e.g., [7,8]). This simulation is largely based on thermodynamic formulations, and is a complete representation of the
four-stroke cycle including the intake, compression, combustion,
expansion and exhaust processes. The simulation uses detailed thermodynamic gas properties including equilibrium composition for
the burned gases. The combustion process is based on a mass fraction burn relation from Wiebe [9].
The cylinder heat transfer is an important feature of these
engines, and is still not well understood [10]. For this work, two
correlations are used for the convective cylinder heat transfer.
For the conventional conguration (case 1), the correlation from
Hohenberg [11] is used. For the subsequent congurations (cases
25), the correlation from Chang et al. [12] is used. The correlation
proposed by Chang et al. [12] is for one version of a low temperature combustion engine. Case 5 represents a conguration that
possesses the characteristics of a low temperature combustion engine. The other cases (24) are close to a low temperature combustion engine, and the Chang et al. [12] was considered
appropriate. In addition, the use of the Chang et al. correlation
would provide a less confusing comparison. Further comments
on the choice of a heat transfer correlation are provided elsewhere
[10].
The thermodynamic system is the cylinder contents (see Fig. 1).
The engine is in steady-state such that the thermodynamic state at
the beginning of each cycle (two crank-shaft revolutions) is equivalent to the state at the end of the cycle. For the compression,
expansion and exhaust processes, the cylinder contents are spatially homogeneous and occupy one zone. For the intake process,
two zones (each spatially homogeneous) are used. One zone consists of the fresh charge and the other zone consists of the residual
gases.
For the combustion processes, three zones (each spatially
homogeneous) are used. The three zones are: the unburned zone,
the adiabatic core burned zone, and the boundary layer burned
zone. The adiabatic core and boundary layer zones together comprise the burned zone. The total heat transfer is divided in an
appropriate fashion between the unburned and burned zone. The
INTAKE
EXHAUST
Adiabatic
Zone
Qu
Qb
u
Boundary
Layer
Fig. 1. A schematic of the engine cylinder depicting the three zones during
combustion.
1
The use of the Wiebe function for the mass fraction burned results in a small
amount of unburned fuel at the end of the combustion period. For example, for values
of the constants a = 5.0 and m = 2.0, this small amount is 0.67% of the original fuel
mass.
86
bf h ho T o s so
DB Bend Bstart
DB Bin Bout BQ BW Bdest
b u uo po v v o T o s so
where DB is the change of the total system exergy for a process, Bend
is the total exergy at the end of the period, Bstart is the total exergy at
the start of the period, Bin is the total exergy transferred into the
system accompanying ow into the system, Bout is the exergy transferred out of the system accompanying ow out of the system, BQ is
the exergy transferred accompanying the heat transfer, BW is the
exergy transfer due to work, and Bdest is the exergy which is destroyed by irreversible processes. This relation may be used to
ascertain the destruction of exergy by solving Eq. (3) to nd Bdest.
For determining the engine efciency, and for completing the
energy and exergy balances, values are needed for the energy
and exergy of the fuel. For the fuel, the lower heating value (LHV)
evaluated for a constant pressure process is used. By denition,
the fuel exergy Bfuel is given by the Gibbs free energy
First, the methodology and constraints of the study are described, and then the results of the study are presented.
4.1. Methodology and constraints
The main idea of this study is to complete a systematic assessment of the various features that have been employed in previous
investigations that resulted in low emissions and high efciencies.
By considering each feature in a step-by-step fashion, the impact of
each feature can be quantied.
The order that the features were added was arbitrary. For the
four features considered (CR, EGR, u and hb), 24 different arrangements are possible. One sequence (the 4th) was selected as representative, but other sequences will be examined. Table 4 is a
description of the cases for the 4th sequence. Obviously, the nal
Table 1
Engine specications.
Item
Number of cylinders
Bore (mm)
Stroke (mm)
Crank rad/con rod ratio
Compression ratio
Inlet valves
Diameter (mm)
Max Lift (mm)
Opens (CA aTDC)
Closes (CA aTDC)
Exhaust valves
Diameter (mm)
Max lift (mm)
Opens (CA aTDC)
Closes (CA aTDC)
Valve overlap (deg)
Value
8
101.6
88.4
0.305
8.0
50.8
10.0
357
136
39.6
10.0
116
371
14
87
Table 3
Case 1 engine and fuel input parameters.
Item
Value used
How obtained
Input
Input
From algorithm [20]
Input
Input
Determined for MBT
Input
Input
Table 4
Description of cases: 4th sequence.
Case
Description
1
2
3
4
5
(base)
(CR)
(hb)
(/)
(EGR)
5. Results
Fig. 2 shows the gross indicated, net indicated and brake thermal
efciencies for this operating condition for each case as described in
Table 4. The efciency increases from case 1 through case 5. The net
indicated efciency values are, sequentially: 37.0%, 46.9%, 48.1%,
52.1%, and 53.9%. The brake efciency values are, sequentially:
33.9%, 42.6%, 43.8%, 47.2%, and 47.8%. The greatest efciency
45
Net Indicated
Efficiency
Mechanical
Friction
Brake
Efficiency
40
35
30
Case
Fig. 2. Indicated and brake thermal efciencies for each case for the 4th sequence.
Table 5
Examples of different sequences.
1
2
3
4
5
a
result (comparison of case 1 and case 5) was the same for each sequence. The individual contributions to the efciency gains were
slightly different, however, depending on the order that the features were added. This is quantied below.
The following results are based on a set of assumptions and
approximations which did not consider a few engine characteristics. For example, combustion stability, cycle-to-cycle variations,
or other combustion issues are not included. In addition, knock,
preignition, or other abnormal combustion phenomena are not
considered.
Some items are not known. For example, the exhaust pressure
will be a function of whether a turbocharger or supercharger is
used. For this work, a simple schedule was assumed for the exhaust
pressure. The exhaust pressure was assumed equal to the greater
of 105 kPa or the inlet pressure plus 10 kPa. The sensitivity of this
assumption is examined below.
As a representative fuel, only isooctane is examined. Although
in practice other fuels have been used, the implication of these
other fuels to the thermodynamics is modest [21].
Again, the focus of this work is not to describe the combustion
in any detail. Rather, the focus is to understand the generic thermodynamics based on successful combustion. Of course, successful
combustion is a challenge for some conditions, but this aspect is
beyond the scope of the current work.
Gross Indicated
Efficiency
50
EGR = 45%
Computed
For isooctane [13]
Input
For isooctane [13]
For isooctane [13]
= 0.7
5.733
15.13
319.3 K
44,400
45,670
Pumping
Losses
= 30o
How obtained
CR = 16
Value used
BASE
Item
60
2nd
sequence
3rd
sequence
4th
sequence
5th
sequence
13th
sequence
Base
CR
EGR
/
hb (HEa)
Base
hb
EGR
CR
/ (HE)
Base
CR
hb
/
EGR (HE)
Base
EGR
hb
/
CR (HE)
Base
EGR
/
hb
CR (HE)
88
(a)
(b)
Brake
Efficiency
40
35
30
Case
Case
(c)
(d)
CR = 16
CR = 16
Gross Indicated
Efficiency
Net Indicated
Efficiency
= 30o
= 0.7
= 30
EGR = 45%
35
Brake
Efficiency
45
Mechanical
Friction
Gross Indicated
Efficiency
Pumping
Losses
50
= 0.7
Net Indicated
Efficiency
Mechanical
Friction
55
EGR = 45%
Pumping
Losses
60
BASE
Case
40
30
Case
50
45
Brake
Efficiency
35
30
60
55
Net Indicated
Efficiency
40
= 0.7
Gross Indicated
Efficiency
CR = 16
30o
30
b=
EGR = 45%
35
= 0.7
CR = 16
40
45
EGR = 45%
Brake
Efficiency
Net Indicated
Efficiency
Mechanical
Friction
50
BASE
45
Mechanical
Friction
Pumping
Losses
= 30o
50
55
Gross Indicated
Efficiency
BASE
Pumping
Losses
55
60
bmep = 900 kPa
2000 rpm
MBT Timing
nd
2 Sequence
BASE
60
Fig. 3. Indicated and brake thermal efciencies for four different sequences.
89
15000
30
4th sequence
25
Case = 5
Avg
10000
20
Min
Pressure (kPa)
Max
15
Case = 4
Case = 3
Case = 2
5000
10
Case = 1
CR
Phi
EGR
EGR
ThetaB
b
Feature
Fig. 4. Relative increase of the net indicated thermal efciency as features were
added in different sequences. The top of the bars represents the average value of the
increase for all 24 sequences. The short horizontal lines represent the maximum
and minimum increases for the specic feature. The stars represent the actual
relative increase of each feature for the 4th sequence.
Table 6
Comparisons to results from [2].
Item
Ref. [2]
Bore/stroke (mm)
Fuels
Inlet pressure (kPa)
Geometric CR
EGR (%)
Equivalence ratio
Speed (rpm)
137/165
Gasoline/diesel
200
16.1
45.5
0.77
1300
102/88
Isooctane
170
16
45
0.7
2000
Results
Imepnet (kPa)
Net ind efciency (%)
Peak pressure (MPa)
Nitric oxide (g/kW h)
1100
50
12
0.01
1015
53.9
12.0
0.003
comparison are not supplied, or in some cases, not even known. For
example, the engine was likely not instrumented for cylinder wall
temperatures. Furthermore, for purposes of this work, only an
approximate comparison was needed to demonstrate the nature
of the results.
Fig. 5 shows the instantaneous cylinder pressures as functions
of crank angle for each case for the 4th sequence. For the higher
compression ratio (case 1 to case 2), higher pressures are observed
as expected. For the shorter burn duration (case 2 to case 3), the
maximum pressures are slightly higher. For the lean operation
(case 3 to case 4), the pressures are higher due to the higher inlet
pressure necessary to achieve the constant load. For the increase of
EGR (case 4 to case 5), the pressures increase most signicantly
due to the higher inlet pressure necessary to achieve the constant
load. As the cases increase from 1 to 5, the maximum cylinder pressure continues to increase. For these cases, the maximum pressure
occurs between about 7.5aTDC (case 5) and 13.8aTDC (case 1).
For this engine load, the maximum cylinder pressure increased
-90
-60
-30
30
60
90
CRANK ANGLE
Fig. 5. Cylinder pressure as a function of crank angle for all ve (5) cases for the 4th
sequence.
from about 4.3 MPa (case 1) to about 12.0 MPa (case 5). These
higher cylinder pressures associated with case 5 are, of course,
important considerations for these types of lean mixture engines.
For example, the engine design needs to be sufciently robust,
and the durability of the engine needs to be veried.
Fig. 6 shows the instantaneous one-zone gas temperature as
functions of crank angle for each case for the 4th sequence. The
one-zone gas temperature is the energy averaged temperature
whenever there is more than one zone. The maximum one-zone
cylinder gas temperature occurs between about 12.2 aTDC (case
5) and 24.8 aTDC (case 1). The temperature increases slightly from
case 1 to case 2 (increase of CR), and increases again from case 2 to
case 3 (short burn duration). The temperature decreases signicantly from case 3 to case 4 (lean), and further from case 4 to case
5 (increase of EGR). The overall decrease of temperature is a key
outcome of the selection of the engine parameters to achieve the
low temperature combustion. This feature also is shown in subsequent gures of the exhaust temperatures.
An average combustion temperature can be dened as the timeaverage of the one-zone temperature during the combustion
process. These average combustion temperatures are, of course,
related to the instantaneous temperatures in Fig. 6. In general,
the average combustion temperatures ranged between about
1306 K (case 5) and 1856 K (case 3).
Another useful average is the mass-average temperature of the
adiabatic zone from start of combustion to 90 aTDC. The average
adiabatic zone temperature ranged from about 1820 K (case 5) to
2426 K (case 1). The relatively low temperatures of case 5 result
in essentially zero nitric oxide formation (see below).
A related observation concerning engine thermodynamics may
be mentioned at this point. Achieving the high thermal efciencies
with low gas temperatures appears to be in conict with results
from the Carnot cycle. For the Carnot cycle, it is well known that
higher temperatures (from the high temperature source) result in
higher efciencies. This is because the Carnot cycle is based on heat
engine concepts. An internal-combustion engine, however, is not a
heat engine. As demonstrated by these results (and explained more
90
60
2500
Case = 3
55
Exhaust
Energy (%)
50
Case = 1
45
Case = 2
3000
2000
Case = 4
1500
Case = 5
1000
40
35
30
25
Relative
Heat Transfer (%)
20
Shorter
Burn
Duration
1
15
Hig
he
rC
R
10
500
0
-90
-60
-30
30
60
35
90
40
2
This previous study [22] is different from the current study. In addition, to the
different heat transfer correlations, parameters such as compression ratio, EGR and
wall temperature were different. Furthermore, the current paper has examined the
signicance of the order that the features were applied and has reported the
relative increase of the efciencies for the different sequences.
50
55
60
Fig. 7. Relative heat transfer and exhaust energy as functions of the net indicated
efciency for the 4th sequence.
1400
High
CR
1300
45
High
EGR
CRANK ANGLE
Fig. 6. One-zone, average cylinder gas temperature as functions of crank angle for
the 4th sequence.
Lean
Burn
1200
Leaner
Short
BD
1100
4
1000
High
EGR
900
800
700
600
35
40
45
50
55
60
91
200
1.35
5
5
1.30
150
High
EGR
Pressure (kPa)
1.25
Leaner
1
High
EGR
pexh
100
40
45
50
Short
BD
Leaner
Higher
CR
2
1.20
35
pin
High
CR
55
60
Shorter
Burn
50
35
40
45
50
55
60
92
operating conditions at or near the optimum values for maximizing the thermal efciencies.
30
25
= 0.7
= 30o
EGR = 45%
15
CR = 16
20
BASE
Fig. 11. (a) Nitric oxide exhaust concentrations as a function of the net indicated efciency for the 4th sequence and (b) the nitric oxide exhaust concentration as a function of
equivalence ratio for conditions related to cases 3 and 4.
Case
Fig. 12. Exergy destruction during the combustion process for each case for the 4th
sequence.
for the base case is about 20% which is typical for automotive engines operating at these conditions [25]. For increases in the compression ratio, the exergy destruction decreases slightly due to the
pressure increases (which has a greater impact than the effects of
the temperature decreases) [26]. For decreases in the burn duration (case 2 to case 3), the exergy destruction decreases slightly
due to the increases of the combustion temperatures (see Fig. 6).
The exergy destruction increases as the mixture is more lean (case
3 to case 4) and as EGR is used (case 4 to case 5) this is due to the
lower combustion temperatures (see Fig. 6) for both these changes.
The effect of combustion temperatures on exergy destruction is
discussed in several references (e.g., [27,28]).
The sensitivity of the values selected for the various features
(e.g., 45% EGR) on efciency were examined for similar conditions
elsewhere [22]. In general, the values selected have provided
Acknowledgments
This work was stimulated in part by interactions with engineers
and scientists at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The contents of
this paper, however, do not necessarily reect the opinions or
views of any of these individuals.
References
[1] Hanson R, Splitter D, Reitz R. Operating a heavy-duty direct-injection
compression-ignition engine with gasoline for low emissions. Society of
Automotive Engineers. SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1442; 2009.
[2] Kokjohn SL, Hanson RM, Splitter DA, Reitz RD. Experiments and modeling of
dual-fuel HCCI and PCCI combustion using in-cylinder fuel blending. Society of
Automotive Engineers, SAE Paper No. 2009-01-2647; 2009.
[3] Wilhelmsson C, Tunestal P, Johansson B. Operation strategy of a dual fuel HCCI
engine with VGT. Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE Paper No. 2007-011855; 2007.
[4] Annual Progress Report, FY 2010. Vehicle technologies program, DOE,
advanced combustion engine technologies, energy efciency and renewable
energy; December 2010.
[5] Tabata M, Yamamoto T, Fukube T. Improving NOx and fuel economy for
mixture injected SI engine with EGR. Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE
Paper No. 950684; 1995.
[6] Eichmeier J, Wagner U, Spicher U. Controlling gasoline low temperature
combustion by diesel micro pilot injection. In: Proceedings of the 2011 fall
technical conference of the ASME internal combustion division. Paper No.
ICEF201160042, Morgantown, WV, 0205 October 2011.
[7] Caton JA. A multiple-zone cycle simulation for spark-ignition engines:
thermodynamic details. In: Wong VW, editor. Large-bore engines, fuel
effects, homogeneous charge compression ignition, engine performance and
simulation, ICE-Vol. 372, Proceedings of the 2001 fall technical conference,
vol. 2. Wong VW editor. The ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Paper No. 2001-ICE-412, Argonne,
IL; 2326 September 2001. p. 4158.
[8] Caton JA. A cycle simulation including the second law of thermodynamics for a
spark-ignition engine: implications of the use of multiple-zones for
combustion. Transaction of the society automotive engineers journal of
engines, vol. 1113, Paper No. 2002-01-0007, September 2003. p. 28199.
[9] Wiebe JJ. Brennverlauf und Kreisprozess von Verbrennungsmotoren. VEBVerlag Technik Berlin; 1970.
93
[10] Caton JA. Comparisons of global heat transfer correlations for conventional and
high efciency reciprocating engines. In: Proceedings of the 2011 fall technical
conference of the ASME internal combustion division, Paper No. ICEF201160017, Morgantown, WV, 0205 October 2011.
[11] Hohenberg GF. Advanced approaches for heat transfer calculations. Society of
Automotive Engineers, SAE Paper No. 790825; 1979.
[12] Chang J, Guralp O, Filipi Z, Assanis D. New heat transfer correlation for an hcci
engine derived from measurements of instantaneous surface heat ux. Society
of Automotive Engineers. SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2996; 2004.
[13] Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York
(NY): McGraw-Hill book Company; 1988.
[14] Caton JA. Utilizing a cycle simulation to examine the use of EGR for a sparkignition engine including the second law of thermodynamics. In: Proceedings
of the 2006 fall conference of the ASME internal combustion engine division,
Sacramento, CA; 58 November 2006.
[15] Heywood JB, Higgins JM, Watts PA, Tabaczynski RJ. Development and use of a
cycle simulation to predict SI engine efciency and NOx emissions. Society of
Automotive Engineers. SAE Paper No. 790291; 1979.
[16] Watts PA, Heywood JB. Simulation studies of the effects of turbocharging and
reduced heat transfer on spark-ignition engine operation. Society of
Automotive Engineers. SAE Paper No. 800289; 1980.
[17] Bayraktar H, Durgun O. Investigating the effects of LPG on spark ignition
engine
combustion
and
performance.
Energy
Convers
Manag
2005;46:231733.
[18] Giakoumis EG. Cylinder wall insulation effects on the rst- and second-law
balances of a turbocharged diesel engine operating under transient load
conditions. Energy Convers Manag 2007;48:292533.
[19] Khalilarya S, Javadzadeh M. Developing of a new comprehensive spark ignition
engines code for heat loss analysis within combustion chamber walls. Therm
Sci 2010;14(4):101225.
[20] Sandoval D, Heywood JB. An improved friction model for spark-ignition
engines. Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0725; 2003.
[21] Caton JA. Implications of fuel selection for an si engine: results from the rst
and second laws of thermodynamics. Fuel 2010;89:315766.
[22] Caton JA. An assessment of the thermodynamics associated with highefciency engines. In: Proceedings of the 2010 fall technical conference of
the ASME internal combustion division, Paper No. ICEF2010-35037, San
Antonio, TX; 1214 September 2010.
[23] Woschni G. A universally applicable equation for the instantaneous heat
transfer coefcient in the internal combustion engine. SAE Transactions, SAE
Paper No. 670931, vol. 76; 1967. p. 306583.
[24] Caton JA. Detailed results for nitric oxide emissions as determined from a
multiple-zone cycle simulation for a spark-ignition engine. In: Wong VW,
editor. ICE, proceedings of the 2002 fall technical conference, vol. 39. The
ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division, American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Paper No ICEF-2002-491, New Orleans, LA; 811 September 2002.
p. 13148.
[25] Caton JA. Exergy destruction during the combustion process as functions of
operating and design parameters for a spark-ignition engine. Int J Energy Res,
in press. doi:10.1002/er.1807.
[26] Caton JA. The effects of compression ratio and expansion ratio on engine
performance including the second law of thermodynamics: results from a
cycle simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2007 fall conference of the ASME
internal combustion engine division, Charleston, SC, 1417 October 2007.
[27] Dunbar WR, Lior N. Sources of combustion irreversibility. Combust Sci Technol
1994;103:4161.
[28] Caton JA. On the destruction of availability (exergy) due to combustion
processes with specic application to internal-combustion engines. Energy
2000;25:1097117.