The Little Blue Consulting Handbook, 2015 Edition

The Little Blue
Consulting
Handbook
2015 Edition
The Little Blue Book will give you an edge in your consulting career, so dont share it with your friends.
Tom Spencer 2015
1
Sponsors:
Acknowledgements:
Special thanks to the following people for their valuable insights,
contributions and support:
Matthew OSullivan, President of the Global Consulting Group;
Shishir Pandit, CEO of the Global Consulting Group.
Tom Spencer 2015
2
Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................5
1. Definitions ......................................................................................................6
1.1 Consulting Jargon ....................................................................................6
1.2 Business Terms ........................................................................................9
2. Industry Analysis ......................................................................................... 31
2.1 Macro Environment ............................................................................. 31
2.1.1 PEST Analysis ................................................................................ 31
2.2 Micro Environment.............................................................................. 37
2.2.1 Business Landscape Survey .......................................................... 37
3. Firm Level Analysis .................................................................................... 52
3.1 Profitability ............................................................................................ 52
3.1.1 Profitability Framework ............................................................... 52
3.2 Competitive Advantage ....................................................................... 58
3.2.1 Value Chain Analysis .................................................................... 58
3.3 Competitive Strategy ............................................................................ 63
3.3.1 Porters Generic Strategies ........................................................... 63
3.3.2 Strategy and the Internet .............................................................. 67
3.4 Growth Strategy .................................................................................... 69
3.4.1 Product / Market Expansion Matrix ......................................... 69
3.4.2 GE McKinsey 9 Box Matrix ........................................................ 77
3.4.3 BCG Growth Share Matrix .......................................................... 81
3.5 Marketing Strategy ................................................................................ 87
3.5.1 Four Ps Framework ...................................................................... 87
3.5.2 Product Life Cycle Model ............................................................ 92
3.6 Cost Management ................................................................................. 98
Tom Spencer 2015
3
3.7 Financial Management ....................................................................... 101

3.7.1 Five C Analysis of Borrower Creditworthiness ...................... 101
3.7.2 Net Present Value........................................................................ 105
3.8 Organisational Cohesiveness ............................................................ 108
3.8.1 McKinsey 7 S Model ................................................................... 108
3.9 Competitive Response ....................................................................... 110
3.10 Corporate Turnaround .................................................................... 112
4. General Concepts and Frameworks ...................................................... 115
4.1 Barriers to Entry ................................................................................. 115
4.2 Cost Benefit Analysis ......................................................................... 119
4.3 Economies of Scale ............................................................................ 122
4.4 Economies of Scope .......................................................................... 126
4.5 Experience Curve ............................................................................... 130
4.6 MECE Framework ............................................................................. 135
4.7 Moral Hazard....................................................................................... 137
4.8 Porters Five Forces ........................................................................... 140
4.9 Quantitative Easing ............................................................................ 143
4.10 Rule of 70 ........................................................................................... 144
4.11 SWOT Analysis ................................................................................. 145
Tom Spencer 2015
4
Introduction
The Little Blue Book is designed for student consultants and first year
management consultants, and aims to provide key concepts and
frameworks that can be used to analyse business problems, evaluate
situations, and achieve outcomes more quickly and easily than would
otherwise be possible.
For the sake of clarity, this document is not designed to help you prepare
for consulting interviews. If you are looking for such a guidebook,
please download The HUBs Guide to Consulting Interviews.
The Little Blue Book will be updated from time to time. If you have any
comments, suggestions or feedback, please email the Editors at
editors@spencertom.com.
The Little Blue Book is structured in four (4) parts:
1. Definitions of consulting jargon and business terms;
2. Frameworks for understanding the broader macro environment
and analysing an industry;
3. Frameworks for examining a firm and firm level strategy; and
4. Concepts and frameworks designed to deepen and broaden your
understanding and ability to analyse business situations and which
are not covered elsewhere in the Little Blue Book.
Tom Spencer 2015
5
1. Definitions
1.1 Consulting Jargon
10,000 foot view: A high-level overview of the situation.
80/20 rule: A rule of thumb which holds that 80% of a business
problem can typically be solved by focusing on 20% of the issues.
Add some colour: Make it more interesting/appealing/persuasive.
Adding value: Making a contribution.
AOB: Stands for any other business and might be used in a meeting
agenda to block out time for miscellaneous discussion.
At the end of the day: A consultant may use this phrase before
summarising the main thrust of her argument.
B2B: Stands for business to business and indicates that a business is
aiming to sell to other businesses rather than to end consumers.
B2C: Stands for business to consumer and indicates that a business is
aiming to sell directly to consumers rather than to other businesses.
Bandwidth: Capacity to take on additional work commitments. For
example, I dont have any bandwidth this week.
Big 3: McKinsey, Bain and BCG.
Big 4: Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC.
Boil the ocean: Go overboard; undertake an excessive amount of
analysis; fail to follow the 80/20 rule.
Buckets: Categories.
Buy in: Agreement; support. For example, we need to get buy in from
the client before finalising the report.
Tom Spencer 2015
6
Charge code: A unique code provided for a project which can be used
to record work-related expenses.
Circle back: Follow up with someone at a later point in time.
Close the loop: Completing an item on the agenda or topic of
discussion with everyone being in agreement.
Core client: A client that has a long-standing relationship with the firm.
Deck: PowerPoint slides.
Deep dive: To conduct an extensive examination of a particular issue.
Deliverable: Work product that a consultant needs to provide to her
manager or the client as part of a client engagement.
Development opportunity: A professional shortcoming or area for
improvement that requires attention.
Due diligence: Comprehensive examination of all relevant issues, such
as a review of the clients business or industry.
Fact pack: A pack of information that provides the essential facts for a
project/industry/company.
Granular: Focusing on the finer details, as in this analysis needs to be
more granular.
Hard stop: A stated time after which the person will no longer be
available to continue the meeting/discussion. For example, I have a
hard stop at 3 oclock.
Key: Critical; essential; required; important; central. For example, the
key issues are X, Y, Z.
Let me play this back: Words used before providing a summary of the
discussion from the listeners perspective. This is a helpful technique
which can allow a consultant to clarify her understanding of the key
Tom Spencer 2015
7
issues and at the same time sound intelligent by saying something even if
the summary adds no additional insights.
Low hanging fruit: Targets that are easily achievable, issues that can be
quickly resolved, opportunities that can be readily exploited, or problems
that are simple to solve. By picking the low hanging fruit first,
consultants can demonstrate quick results, which can boost the clients
confidence in the project.
Lots of moving parts: Complex.
Managing upwards: Providing feedback to more senior employees.
MBB: McKinsey, Bain and BCG.
MECE: Pronounced me see, and stands for mutually exclusive,
collectively exhaustive. It is a principle for grouping information into
distinct categories which, taken together, deal with all available options.
For more information, see 4.6 MECE Framework.
On the beach: In between assignments. Time spent on the beach may
be spent in training or used for business development.
On the same page: See things from the same perspective.
Out of the box thinking: Thinking that generates novel ideas which
dont follow neatly from the data.
Ping: Contact someone, as in I will ping you later via email.
PIOUTA: Pulled it out of thin air.
Pipeline: Current and upcoming client engagements.
Production: A department of the consulting firm (often outsourced)
that assists in producing material needed for presentations and meetings.
Pushback: Resistance or disagreement, as in we received some
pushback from the client.
Tom Spencer 2015
8
Right size: Downsize.

Sandwich feedback technique: A structure for providing feedback
that resembles a sandwich one positive comment, followed by a piece
of feedback, and ending with a positive comment.
Scope: Agreed set of deliverables for a client engagement.
Scope creep: When the client adds, or attempts to add, additional
deliverables which were not agreed in the initial project brief.
Sniff test: A common sense check of a particular idea, proposal or
analysis.
SWAG: Some wild-ass guess.
Take the lead: Take responsibility for something, as in: Why dont you
take the lead on this project.
Takeaways: The key points that should be remembered at the end of a
discussion, meeting or presentation.
Touch base: To meet at a certain time to talk about the project.
Up or out: Many top consulting firms adopt an up or out policy.
Employees are expected to advance up to the next level of responsibility
or they will be counselled out of the firm.
Work stream: The tasks that make up a project.
1.2 Business Terms

Anchoring: The common tendency for people to rely too heavily on
readily available information (the anchor) when making decisions
involving uncertainty. Anchoring is a cognitive bias relevant in many
business contexts. Here are two (2) examples:
1. Price negotiations: A sophisticated buyer in a price negotiation will
want the seller to name the first price. This sets an anchor, or a
Tom Spencer 2015
9
maximum price from which the buyer can negotiate downwards.

If the seller names an unrealistically high price then the
sophisticated buyer will want to emotionally reject the price, which
might be done by exclaiming shock, disgust or pretending to walk
away. The buyer may still be interested but the purpose of
emotionally rejecting the initial offer is to break the anchor so that
negotiations can begin afresh.
2. Stock trading: Algorithmic traders can use their knowledge of
anchoring to gain a statistical edge in the stock market. Many
traders will use a recent high or low price as an anchor to
determine whether prices are too high or too low and an
algorithmic trader can use this fact to develop trading systems that
allow her to trade with positive expectation over the longer term.
For a good book on this subject, get yourself a copy of Way of the
Turtle by Curtis M. Faith.
Asset (accounting definition): An economic resource that a company
uses to operate its business, e.g. cash, inventories, property, plant and
equipment.
Asset (finance definition): An economic resource that generates cash
every month (i.e. your house and your car are probably not assets under
this definition).
Asset (strategy definition): An economic resource (whether tangible
or intangible) that allows an organisation to provide more value to
customers (whether real or perceived) for a given cost base.
Bandwagon effect: The common tendency for people to believe
something because many other people already believe it. The
bandwagon effect is relevant in business contexts since it suggests that
the probability of a person purchasing a product is proportional to the
number of people who have already done so. This helps to explain the
existence of fashions, fads and trends.
Tom Spencer 2015
10
Barriers to entry: The costs that must be paid by a new market entrant
but not by firms already in the industry. Barriers to entry have the effect
of making a market less contestable and so allow existing firms to
maintain higher prices than would otherwise be possible.
Key barriers to entry might include capital requirements, economies of
scale, network effects, product differentiation, proprietary product
technology, government policy, access to suppliers, access to
distribution channels, and switching costs.
For more information, see 4.1 Barriers to Entry.
Black Swan: An event that is unpredictable, has significant
consequences, and is (or at least appears to be) retrospectively
explainable. The term Black Swan was coined by Nassim Nicholas
Taleb in his book The Black Swan.
Brand: A brand is commonly defined as a name, mark, logo, symbol or
other identifier used to distinguish a product or organisation. The
power of a brand derives not from the particular symbol used but from
the stories that people tell about it, and so a brand might more
accurately be defined as what people say about you (your product, or
your organisation) when youre not in the room.
Break-even analysis: Break-even analysis is relevant when trying to
decide whether to launch a new product or invest in a project with high
fixed costs.
Break-even analysis calculates the point at which revenues will equal
associated costs. Break-even analysis can be used to calculate the margin
of safety, the amount by which revenues are expected to exceed the
break-even point.
=
Tom Spencer 2015
11
Break-even analysis is a form of supply side analysis that considers costs

(variable costs and fixed costs). However, it does not consider how
demand may change at different price levels, and so it may make sense
to combine break-even analysis with some form of demand side analysis.
Bund: The German governments federal bond, similar to Treasury
bonds in the U.S.
Bundling: Combining products or services together in order to sell
them as a single unit. Bundling can benefit a company by allowing it to
increase sales volume and market share. Bundling can also benefit
customers by allowing them to purchase the bundle for less than the
price of the bundled products if purchased separately.
CAGR: Compound annual growth rate.
1
(# )
= (
)
1

CFA: Stands for Chartered Financial Analyst. For more information,

visit the CFA Institute.
Coase theorem: An economic theorem outlined by Ronald Coase in an
article entitled The Problem of Social Cost published in October 1960 in
the Journal of Law and Economics. The theorem states that if trade in
an externality is possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining
will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of
property rights. In practice, poorly defined property rights or obstacles
to bargaining (e.g. transaction costs, lack of an organised market, or the
presence of asymmetric information) tend to prevent Coasian
bargaining.
Tom Spencer 2015
12
Comparative advantage: Comparative advantage is an economic

theory that explains the existence of gains from trade.
David Ricardo developed the classical theory of comparative advantage
in 1817 to explain why a country whose workers are more efficient at
producing every good compared with workers in other countries will still
gain from international trade.
In general terms, an individual, firm or country has a comparative
advantage in producing a good if it can produce the good at a lower
Opportunity cost relative to other individuals, firms or countries.
Complimentary goods: Any goods for which an increase in demand
for one leads to an increase in demand for the other. Examples of
complimentary goods include printers and ink cartridges, DVD players
and DVDs, and Microsoft Windows and PCs.
Confirmation bias: The common tendency for people to favour
information that confirms their existing beliefs. Confirmation bias is
relevant in many business contexts. For example, in stock trading
confirmation bias can lead a trader to ignore evidence that her trading
strategies will lose money leading her to be overconfident.
Conglomerate Diversification: A form of diversification where a firm
adds new products that are unrelated to existing products and which
target new customer segments.
Cost benefit analysis: A type of analysis that involves weighing up the
total expected costs and benefits of one course of action against one or
more other courses of action. For more information, see 4.2 Cost
Benefit Analysis.
Credit default swap (CDS): A form of insurance policy which obliges
the seller of the CDS to compensate the buyer in the event that the loan
defaults. In the event of default, the buyer of the CDS would normally
receive money and the seller of the CDS would receive the defaulted
loan (and the right to recover amounts outstanding under the loan).
Tom Spencer 2015
13
Cross Rate: The exchange rate between two currencies inferred from
each currencys exchange rate with a third currency.
Current Ratio: Otherwise known as the liquidity ratio, cash asset
ratio, cash ratio or working capital ratio, the current ratio measures
a company's ability to repay short term liabilities.
=
Customer Lifetime Value: Customer lifetime value is a prediction of

the entire future value that a company expects to derive from its
relationship with a customer. It can be a useful tool for a company that
is trying to decide which customer segments to target and how much to
spend on customer acquisition.
= 1 + 2 ()2 + 3 ()3 +
Debt to Asset Ratio: The debt ratio is the ratio of total debt to total
assets, and can be understood as the percentage of a companys assets
that are financed by debt.
=
Debt to Equity Ratio: A measure of a companys financial leverage

calculated by dividing total debt by shareholders equity.
=
Discouraged worker: A person who does not have a job and is

available to work but who has stopped actively looking for work. This
may happen because the unemployed person:
Becomes discouraged due to previous unsuccessful attempts to
obtain work;
Tom Spencer 2015
14
Believes (reasonably or not) that there are no jobs available in their

industry or location;
Lacks the skills needed for the jobs which are available, either
because they never had the required skills or because their skills
have eroded due to a long period of unemployment;
Is discriminated against by prospective employers for some reason
beyond their control (e.g. age, race, gender); or
Becomes addicted to Twinkies and day time television.
Diseconomies of scale: A situation where the average cost of
production increases as output increases. For more information, see 4.3
Economies of Scale.
Disruptive innovation: A term coined by HBS Professor Clayton
Christensen to describe the process by which a product or service
initially takes root in simple applications at the bottom of a market and
then consistently moves up market, eventually displacing established
competitors.
Diversification: In the 3.4.1 Product / Market Expansion Matrix,
originally explained by Igor Ansoff in his 1957 Harvard Business Review
article, diversification is defined as a growth strategy whereby an
organisation develops new products for new markets.
Diversification is a high risk growth strategy, and a company should look
for markets with strong growth and high levels of industry attractiveness
(see 4.8 Porters Five Forces).
Diversification might involve a company adding new products, which
appeal to existing customers (Horizontal diversification); it might
involve a company acquiring a customer or supplier (Vertical
Integration); or it might involve a company moving into an entirely
new industry (Conglomerate Diversification).
Tom Spencer 2015
15
Economic indicator: An economic statistic (e.g. the unemployment

rate, GDP, or inflation) which indicates the strength of the economy or
the expected future performance of the economy.
Economies of scale: A situation where the average cost of producing a
unit of output decreases as the quantity of output increases. For more
information, see 4.3 Economies of Scale.
Economies of scope: A situation where a firm can produce two or
more products at a lower per unit cost than would be possible if it
produced only the one. For more information, see 4.4 Economies of
Scope.
Elevator pitch: A high-level overview of whatever it is that you are
selling and which is designed to just get the conversation started. For
more information, please read the articles entitled The Elevator Pitch
and 12 Tips for Creating an Effective Pitch.
Equity: Assets minus Liabilities. Equity holders are the owners of the
business.
Expenses: Costs incurred by a business over a specified period of time
to generate the revenues earned during that period. For more
information, read the article entitled Understanding Financial
Statements 101.
Externality: Costs incurred or benefits gained by third parties resulting
from an economic activity. Externalities that confer a benefit are
referred to as positive externalities, an example of which would be
honey bees kept for honey that help to pollinate neighbouring crops.
Externalities that impose a cost are referred to as negative
externalities, an example of which would be a factory that creates air
pollution and imposes health and clean-up costs on the surrounding
community.
Fiscal Policy: Government policy relating to government spending and
taxes.
Tom Spencer 2015
16
Fisher Effect: The Fisher effect describes the relationship between real
interest rates, nominal interest rates and inflation. The Fisher effect
states that a change in the nominal interest rate is equal to the real
interest rate plus the inflation rate:
(1 + ) = (1 + ) (1 + )
Fixed cost: A cost that does not vary with the quantity of output
produced. It is important to understand that fixed costs are fixed only
in the short term. In the long run nearly all costs are variable. For
example, in the long run a company could renegotiate supply contracts
or move its factories to a lower cost jurisdiction.
Forward Contract: A forward contract is a customized contract to buy
or sell an asset on a future date at a pre-determined price (the forward
price). A forward contract is non-standardized, and so can be used by
businesses to manage risk.
Futures Contract: A futures contract is a standardized contract to buy
or sell an asset on a future date at a pre-determined price (the futures
price). A futures contract is standardized and traded on a futures
exchange. Settlement may take place through physical delivery of the
underlying asset or payment in cash.
Greenspan Put: The monetary policy of Alan Greenspan and the U.S.
Federal Reserve from the late 1980s to the mid-2000s, which involved
significantly lowering interest rates in the wake each financial crisis.
Homogenous Product: Any good or service for which buyers perceive
no difference between the products offered by different suppliers.
Examples of homogenous products might include wheat, corn and oil.
Horizontal competition: Competition between entities at the same
stage of production. See also, Vertical competition.
Tom Spencer 2015
17
Horizontal diversification: A form of diversification where a firm adds

new products that may be unrelated to existing products but are likely to
appeal to existing customers. See also, Vertical Integration and
Conglomerate Diversification.
Inflation: The rate at which the overall price level for goods and
services is rising.
Investment Operation: An operation which, upon thorough analysis,
promises safety of principal and an adequate return. Operations not
meeting these requirements are speculative (Ben Graham, The
Intelligent Investor).
Joint Production: Production where the production process for two or
more different goods is connected. Producing the goods separately
would result in increased costs. Joint production may occur naturally, for
example a chicken farm produces both chicken wings and chicken
breasts. Joint production may also be used because it provides 4.4
Economies of Scope.
Leverage (common usage): Make use of.
Leverage (investment definition): The use of borrowed capital to
partially or fully fund an investment. Leverage is used when an investor
expects the return on investment to be greater than the cost of debt, in
which case the investors return on equity will be greater than the return
on investment. In other words, the returns are leveraged.
Liability (accounting definition): The debt of a company, a claim that
creditors have on the companys resources.
LIBOR: The London Interbank Offered Rate is a benchmark rate
quoted by the worlds leading banks as a rate of interest that they would
charge financial institutions for short term loans. LIBOR is used
extensively in finance as a first step in calculating appropriate rates of
interest for a variety of financial products.
Tom Spencer 2015
18
Liquidity trap: A situation where interest rates are zero (or near zero)
and a central bank is no longer able to stimulate the economy by
controlling short term interest rates. In 2008, the US Federal Reserve
faced a liquidity trap and employed quantitative easing (i.e. electronically
generating money) in an attempt to stimulate the economy.
Loss aversion: A commonly observed behavioural tendency whereby
people prefer to avoid a loss than to make a commensurate gain. For
more information, read the article entitled Loss Aversion.
Ludic Fallacy: A term coined by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in The Black
Swan. The term refers to the misuse of games to model real-life
situations. Taleb explains the fallacy as basing studies of chance on the
narrow world of games and dice.
Madoff Scheme: See also Ponzi Scheme.
Management consulting (Institute of Management Consultants
definition): The provision to management of objective advice and
assistance relating to the strategy, structure, management and operations
of an organisation in pursuit of its long-term purposes and objectives.
Such assistance may include the identification of options with
recommendations; the provision of an additional resource and/or the
implementation of solutions.
Metcalfe's law: A rule which states that the value of a network is
proportional to the square of the number of connected users (or
connected devices). Metcalfes law explains the network effect which
exists for products such as fax machines, telephones, eBay, WhatsApp
and Facebook.
Monopolistic competition: A situation in which consumers are taught
to perceive differences between products. As a result, even though there
may be a large number of producers, each producer has a degree of
control over price.
Tom Spencer 2015
19
Monopoly: A situation where a market has only one supplier for a

particular good or service. The term may also be used where one seller
has substantial control of the market. Monopolies are characterised by a
lack of competition and a lack of viable substitutes.
Monopsony: A situation where a market has only one buyer for a
particular good or service. The term may also be used where one buyer
has substantial control of the market. See also Walmart Effect.
Moral Hazard: Any situation in which a person or entity is not fully
responsible for the consequences of its actions. As a result, the entity
may take greater risks than it would have otherwise because it is not
responsible for paying the full cost if things go badly. For more
information, see 4.7 Moral Hazard.
Mortgage Securitisation: A process of packaging and selling mortgage
debt which involves:
1. Purchasing mortgages from banks or mortgage brokers;
2. Packaging the mortgages into large pools; and
3. Selling shares in these mortgage pools to investors.
Natural monopoly: An industry where one firm can produce the
desired output at a lower social cost than could be achieved by two or
more firms (social costs being the sum of private and external costs).
Natural monopolies exist because of the existence of economies of scale
and examples include railways, water services, and electric utilities.
Net Present Value: The NPV of an investment is the present value of
the series of expected future cash flows generated by the investment
minus the cost of the initial investment.
=
1
2

+
+
+
+

(1 + )1 (1 + )2
(1 + )
(1 + )
(1 + )
Tom Spencer 2015
20
Where r = discount rate; CFt = expected cash flow in year t; g = long

term cash flow growth rate.
For more information, see 3.7.2 Net Present Value.
Network effects: The situation whereby a product or service becomes
more valuable as more people use it (also known as network
externalities). One example is eBay; as more buyers use the online
auction site it becomes more valuable to each seller, and as more sellers
use the site it becomes more valuable to each buyer.
NINJA Loan: Any loan made where the borrower has No Income, No
Job, and No Assets.
Nominal value: A value expressed in dollar terms. For example, if a Big
Mac costs $3 this year and $6 next year, then we would say that the
nominal price of a BigMac has doubled.
Numraire: An economic term meaning the unit of account. In
French, the term means money, coinage or face value. A
countrys currency normally acts as the numraire and is used to measure
the worth of other goods and services within the country. In the absence
of currency, you could define a numraire good (e.g. salt, copper,
gold) to have a fixed price of 1; the worth of other goods and services
could then be measured relative to the numraire good.
Oligopoly: A situation where a market is dominated by a small number
of suppliers for a particular good or service. Oligopolies are
characterised by a lack of competition and a lack of viable substitutes.
Each firm in an oligopoly needs to take into account the likely actions
and reactions of other firms when developing its strategic plan of action.
Operating Cash Flow Ratio: A liquidity ratio that measures how well a
companys current liabilities are covered by cash flow from operations.
Tom Spencer 2015
21
Opportunity cost: What you give up in order to obtain something; the

value of the next best alternative.
Option: A derivative financial instrument which grants its owner the
right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an underlying asset at a preestablished price for a specified period of time.
Organic growth: Growth that a company can achieve by increasing
output and sales. This excludes growth achieved as a result of mergers
and acquisitions since this growth is purchased not generated internally.
For example, growth that Facebook achieved as a result of its purchase
of Instagram or WhatsApp is not organic growth.
Outcome bias: The tendency for people to judge a decision based on
its outcome rather than the quality of the decision at the time it was
made. For example, a person who learns that a friend made a large profit
from investing in the stock market may, without any additional evidence,
form the view that investing in stocks is a good idea; this person is
suffering from outcome bias.
Overconfidence bias: A common behavioural trait whereby a persons
confidence in their opinions is invariably higher than the accuracy of
those opinions.
Pareto efficient: An economic allocation is said to be Pareto efficient
if no person can be made better off without making at least one person
worse off. Pareto efficiency does not imply that an economic allocation
is fair or equitable.
Perpetuity: A perpetuity is a constant stream of identical cash flows
with no end.
=

+
+
+
(1 + )1 (1 + )2 (1 + )3
Tom Spencer 2015
22
Where r = discount rate; CFannual = annual cash flow.

Ponzi Scheme: Any kind of fraudulent investment operation that pays
returns to investors from their own money or money paid by subsequent
investors rather than from any profits earned. See also, Madoff
Scheme.
Price discrimination: Price discrimination involves setting a different
price for the same product for different customer segments. First degree
price discrimination involves charging each customer a different price
based on their willingness to pay. Second degree price discrimination
involves varying the price according to the quantity demanded. Third
degree price discrimination involves varying the price by location or
customer segment. For example, charging higher prices in expensive
suburbs or tourist locations or offering discounted prices for students.
Price elasticity of demand: A measure of the responsiveness of the
quantity demanded to changes in the price level. Price elasticity of
demand is relevant for pricing strategy and for examining customer price
sensitivity.
=
%
%
If the price elasticity of demand is less than one in absolute value

(| | < 1) then demand is said to be inelastic. That is, changes in
price have a relatively small effect on the quantity demanded. As a result,
total revenue will rise if prices are raised.
If the price elasticity of demand is greater than one in absolute value
(| | > 1) then demand is said to be elastic. That is, changes in price
have a relatively large effect on the quantity demanded. As a result, total
revenue will rise if prices are lowered.
Tom Spencer 2015
23
Price maker: A firm that has some control over the price that it charges
for a product. For example, a Monopoly or a firm operating within
Monopolistic competition.
Price taker: A firm that can change production and sales of a product
without significantly affecting the market price.
Principle-agent problem: The principle-agent problem occurs when a
principal employs an agent to perform duties on its behalf.
The problem arises where there are conflicts of interest between the
principle and the agent (for example, the principle prefers that the agent
exert more effort and the agent prefers to exert less effort), the agent is
not required to pay the full cost if things go badly (that is, moral hazard
issues exist), and the principle cannot directly monitor the agents
behaviour (that is, there is asymmetric information).
An example of where the principle-agent problem arises is in the
relationship between management (the agent) and shareholders (the
principle).
Possible solutions to the principle-agent problem include:
1. Aligning the interests of principle and agent by providing the agent
with performance incentives;
2. Reducing the moral hazard issue by promising the agent an
ownership stake in the organisation.
Product differentiation: The process of distinguishing a good or
service in order to create an impression of value in the mind of the
customer.
Profit Margin:
Gross Profit Margin: Gross profit margin measures how much of every
dollar of sales revenue remains after subtracting the cost of goods sold.
=
Tom Spencer 2015
24
= 1
Net Profit Margin: Net profit margin measures how much out of every
dollar of sales revenue a company actually keeps. Net profit margin is
useful when comparing companies in similar industries. A higher net
profit margin indicates a more profitable company that has better
control of its costs.
=
= 1
[ + ]
Contribution Margin: A cost accounting concept that allows a company

to determine the profitability of individual products.
=
Equivalently:
=
Public good: A public good is a good that a person can consume

without reducing its availability to others (that is, the good is nonrival) and from which no one can be excluded (that is, the good is
non-excludable). Examples of public goods might include national
defence, public television, radio, knowledge, fresh air and sunshine.
Pull System of Inventory Control (just in time): The pull system of
inventory control involves producing just enough to fill customer
orders. An advantage of this system is that there will never be excess
Tom Spencer 2015
25
inventory and so inventory storage costs are minimized. A disadvantage

of this system is that supplier bottlenecks or limited operating capacity
can lead to ordering backlogs and customer dissatisfaction.
Push System of Inventory Control: The push system of inventory
control involves forecasting customer demand and producing enough to
meet forecast demand. An advantage of this system is that there will
typically be enough products on hand to satisfy customer orders.
Disadvantages include (a) the difficulty of forecasting demand, and (b)
the cost of storing excess inventory if actual demand falls short of
expectations.
Quantitative easing: A monetary policy tool sometimes employed by
central banks to stimulate the economy when conventional monetary
policy becomes ineffective. Quantitative easing involves increasing the
money supply by purchasing government bonds or other financial assets
with newly generated money. For more information, see 4.9
Quantitative Easing.
Quick (Acid Test) Ratio: The quick ratio is more rigorous than the
current ratio, and measures whether a company has enough short-term
assets to cover short term liabilities without selling inventory.
=
+ +

Real value: A value adjusted for inflation or deflation. For example, if a

Big Mac costs $3 this year and $6 next year and inflation is 100%, then
the real price of a BigMac has not changed.
Recency bias: The common tendency for people to place more weight
on recent data or experience compared with earlier data or experience.
An example of recency bias is where a salesperson with an acceptable
long term sales record becomes discouraged after a few consecutive
weeks of unsuccessful sales calls. A few weeks of poor performance can
Tom Spencer 2015
26
count in the sales persons mind as much as a few months or years of

prior success.
Recession: Broadly speaking, a recession is a period of slow or negative
economic growth, usually accompanied by rising unemployment.
Economists sometimes define a recession more formerly as two
consecutive quarters of falling GDP.
Replacement value: An estimate of how much it would cost to build
equivalent resources or capabilities from scratch.
Return on Investment: ROI is a performance measure that a company
can use to evaluate the return from an investment or to compare the
returns of a number of different investments.
=
Revenue: Income generated from trading or, for example, from selling
off an asset or piece of the business. Revenue should be recorded when
the sale is made as opposed to when the cash is received. For more
information, please read the article entitled Understanding Financial
Statements 101.
Rule of 70: The Rule of 70 is a simple rule of thumb that can be used to
figure out roughly how long it will take for an investment to double,
given an expected growth rate. The rule can be described by the
following equation:
() =
70

For more information, see 4.10 Rule of 70.

Spillover: Externalities that result from economic activity and affect
people who are not directly involved in the activity. Spillover can be
positive or negative. Pollution that leaks out of a manufacturing plant
Tom Spencer 2015
27
and into a local river would have a negative spillover effect on local
fishermen. The beauty of the buildings in Oxford would have a positive
spillover effect on locals and tourists.
Substitute goods: Any goods for which an increase in demand for one
leads to a fall in demand for the other. Substitute goods represent a
form of indirect competition. Examples of substitute goods might
include petroleum and natural gas, or Vegemite and Nutella.
Sunk cost: Sunk costs are expenditures that have already been made,
and which cannot be recovered. Sunk costs should not be factored into
the decision making process when evaluating a potential course of
action.
Sunk cost fallacy: The common tendency for people to factor amounts
of money already spent the sunk costs into their decision-making
process. This is irrational since sunk costs cannot be recovered, and so
are not relevant when making a decision about a future course of action.
An example of the sunk cost fallacy would be where a company factors
past R&D spending into its future pricing strategy.
SWAP Agreement: An agreement to exchange one series of cash flows
for another for a set period of time. One of the series of cash flows will
normally be more uncertain, such as a floating interest rate, foreign
exchange rate, stock price or commodity price. SWAP Agreements are
not traded on an exchange, they are customized contracts traded
between private parties in the over-the-counter market.
Switching costs: Any costs that a customer incurs (for example, time,
money, effort) as a result of changing suppliers, brands or products.
Switching costs will be affected by various factors including the length
of customer contracts, the existence of customer loyalty programs, and
the price performance and compatibility of complimentary products.
Tom Spencer 2015
28
Underemployment: A situation where a persons capacity to work is

not fully utilised. This may occur due to (1) over-qualification, (2)
involuntary part-time work, or (3) over-staffing.
Vanilla: Plain or simple version.
Variable cost: A cost that varies with the quantity of output produced.
When making decisions in the short run, variable costs are the only costs
that should be considered because, in the short term, a company cannot
change its fixed costs.
Vertical competition: Competition which takes place between firms at
different stages of production. Suppliers and customers within the
supply chain may be able to exert their bargaining power to compete for
a larger share of industry profits.
Vertical Integration: A form of diversification in which a firm expands
its business to different points in the supply chain. For example, taking
over a supplier (backwards vertical integration) or taking over a
customer (forwards vertical integration).
Backwards vertical integration: A company engages in
backwards vertical integration when it purchases one or more
suppliers that produce inputs that the company uses to produce
final goods or services. For example, a car company might
purchase a tire company, a glass company, or an engine
manufacturer. Benefits of backwards vertical integration may
include (1) creating stable supply, (2) ensuring consistent quality of
inputs, and (3) restricting a competitors access to essential
supplies.
Walmart Effect: A situation where a single buyer gains substantial
control of a market as the major purchaser of goods or services. See
also, Monopsony.
Wealth: [Note that both of the definitions below use time as the
relevant yardstick, not money.]
Tom Spencer 2015
29
1. Real wealth is discretionary time; money is merely the fuel

(attribution: Alan Weiss);
2. A measure of a persons ability to survive so many number of days
forward into the future if they were to stop working today
(attribution: Robert Kiyosaki).
Tom Spencer 2015
30
2. Industry Analysis
2.1 Macro Environment
2.1.1 PEST Analysis
Understanding the big picture can help reveal hidden
opportunities and threats
1. Background
In 1967, Harvard Professor
Francis Aguilar wrote a
book entitled Scanning the
Business Environment in
which he identified four
important factors
Economic, Technical, Political, and Social that a business can use to
better understand the big picture.
While the ordering of the letters may have changed, the four factors that
Aguilar identified half a century ago have not, and they form the basis of
PEST Analysis.
2. Relevance
If you are thinking about producing a strategic plan, developing a new
product, entering a new market, engaging in a joint venture, acquiring a
competitor, launching a start-up, or financing a new project then it
probably makes sense to understand the big picture issues that could
affect the projects success.
Conducting a PEST Analysis can reveal hidden opportunities and
threats, and allow you to adapt your approach to achieve a more
favourable outcome.
Tom Spencer 2015
31
3. Importance
There is something inherently appealing about a four-part model, and its
simplicity makes PEST Analysis a convenient and practical tool for
understanding the macro environment.
Conducting a PEST Analysis can be helpful for three reasons:
1. Understanding the facts: Understanding the big picture can help a
business make informed decisions, and avoid making incorrect
assumptions based on past experience;
2. Anticipating change: Understanding the macro environment can
help a business identify trends and anticipate change, allowing it to
take advantage of opportunities and manage potential threats; and
3. Avoiding failure: Understanding the macro environment can help a
business (and its investors) to identify projects that are likely to fail
due to unfavourable conditions. Knowing which battles not to fight
can often be half the battle.
4. PEST Analysis Explained
PEST is an acronym that stands for Political, Economic, Social and
Technological the four factors that a business will want to consider
when scanning the macro environment.
PEST Analysis is a simple framework that uses these four factors to
examine the macro environment in order to understand the potential
implications for a business unit, product or project. Insights gained from
the analysis can be used to develop a strategic plan of action.
PEST Analysis can be used as part of a broader situation analysis.
Figure 1: Situation Analysis

Tom Spencer 2015
32
There is a long list of alternative frameworks that could be used to scan

the macro environment. However, they generally complicate the analysis
by adding factors that could be dealt with more simply using PEST
Analysis. Some of the other variations include:
1. SLEPT: Social, Legal, Economic, Political, and Technological;
2. PESTEL: Political, Economic, Social, Technological,
Environmental, and Legal;
3. PESTELI: Political, Economic, Social, Technological,
Environmental, Legal, and Industry Analysis;
4. STEEPLED: Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental,
Political, Legal, Ethical, and Demographic;
5. PESTLIED: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal,
International, Environmental, and Demographic; and
6. LONGPESTLE: Local, National, and Global versions of PESTLE
(might be useful for multinational organisations).
5. Conducting a PEST Analysis
Conducting a PEST Analysis involves considering issues relating to the
four key factors: Political, Economic, Social, and Technological.
The four factors will vary in significance depending on the nature of the
business. For example, social factors might be relevant for a retail
business, but political factors may be more relevant for a munitions
dealer.
The purpose of a PEST Analysis is to identify potential implications for
a specific business unit, product or project, and so it is important to be
clear about this purpose before commencing the analysis.
Below we outline a range of issues that you might want to consider
when conducting a PEST Analysis.
Tom Spencer 2015
33
1. Political
Potential political issues include:
1. Laws and regulations that a company may need to comply with
(tax, competition, employment, anti-discrimination, consumer
protection, environmental, corporate social responsibility, and
international law);
2. Property rights, including protection of intellectual property
(trademarks, copyrights, patents, registered designs, trade secrets,
software and circuit layouts);
3. Industry regulation How is the industry regulated? Have there
been any recent changes? Are there any planned changes? Is there
a trend towards regulation or deregulation?
4. Government policy, trade unions, lobby groups, and the electoral
cycle. Who holds political power? How might this change at the
next election?
5. Rule of law, bureaucracy and corruption; and
6. Political stability, war and conflict.
2. Economic
Potential economic issues include:
1. GDP and market growth rates;
2. Inflation, interest rates, and monetary policy;
3. Exchange rates For companies engaged in cross border trade it
may be important to consider exchange rate volatility and the
need for a SWAP Agreement;
4. Availability of credit, as well as the liquidity and depth of the
credit markets;
5. Labour costs and the unemployment rate. Will it be possible to
hire skilled workers?
6. Government support including infrastructure investment, grants,
subsidies, and tax breaks;
Tom Spencer 2015
34
7. Tax issues including corporate, employee, and value added taxes;

8. Trade restrictions, subsidies, tariffs and quotas;
9. Business cycle, stock market trends, market prices, and
seasonality issues;
10. Consumer confidence; and
11. Industry specific factors.
3. Social
Potential social issues include:
1. Population growth;
2. Age distribution and life expectancy. Are generational shifts likely
to affect customer preferences and market demand?
3. Income distribution, average disposable income, and social
mobility;
4. Attitudes towards work;
5. Family size and structure;
6. Health levels, and health consciousness; for example, attitudes
towards smoking and drinking;
7. Education levels;
8. Emphasis on safety;
9. Social norms; for example, people tend to take holidays over
Christmas and in the summer;
10. Fashions, fads, trends, role models, and influential personalities;
11. Buying patterns and consumer preferences. For example, brand
preferences, and attitudes toward product quality, customer
service, fair trade, green, and organic products;
12. Ethnic and religious factors;
13. Cultural and sporting events; and
14. Prohibitions, taboos, and ethical issues.
Tom Spencer 2015
35
4. Technological
Technological issues relate to the state of technology and its rate of
advancement, and may have implications for the competitive intensity of
an industry (for example, new technologies can reduce barriers to entry)
or may lead to disruptive innovation (for example, Amazon, Airbnb, and
Uber).
Potential technological issues include:
1. Emerging technologies and trends. For example, 3D printing,
collaborative consumption, and wearable technology;
2. Technology level and rate of change in an industry;
3. Technology lifecycle;
4. Location of technology hubs or clusters; university and business
partnerships;
5. Supporting infrastructure like high speed internet;
6. R&D spending;
7. Availability of financing for technology and innovative projects;
8. Automation; and
9. Legal frameworks, for example, protection of intellectual property
and support for crowd funding.
6. PEST Analysis Template
If you would like to download a template that can be used to conduct a
PEST Analysis, please click here.
Tom Spencer 2015
36
2.2 Micro Environment

2.2.1 Business Landscape Survey
Before taking decisive action, it may be a good idea to assess the
lay of the land
According to Sun Tzu, the quality of decision is like the well-timed
swoop of a falcon which enables it to strike and destroy its victim.
Much like a circling falcon overhead, a company needs to take a 10,000
foot view of the business landscape before it can take swift and decisive
action.
The framework outlined in this section provides a structure that
consultants and business leaders can follow to help them examine the
business situation.
1. Relevance
Having a framework to assess the business situation is relevant to any
company in the context of making strategic decisions and, whats more,
every important decision that a company makes will in some way be
strategic.
In the pursuit of growth, should a company enter a new market, develop
a new product, launch a start-up, form a joint venture, or acquire a
competitor? In the bid to cut costs, should a company reduce
headcount, outsource production to a supplier, or utilize lower cost
distribution channels? How should the company position itself within its
industry?
In order to find answers to these key strategic questions, a company and
its executives need to develop a clear understanding of the business
landscape, and this section provides a structured framework that can be
used to guide the exploration process.
Tom Spencer 2015
37
2. Importance
Failure to properly assess and understand the
business landscape can have billion dollar
implications and affect the course of an entire
industry.
The story that best illustrates this point was
IBMs secret project in 1980 to create the
IBM Personal Computer.
As part of the project, IBM made three
surprising decisions:
1. It allowed Microsoft the right to produce the operating system
software and market it separately from the IBM PC;
2. It chose to purchase the microprocessor from Intel; and
3. It opted to make the IBM PC an open architecture product,
publishing technical guides to the circuit designs and software
source code.
These three strategic decisions helped to shift market power in the PC
industry away from IBM and towards Microsoft and Intel.
Although the PC market grew quickly, companies like Compaq, Dell and
HP soon reverse engineered the IBM PC and, since IBM had made it an
open architecture product, they were able to sell a large number of
clones, known as IBM compatibles, which dramatically increased the
intensity of competition in the PC industry. Meanwhile, booming PC
sales from multiple vendors provided Microsoft and Intel with a
lucrative and rapidly growing market for operating system software and
microprocessors.
Despite the fact that IBM had set the technology standard in the
personal computer industry, it failed to capture the lions share of
industry profits. It helped Microsoft and Intel establish lucrative markets
Tom Spencer 2015
38
for themselves, but was not itself able to compete in these markets due
to high barriers to entry including patents, the 4.5 Experience Curve
effect and 4.3 Economies of Scale.
IBMs three strategic missteps were a blessing for Microsoft and Intel,
which as of 2015 have a combined market cap of over US$555 billion,
but are an enduring sore point for IBM, which decided to jettison its PC
business to Lenovo in 2005 for a mere US$1.8 billion.
The story of the IBM PC is a cautionary tale. Companies that fail to
assess the business landscape before taking action may find themselves
in an untenable position.
3. Surveying the Business Landscape
A popular way to examine the competitive intensity and attractiveness of
an industry is to use 4.8 Porters Five Forces, a technique which was first
outlined by HBS Professor Michael Porter in his 1979 book Competitive
Strategy.
While Porters Five Forces remains a useful reference point, and its core
elements are incorporated into the framework outlined in this section,
we do not use it directly to assess the business landscape since it fails in
one important respect. It does not consider the market power and
unique characteristics of the company from whose perspective we are
supposed to be analysing the industry. For example, an industry may
appear attractive from the perspective of a cash rich tech savvy player
like Google but appear quite unattractive from the perspective of other
firms.
Through their strategies, firms have the ability to change industry
structure, and so the business landscape will always need to be assessed
relative to the market power of a particular organisation.
In order to assess the business landscape, we will examine the three
entities whose market power, strategies and actions will, in any industry,
Tom Spencer 2015
39
affect a firms profitability: the customer, the competition and the

company itself.
3.1 Examining the Customer
There is only one boss. The customer. And he can fire everybody in the
company from the chairman on down, simply by spending his money somewhere
else.
~ Sam Walton, founder of Walmart
A good first step in assessing the business landscape is to examine the
customer, the people whose problems the industry is trying to solve.
Below we outline eight (8) factors to consider when examining the
customer.
1. Customer Identification
In general terms, who is the customer?
In trying to identify the customer, remember that the person who makes
the purchase decision, the person who pays (the customer), and the end
user (the consumer) may all be different people. For example, a doctor
may prescribe medicine that will be paid for by an insurance company
(the customer) and ultimately used by a patient (the consumer).
2. Customer Segmentation
Customer segmentation can make it easier to understand customer
needs and preferences, and to understand the size and growth rate of
different revenue streams. For example, it may make sense to segment
customers by:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Age group;
Gender;
Income level;
Employment status;
Distribution channel;
Tom Spencer 2015
40
6. Region;
7. Product preference;
8. Willingness to pay;
9. New versus existing customers; or
10.Large versus small customers.
3. Size
How big is the market? How big is each customer segment? How many
customers are there and what is the dollar value of those customers?
4. Growth
How fast is the market growing? What is the growth rate of each
customer segment?
5. Customer Preferences
What do customers want? Do different customer segments want
different things? Are the needs and preferences of customers changing
over time?
6. Willingness to Pay
How much is each customer segment willing to pay?
How price sensitive is each customer segment? For example, students
will normally be very price sensitive, which means that offering student
discounts may increase units sold by enough to raise total revenues.
7. Bargaining Power
What is the concentration of customers in the market relative to the
concentration of firms?
If there is a small number of powerful customers who control the
market, then it may be necessary to either play by their rules or search
for a more favourable market. Examples of this kind of customer
include Walmart in the market for homeware products, Amazon in the
Tom Spencer 2015
41
publishing industry, and the U.S. Department of Defence in the market

for defence equipment.
Do customers face high switching costs? If customers face high
switching costs then this will reduce their bargaining power. Switching
costs will be affected by various factors including the length of customer
contracts, the existence of customer loyalty programs, and the price
performance and compatibility of complimentary products.
8. Distribution
What is the best way to reach customers? Does each customer segment
have a preferred distribution channel?
Seven (7) distribution channels that a firm might use to reach customers
include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Network marketing;
Mail order;
Online store;
Factory outlet;
Retail store;
Supermarket; and
Department store.
3.2 Examining the Competition

Competition is not only the basis of protection to the consumer, but is the
incentive to progress.
~ Herbert Hoover, 31st President of the United States
In order to understand the business landscape it is also important to
understand the competition, and this can be done by examining the
Horizontal competition (competition between firms at the same stage of
production) and Vertical competition (competition between firms within
the supply chain).
Tom Spencer 2015
42
3.2.1 Horizontal Competition

Competition can come from firms within an industry who are offering
similar solutions to the same group of customers (for example, Pepsi
and Coca Cola).
Competition can also come from firms in other industries who produce
substitutes. Substitutes may have quite different characteristics (for
example, petroleum and natural gas) but they represent a form of
indirect competition because consumers can use them in place of one
another (at least in some circumstances). For example, petroleum and
natural gas might both be used to produce heat and energy.
Below we outline eleven (11) factors to consider when examining the
competition.
1. Competitor Identification
Who are the companys major competitors? Taking Cadbury as an
example, some of its major competitors include Lindt, Ferrero, Nestl,
Hersheys and Mars. What products and services do they offer?
2. Substitutes
Who are the companys indirect competitors? That is, which firms are
producing substitutes?
To identify indirect competitors, it helps to take a broader view of what
the company offers. For example, Cadbury sells chocolate, but more
broadly it might be thought of as a snack food company, and so indirect
competitors might include companies like Lays, Cheetos and Doritos.
3. Competitor Segmentation
Is it possible to segment competitors in a meaningful way? The
competition might be grouped by distribution channel, region, product
line, or customer segment.
Tom Spencer 2015
43
For example, the FOX Broadcasting Company might segment the

competition by region. In America, competitors include PBS, NBC, CBS
and ABC. While in Australia, competitors include companies such as
Channel 7, 9 and 10 as well as ABC and SBS.
4. Size and Concentration
What are the revenues and market shares of major competitors?
What is the concentration of competitors in the industry? That is, are
there lots of small competitors (a low concentration industry) or a few
dominant players (high concentration industry)? Examples of high
concentration industries include oil, tobacco and soft drinks. Examples
of low concentration industries include wheat and corn.
5. Performance
What is the historical performance of the competition? Relevant
performance measures might include profit margins, net income, and
return on investment.
6. Industry Lifecycle
Where is the industry in its lifecycle: early stage, growth, maturity or
decline?
7. Industry Drivers
What drives the industry: brand, product quality, scale of operations, or
technology?
8. Competitive Advantage
What is the competition good at? How sustainable are these advantages?
What are their weaknesses? How easily can these weaknesses be
exploited?
Tom Spencer 2015
44
9. Competitive Strategy
What competitive strategy is the competition pursuing? Is the
competition producing products that are low cost or differentiated?
What customer segments is the competition targeting?
What is the competitions pricing strategy and distribution strategy?
What is the competitions growth strategy? That is, are they seeking
growth by focusing on customer retention and increased sales volume,
by entering new markets, or by launching new products?
10. Competitive Balance
Is the industry balanced in the sense that competitors have clear and
sustainable positions within the industry? This may be the case where
firms provide customers with different value propositions which appeal
to different consumer preferences.
On the other hand, the industry may be unbalanced where multiple
competitors are trying to become the low cost firm within the industry
resulting in aggressive price competition and declining industry
profitability. Similarly, the industry may be unbalanced by a distant
follower who is making aggressive moves in an attempt to improve its
position, for example by introducing low priced unbranded generic
products.
11. Barriers to entry
The threat posed by potential competitors depends on the level of4.1
Barriers to Entry.
Key barriers to entry might include capital requirements, economies of
scale, network effects, product differentiation, proprietary product
technology, government policy, access to suppliers, access to
distribution channels, and switching costs.
For more information on barriers to entry, see 4.1 Barriers to Entry.
Tom Spencer 2015
45
3.2.2 Vertical Competition within the Supply Chain

Competition includes not just rivalry between firms operating at the
same stage of production (horizontal competition) but also the
interaction between all firms that have the potential to solve all or part
of the end users problem, and thereby compete for a share of industry
profits. This naturally includes vertical competition from suppliers and
customers within the supply chain.
An example of supplier bargaining power comes from the PC industry.
IBM learned about vertical competition the hard way when it helped
Microsoft and Intel gain virtual monopolies over the supply of key
components for the IBM PC.
Factors that will affect supplier bargaining power include:
1. The number of available suppliers and the strength of competition
between them;
2. Whether suppliers produce homogenous or differentiated
products;
3. The brand recognition of a supplier and its products;
4. The importance of sales volume to the supplier;
5. The cost to the firm of switching suppliers;
6. The availability of supplier substitutes; and
7. The threat of forward integration by the supplier relative to the
threat of backward integration by firms in the industry.
An example of customer bargaining power comes from the publishing
industry where Amazon has gained substantial bargaining power due to
its ability to sell and distribute huge volumes of books to end users.
Factors that will affect customer bargaining power include:
1. The number of customers. If there are fewer customers then each
customer will have more bargaining power;
2. The volume a customer demands relative to a firms total output;
3. The availability of substitutes;
Tom Spencer 2015
46
4. The cost to the customer of switching firms;

5. The availability of product comparison information; and
6. The threat of backward integration by the customer relative to the
threat of forwards integration by firms in the industry.
3.2.3 Competitive Intensity
The intensity of competitive rivalry depends on the pressure exerted by
all sources of competition: horizontal competition from direct
competitors and substitutes, and vertical competition from firms at
different points within the supply chain.
Below we outline twelve (12) factors that will influence the strength of
competition within an industry:
1. Number of firms: The more firms there are in an industry the
stronger will be the competitive rivalry since there will be more
firms competing to serve the same number of customers;
2. Market growth: If the market growth rate slows then this will
increase competition since firms will need to compete more
aggressively to gain new customers;
3. Economies of scale: If firms in the industry have relatively high
fixed costs and low variable costs then this will lead to more
intense rivalry as firms compete to gain market share;
4. Excess capacity: If the industry experiences cyclical demand then
this may result in sporadic industry wide excess capacity leading
to bouts of intense price competition;
5. Switching costs: If customers have low switching costs, then this
will intensify competition as firms compete to retain existing
customers and steal customers from the competition;
6. Product differentiation: If firms in an industry produce
homogeneous products, then firms will be forced to compete on
price. Firms can achieve product differentiation in various ways
including product quality, features, branding and availability;
Tom Spencer 2015
47
7. Instability: Diversity of competition (for example, firms from

different countries or cultures) may reduce predictability within a
market and lead firms to compete more aggressively;
8. Entry barriers: Low entry barriers will allow more competitors to
enter the market resulting in more intense competitive rivalry. For
more information on barriers to entry, see 4.1 Barriers to
Entry;
9. Exit barriers: High exit barriers will increase competition because
firms that might otherwise exit an industry are forced to stay and
compete. A common exit barrier is where a firm has highly
specialized equipment that it cannot sell or use for any other
purpose;
10. Industry shakeout: Where a growing market induces a large
number of firms to enter, a point is likely to be reached where the
industry becomes crowded. When market growth slows, a period
of intense competition, price wars and company failures is likely
to ensue;
11. Substitutes: If the number of substitutes increases, the relative
price performance of substitutes improve, the prices of
substitutes decrease, or customer willingness to substitute
increases, then this will increase the intensity of rivalry within an
industry as firms compete to retain customers; and
12. Bargaining power of suppliers and customers: If suppliers and
customers have more bargaining power then they will be able to
extract a larger share of industry profits. This will reduce the
profitability of firms in the industry, which may lead to more
intense competition, industry consolidation, vertical integration,
and company failures.
3.3 Examining the Company
Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles
without disaster.
~ Sun Tzu
Tom Spencer 2015
48
In assessing the business landscape, it is not enough simply to

understand the customer and the competition, it is also important to
understand the firm from whose perspective you are analysing the
industry.
Below we outline ten (10) factors to consider when examining the
company.
1. Performance
What is the historical performance of the company? What is its market
share? If profits are falling, what is the cause of the issue?
2. Competitive Advantage
Identify the companys resources and capabilities. Consider both
tangible assets (property, plant, equipment, inventory and employees)
and intangible assets (brand, patents, copyrights and specialised
knowledge).
How sustainable are the companys advantages? What are the
companys weaknesses and can they be remedied?
3. Competitive Strategy
What is the companys competitive strategy? Is the company producing
products that are low cost or differentiated? Which market segments
does the company target? (see 3.3.1 Porters Generic Strategies).
What is the companys pricing strategy, distribution strategy and growth
strategy? (see 3.4.1 Product / Market Expansion Matrix).
4. Products
What does the company offer and how does it benefit consumers? Does
the product have any downsides or side effects?
Is the product differentiated?
Tom Spencer 2015
49
How does the companys product offering compare with the

competition? Are there substitutes available? Do customers face high
switching costs?
Where does the product fall within its product lifecycle? (see 3.5.2
Product Life Cycle Model).
What is bundled with the product? For example, customer service,
warranties and spare parts. Are there opportunities to bundle or
unbundle the product in order to increase sales volume?
5. Finances
If the company is considering a particular course of action, does it have
sufficient funds available to undertake the project? Financing may be
secured from various sources including internal cash reserves, bank
loans, shareholder loans, bond issues or sale of shares.
How many units will the company need to sell in order to cover the cost
of the project? Is there sufficient market demand?
6. Cost Structure
In order to understand a companys cost structure, it helps to break each
business unit down into the collection of activities that are performed to
produce value for customers. The way each activity is performed
combined with its economics will determine a firms relative cost
structure within its industry.
Are costs predominantly fixed or variable? How does this compare with
the competition?
For more information on understanding a companys cost structure, see
3.6 Cost Management.
7. Organisational Cohesiveness
Understanding a firms inner workings is important since competitive
strategies can fail if they conflict with a firms culture, systems and
Tom Spencer 2015
50
general way of doing business. The organisational aspects of a firm can

be examined using the 3.8.1 McKinsey 7 S Model.
8. Marketing
What does the company stand for? How do customers perceive the
company and its products? How does the company communicate with
customers?
9. Distribution Channels
What distribution channels does the company use to reach customers
(network marketing, mail order, online store, factory outlets, retail
stores, supermarkets and/or department stores)? Are there other
channels that are more cost effective or which are preferred by
customers?
10. Customer Service
How does the company interact with customers and support its
products post sale? Are employees empowered to solve problems and
delight customers? Does the company have a customer loyalty program?
4. Business Landscape Survey Template
If you would like to download a template that can be used to conduct a
survey of the business landscape, please click here.
Tom Spencer 2015
51
3. Firm Level Analysis

3.1 Profitability
3.1.1 Profitability Framework
Understanding profitability issues can help executives, consultants
and entrepreneurs to diagnose and respond to falling prices,
declining sales volume and rising costs
Businesses sometimes experience reduced profitability.
This is not necessarily a problem if the decline was expected since a
business can be sustained from cash flow, and long term growth can be
pursued through capital accumulation, which shows up on the balance
sheet not on the profit and loss statement.
However, a drop in profits can be concerning if it is unexpected and
unexplained. It can limit a businesss ability to achieve organic growth
and may mean that its existing business model is no longer viable.
1. Profit
2. Revenue
3. Cost
Price
Units Sold
Variable Costs
Fixed Costs
Pricing Strategy:
Competitive, Cost
Based, Value Based
Customer
segmentation;
Market share; New
markets; New
products
COGS: Raw
Materials,
Transport, Energy,
Labor
SG&A, Rent, R&D,

Depreciation,
Interest, Labor
(fixed contract),
Marketing
Tom Spencer 2015
52
1. Profit
Profit equals revenue minus cost.
By considering the broader economy and comparing a businesss
performance numbers with the competition it will be possible to
determine whether declining profitability is a company specific or
industry wide problem.
Assuming the issue is company specific, it will be possible to discover
the source of declining profitability by investigating each branch of the
profit equation, revenue and cost, and drilling down to explore the
companys current and historical performance figures.
Declining profitability may result from falling prices, declining units
sold, rising costs or a combination of these factors.
2. Revenue
Revenue can come from various sources including advertising and
product sales and is normally thought of as being a function of price per
unit and units sold. For example, price per widget multiplied by the
number of widgets, or cost per click multiplied by the number of clicks.
Declining revenue can derive from a fall in prices or a reduction in units
sold, and can be examined in four steps.
Step 1: Segmentation
What are the major revenue streams? It will typically be a good idea to
segment units sold, and this might be done by:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Product;
Product line;
Distribution channel;
Region;
Customer type (new/old, big/small); or
Industry vertical.
Tom Spencer 2015
53
Step 2: Examination
What percentage of total revenue does each revenue stream represent?
Compare current and historical figures to identify how these percentages
have changed over time.
Step 3: Diagnosis
What is the underlying cause of the problem?
Step 4: Response
Develop a strategic response.
2.1 Diagnosis
If faced with declining prices or sales volume, factors to consider include
the following.
1. Macro Economy
PEST Analysis: Are there recent or impending changes to the
macro environment? This may include changes to political,
economic, socio-cultural or technological factors.
2. Customers
Market growth: Has market growth slowed forcing competitors to
compete for market share?
Customer needs and preferences: Have customer needs and
preferences changed?
Price Discrimination: Is the fall in prices or sales volume
attributable to a particular customer segment? Can the company
distinguish between customers and charge different prices to
different customer segments? This could be done by offering
quantity discounts or by distinguishing between people in different
groups (e.g. students) or in different locations (e.g. you pay more
for popcorn at the cinemas).
Tom Spencer 2015
54
Distribution Channels: What channels are used to reach

customers? Have new or preferred channels become available?
Has there been a change in the cost effectiveness of these
channels?
3. Competition
Rivalry: Have competitors lowered their prices? How does the
companys product mix, product quality, and cost structure
compare to the competition?
Substitutes: Has the availability of substitutes increased or the price
performance of substitutes improved?
Barriers to entry: Has it become easier for new competitors to
enter the industry? For example, the Internet has enabled new
entrants in many established industries including publishing,
newspapers, and taxis.
Buyer bargaining power: Has there been an increase in customer
bargaining power? For example, Amazon has used its market
dominance to drive down the price of books much to the chagrin
of book publishers.
4. Company
Market Power: Does the company have market power that might
allow it to raise prices (monopoly, product differentiation,
proprietary technology, economies of scale, network effects)? For
example, De Beers had (and largely still has) a monopoly on the
diamond trade which allows it to keep the price of diamonds high.
Products: What products and product mix does the company
offer? How does this compare to the competition? Is there
something different about the products that might allow the
company to raise prices? For example, brand recognition, superior
quality, appealing design, unique product features, or strong
customer service.
Tom Spencer 2015
55
Value chain analysis: Consider value chain activities such as access

to raw materials, operating capacity, inventory handling and
distribution. Are there any bottlenecks or capacity limitations?
2.2 Response
Declining prices
You would be forgiven for thinking that the best way to respond to
falling prices is simply to raise them. But unfortunately things are often
not that simple since a businesss ability to raise prices can often be
constrained.
In response to declining prices, there are three pricing strategies to
consider:
1. Competitive pricing: How do prices compare with the
competition? Is the pricing appropriate given the products relative
quality and position within the market? How is the competition
likely to respond to the firms pricing strategy?
2. Cost based pricing: Cost based pricing is a simple pricing strategy
that sets price relative to the companys costs. The price is set by
calculating the companys per unit cost and adding a margin for
profit.
3. Value based pricing: Value based pricing involves assessing the
customer and setting the price based on the customers willingness
to pay.
For further discussion on pricing strategy, see 3.5.1 Four Ps
Framework.
Declining sales volume
Faced with falling sales volume, there are four growth strategies that a
company might employ: market penetration, market development,
product development, and diversification.
Tom Spencer 2015
56
Figure 2: Product/market expansion matrix
For more information on growth strategy, see 3.4.1 Product / Market

Expansion Matrix.
3. Costs
The third driver of declining profitability is rising costs.
3.1 Diagnosis
If rising costs are driving a decline in profitability, then the cost structure
of the business will need to be examined in order to locate the source of
the cost blow out. This might be done by segmenting costs into value
chain activities: inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, sales &
marketing, customer service (see 3.2.1 Value Chain Analysis).
Have there been any significant changes in the companys cost drivers?
How do costs compare to the competition?
3.2 Response
After determining the source of rising costs, a firm can develop
strategies to manage and reduce costs. For more information on cost
management, see 3.6 Cost Management.
Tom Spencer 2015
57
4. Profitability Framework Cheatsheet

If you would like to download a one page profitability framework
cheatsheet that contains all the essentials of the profitability framework
on one page, please click here.
3.2 Competitive Advantage

3.2.1 Value Chain Analysis
To understand which activities provide a business with a
competitive advantage, either through cost advantage or product
differentiation, it is helpful to separate operations into a series of
value-generating activities referred to as the value chain
1. Background
Value Chain Analysis is a concept that was first described and
popularised by Michael Porter in his 1985 book, Competitive
Advantage.
2. Relevance
In order to understand the activities that provide a business with a
competitive advantage, either through cost advantage or product
differentiation, it is useful to separate the business operation into a series
of value-generating activities referred to as the value chain.
Value Chain Analysis involves identifying all of the important activities
in which a business engages and then determining which ones give the
company a defensible competitive advantage. By doing this, a company
can:
1. Determine which activities are best undertaken internally and
which ones are able to be outsourced or eliminated;
2. Identify and compare strengths and weaknesses with the
competition; and
Tom Spencer 2015
58
3. Identify synergies between activities.

3. Value Chain Analysis Explained
Michael Porter introduced a generic value chain model that comprises a
sequence of activities common to a wide range of firms. Porter
suggested that the activities of a business could be grouped under two
headings:
1. Primary activities: Those that are directly concerned with
creating and delivering a product or service; and
2. Support activities: Those that are not directly involved in
production, but may increase efficiency or effectiveness.
Figure 3: The Generic Value Chain
The firms margin or profit depends on its ability to perform these

activities efficiently, so that the amount that the customer is willing to
pay for the products exceeds the cost of the activities in the value chain.
3.1. Primary activities
The primary value chain activities include:
1. Inbound Logistics: Receiving and storing externally sourced
materials;
Tom Spencer 2015
59
2. Operations: Manufacturing; the way in which inputs are converted

into final products;
3. Outbound Logistics: Inventory storage and distribution to
customers;
4. Marketing & Sales: Identification of customer needs and
preferences, marketing strategy and sales generation;
5. Service: Supporting customers after the product or service has
been sold to them.
3.2. Support activities
The support value chain activities include:
1. Human resource management: Recruitment, training,
development, motivation and compensation of employees;
2. Infrastructure: Includes a broad range of support systems
including organisational structure, planning, management, quality
control, culture, and finance;
3. Procurement: Sourcing resources and negotiating with suppliers;
and
4. Technology development: Managing information, developing and
protecting new products and services, developing more efficient
processes, and improving quality.
4. Application of the Value Chain Analysis
4.1 Steps to take
Value Chain Analysis can be undertaken by following three (3) steps:
1. Break down a company into its key activities under each of the
headings in the model;
2. Identify activities that contribute to the firms competitive
advantage either by giving it a cost advantage or creating product
differentiation. At the same time, also identify activities where the
business appears to be at a competitive disadvantage; and
Tom Spencer 2015
60
3. Develop strategies around the activities that provide a sustainable

competitive advantage.
4.2 Cost advantage
A business can achieve a cost advantage over its competitors by
understanding the costs associated with each activity and then organising
each activity so that it is as efficient as possible.
Porter identified ten (10) cost drivers related to each activity in the value
chain:
1. 4.3 Economies of Scale;
2. Learning;
3. Capacity utilisation;
4. Linkages among activities;
5. Interrelationships among business units;
6. Degree of vertical integration;
7. Timing of market entry;
8. Firms policy on targeting cost or product differentiation;
9. Geographic location;
10. Institutional factors (regulation, union activity, taxes, etc.).
A firm can develop a cost advantage by controlling these ten (10) cost
drivers better than its competitors.
A cost advantage can also be pursued by reconfiguring the value chain.
Reconfiguration means introducing structural changes such as a new
production process, new distribution channels, or a different sales
approach. For example, Qantas structurally redefined its maintenance of
aircraft, traditionally conducted by in-house engineers, by outsourcing
this function to private overseas contractors.
4.3. Product differentiation
A firm can achieve product differentiation by focusing on its core
competencies in order to perform them better than its competitors.
Tom Spencer 2015
61
Product differentiation can be achieved through any part of the value

chain. For example, procurement of inputs that are unique and not
widely available to competitors, providing high levels of product support
services, or designing innovative and aesthetically attractive products.
5. Issues arising from Value Chain Analysis
5.1. Linkages between value generating activities
Value chain activities are not isolated from one another. Rather, one
value chain activity often affects the cost or performance of other value
chain activities. Linkages may exist between primary activities and also
between primary and support activities.
For example, the design of a product might be changed in order to
reduce manufacturing costs. However, if the new product design
inadvertently results in increased service costs then the total cost
reduction could be less than anticipated.
5.2. Business unit interrelationships
Business unit interrelationships can be identified using the Value Chain
Analysis.
Business unit interrelationships offer opportunities to create synergies
among business units. For example, if multiple business units require the
same raw material and the procurement process can be coordinated then
bulk purchasing may result in cost reductions. Such interrelationships
may exist simultaneously in multiple value chain activities.
5.3. Outsourcing
Value Chain Analysis can help management decide which activities to
outsource. It is rare for a business to undertake all primary and support
activities internally. In order to decide which activities to outsource
managers must understand the firms strengths and weaknesses, both in
terms of cost and ability to differentiate.
Tom Spencer 2015
62
6. Case Example
Below we consider some of the issues that might be relevant for some of
Coca Colas value chain activities:
1. Procurement: Is it more cost effective to procure inputs locally,
regionally or globally? If local procurement is more expensive but
better for the environment and local communities, can this be used
as a point of differentiation? Are there likely to be political or
environmental disturbances that could drive up the cost of key
inputs like corn syrup or aluminium?
2. Operations: How much does a bottling plant cost to build and
run? How often do factories need to be re-engineered? Would it
be more cost effective to outsource bottling? Is bottling
strategically important for product differentiation?
3. Logistics: What is the cost of inventory storage? How is Coca
Cola distributed to customers? How many cans are lost in transit?
4. Marketing & Sales: Are consumer preferences changing over
time? Will people enjoy cherry cola? Are people becoming more
health conscious?
3.3 Competitive Strategy

3.3.1 Porters Generic Strategies
Three strategies to achieve above-average performance: cost
leadership, differentiation, and focus
In order to understand Porters Generic Strategies, it is helpful to take a
step back and examine the two things which determine a firms
profitability in the long run.
The first is industry attractiveness, which is determined in any industry
by the five competitive forces: the threat of entry by new competitors,
the threat of substitutes, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining
power of suppliers, and the rivalry among existing firms.
Tom Spencer 2015
63
Figure 4: Porters Five Competitive Forces that Determine Industry

Profitability
It is the collective strength of these five forces that determine whether

firms in an industry will be able to earn attractive rates of return. In
industries where the five forces are favourable, such as the soft drink
industry, many competitors have earned attractive returns for many
decades. However, where one or more of the forces exerts strong
pressure on industry profitability, such as in the airline industry, few
firms ever do well for long.
Understanding industry structure, as determined by the five forces, will
inform a firms decision to enter or exit an industry, and will also be a
key consideration for industry leaders who have the ability to mould
industry structure for better or for worse. For example, Coca-Cola is a
leader in the soft drink industry and could, if it wanted to, encourage the
production and sale of generic unbranded soft drinks. Even if this would
increase Coca-Colas profits in the short run, it would also threaten the
structure of the industry. Generic cola may increase the price sensitivity
of buyers, lead to aggressive price competition, and lower barriers to
entry by enabling new competitors to enter the market without a large
advertising budget.
Tom Spencer 2015
64
In addition to industry attractiveness, the second thing which determines

a firms profitability in the long run (and this is where Porters Generic
Strategies comes in) is a firms relative position within the industry. That
is, can a firm position itself to achieve above average performance
within its industry? Or put differently, is it possible for a firm to
establish and maintain a competitive advantage?
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Michael Porter explains that
there are two basic sources of competitive advantage that a firm can
possess: cost leadership and differentiation. A firm can also narrow the
scope of its activities to compete in niche segments of the market, and
so there are actually three generic strategies that a firm can adopt to
achieve above-average performance: cost leadership, differentiation, and
focus.
Figure 5: Three Generic Strategies
Porters generic strategies are based on the idea that in order to achieve a
competitive advantage a firm needs to make hard choices. Trying to be
all things to all people will put a firm on the fast track to mediocrity, and
so a firm needs to decide what kind of competitive advantage to pursue
and which market segments it should target.
Cost Leadership
As the name suggests, a firm that pursues cost leadership aims to be the
low cost producer in its industry. While the strategy involves a primary
Tom Spencer 2015
65
focus on cost reduction, the cost leader will also need to produce
comparable products in order to maintain prices.
If a firm can sustain cost leadership while at the same time charging
prices at or near the industry average, then this strategy can allow a firm
to achieve above average performance.
One danger of the cost leadership strategy is that if there is more than
one aspiring cost leader then this can lead to intense competitive rivalry
and ultimately destroy industry profitability. If a firm wants to be the
cost leader, then its best bet is to get in first in order to deter the
competition.
Differentiation
Differentiation is a strategy in which a firm sets out to provide unique
value to buyers. This may be achieved in various ways including
producing products with unique features, serving buyers through new or
different distribution channels, or by creating perceived differences in
the buyers mind through clever marketing.
While the strategy involves a primary focus on being different the
differentiator will still need to manage its costs, and will want to reduce
costs in any area that does not contribute to differentiation. If a firm is
able to charge a price premium that exceeds the cost of sustaining its
uniqueness, then the firm will be able to achieve above average returns.
Focus
The focus strategy involves narrowing the scope of competition in order
to serve certain niche segments within the overall market. By serving
these target segments well, the focuser may be able to achieve a
competitive advantage in its niche even though it does not enjoy a
competitive advantage in the market overall.
Tom Spencer 2015
66
Stuck in the Middle

While there are three generic strategies for achieving above average
performance, a firm that tries to employ all of these strategies without
successfully pursuing any of them faces the risk of becoming stuck in
the middle. As such, it may find itself perpetually outperformed by
other firms in the industry that have been willing to make hard strategic
choices about how to compete.
3.3.2 Strategy and the Internet

There are six strategic principles which are relevant to any
company that wants to be profitable online
In an article entitled Strategy and the Internet published in the March
2001 edition of the Harvard Business Review, Michael Porter outlined
six principles that he believes internet companies need to follow if they
want to establish and maintain a distinctive strategic position online.
While we largely agree with Porters six principles, we take issue with his
second principle which argues for a focus on profitability through the
sale of products and services.
Porters six strategic principles are instructive, and we outline them
below.
1. Stand for something
In order for a company to develop unique skills, build the right assets,
and establish a strong reputation it is important to define what the
company stands for so that the company will have continuity of
direction.
2. Focus on profitability
Many internet based companies focus on unique visitors and page
views as measures of performance and Porter notes that, at the end of
Tom Spencer 2015
67
the day, sustainable profits will only be possible where goods or services
can be provided at a price which exceeds the cost of production.
We take issue with this focus on profitability through the sale of goods
and services since it misses the key insight that successful internet-based
companies are typically in the business of connecting people around a
common interest or shared purpose. In other words, the internet is not
primarily about selling goods and services, but is instead about creating
markets, building communities and connecting people. While it is true
that a successful internet-based company may derive some profits from
the sale of goods and services, it is also likely to generate a portion of its
revenues from advertising, membership fees and commissions.
3. Offer consumers a unique set of benefits
Good strategy involves being able to provide a distinct set of benefits to
a particular group of consumers. Trying to please every consumer will
not give a company a sustainable competitive advantage.
4. Perform core activities differently
If a company is able to establish a distinctive value chain by performing
key activities differently from its competitors, then this will help the
company establish a sustainable competitive advantage.
5. Specialise
There is no competitive advantage to being a jack of all trades and a
master of none. Porter recommends making trade-offs. By focusing on
certain activities, services or products at the expense of others a
company can establish a unique strategic position.
6. Ensure that all activities reinforce the companys
strategy
All of a companys activities are interdependent and, as a result, they
must be coordinated so as to reinforce the companys overall strategy. A
Tom Spencer 2015
68
companys product design, for example, will affect the manufacturing

process and the way that products are marketed. By coordinating all of
its activities, a company makes it harder for competitors to imitate its
strategy.
3.4 Growth Strategy

3.4.1 Product / Market Expansion Matrix
A framework to help executives, senior managers and marketers
devise strategies for future growth
1. Background
The Product/Market Expansion Matrix (or Ansoff Matrix as it is
sometimes called) was developed by a Russian-American mathematician
named Igor Ansoff, and first explained in his 1957 Harvard Business
Review article entitled Strategies for Diversification.
2. Relevance
The Product/Market Expansion Matrix is particularly useful for strategic
planning because it provides a framework to help executives, senior
managers and marketers devise strategies for future growth.
By aiding clear thinking about growth strategy, the Product/Market
Expansion Matrix can help an organisation avoid key risks including:
1. Overlooking available growth strategies;
2. Misunderstanding the implications of pursuing a particular
strategy; and
3. Selecting an inappropriate strategy given the firms diversification
objectives.
3. Product/Market Expansion Matrix Explained
The Product/Market Expansion Matrix can help a firm devise a
product-market growth strategy by focusing on four growth alternatives:
Tom Spencer 2015
69
1.
2.
3.
4.
Market Penetration;
Market Development;
Product Development; and
Diversification.
Figure 6: Product/market expansion matrix
What is a Product-Market Growth Strategy?

A product-market strategy is a description of a firms products and
target markets. While this may sound straightforward, it can be difficult
to clearly delineate a target market since it can be defined very broadly
(for example, the transport market) or very narrowly (for example,
domestic air transport in America for cost-conscious business travellers).
In general, a market should not be defined too broadly (or too narrowly)
since a key purpose of market definition is to allow a firm to develop
strategy and make decisions.
In his 1957 paper, Ansoff defined a product-market strategy as a joint
statement of a product line and the corresponding set of missions which
the products are designed to fulfil. For example, one of Apples
product missions might be to provide consumers with easy-to-use digital
technology, and another mission might be to provide fashion accessories
for Yuppies and young people.
Tom Spencer 2015
70
The Four Growth Alternatives

The four alternative growth strategies are:
1. Market Penetration: A strategy to increase sales without departing
from the original product-market strategy. This involves increasing
sales to existing customers and finding new customers for existing
products.
2. Market Development: A strategy to sell existing products to new
markets (normally with some modifications). Ansoff described this
as a strategy to adapt [the] present product line to new
missions. For example, Boeing might adapt an existing model of
passenger aircraft and sell it for cargo transportation.
3. Product Development: A strategy to sell new products, with new
or altered features, to existing markets. Ansoff described this as a
strategy to develop products with new and different
characteristics such as will improve the performance of the
[existing] mission. For example, Boeing might develop a new
aircraft design which offers improved fuel economy.
4. Diversification: A strategy to develop new products for new
markets, which can either be related to the current business (e.g.
vertical integration or horizontal diversification) or unrelated (e.g.
conglomerate diversification).
Each of the above strategies represents a different path that a firm can
take to pursue growth. However, in practice, a firm will often implement
more than one strategy at the same time. As Ansoff noted, a
simultaneous pursuit of market penetration, market development, and
product development is usually a sign of a progressive, well-run business
and may be essential to survival in the face of economic competition.
4. Selecting a Strategy
A growth strategy can be selected through a three-step process:
1. Setting out all of the available strategies;
Tom Spencer 2015
71
2. Applying qualitative criteria to short list the most favourable

alternatives; and
3. Applying a return on investment hurdle to narrow the options still
further.
The discussion below provides a summary of the issues and various
situations in which it may make sense for a firm to select a particular
growth strategy.
4.1 Market Penetration
Market Penetration carries the least implementation risk since a firm is
focusing on its existing products and existing markets, and so should be
able to leverage its existing resources and capabilities.
Pursuing this strategy is likely to make sense if the firm has a strong
competitive advantage, or if the overall size of the market is growing or
can be induced to grow.
4.2 Market Development
Market Development carries more implementation risk than Market
Penetration because a firm is expanding into new markets.
Companies that have successfully pursued this strategy include CocaCola and McDonalds, and it may make sense where:
The firms core competencies relate to its existing products and it
has a strong marketing team;
The firm can identify opportunities for market development
including chances to reposition the brand, exploit new uses for the
product, or expand into new geographical regions;
The firms resources are organised to produce particular products
and changing the production technology would be costly.
Tom Spencer 2015
72
4.3 Product Development

Product Development carries more implementation risk than Market
Penetration because the firm is developing new products.
Companies that have successfully pursued this strategy include 3M,
P&G and Unilever, and it may make sense where:
The firm understands the needs of its customers, and identifies an
opportunity to sell new products to satisfy new or changing needs;
The firm operates in a competitive market where continuous
product innovation is necessary to prevent product obsolescence
or commoditisation;
The firm has large market share and a strong brand;
The firms products benefit from network effects or proprietary
technology, and new products can gain a significant edge by being
first to market;
The firm operates in a market with strong growth potential;
The firm identifies opportunities to commercialise new
technology;
The firm has a strong R&D team.
4.4 Diversification
Diversification carries the most implementation risk since a firm is
simultaneously developing new products and entering new markets, and
may need to develop or acquire new resources and capabilities.
Diversification can enable a firm to achieve three main objectives:
growth, stability, and flexibility. The specific strategies that a firm
employs will differ depending on which of these goals a firm is pursuing.
There are three primary kinds of diversification that a firm might pursue:
1. Vertical Integration: The firm expands its business to different
points in the supply chain;
Tom Spencer 2015
73
2. Horizontal Diversification: The firm adds new products that may

be unrelated to existing products but are likely to appeal to existing
customers. For example, Amazon initially sold only books through
its website but has over time added new products such as clothes,
jewellery and electronics;
3. Conglomerate Diversification: The firm adds new products that
are unrelated to existing products and are likely to appeal to new
customer segments. While conglomerate diversification may have
little relationship with a firms existing business, a firm might
adopt this strategy in order to:
Improve profitability by entering a lucrative industry;
Develop resources and capabilities in a potential new growth
industry;
Poach top management or key talent;
Compensate for technological obsolescence;
Expand the firms revenue base so as to improve its perception
in the capital markets and make it easier to borrow money;
Increase strategic flexibility in an uncertain business
environment; or
Reduce risk by spreading the firms activities across multiple
products and markets, and thereby decrease its vulnerability to
negative Black Swans and unfavourable events such as
economic downturns, increased competitive rivalry, improved
supplier or buyer bargaining power, improved price
performance of substitutes, or reduced barriers to entry.
5. Implementing a Growth Strategy
Below we provide suggestions on how to implement each of the four
alternative growth strategies.
5.1 Market Penetration
Market Penetration involves increasing sales of existing products to
existing markets, and could be pursued in the following ways:
Tom Spencer 2015
74
1. Pricing:
Changing product pricing; for example, if demand is relatively
inelastic, then it might be possible to raise prices without a big
drop in sales. Alternatively, prices could be lowered to increase
sales volume;
2. Product:
Modifying the products or product packaging in order to
broaden their appeal;
Bundling products together in order to sell them as a single
unit;
Increasing the size of a product in order to increase the amount
sold per unit;
3. Place:
Improving distribution channels in order to reach more
customers within existing markets;
Targeting a market niche in order to grow sales and build
overall market share (this approach may make sense if the firm
is small compared to its competitors);
Make products available at times and in locations which
correspond with high customer demand (for example, selling
ice cream near the beach, selling Christmas trees in December);
4. Promotion:
Increasing advertising to promote the product or reposition the
brand;
Offering quantity discounts (e.g. 2 for 1, Buy One Get One
Free);
Introducing customer loyalty schemes;
Improving the quality or size of the sales force;
5. Acquisitions:
Acquiring a competitor (this approach may make sense in
mature markets where the size of the overall market is not
growing);
6. Cost Management:
Tom Spencer 2015
75
Improving operational efficiency so that increased sales can be

achieved without a proportional increase in costs (this might be
attained through 4.3 Economies of Scale and product
rationalisation).
5.2 Market Development
Market Development involves selling existing products to new markets,
or new market segments, and could be pursued in the following ways:
1. Product:
Modifying the pricing strategy, products and/or product
packaging in order to appeal to different customer segments;
2. Place:
Utilising new distribution channels to reach new market
segments, for example building an online store;
3. Promotion:
Marketing products in new locations in order to expand
regionally, nationally or internationally;
Advertising through different media in order to reach different
customer segments;
4. Acquisitions and Joint Ventures:
Acquiring a competitor or forming a joint venture or strategic
alliance in order to gain access to new distribution channels.
5.3 Product Development
Product Development involves selling new products to existing markets,
and could be pursued in the following ways:
1. Product:
Developing new products through R&D or licensing new
technologies;
Extending an existing product by producing different versions;
for example, Apple released two versions of the iPhone 5, the
iPhone 5C and the iPhone 5S;
Tom Spencer 2015
76
Packaging existing products in new ways; for example, Apple

re-released the iPhone 5 in a range of colourful cases and called
it the iPhone 5C;
2. Place:
Distributing products manufactured by other firms in order to
increase utilization of an existing distribution channel. For
example, Amazon not only sells and distributes products
through its website but also allows other vendors to do so;
3. Acquisitions and Joint Ventures:
Acquiring a competitor in order to acquire its product line;
Forming a joint venture or strategic alliance with a
complementary firm.
5.4 Diversification
Diversification involves selling new products to new markets, and can be
pursued by simultaneously adopting the strategies suggested above for
Market Development and Product Development.
3.4.2 GE McKinsey 9 Box Matrix

The GE-McKinsey 9-Box Matrix offers decentralised corporations
with multiple business units a systematic approach for investing
available cash reserves
1. Background
The 9-Box Matrix was developed as part of work that McKinsey did for
GE in the early 1970s. At that time, GE had around 150 business units
and was faced with the challenge of how to manage such a large number
of business units profitably.
The 9-Box Matrix was developed as a result of the realisation that it is
important to separate the ability of a business to generate cash from the
decision about whether to put more cash into the business.
Tom Spencer 2015
77
2. Purpose
The 9-Box Matrix offers any decentralised corporation with multiple
business units a systematic approach to help it decide where to invest its
excess cash reserves.
The 9-Box Matrix solves the problem of trying to compare potentially
very different business units: one might be capital intensive; another
might require high advertising expenditure; a third might have
economies of scale.
Instead of relying on the projections provided by the manager of each
individual business unit, the company can determine whether a business
unit is going to do well in the future by considering two factors:
1. Industry attractiveness; and
2. Competitive advantage.
[It is worth noting that these are the same factors proposed by Professor
Michael Porter in his 1985 book Competitive Advantage.]
3. Using the 9-box Matrix
Figure 7: GE-McKinsey 9-box matrix
Tom Spencer 2015
78
Placing each business unit within the 9-Box Matrix offers a framework
for comparison between them.
In order to keep things simple, the framework offers three investment
strategies:
1. Invest/Grow;
2. Selectivity/Earnings; and
3. Harvest/Divest.
Allocating one of these investment strategies to each business unit is the
first step. However, it is important to note that two business units that
have been given the same strategy will not necessarily be treated in the
same way. For example, a strong unit in a weak industry will be in a very
different situation from a weak unit in an attractive industry.
After placing every business unit into one of the nine boxes, there are at
least two questions that need to be asked:
1. If a business unit is in one category, say selectivity/earnings, are
there any actions that might be taken to improve its position?
2. If a business unit is to receive money, what does it plan to do with
that money and does this strategy make sense? It is important that
a business unit has a purpose in mind because the best use of
money will vary depending on the industry and on the business
unit. For example, advertising to enhance the brand might work
for one business unit, whereas increasing R&D spending might
work for another.
4. Axes of the 9-box Matrix
The 9-Box Matrix places industry attractiveness along the vertical axis,
and competitive advantage along the horizontal axis.
Tom Spencer 2015
79
4.1 Industry attractiveness

Industry attractiveness refers to industry profitability. That is, how easy
will it be for the average firm to generate above average profits over the
long run? For a straightforward approach to examining industry
attractiveness, see 4.8 Porters Five Forces.
4.2 Competitive advantage
A business unit has a competitive advantage when it is able to achieve
profits that exceed the industry average.
Understanding whether a business unit has a sustainable competitive
advantage involves examining its relative position within its industry
and the resources and capabilities that it possesses which will allow it to
maintain and strengthen that position over time.
Relevant considerations might include:
1. Does the business unit benefit from economies of scale or
network effects?
2. Does the business unit enjoy strong brand recognition?
3. Is the business unit more profitable than its competitors? If so,
why so?
5. Available Strategies
5.1 Invest / Grow
A business unit will be in the invest/grow category if the prospects
for the industry as a whole are attractive and the business units position
in the industry means that it is likely to do better than most of the other
firms in the industry.
A business unit in this category should be given increased investment
regardless of whether it can generate those funds itself.
Tom Spencer 2015
80
5.2 Selectivity / Earnings

Business units in this category are given second priority to those in the
invest/grow category. As such, the amount of money spent on
business units in the invest/grow category will determine how much is
left over for business units in this category.
When allocating money to a business unit in this category, it is important
to be selective about where the money is spent and monitor earnings
closely. With the right combination of strategies, it may be possible to
move a business unit into the invest/grow category. However, if a
business unit doesnt improve its performance it may be advisable to
reallocate cash to another business unit.
5.3 Harvest / Divest
A business unit will be in the harvest/divest category if it is in an
unattractive industry and its competitive position is weak.
There are two potential strategies can be pursued for business units in
this category:
1. Harvest: Increase short-term cash flows as far as possible, even at
the expense of the business units long term future; or
2. Divest: Sell the business unit or liquidate its assets.
3.4.3 BCG Growth Share Matrix

The BCG Growth Share Matrix is a simple conceptual framework
for resource allocation within a firm
1. Background
In 1968, BCG developed the growth share matrix, which is a simple
conceptual framework for resource allocation within a firm.
2. Purpose
The BCG matrix is a simple tool that enables management to:
Tom Spencer 2015
81
1. Classify products in a companys product portfolio into four

categories Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, and Dogs;
2. Index a companys product portfolio according to cash usage and
generation;
3. Determine the priority that should be given to different products
in a companys product portfolio; and
4. Develop strategies to tackle various product lines.
3. BCG Growth Share Matrix Explained
The idea behind the growth share matrix is that the amount of cash that
a product uses is proportional to the rate of growth of that product in
the market, and the generation of cash is a function of its market share.
Money generated from high-market-share products can be used to
develop high-growth products.
Figure 8: BCG Growth Share Matrix
Under the BCG matrix, products are classified into four types:
1. Stars are leaders in high growth markets. Stars grow rapidly and
therefore use large amounts of cash. Stars also have a high market
share and therefore generate large amounts of cash. Over time, the
growth of a product will slow. If a Star maintains a high market
Tom Spencer 2015
82
share, it will eventually become a Cash Cow. If not, it will become

a Dog.
2. Cash Cows are highly profitable, and require low investment
because they are market leaders in a low-growth market. Growth is
slow and therefore cash use is low, and market share is high and
therefore cash generation is high. Money generated from cash
cows can be used to pay dividends, interest, and overheads, and to
develop Stars and Question Marks.
3. Question Marks are low market share high growth products, and
almost always require more cash than they can generate. If a
Question Mark can improve its market share, it will eventually
become a Cash Cow. If not, it will become a Dog.
4. Dogs generate little cash because of their low market share in a
low growth market. BCG refers to these products as cash traps.
Although they may be sold profitably in the market, BCG indicates
that, in terms contributing to growth, Dogs are essentially
worthless.
4. Available Strategies
The BCG matrix offers four alternative strategies:
1. Develop: This strategy is appropriate where a products market
share needs to be increased in order to strengthen its market
position. Short-term earnings and profits are forfeited because it is
hoped that the long-term gains will outweigh these short term
costs. This strategy is suited to Stars, as well as Question Marks if
they are to become Stars.
2. Hold: The objective of this strategy is to maintain the current
market share of a product, and is used for Cash Cows so that they
will continue to generate large amounts of cash which can be
invested in Stars and Question Marks.
3. Harvest: Under this strategy, management attempts to increase
short-term cash flows as far as possible (e.g. by increasing prices,
Tom Spencer 2015
83
and cutting costs) even at the expense of the products long-term

future. It is a strategy suited to weak Cash Cows or Cash Cows
that are in a market with a limited future. Harvesting is also used
for Dogs, and for Question Marks that have no possibility of
becoming Stars.
4. Divest: The objective of this strategy is to get rid of unprofitable
products and products with low market share in low growth
markets. Money from divestment can then be used to develop and
promote more profitable products. This strategy is typically used
for Dogs and for Question Marks that will not become Stars.
5. Criticisms
The simplicity of the BCG matrix helped to popularise the tool with
management teams around the world. Unfortunately, however, the BCG
matrix is not just simple and easy to remember but also simplistic, and
using the framework without careful consideration can lead to serious
strategic missteps.
Below we highlight four (4) key criticisms of the BCG matrix.
First of all, the BCG matrix encourages managers to focus primarily on
market share at the expense of other factors that may be important for
organisational performance. A myopic focus on market share may lead
managers to:
1. Engage in aggressive price competition leading to the destruction
of industry profits;
2. Focus narrowly on one product or product line, forgetting that
markets are fluid and notoriously hard to define. For example, if
Apple had defined its market as PCs and laptops then it would
never have pioneered the iPod, iPhone and iPad; and
3. Ignore other growth alternatives including new product
development, new market entry, and diversification.
Tom Spencer 2015
84
The second problem with the BCG matrix is that by classifying a

product into one of four types Star, Cash Cow, Question Mark, or
Dog it is essentially forecasting the products potential which can
result in a self-fulfilling prophecy. For example, if a product is labelled a
Star then it will receive increased investment and management focus,
employees working on the product are likely to be more motivated, and
the product will therefore be likely to perform much better than it would
have otherwise.
The third problem with the BCG matrix is that it is often difficult to
determine where a product or an industry falls within its life cycle. A
technology product with high market share in a low growth market
might be labelled as a Cash Cow and assigned a hold strategy, and so
be given just enough investment to maintain its market share. While this
may be an appropriate strategy for a product in a slow moving industry,
rapidly changing technology may require significant investment in order
to capture new opportunities for growth and innovation. For example,
Microsoft, with its a dominant market share for operating system
software in the PC industry has been slow to innovate and slow to
release software for other devices such as smartphones and tablets.
The fourth criticism of the BCG matrix is that it equates high market
share with high cash generating ability. It assumes that a product with
higher market share will generate more cash; however this may not be
the case.
In 1970, while outlining the BCG matrix, Bruce Henderson stated that
Margins and cash generated are a function of market share. High
margins and high market share go together. This is a matter of common
observation, explained by the 4.5 Experience Curve effect.
Hendersons observation turns out to be an oversimplification of reality
(for a full discussion on this point, see Implications for Strategy). If a
product benefits from 4.3 Economies of Scale and the 4.5 Experience
Curve effect, then higher market share will lead to lower unit costs.
Tom Spencer 2015
85
However, this does not necessarily mean that the product will generate
more cash since the amount of cash that a product generates depends on
two factors:
1. The profit margin per unit; and
2. The number of units sold.
1. Profit margin per unit
It is common for firms to achieve increased market share by lowering
prices, which will lead to lower profit margins unless sufficient cost
savings can be found to offset the lower price. This means that a
product with higher market share will only generate more cash if the
percentage increase in units sold is greater than the percentage decrease
in profit margin per unit. This will not always be the case, but
admittedly it is likely to occur for the kinds of products that Henderson
was talking about, that is, for products which benefit from 4.3
Economies of Scale and the 4.5 Experience Curve effect.
2. Units sold
In considering a products cash generating potential, companies need to
consider not only market share but also market size since units sold is a
function of both. For example, a product that has a small market share
in a large market may have the potential to generate a large amount of
cash. This insight is overlooked by the BCG matrix.
Tom Spencer 2015
86
3.5 Marketing Strategy

3.5.1 Four Ps Framework
A useful framework for evaluating the marketing strategy for a
product
The Four Ps Framework involves examining four aspects relevant to a
products marketing strategy:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Price;
Product;
Promotion; and
Place.
1. Price
The pricing strategy that a firm employs will affect a products market
share and profitability.
Depending on the situation, there are many different pricing strategies
that a firm might choose to employ. We can group all of these strategies
under three headings: competitive pricing, cost based pricing, and value
based pricing.
1.1 Competitive pricing
Under this strategy, the price of a product will be affected by the price
of competing products, and by the availability of substitutes.
How do prices compare with the competition? Is the pricing appropriate
given the products relative quality and position within the market?
A firm might consider the following competitive pricing strategies:
1. Predatory pricing: Aggressive pricing intended to undercut
competitors and drive them out of the market.
2. Limit pricing: A low price charged by a monopolist in order to
discourage entry into the market by other firms.
Tom Spencer 2015
87
3. Penetration pricing: The price is set low in order to gain market

share.
1.2 Cost based pricing
Under this strategy, the price of a product will be determined by the
companys cost structure and the cost of goods sold.
What is the companys cost structure? What percentage of costs are
fixed and variable? A company that has high fixed cost and low variable
costs will benefit from economies of scale and may want to lower prices
to increase market share.
A firm might consider the following cost based pricing strategies:
1. Marginal cost pricing: The price of a product is set equal to the
cost of producing one extra unit of output.
2. Target pricing: The price of a product is calculated to produce a
particular return on investment.
3. Cost-plus pricing: Arguably the most basic pricing strategy which
involves setting price equal to the unit cost of production plus a
margin for profit.
1.3 Value based pricing
Under this strategy, pricing will be driven by the perceived value of the
product in the mind of the customer. Perceived value will depend on
various factors include branding, product differentiation, availability, the
customers price sensitivity and willingness to pay.
Are customers price sensitive? If prices are changed, how will this affect
sales volume and product perception?
Two (2) practical examples of value based pricing include:
1. A company that manufactures t-shirts might produce branded
Gucci t-shirts that retail for $80 per shirt, and produce unbranded
t-shirts of the same design and quality that retail for $30;
Tom Spencer 2015
88
2. A movie theatre might sell adult tickets for $20, and sell the exact
same tickets to students for $10.
A firm might consider the following value based pricing strategies:
1. Price discrimination: Setting a different price for the same product
for different customer segments. See Price discrimination.
2. Dynamic pricing: A flexible pricing mechanism, which allows
online companies to adjust the price of identical goods to
correspond to a customers willingness to pay. This is made
possible by using data gathered from a customer including where
they live, what they buy, and how much they have spent on past
purchases.
3. Market-orientated pricing: Setting a price based upon analysis of
the target market.
4. Psychological pricing: Pricing designed to have a positive
psychological impact. For example, selling a product at $3.95
instead of $4.
5. Skimming: Charging a high price to gain a high profit, at the
expense of achieving high sales volume. This strategy is usually
employed to recoup the initial investment cost in research and
development, commonly used in consumer electronic markets
when a new product range is released since early adopters are
typically less price sensitive.
6. Premium pricing: Keeping the price of a product artificially high in
order to encourage a favourable perception among buyers.
7. Loss leader pricing: A loss leader is a product sold at a low price to
stimulate other profitable sales. For example, the 30 cent soft serve
cone at McDonalds.
8. Seasonal pricing: Adjusting the price depending on seasonal
demand.
Tom Spencer 2015
89
2. Product
Is the product a low cost commodity or differentiated? The major
sources of product differentiation include:
1. Vertical differentiation: Products can differ in their quality due to
differences in reliability, comfort, support services, or other
factors. For example, BMW versus Hyundai.
2. Horizontal differentiation: Products can differ in features that
cannot be ordered. For example, different flavours of ice-cream.
3. Availability: Products may be available at different times (e.g.
seasonal fruits) and locations (e.g. ice-cream sold near the beach).
4. Perception: Products can differ in their brand recognition, which
can be influenced through sales, marketing and promotion.
How does a product compare with what the competition is offering?
Are their viable substitutes? Do customers face high switching costs?
Successful product differentiation can lead to Monopolistic competition,
a situation where firms retain some control over pricing despite there
being multiple competitors.
3. Promotion
Promotion is used to enhance the perception of a company or its
products in the mind of the customer. A promotion may draw peoples
attention to branding, quality, product features, price or availability.
What message is the firm trying to communicate? What is the objective?
Who is the target customer? What is the right promotion medium, reach
(that is, number of people reached through the chosen medium) and
frequency of promotion? What is the firms marketing budget?
How does the firms marketing strategy differ from the competition?
How might the competition react to the firms marketing strategy?
Tom Spencer 2015
90
Understanding the customers buying decision process can help a firm

decide where and how to influence the customers purchase decision.
Awareness
Information
Search
Evaluation
Purchase
Re-puchase
Figure 9: Customer Buying Decision Process
Promotion can be carried out in various ways including:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Advertising (digital, TV, newspapers, magazines);

Direct Sales (door to door, cold calling, warm calling, direct mail);
Indirect Sales (word of mouth);
Trade Promotions (price discounting, quantity discounting);
Public Relations (donating to charity, sponsoring a sports team,
celebrity appearances).
4. Place
The physical location and availability of a product can be a source of
competitive advantage. For example, if there are two ice-cream stores,
one next to a popular tourist beach and the other in a quiet suburb, we
would reasonably expect that the ice cream store near the beach will be
able to charge higher prices and sell more ice-cream.
A firm should consider the markets and market segments that it serves.
Does the competition serve the same markets and market segments?
Which inventory control system should the firm use? Should the firm
insource or outsource transportation and logistics?
What distribution channels does the firm use? Which channels are most
closely aligned with the companys strategy? What are the economics of
available channels? Do these fit with the intended selling price of the
product? How much control is the company willing to give up in the
delivery of its products? What is the risk that market power shifts to the
channel?
Tom Spencer 2015
91
3.5.2 Product Life Cycle Model

The Product Life Cycle Model can be used to analyse the maturity
stage of products and industries
1. Background
The idea of the Product Life Cycle was first developed in 1965 by
Theodore Levitt in an article entitled Exploit the Product Life Cycle
published in the Harvard Business Review on 1 November 1965.
2. Benefits
For a business, having a growing and sustainable revenue stream from
product sales is important for the stability and success of its operations.
The Product Life Cycle model can be used by consultants and managers
to analyse the maturity stage of products and industries. Understanding
which stage a product is in provides information about expected future
sales growth and the kinds of strategies that a firm should implement.
3. Product Life Cycle Model
The Product Life Cycle is the name given to the stages through which a
product passes over time. The classic Product Life Cycle has four stages:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Introduction;
Growth;
Maturity; and
Decline.
Tom Spencer 2015
92
Figure 10: Product Life Cycle Model
3.1 Introduction
At the market introduction stage the size of the market, sales volumes
and sales growth are small. A product will also normally be subject to
little or no competition. The primary goal in the introduction stage is to
establish a market and build consumer demand for the product.
There may be substantial costs incurred in getting a product to the
market introduction stage. Costs may derive from activities such as
thinking of the product idea, developing the technology, determining the
product features and quality, establishing sufficient manufacturing
capacity, preparing the product branding, ensuring trade mark
protection, testing the market, setting up distribution channels, and
launching and promoting the product.
The market introduction stage is likely to be a period of low or negative
profits. As such, it is important that products are carefully monitored to
ensure that sales volumes start to grow. If a product fails to become
profitable it may need to be abandoned.
Factors to consider during the introduction stage include:
Tom Spencer 2015
93
Product development: Research and development of the basic

technology and product concept, determining the product features
and quality level.
Pricing: Should penetration pricing or a skimming price strategy be
used? A skimming price strategy might be appropriate where there
are very few competitors.
Distribution: Distribution might be quite selective until consumer
acceptance of the product can be achieved.
Promotion: Marketing efforts are aimed at early adopters, and seek
to build product awareness and educate potential consumers about
the product.
3.2 Growth
If the public gains awareness of a product and consumers come to
understand the benefits of the product and accept it then a company can
expect a period of rapid sales growth. In the growth stage, a company
will try to build brand loyalty and increase market share.
Profits are driven by increased sales volume due to growth in market
share as well as an increase in the size of the overall market. Profits
might also be driven by cost reductions gained from economies of scale,
and perhaps more favourable market prices. Competition in the growth
stage remains low, although new competitors are expected to enter the
market. When competitors enter the market a company might be subject
to price competition and increase its marketing expenditure.
Factors to consider during the growth stage include:
Product improvement: Product quality might be improved,
additional features and support services added, and packaging
updated.
Pricing: If consumer demand is high the price might be maintained
at a high level.
Tom Spencer 2015
94
Distribution: Distribution channels might be added as consumer

demand increases.
Promotion: Promotion is aimed at a broader audience. A company
might spend a lot of resources on promotion during the growth
stage in order to build brand loyalty.
3.3 Maturity
When a product reaches maturity, sales growth slows and sales volume
eventually peaks and stabilises. This is the stage during which the market
as a whole makes the most profit. A companys primary objective at this
point is to defend market share while maximising profit.
In this stage, prices tend to drop due to increased competition. A
companys fixed costs are low because it is has well established
production and distribution. Since brand awareness is strong, marketing
expenditure might be reduced, although increased marketing
expenditure might be needed to retain market share and fight increasing
competition. Expenditure on research and development is likely to be
restricted to product modification and improvement, and perhaps
research into improved production efficiency and product quality.
Factors to consider in a mature product market include:
Product differentiation: Increased competition in the mature
product market means that a company must find ways to
differentiate its product from that of competitors. Strong branding
is one way to do this.
Pricing: Prices may be reduced because of increased competition.
Firms in the market should be careful not to start a price war.
Distribution: Distribution intensifies and incentives may be offered
to encourage preference to be given over competing products.
Promotion: Promotion will focus on emphasising product
differences and creating/maintaining a strong brand.
Tom Spencer 2015
95
3.4 Decline
A product enters into decline when sales and profits start to fall. The
market for that product shrinks which reduces the amount of profit
available to firms in the industry. A decline might occur because the
market has become saturated, the product has become obsolete, or
customer needs or preferences have changed.
A firm might try to stimulate growth by changing its pricing strategy, but
ultimately the product will have to be re-designed, or replaced. Highcost and low market share firms will be the first to exit the industry.
As product sales decline, a firm has three options:
1. Hold: Maintain production, add new features and find new uses
for the product. Reduce the cost of manufacturing (e.g. move
manufacturing to a low cost jurisdiction). Consider whether there
are new markets in which the product might be sold.
2. Harvest: Continue to offer the product, but reduce marketing
expenditure perhaps by targeting a smaller niche segment of the
market.
3. Divest: Discontinue production, and liquidate the remaining
inventory or sell the product to another firm.
Factors to consider during a declining market include:
Product consolidation: The number of products may be reduced,
and surviving products rejuvenated.
Price: Prices may be lowered to liquidate inventory, or maintained
for continued products.
Distribution: Distribution becomes more selective. Channels that
are no longer profitable are phased out.
Promotion: Expenditure on promotion is reduced.
Tom Spencer 2015
96
4. Criticisms
The Product Life Cycle is useful for monitoring sales results over time
and comparing them to products with a similar life cycle. However, the
Product Life Cycle model is by no means a perfect tool. Products often
do not follow a defined life cycle, not all products go through each stage,
and it is not always easy to tell which stage a product is in at any point in
time. Consequently, the life cycle concept is not well-suited for
forecasting product sales.
The length of each stage will vary depending on the product and the
marketing strategies employed. A Product Life Cycle may be as short as
a few months for a fad or as long as a century or more for a product like
petrol cars. In many markets the product life cycle is longer than the
planning cycle of the organisations involved. Major products often hold
their position for several decades or more, indeed, Coca-Cola was
introduced in 1886 and is still the leading brand of cola.
The Product Life Cycle is only one of many considerations that a
company needs to bear in mind. The product life cycle of many modern
products is shrinking, while the operating life for many of these
products is lengthening. For example, the operating life of durable goods
like household appliances has increased substantially. As a result, a
company that produces these products must take their market life and
service life into account when planning.
Some critics have argued that a Product Life Cycle can become selffulfilling. For example, if sales peak and then fall a manager may
conclude that a product is in decline and cut back on marketing, thus
precipitating a further drop in sales.
Tom Spencer 2015
97
3.6 Cost Management

1. Cost Structure
In order to understand a companys costs, it will help to break each
business unit down into the collection of activities that are performed to
produce value for customers. This is an application of Value Chain
Analysis (see 3.2.1 Value Chain Analysis). The way each activity is
performed combined with its economics will determine a firms relative
cost structure within its industry.
In examining a firms cost structure, relevant considerations include:
1. What are the businesss fixed costs? For example, Sales General &
Admin, overheads, rent and interest expenses, depreciation, capital
costs, R&D, and wages under fixed employment contracts.
2. What are the businesss variable costs? For example, raw materials,
shipping, energy, sales commissions and performance bonuses.
3. What are the main cost drivers?
4. How have costs changed over time?
5. How does the firms cost structure compare to the competition?
A company that has more fixed costs relative to variable costs is said to
have more operating leverage, and will experience a greater percentage
change in profits for a given percentage change in sales. Firms with high
operating leverage tend to be in industries that require large economies
of scale, such as the software industry. Operating leverage is a form of
risk since a company with high operating leverage will require high sales
volumes in order to ensure profitability.
2. Cost Reduction
When developing a cost reduction strategy, three questions to consider
include:
1. How long will it take to reduce major cost drivers?
2. Are the activities strategically important?
Tom Spencer 2015
98
3. To what extent do the activities contribute to operational

performance?
Figure 11: Cost reduction decision matrix
A company will want to eliminate or outsource costly activities that have

low strategic importance. If the activity has a low contribution to
operational performance it should probably be eliminated, and if it has a
high contribution to operational performance it can be outsourced.
A company will want to retain control of activities that have high
strategic importance. This can be done by continuing with business as
usual, finding ways to increase efficiency, or forming a strategic alliance
with more capable firms.
Twelve (12) common cost reduction techniques include:
Procurement
1. Consolidate procurement or renegotiate supply contracts;
HR Management
2. Reduce labour costs through decreasing salaries, training, overtime,
benefits and healthcare, introducing employee stock ownership,
and right sizing;
Tom Spencer 2015
99
Technology Development
3. Use IT and digital technology to reduce communication and
organisational costs;
4. Employ more advanced production technology;
Operations
5. Improve the utilisation rate of plant, property and equipment;
6. Outsource manufacturing to a lower cost jurisdiction (for example,
China or India);
7. Relocate the centre of operations to a lower cost city, region or
country;
Logistics
8. Partner with distribution companies (for example, FedEx);
Finance
9. Reduce working capital including inventory and accounts
receivable;
10.Refinance outstanding debt;
11.Buy futures contracts to hedge against changes in commodity
prices and foreign exchange rates;
12.Divest non-core assets.
Tom Spencer 2015
100
3.7 Financial Management

3.7.1 Five C Analysis of Borrower
Creditworthiness
When a company is trying to borrow money, executives,
entrepreneurs and consultants need to be aware of the five criteria
that lenders typically care about
It is important to understand what lenders look for when they assess a
companys creditworthiness because companies often need to borrow
money for various purposes: increasing working capital, refinancing
existing debt, paying operating expenditures, conducting research and
development, undertaking new product development, expanding into
new markets, or pursuing M&A activity.
There are five criteria that most lenders use to assess a borrowers
creditworthiness:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Capacity to generate sufficient cash flows to service the loan;

Collateral to secure the loan in case the borrower defaults;
Capital that shareholders have invested in the business;
Conditions prevailing in the borrowers industry and the broader
economy; and
5. Character and track record of the borrower and the borrowers
management.
It is important to bear in mind that lenders dont give equal weight to
each criterion and will use all five criteria to create an overall impression
of a companys creditworthiness. Lenders are typically cautious and
weakness in one of the five criteria may offset strength in all of the
others. For example, if a company is in a cyclical industry (e.g.
construction, auto, or aviation) the company may find it difficult to
borrow money during an economic downturn even if the company
shows strength in all of the other criteria. Similarly, if a companys
Tom Spencer 2015
101
management has a bad reputation and poor track record then the
company may find it difficult to borrow money even if it has a strong
financial statement.
Taken together, these five criteria indicate a borrowers ability and
willingness to repay its debts. As such, if you a company aiming to raise
finance, or are advising such a company, it is important to ensure that
the company can satisfy prospective lenders on each of the five criteria.
Below we consider each of the five criteria in more detail.
1. Capacity
Capacity to repay a loan is the most important criterion used to assess a
borrowers creditworthiness. The borrower must be able to satisfy the
lender that it has the ability to repay the loan. To satisfy itself of the
borrowers capacity, the lender will consider various factors including:
1. Profitability: What are the revenues and expenses of the
borrower?
2. Cash flows: How much cash flow does the business generate?
The lender is interested not only in cash flows from operations,
but also cash flows from investing and financing activities. What
are the timing of cash flows with regard to repayment?
3. Payment history: What is borrowers payment history and track
record of loan repayment?
4. Debt levels: How much debt does the borrower have? How much
debt can the borrower reasonably afford to repay?
5. Industry evaluation: What is the normal debt/liquidity level for
companies in the borrowers industry?
6. Financial ratios: There are a number of financial ratios, such as
debt and liquidity ratios, that lenders will typically evaluate before
lending money: for example, Debt to Equity Ratio, Debt to Asset
Ratio, Current Ratio, Quick (Acid Test) Ratio, and Operating Cash
Flow Ratio.
Tom Spencer 2015
102
2. Collateral
While cash flows are the primary source for the repayment of a loan,
collateral provides lenders with a secondary source of repayment.
Collateral represents the assets that are provided to the lender to secure
a loan. In the event that the borrower defaults, the collateral may be
seized by the lender to repay the loan.
A borrower will usually need to provide a lender with suitable collateral.
To do this, the borrower normally pledges hard assets like real estate,
office equipment or manufacturing equipment. However, accounts
receivable and inventory might also be pledged as collateral.
Service businesses and small companies may find it difficult to provide
lenders with the collateral they require because they have fewer hard
assets to pledge.
If the borrower doesnt have the necessary collateral, the lender may
require personal guarantees from the borrowers directors or from a
third party such as the borrowers parent company.
3. Capital
Capital is the money that shareholders have personally invested in the
business. Capital represents the money that shareholders have at risk if
the business fails.
Lenders are more likely to lend money to a borrower if shareholders
have invested a large amount of their own money in the business. If the
business runs into financial difficulty, then the capital of the business
provides a cushion for repayment of the loan. If shareholders have a
large amount of capital invested in the business, this indicates they have
confidence in the venture and that they will do all that they can to
ensure the borrower does not default on the loan.
Tom Spencer 2015
103
4. Conditions
Conditions refer to two factors that the lender will take into account.
Firstly, conditions refer to the overall economic climate, both within the
borrowers industry and in the economy generally that could affect the
borrowers ability to repay the loan. For example, during recessions and
periods of tight credit it becomes more difficult for small businesses to
repay loans and more difficult for lenders to find money to lend. Thus,
during these periods a small business will find it difficult to borrow
money and must present lenders with a flawless loan application.
In considering the overall economic climate a lender may consider
various questions including:
1. What is the current business climate?
2. What are the trends for the borrowers industry? How does the
borrower fit within them?
3. What is the short and long-term growth potential for the industry?
4. Where does the industry fall within its life cycle? Is it an emerging
or mature industry?
5. Are there any economic or political hot potatoes that could
negatively impact the borrowers growth?
Secondly, conditions refer to the intended purpose of the loan. The
borrowers reasons for seeking the loan should be spelt out in detail in
the loan application. Will the money be used to buy new equipment for
expansion? Will the money be used to replenish working capital to
prepare for a seasonal inventory build-up?
5. Character
Character refers to the general impression that the borrower forms
about the prospective lender. The lender will form a subjective
judgement as to whether the borrower is sufficiently trustworthy to
repay the loan.
Tom Spencer 2015
104
Lenders want to place their money with companies that have impeccable
credentials. Relevant factors that a lender may consider in deciding
whether the borrower is sufficiently trustworthy include:
1. What is the character of each member of the management team?
2. What reputation do management have in the industry and the
community?
3. What educational background and level of experience does
management have?
4. What is managements track record?
5. What is the overall consumer perception of the borrower?
6. Is the borrower progressive about its waste disposal, quality of life
for its employees, and charitable contributions?
7. Does the borrower have a track record of fulfilling its obligations
in a timely manner?
8. What is the borrowers payment history and track record of loan
repayment?
9. Are there any legal actions pending against the borrower? If so,
what is the reason for these legal actions?
3.7.2 Net Present Value

NPV is a simple tool that executives and consultants can use to
determine whether an investment should be undertaken. The NPV
of an investment is the present value of the series of expected cash
flows generated by the investment minus the cost of the initial
investment
The net present value (NPV) of an investment is the present value of the
series of expected cash flows generated by the investment minus the
cost of the initial investment, and can be written as follows:
=
1
2

+
+
+
+

(1 + )1 (1 + )2
(1 + )
(1 + )
=
(1 + )
Tom Spencer 2015
105
Where r = discount rate; CFt = expected cash flow in period t; g = long

term cash flow growth rate.
NPV is a simple tool used to assess whether an investment should be
undertaken. As a general rule, assuming you have selected an appropriate
discount rate, only investments that yield a positive NPV should be
considered for investment.
1. The Discount Rate
The rate used to discount future cash flows to their present value is an
important variable in the net present value calculation. The choice of
discount rate will depend on the situation.
1.1 Cost of capital
One option is to use a firms weighted average cost of capital.
However, there are two potential problems with using the cost of capital
for the discount rate. Firstly, it may not be possible to know what the
cost of capital will be in the future. Secondly, the cost of capital does not
take into account opportunity costs. A positive NPV calculation tells us
that the investment is profitable, but does not tell us whether the
investment should be undertaken because there may be even more
profitable investment opportunities.
1.2 Opportunity Cost
A second option is to use a discount rate that reflects the opportunity
cost of capital. The opportunity cost of capital is the rate which the
capital needed for the project could return if invested in an alternative
venture. Obviously, where there is more than one alternative investment
opportunity, the opportunity cost of capital is the expected rate of return
of the most profitable alternative.
Tom Spencer 2015
106
2. Potential Issues
2.1 Negative future cash flows
One potential problem with NPV is that if the future cash flows are
negative (for example, a mining project might have large clean-up costs
towards the end of a project) then a high discount rate is not too
cautious but too optimistic. A way to avoid this problem is to explicitly
calculate the cost of financing losses after the initial investment.
2.2 Adjusting for risk
Another common pitfall is to adjust for risk by adding a premium to the
discount rate. Whilst a bank might charge a higher rate of interest for a
risky project that does not necessarily mean that this is a valid way to
adjust a net present value calculation. One reason for this is that where a
risky investment results in losses, a higher discount rate in the NPV
calculation will reduce the impact of such losses below their true
financial cost.
2.3 Negative NPV
The general rule is that only those investments that yield a positive NPV
should be considered for investment. However, this will only be true if
we have selected an appropriate discount rate. For example, if the
appropriate discount rate is 15% but we used a higher discount rate to
calculate NPV, then obtaining a negative NPV does not mean that the
project should be rejected.
Tom Spencer 2015
107
3.8 Organisational Cohesiveness

3.8.1 McKinsey 7 S Model
The 7 S Model can help executives and consultants understand the
inner workings of an organisation, and can provide a guide for
organisational change
1. Background
Developed around 1978, the 7 S model first appeared in a book called
The Art of Japanese Management by Richard Pascale and Anthony
Athos, and also featured in In Search of Excellence by Tom Peters and
Robert Waterman.
McKinsey has adopted the 7 S model as one of its basic analysis tools.
2. Relevance
The 7 S model is a useful diagnostic tool for understanding the inner
workings of an organisation. It can be used to identify an organisations
strengths and sources of competitive advantage, and also to identify the
reasons why an organisation is not performing effectively. As such, the 7
S model can be a useful analysis tool for mangers, consultants, business
analysts and potential investors.
The 7 S model can provide a guide for organisational change. The
framework maps a group of interrelated factors, all of which influence
an organisations ability to change. The interconnectedness among each
of the seven factors suggests that significant progress in one area will be
difficult without working on the others. The implication is that, if
management wants to successfully establish change within an
organisation, they must work on all of the factors, and not just one or
two.
Tom Spencer 2015
108
3. McKinsey 7 S Model
The 7 S model describes seven factors which together determine the way
in which an organisation operates. The seven factors are interrelated
and, as such, form a system that might be thought to preserve an
organisations competitive advantage. The logic is that competitors may
be able to copy any one of the factors, but will find it very difficult to
copy the complex web of interrelationships between them.
Figure 12: McKinsey 7 S Model
The seven (7) factors considered by the 7 S Model include:

1. Shared values refer to the values that are widely practiced within
an organisation and which form its core guiding principles. Shared
values may include things like the purpose of the organisation and
its long term vision for the future. For example, the core guiding
principle at McKinsey is professionalism.
2. Strategy refers to the plans that a company has for gaining a
sustainable competitive advantage (e.g., low cost or differentiated
products; new product development and entering new markets).
Tom Spencer 2015
109
3. Skills refers to the competencies of the organisation, the skills and

experience of staff, management practices, and the ability to
innovate.
4. Structure refers to the way in which an organisations people and
business units relate to each other. This includes organizational
structure, communication channels, and chain of command.
5. Staffing refers to the recruitment, selection, training,
development, and management of talent.
6. Style refers to the work culture, the leadership style of upper
management and the way things are done in the course of day-today operations.
7. Systems refers to the organisations processes and procedures for
things like budgeting, communication, recruitment, compensation,
and performance reviews.
3.9 Competitive Response

A competitors recent or impending actions may call for a competitive
response.
When placed in this kind of situation, a company should first examine
the business situation to see what kind of response might be
appropriate.
Have customer needs and preferences changed?
What actions have the competition taken or threatened to take? Are they
offering new or different products? Have they changed their pricing
strategy? Are they using new raw materials or distribution channels?
Have they gained market share or entered new markets? Have they
changed their cost structure or increased their operating efficiency?
Potential competitive responses might include:
Product innovation: Redesign, repackage or improve existing
products;
Tom Spencer 2015
110
Product development: Introduce new products;

Pricing: Change the pricing strategy. See 3.5.1 Four Ps
Framework;
Marketing: Increase brand recognition and improve customer
loyalty;
Customer service: Improve customer service and introduce
customer loyalty programs;
New market entry: Enter new markets. This might be achieved
by launching a start-up, acquiring a competitor, or forming joint
ventures;
Control suppliers and channels: Monopolize key suppliers and
distribution channels through acquisition or by entering into long
term contracts;
Mimic: Observe the competition and mimic their behaviour;
Attack: Seek to undermine the competition by poaching key
employees, entering one of its other markets, launching a patent
lawsuit, or attacking it in the media.
Case Example
A situation might unfold in which CanadaCo, the largest discount
retailer in Canada by market share, is forced to respond to a competitive
threat from USCo, the largest discount retailer in the United States,
which has decided to expand into Canada by purchasing CanadaCos
competition. The question is, how should the CEO of CanadaCo
respond?
In the CanadaCo example, it would be important to test the hypothesis
that USCo has a cost advantage due to economies of scale in the US
market. A cost advantage would allow USCo to provide lower prices to
Canadian consumers and, as a result, USCos entry into the Canadian
market might be expected to reduce CanadaCos market share.
Tom Spencer 2015
111
Once the business situation and the relative strengths and positions of
USCo and CanadaCo are fully understood, it will then be possible to
formulate a competitive response.
CandaCo could opt to do nothing, or respond in one or more of the
following ways:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Change its pricing strategy;

Hire top executives away from USCo;
Acquire or merge with a competing company;
Rouse customer loyalty through rewards programs and customer
service;
5. Mimic USCos behaviour by entering the US market; or
6. Market CanadaCos products in order to build brand recognition.
3.10 Corporate Turnaround

When faced with the challenge of turning around and restructuring a
company, it is important to ask a variety of questions to determine the
source of the problem.
What is the state of the economy?
What have been the prevailing trends in the industry? Are competitors
facing the same problems?
Are there issues with the companys finances? Is the company publicly
traded or privately held?
Below we outline eight (8) actions that a company might pursue as part
of a turnaround:
1. Examine and understand the company, its finances and operations;
2. Talk to key stakeholder including suppliers, distributors and
customers;
3. Review the companys culture, management team and existing
talent;
Tom Spencer 2015
112
4. Review the companys products and services;

5. Secure sufficient funding to give the company the time and
resources needed to pursue a turnaround strategy;
6. Establish and prioritize short term and long term goals;
7. Prepare a business plan;
8. Prioritize small successes in order to build positive momentum.
Case Example
Take RadioShack as an example, which filed for bankruptcy protection
in February 2015. Assuming a turnaround is possible, what strategy
should be followed to save the company?
Looking at the stock price of RadioShack over the past fifty years, it is
apparent that the dotcom boom represented the height of success for
the company. RadioShack had developed a reputation as the ultimate
shopping destination for budding innovators and engineers. But
unfortunately the company failed to modernize, doing little to transform
itself into a destination for mobile buyers.
By comparison, rivals Amazon and Wal-Mart have continuously adapted
and maintain a significant competitive advantage in pricing these
products due to scale.
In a competitive landscape fraught with declining sales of consumer
electronics and falling margins, RadioShack has fallen into a precarious
situation.
As of 15 January 2015, RadioShack closed 175 underperforming brick
and mortar stores and may close further stores as part of restructuring
plans. This should present the company with the opportunity to reinvent
product offerings and create a new culture.
A strategy that RadioShack might consider is to return to its roots as a
place of innovation by offering specialty and niche products that are
unavailable through the companys major rivals. Shifting the product
Tom Spencer 2015
113
focus would need to be accompanied by a shift in employee training,

encouraging hiring practices that target inventive individuals that can
appropriately engage with the new desired consumer base.
Rather than attempt to compete with pre-existing rivals, RadioShack
should carve out a new niche in the consumer electronics market that
celebrates the pioneers and the mavericks.
Tom Spencer 2015
114
4. General Concepts and

Frameworks
This section contains concepts and frameworks designed to deepen and
broaden your understanding and ability to analyse business situations.
4.1 Barriers to Entry

Barriers to entry represent the costs that must be paid by a new market
entrant but not by firms already in the industry. Barriers to entry reduce
the threat posed by potential competitors by making a market less
contestable, and allow existing firms to maintain higher prices than
would otherwise be possible.
Below we outline eight (8) examples of barriers to entry:
1. Economies of Scale
The existence of economies of scale in an industry creates a barrier to
entry. Since existing firms are already producing they are often in a
better position to exploit economies of scale than a new entrant and, as
such, can often undercut on price. A new entrant is forced either to
accept the cost disadvantage or enter the industry on a large scale (which
increases the likely financial loss if they are later forced to exit the
industry).
2. Network Effects
If existing products or services in the industry benefit from Network
effects then it may be difficult for new firms to enter the industry.
3. Product Differentiation
If there is a high level of product differentiation in the industry then this
creates a barrier to entry since new entrants will not be able to compete
merely on price, but will need to provide a unique value proposition.
Tom Spencer 2015
115
Sources of product differentiation include:

3.1 Branding: If existing firms and products have strong brand
recognition then this will deter new entrants. If customers perceive
existing products as unique or high quality then a new entrant will need
to spend money to educate customers about the unique qualities and
benefits of its products. This will increase the cost of gaining market
share and deter entry into the market.
3.2 Customer service: If existing firms have strong customer
relationships formed through customer service and customer loyalty
programs then it may be difficult for new entrants to gain market share.
3.3 Product differences: Existing products in the industry may be
different due to differing design, quality, benefits, features, or
availability.
4. Capital Requirements
High start-up costs: High fixed start-up costs will deter new firms from
entering an industry. Examples of capital intensive industries with high
fixed costs include the automotive and telecommunications industries.
High sunk costs: If a large portion of the start-up costs cannot be
recovered (that is, they are Sunk costs) then a new entrant risks having
to absorb the loss if it decides to exit the industry. Examples of sunk
costs include:
Specialised assets: Highly specialised technology or equipment that
cannot be used for other purposes and which cannot be sold (or
can only be sold at a steep discount); and
Industry specific expenditure: Industry specific expenditure, such
as marketing or R&D, which cannot be used to benefit the firms
operations in other industries.
Tom Spencer 2015
116
5. Intangible Assets
Proprietary product technology: The existence of proprietary product
technology represents a barrier to entry. If an existing product is
protected by patent then it will not be possible for a new entrant to use
the patented technology without permission from the patent owner.
Specialised knowledge: Incumbents may possess specialised knowledge,
skills or qualifications which are difficult or costly to acquire, for
example, legal or medical certifications.
6. Access to Suppliers and Buyers
Access to raw materials: If a new entrant cannot gain access to raw
materials then this represents a barrier to entry. If existing firms have
exclusive long term contracts with suppliers, or existing firms own key
suppliers, then this will make it difficult for a new entrant to obtain the
raw materials it needs to operate effectively in the industry.
Access to distribution channels: If a new entrant cannot gain access to
distribution channels then this represents a barrier to entry. If there are a
limited number of wholesale or retail distribution channels, or existing
firms have exclusive long term contracts with distributors then this will
make it difficult for a new entrant to reach the customer. For example,
McDonalds often has stores in the best locations which makes it more
difficult for new restaurants to compete with it.
Switching costs: If customers face high switching costs, then it will be
more difficult for a new entrant to gain market share. Switching costs
will be affected by various factors including the length of customer
contracts, the existence of customer loyalty programs, and the price
performance and compatibility of complimentary products.
Tom Spencer 2015
117
7. Government Policy
7.1 Government Regulation
The government may limit or restrict entry into a market by requiring
market participants to obtain a licence or other government approval in
order to carry on business; examples include taxi licenses, safety
standard compliance certificates, mining permits, and investment
approvals.
In extreme cases, the government may make competition illegal by
establishing a statutory monopoly. For example, AT&T had a statutory
monopoly in the telecommunications industry in the United States until
the early 1980s.
7.2 Tariffs and Subsidies
Government regulations that subsidise or tax the activity of all industry
participants do not represent a barrier to entry. For example, tariffs,
quotas or subsidies that apply equally to incumbents and new entrants
are not barriers to entry.
That being said, tariffs and quotas may pose barriers to entry where they
protect the market share of existing firms or prevent new firms from
gaining access to the market. Similarly, subsidies may pose a barrier to
entry where they operate solely or predominantly for the benefit of
incumbents.
8. Competitive Response
A potential entrants expectations about how existing firms will respond
to market entry by a new player will affect their entry decision. If a
potential entrant reasonably expects, or irrationally fears, that existing
firms will compete aggressively then this may deter entry.
Expectations of a strong competitive response from incumbents will be
higher where:
Tom Spencer 2015
118
1. Industry growth is slow, which means the industry will not be able
to absorb new entrants without the profitability of incumbents
being hurt;
2. Incumbents have a lot of fighting potential including large cash
balance, strong cash flow, unused credit facilities, or clout with
government, distribution channels and customers; and
3. Incumbents are likely to cut prices due to industry wide excess
capacity or a desire to retain market share.
4.2 Cost Benefit Analysis

The cost benefit analysis is a basic analysis framework that involves
weighing up the costs and benefits of one course of action against one
or more other courses of action.
1. Relevance
The cost benefit analysis is one of the most straightforward ways to
compare one course of action against another. Business leaders need to
constantly evaluate options, and consultants are paid to provide
recommendations to help executives make these decisions.
2. Cost Benefit Analysis Explained
The cost-benefit analysis is one of the most basic analysis frameworks
that can be used to examine a business problem, and involves weighing
up the expected costs and benefits of one course of action against
another.
Understanding the relative benefits and costs of the available options
can make it easier to select a course of action and identify whether
further information is required.
Tom Spencer 2015
119
3. Case Example
Consider the following situation. Your client is a mining company and
presents the following problem, We currently own and operate a gold
mine, Mine A, and we are trying to decide whether to expand Mine A or
build a second mine, Mine B. Which project should we undertake?
In this problem there are three possible options:
1. Expand Mine A;
2. Build Mine B; or
3. Do nothing.
To make a recommendation, it is necessary to consider the benefits and
costs of each potential course of action.
In this example, the benefits are the expected revenues from pursuing
each option (revenue=quantity x price), and might be estimated using a
discounted cash flow model.
Costs derive from various sources, and there are four types of cost that
should be considered:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Sunk costs;
Fixed costs;
Variable costs; and
Opportunity costs.
1. Sunk Costs
Sunk cost are expenditures that have already been made and which
cannot be recovered. As a result, they should not be factored into the
decision-making process.
For example, in our mining example the original cost of building Mine A
is a sunk cost. The money was spent in the past, it cannot be recovered,
and so it should not affect the current decision.
Tom Spencer 2015
120
2. Fixed Costs
Fixed costs are costs that do not vary with the quantity of output
produced.
In our mining example, fixed costs might include things like rent, wages,
land taxes, utilities and overheads.
It is important to remember that fixed costs are fixed only in the short
term. For example, wages may be a fixed cost in the short term if the
company cannot vary the number of employees due to contractual
obligations. In the long run, however, these contracts could be
renegotiated. In the long run, nearly all costs are variable, even things
like rent, because a company can always move its operations to new
premises or to a lower cost jurisdiction.
3. Variable Costs
Variable costs are costs that vary with the quantity of output produced.
In our mining example, the main variable costs would be the cost of
extracting ore from the ground, and the cost of transportation.
When making decisions in the short run, variable costs are the only costs
that should be considered because a company will not be able to change
its fixed costs.
4. Opportunity costs
The opportunity cost of pursuing a course of action is what must be
given up in order to pursue it.
In our mining example, failing to consider opportunity costs could lead
to the wrong decision being made.
For example, if expanding Mine A is expected to produce a $1 million
profit and building Mine B is expected to produce a $2 million profit,
which project should the company pursue?
Tom Spencer 2015
121
Building Mine B appears favourable, but the company also needs to

consider the opportunity cost. If business as usual is expected to
produce an even greater profit, then the opportunity cost of pursuing
either project exceeds the expected payoffs, and so the company should
not take action.
4.3 Economies of Scale

Economies of scale exist where the average cost of producing one unit
of output decreases as the quantity of output increases.
1. Relevance
There are many instances when, for a firm to make a sensible decision or
for a government to engage in sound policy making, an understanding of
economies of scale is helpful.
1.1 Barriers to entry
The existence of economies of scale in an industry creates a barrier to
entry (for more information, see 4.1 Barriers to Entry). This is
relevant for firms that benefit from economies of scale and want to
deter new entrants from entering their industry. This might be done by
investing in excess capacity, which can be used to compete aggressively
in response new entrants.
1.2 Natural monopoly
An industry is a natural monopoly if one firm can produce the desired
output at a lower social cost than two or more firms. That is, a natural
monopoly exhibits economies of scale in social costs. Examples of
industries that are natural monopolies include railways, water, electricity,
telecommunications, and postal services.
Since it is always more efficient for one firm to expand than for a new
firm to be established, the dominant firm in a natural monopoly often
Tom Spencer 2015
122
has significant market power. As a result, it will make sense for these
firms to be highly regulated or publicly-owned.
1.3 Free trade
Economies of scale provide a justification for free trade policies since a
firm may require more customers than are present in the domestic
market in order to fully benefit from economies of scale. For example,
it is unlikely that Airbus, based in Toulouse, would be able to operate
profitably if it could only sell aeroplanes within France.
2. Importance
In the early 20th century, by using assembly lines to mass produce the
Model T Ford, Henry Ford became one of the richest and best-known
men in the entire world.
Economies of scale provide a company with two key benefits:
1. Increased market share: Lower per unit costs can allow a
company to reduce prices and increase market share. Economies
of scale allow larger companies to be more competitive and to
undercut smaller firms.
2. Higher profit margins: If a company is able to maintain prices,
then lowering the average cost per unit will result in higher profit
margins.
3. Economies of Scale Explained
Economies of scale may result from the increased output of an
individual firm (internal economies of scale) or from the growth of the
industry as a whole (external economies of scale).
Tom Spencer 2015
123
Figure 13: Economies of scale exist where the average cost of

producing one unit of output decreases as the quantity of output increases
3.1 Internal economies of scale

Internal economies of scale are the cost savings that accrue to a firm as
its output increases. A firm will benefit from internal economies of scale
where it has high fixed costs and low variable costs since it will be able
to spread fixed costs over more units of output as production increases.
Below we list seven (7) potential sources for internal economies of scale:
1. Lower input costs: A larger firm may have more bargaining power
with suppliers that it can use to negotiate lower prices for raw
materials by bulk buying or entering long term contracts.
2. Efficient technology: As output increases it may become
economical for a firm to invest in more advanced production
technology leading to lower average costs.
3. Research and development: Research and development is a large
fixed cost for many firms. As a company increases output, R&D
can be spread over more units of output.
4. Access to finance: A large company will typically find it easier to
borrow money, to access a broader range of financial instruments,
and may be able to borrow at lower interest rates.
Tom Spencer 2015
124
5. Marketing: Many marketing costs are fixed costs, and so as output

increases a firm can spread this cost over a larger number of units
thereby reducing the average marketing cost per unit.
6. Specialisation of labour: In a larger company, employees are able
to become more specialised in the tasks that they perform. For
example, different managers might specialise in operations,
marketing, human resources and finance. Specialist managers are
likely to be more effective and efficient since they are likely to have
a higher level of experience as well as role specific training and
qualifications.
7. Learning by doing: Workers will improve their productivity by
regularly repeating the same tasks (see 4.5 Experience Curve).
3.2 External economies of scale
External economies of scale arise when firms benefit from the way in
which the industry is organised.
Below we list three (3) potential sources of external economies of scale:
1. Improved transport and communication links: As an industry
becomes established in a particular location, the government is
likely to provide better transport and communication links to the
region. This benefits firms as they will be able to reduce related
expenses. Improved transport will also allow firms to attract more
customers, and recruit from a broader pool of employees.
2. Industry specific training and education: As an industry becomes
more dominant, universities will offer more courses tailored for a
career in that industry. For example, the rise of the IT industry led
to a proliferation of IT courses. Firms benefit from being able to
recruit from a larger pool of appropriately skilled employees.
3. Growth of support industries: If a network of suppliers and other
support industries grows alongside the main industry then firms
will be able to purchase higher quality inputs at lower cost.
Tom Spencer 2015
125
4. Diseconomies of scale
Diseconomies of scale exist where the average cost of production
increases as output increases. As a firm grows it is likely to become more
complex to manage and run. Diseconomies may result from increasing
bureaucracy, problems with motivating a larger work force, greater
barriers to innovation and entrepreneurial activity, and increased agency
costs (see Principle-agent problem).
4.4 Economies of Scope

Economies of scope exist where a firm can
produce two products at a lower per unit cost
than would be possible if it produced only the
one.
Economies of scope is an idea that was first
explored by John Panzar and Robert Willig in an
article published in 1977 in the Quarterly Journal
of Economics entitled Economies of Scale in
Multi-Output Production.
1. Relevance
The title of Panzar and Willigs landmark article may not sound very
interesting, but it does make one thing clear; economies of scope and 4.3
Economies of Scale are closely related concepts.
4.3 Economies of Scale is a fairly well known concept relevant to big
producers like Intel, Microsoft, Boeing and Toyota.
In contrast, economies of scope is a lesser known concept particularly
relevant to small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) that may not
have access to large markets or the ability to produce at scale.
SMEs are important because they represent the overwhelming majority
of global business activity, and are the worlds main source of job
Tom Spencer 2015
126
creation and economic growth. For example, SMEs account for around
99% of businesses in Europe (Economist Intelligence Unit 2011).
2. Importance
Economies of scope provide firms with two key benefits:
1. Lower average costs: If a company diversifies its product
offering it may be able to lower the average cost of production.
For example, McDonalds offers a range of different products
(burgers, fries, sundaes, salads, etc.). As a result, it can achieve
lower per unit costs by spreading overheads across a broader range
of products. Lower per unit costs allow a company to enjoy higher
profit margin on each unit sold, or lower the price it charges
customers in order to increase market share.
2. Diversified revenue streams: By producing multiple products, a
firm can diversify its sources of revenue, which reduces the risk
associated with product failure.
3. Economies of Scope Explained
Economies of scope exist where a firm can produce two products at a
lower average per unit cost than would be possible if it produced only
one of those products. Economies of scope have been found to exist in
a range of industries including banking, publishing, distribution, and
telecommunications.
Economies of scope and 4.3 Economies of Scale are related concepts.
The distinction is that 4.3 Economies of Scale refers to the situation
where the average per unit cost of production decreases as output
increases, whereas economies of scope refers to the situation where the
average per unit cost of production decreases as the number of different
products increases.
Tom Spencer 2015
127
Figure 14: Economies of scope exist where the average cost of producing
one unit of output decreases as the number of different products increases.
3.1 Sources of Economies of Scope

Below we outline seven (7) potential sources of economies of scope:
1. Common inputs: Using more of the same inputs will increase a
firms bargaining power with suppliers. For example, Kleenex
manufactures a range of products which use the same raw
materials: tissues, napkins, paper towels, facial tissues, incontinence
products and Huggies nappies.
2. Joint production facilities: Plant and equipment can be more fully
utilised. For example, a dairy manufacturer may be able to use its
existing dairy production facilities to produce a range of different
dairy based products: milk, butter, cheese and yoghurt.
3. Shared overhead costs: Overheads can be shared across multiple
products. For example, McDonalds can produce hamburgers,
French fries and salads at a lower average per unit cost than would
be possible if it produced only one of these goods. Each product
shares overhead costs such as food storage, preparation facilities,
restaurant space, toilets, car parks and play equipment.
4. Marketing: Marketing and advertising costs can be shared across
products. For example, Proctor & Gamble produces hundreds of
Tom Spencer 2015
128
products from Gillette razors to Old Spice aftershave, and can

therefore afford to hire expensive designers and marketing experts
and spread the cost across a broad range of products.
5. Sales: Selling products is easier when it is possible to provide
customers with a range of options Would you like fries with
that?
6. Distribution: Shipping a range of products is more efficient than
shipping a single product. For example, Amazon sells an extremely
broad range of products, which enables it to negotiate favourable
deals with freight companies.
7. Diversified revenue streams: A firm that sells multiple products
will have lower revenue risk because it is less dependent on any
one product to sustain sales. More stable cash flows are attractive
for three reasons:
a. They can be used to negotiate more favourable credit terms
with banks.
b. A strong cash position can also be used to extend credit to
customers and thereby increase sales.
c. More stable cash flows can allow a firm to be more innovative
with new product launches because the failure of any one
product will have less impact on total revenues.
4. Diseconomies of scope
A firm that offers too many products may begin to incur an increase in
average per unit costs with each additional product offered. Reasons for
diseconomies of scope may include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Diluted competitive focus;

Lack of management expertise;
Higher raw material costs due to bottlenecks or shortages; and
Increased overhead costs.
Tom Spencer 2015
129
4.5 Experience Curve

The Experience Curve captures the predictable and persistent
relationship between increasing production experience and
declining costs
1. Background
The Learning Curve, the concept which predates the Experience Curve,
was first described by German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus in
1885 as part of his studies into human memory.
In 1936, T.P. Wright described the effect of learning on production
costs in the aircraft industry showing that required labour time dropped
by 10 to 15 percent with every doubling of production experience.
In 1966, Bruce Henderson and the Boston Consulting Group conducted
research for a major semiconductor manufacturer, in which they
introduced the concept of the Experience Curve and revealed that unit
production costs fell by 20 to 30 percent every time production
experience doubled.
How did BCGs Experience Curve differ from the earlier concept of
the Learning Curve?
Well, in essence the two concepts capture the same big idea:
performance improves with experience in a predictable and persistent
manner.
In his 1968 article, Bruce Henderson attempted to distinguish the two
concepts by explaining that the Learning Curve relates only to labour
and production inputs, whereas the Experience Curve focuses on total
costs. In other words, the Experience Curve is intended to be a more
comprehensive measure of how costs decline with production
experience.
Tom Spencer 2015
130
2. The Experience Curve

The Experience Curve captures the relationship between a firms unit
production costs and production experience. Research has shown that a
firms costs typically fall by a predictable amount for every doubling of
production experience.
Source: Wikipedia
Unit production costs tend to decline at a consistent rate as a firm gains

production experience, however the rate typically varies from firm to
firm and from one industry to another.
The interesting thing about the Experience Curve is not that a firms
performance improves with experience, we would expect as much, but
instead that performance tends to improve with experience at a
predictable rate.
This is surprising. What might explain the Experience Curve effect?
3. The Experience Curve Effect
In his 1968 article, Bruce Henderson noted that:
reductions in costs as volume increases are not necessarily
automatic. They depend crucially on a competent management
that seeks ways to force costs down as volume expands.
Production costs are most likely to decline under this internal
pressure. Yet in the long-run the average combined cost of all
Tom Spencer 2015
131
elements should decline under the pressure for the company to

remain as profitable as possible. To this extent the [Experience
Curve] relationship is [one] of normal potential rather than one of
certainty
While falling costs may not occur with certainty, the Experience Curve
effect has proved to be pervasive and has been shown to exist for
different firms and across a broad range of different industry sectors. It
must be the case then that declining costs are the result of certain innate
human and organisational factors rather than from a specific cause, such
as the brilliance of a rock star management team or the well power
pointed recommendations of a top consulting firm.
If top executives and consultants are not the key source of persistent
organisational learning, then what is?
There does not appear to be a definitive answer to this question,
however seven (7) factors that are likely to contribute to the Experience
Curve effect include:
1. Optimised Procurement: As a firm gains production experience
it will learn more about its suppliers, which will allow it to optimise
its procurement practices. Increased production may also give a
firm more bargaining power with suppliers;
2. Labour efficiency: As employees gain production experience they
will develop skills, learn shortcuts, and find ways to produce more
with less;
3. Standardisation: Over time processes and product parts are likely
to become standardised allowing for more streamlined production;
4. Specialisation: As production volume increases a firm is likely to
hire more employees, allowing each of them to specialise in a
narrower range of tasks and thereby perform more efficiently;
5. Product Refinement: A firm may engage in significant R&D and
marketing prior to and during the initial product launch. As it
learns more about the product and its customers it will be able to
Tom Spencer 2015
132
refine the product, which may allow the firm to reduce ongoing
R&D and marketing costs;
6. Automation: Increased production volume may make it feasible
for a firm to adopt more automated and advanced production
technology and IT systems; and
7. Capacity Utilisation: If a firm has incurred large set up costs,
then increasing production will allow it to spread these fixed costs
across a larger number of units.
4. Implications for Strategy
The Experience Curve effect shows that a firms production costs
decline in a predictable way as it gains production experience.
What are the implications of the Experience Curve effect for corporate
strategy?
In 1968, in light of BCGs research, Bruce Henderson took the view that
a firm should price its products as low as would be necessary to
dominate their market segment, or else it should probably stop selling
them. The same year BCG also developed the growth share matrix, a
framework which recommends allocating resources within a firm
towards products that are, or are likely to become, market leaders.
The clear and resounding message from Henderson and BCG was
dominate the market or dont bother.
The thinking behind this simple and rather clear-cut view was that a
company with market share leadership would be able to gain production
experience more quickly than its rivals and so would be able to achieve a
self-sustaining cost advantage.
As it turns out though, pursuing market share leadership will not always
be the best approach as there are four (4) countervailing factors that may
neutralise the benefits of market share leadership.
Tom Spencer 2015
133
Firstly, market share may not confer a cost advantage since firms can
learn not just from production experience but also from books, courses,
formal training, conferences, reverse engineering, talking to suppliers,
hiring consultants, and by poaching staff from the competition.
Secondly, if multiple firms pursue market share leadership at the same
time then this may create intense competitive rivalry leading to a decline
in industry profitability.
Thirdly, new entrants can often avoid going head to head with the
market share leader by creating more advanced products or by using
more efficient production technology. This can allow new players to leap
frog the competition and force existing firms to play catch up by
investing heavily in R&D, forming strategic alliances or acquiring the
new players before they are able to dominate the market.
Fourthly, even if market share leadership does confer a cost advantage
there are other ways to compete effectively. Firms can also gain a
competitive advantage by creating differentiated products or by targeting
a niche market segment (see 3.3.1 Porters Generic Strategies).
So, where does this leave us?
Well, a firm that aims to be the cost leader within its industry will
probably want to pursue market share leadership since the Experience
Curve effect and 4.3 Economies of Scale are two significant factors that
will allow it to reduce costs.
However, a firm that aims to compete by providing differentiated
products or by targeting a market niche may find the pursuit of market
share leadership to be incompatible with its chosen strategy. A firm that
provides unique or targeted products will generally be able to charge
higher prices and this will naturally limit potential sales volume. If it
makes its products more generic or more widely available in an attempt
to gain market share, then this may reduce the uniqueness of its
products and require the firm to lower prices. A firm that tries to make
Tom Spencer 2015
134
its products both differentiated and ubiquitous runs the risk of failing to
achieve either strategy.
In short, market share leadership is likely to be appropriate for firms that
are competing on the basis of cost leadership. It is unlikely to be the
correct strategy in every situation.
4.6 MECE Framework

MECE (pronounced me see) stands for
mutually exclusive and collectively
exhaustive and is one of the hallmarks of
problem solving at McKinsey (The
McKinsey Way by Ethan M. Rasiel).
1. Benefit of the MECE Framework
The MECE framework can aid clear thinking about a business problem
by:
1. Helping to avoid double counting categories of information are
grouped so that there are no overlaps; and
2. Helping to avoid overlooking information all categories of
information taken together should cover all possible options.
2. MECE
MECE is a framework used to organise information which is:
1. Mutually exclusive: Information is grouped into categories that
are separate and distinct; and
2. Collectively exhaustive: All categories taken together should deal
with all possible options without leaving any gaps.
3. MECE Tree Diagram
The MECE tree diagram is a way of graphically organising information
into categories which are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive.
Tom Spencer 2015
135
The diagram as a whole represents the problem at hand; each branch

stemming from the starting node of the tree represents a major issue
that needs to be considered; each branch stemming from one of these
major issues represents a sub-issue that needs to be considered; and so
on.
A major issues list should not contain more than five issues, with three
being the ideal number (see Rule of Three). If you are not able to
categorise a problem in five major issues then consider creating a
category of other issues.
The MECE framework can be applied to a wide variety of business
problems, for example, Coca-Cola might ask the question what is the
source of declining global profitability? To answer this question, CocaCola might use a MECE tree diagram to help it identify the source of
the issue.
Figure 15: MECE Tree Diagram
4. Resources
For more information on the MECE framework, please see Barbara
Mintos book Pyramid Principle.
Tom Spencer 2015
136
4.7 Moral Hazard

Moral hazard is when they take your money and then are
not responsible for what they do with it.
~ Gordon Gekko
Moral Hazard refers to any situation where a person
is not fully responsible for the consequences of
their actions. As a result, they may take greater risks
than they would have otherwise.
1. Relevance
The 2008 financial crisis caused the largest recession since the great
depression. According to the US Department of the Treasury as many
as 8.8 million jobs were lost and $19.2 trillion in household wealth was
wiped out (US Treasury Report).
At the heart of the great recession was a concept known as moral
hazard.
2. What is Moral Hazard?
Moral Hazard is a concept that is often misunderstood by politicians,
journalists and economists. And so we turn to Hollywood for clarity.
Gordon Gekko in the movie Wall Street captured the nature of Moral
Hazard very concisely when he explained that moral hazard is when
they take your money and then are not responsible for what they do
with it.
Gekko may well have borrowed his definition from Paul Krugman,
Professor of Economics at Princeton University, who described Moral
Hazard as any situation in which one person makes the decision
about how much risk to take, while someone else bears the cost if things
go badly.
Tom Spencer 2015
137
It is worth noting that Moral Hazard is an economic concept and does

not necessarily imply immorality or unscrupulous dealing.
Below we outline six (6) examples of where Moral Hazard shows up in
practice.
1. Insurance: The provision of insurance is the most common
example of where Moral Hazard tends to arise.
For example, if you have comprehensive private health insurance
you are more likely to visit the doctor. You may also engage in
more risk taking behaviour, like bungy jumping or sky diving,
because you are not responsible for paying the medical bill if
things go wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell provides an amusing example of Universal
Pepsi Insurance:
Moral hazard is the term economists use to describe the
fact that insurance can change the behaviour of the person
being insured. If your office gives you and your co-workers
all the free Pepsi you wantif your employer, in effect,
offers universal Pepsi insuranceyoull drink more Pepsi
than you would have otherwise.
2. Mortgage Securitisation: Mortgage securitisation is another
example of where Moral Hazard shows up.
The US government, motivated by a desire to expand home
ownership, for many years actively encouraged bankers to make
loans to people with poor credit ratings. Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac, two large government sponsored enterprises, carried out this
policy through a process known as mortgage securitisation.
Moral Hazard occurred because the banks and mortgage brokers
who originated the loans were able to on-sell the loans to Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac, and so were not on the hook if lenders
Tom Spencer 2015
138
ultimately defaulted. As a result, they had an incentive to make as

many loans as possible, even to people with extremely poor credit
ratings.
3. The Greenspan Put: The Greenspan Put is another example of
where Moral Hazard comes into play.
Since the late 1980s the Federal Reserve followed a policy of
significantly lowering interest rates in the wake each financial crisis
(often referred to as the Greenspan Put). Lowering interest rates
has the effect of increasing the amount of money available in the
economy which prevents the economy from deteriorating further
and stops asset prices from falling. As a result, investors were
encouraged to take excessive risks because they knew that the Fed
would lower interest rates if a financial crisis ensued.
4. Bank Bailouts: The provision of bank bailouts by government is
another example of where Moral Hazard occurs.
In 2008, in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, the US
government created a US$700 billion Troubled Asset Relief
Program (known as TARP) to buy financial assets from banks and
other financial institutions. The bailout was intended to stabilise
financial markets, make sure that credit markets remained liquid
and prevent a repeat of the great depression. A worthy goal,
however a big problem with TARP was that it created a large
Moral Hazard. If banks come to know that government will bail
them out during periods of financial instability, then they have an
incentive to take excessive risks in the future.
5. Private Equity: Private equity vehicles are another example of
where Moral Hazard can show up.
Assume, for example, that investors give a private equity firm $100
million to invest. If the fund makes a profit of $20 million then the
fund managers might take fees of 20%, or $4 million. On the other
Tom Spencer 2015
139
hand, if the fund loses $20 million then the investors lose money
but the fund managers are not required to cover the cost. Since the
managers do not have to pay for the cost of their investment
decisions if things go badly they have a strong incentive to take
excessive risks.
6. The Limited Liability Company: The limited liability company
presents an often overlooked example of where Moral Hazard
takes place.
Companies often link executive remuneration with the companys
performance on the stock market. The reason for doing this is to
align the interests of executives with the interests of shareholders,
in an attempt to reduce the Principle-agent problem.
If the company performs well and its stock price rises then
shareholders are happy and executives are paid a bonus (which
might be in the form of cash or shares). However, if the company
performs poorly then shareholders lose, while executives still
receive their base salary and are not required to compensate
shareholders. Since executives are not responsible for paying the
full cost if things go badly, they have an incentive to take excessive
risks in order to boost the companys short term stock price in
order to secure their bonuses.
4.8 Porters Five Forces

The Porters Five Forces framework is used to determine the
competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry
1. Background
Harvard Business School Professor Michael Porter, in his 1979 book
Competitive Strategy, developed the Porters Five Forces.
Tom Spencer 2015
140
The Porters Five Forces framework is used to determine the

competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry (attractiveness in
this context refers to the overall industry profitability).
The framework can be used in the context of deciding whether to enter
a new market.
In determining the competitive intensity of an industry, Porters Five
Forces include three forces from Horizontal competition (1, 2 and 3),
and two forces from Vertical competition (4 and 5):
1. Existing competition: How strong is the rivalry among existing
firms?
2. Barriers to entry: What is the threat posed by new entrants?
3. Substitutes: What is the threat posed by substitutes?
4. Supplier bargaining power: How much bargaining power do
suppliers have?
5. Customer bargaining power: How much bargaining power do
customers have?
Figure 16: Porters Five Forces
1. Existing Competition
Factors contributing to increased competitive rivalry among exiting
competitors include:
Increased number of firms,
Tom Spencer 2015
141
Slower market growth rate,

Low product differentiation,
Low switching costs,
Industry wide excess capacity,
High fixed costs / economies of scale,
High exit barriers.
For more information on the factors that will influence the strength of
competition within an industry, see 3.2.3 Competitive Intensity.
2. Barriers to entry
The threat posed by new players entering the market will depend on the
level of barriers to entry. High barriers to entry will reduce the rate of
entry by new firms, and allow firms already in the industry to charge
higher prices than would otherwise by possible.
Barriers to entry might include capital requirements, economies of scale,
network effects, product differentiation, proprietary product technology,
government policy, access to suppliers, access to distribution channels,
and switching costs.
For more information on barriers to entry, see 4.1 Barriers to Entry.
3. Substitutes
Substitutes represent a form of indirect competition because consumers
can use substitute products in place of one another (at least in some
circumstances). For example, natural gas is a substitute for petroleum.
The threat posed by substitutes will depend on various factors,
including:
1. Switching costs: The cost to customers of switching to a substitute
product or service;
2. Buyer propensity to substitute;
3. Relative price-performance of substitutes; and
Tom Spencer 2015
142
4. Perceived level of product differentiation.

4. Supplier Bargaining Power
Suppliers provide inputs to firms in an industry, for example, labour and
raw materials. The ability of suppliers to extract a share of industry
profits depends on the level of supplier bargaining power.
For more information on the factors that will affect supplier bargaining
power, see 3.2.2 Vertical Competition within the Supply Chain.
5. Customer Bargaining Power
Customers are the purchasers of goods or services produced by firms in
the industry. The ability of customers to extract a share of industry
profits depends on the level of customer bargaining power.
For more information on the factors that will affect customer
bargaining, see 3.2.2 Vertical Competition within the Supply Chain.
4.9 Quantitative Easing

Quantitative easing is a monetary policy tool sometimes employed by
central banks to stimulate the economy when conventional monetary
policy becomes ineffective.
Normally, the central bank carries out expansionary monetary policy by
lowering short-term interest rates through the purchase of short-term
government securities. However, when the short-term interest rate gets
close to zero it becomes impossible to lower the short-term interest rate
further and so this policy tool can no longer be used to stimulate the
economy (this is known as the liquidity trap).
When faced with the liquidity trap, the central bank can shift the focus
of monetary policy away from interest rates and towards increasing the
money supply (that is, quantitative easing). To increase the money
supply, the central bank creates new money electronically and uses it to
buy financial assets from financial institutions. This leads to an increase
Tom Spencer 2015
143
in the excess reserves held by these financial institutions, and the central
bank hopes that banks will use these funds to increase lending and
stimulate the economy.
If the central bank increases the money supply too quickly, then this is
likely to lead to price inflation since there will be more money chasing
the same number of goods and services.
4.10 Rule of 70
The Rule of 70 is a simple rule of thumb that can be used to figure
out roughly how long it will take for an investment to double,
given an expected growth rate
The Rule of 70 is a simple rule of thumb that can be used to figure out
roughly how long it will take for an amount to double, given an expected
growth rate.
The rule can be described by the following equation:
( ) =
70

If the worlds GDP is growing at 4% per year then global GDP will
double in about 17 years.
=
70
= 17.5 17
4
If your companys revenue is growing at 10% per month then revenues

will double in about 7 months.
=
70
=7
10
Tom Spencer 2015
144
4.11 SWOT Analysis

SWOT Analysis is a strategic planning tool used to evaluate the
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats involved in a
business venture
1. Background
Albert Humphrey is credited with inventing the SWOT analysis
technique.
2. SWOT Analysis
SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool used to evaluate the
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a
business venture. It involves specifying the objective of the business
venture and identifying the internal and external environmental factors
that are expected to help or hinder the achievement of that objective.
After a business clearly identifies the objective, SWOT analysis involves:
1. Examining the strengths and weaknesses of the business (internal
factors); and
2. Considering the opportunities presented and threats posed by
business conditions, for example, the strength of the competition
(external factors).
By identifying its strengths, a company will be better able to think of
appropriate strategies to take advantage of new opportunities. By
identifying weaknesses and threats, a company will be better able to
identify changes that need to be made to improve performance and
protect the value of its current operations.
3. Criticisms
SWOT analysis has two clear weaknesses. Firstly, using SWOT analysis
may persuade companies to write lists of Pros and Cons, rather than
think about what needs to be done to achieve objectives. Secondly, there
Tom Spencer 2015
145
is a risk that the resulting lists will be used uncritically and without clear
prioritisation. For example, weak opportunities might be used to balance
strong threats.
4. Case example
To help understand SWOT analysis, consider the strategy of a
hypothetical soft drinks manufacturer called Coca-Cola. Coke is
currently the market leader in the manufacture and sale of sugary
carbonated drinks and has a strong brand image. Sugary carbonated
drinks are currently an extremely profitable line of business. The
companys goal is to develop strategies to achieve sustained profit
growth in future.
1. Strengths
Cokes strengths are its resources and capabilities that provide it with a
competitive advantage in the market place, and help it to achieve its
strategic objective. Cokes strengths might include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Strong product brand names,

Large number of successful drink brands,
Good reputation among customers,
Low cost manufacturing, and
A large and efficient distribution network.
2. Weaknesses
Weaknesses include the attributes of Cokes business that may prevent it
from achieving its strategic objective. Cokes weaknesses might include:
1. Limited range of healthy beverage options, and
2. Large manufacturing capacity makes it difficult to change
production lines in order to respond to changes in the market.
Tom Spencer 2015
146
3. Opportunities
Changing business conditions may reveal new opportunities for profit
and growth. Cokes opportunities might include:
1. New markets into which Coke could expand, and
2. The absence of a dominant global manufacturer of healthy
beverages may leave a gap in the market.
4. Threats
Changing business conditions may present certain threats. Cokes threats
might include:
1. Shifting consumer preferences away from Cokes core products,
and
2. New government regulations that prevent the acquisition of large
competing soft drink companies.
5. Proposed strategy
Based on the foregoing analysis, the main opportunity for Coca-Cola
might be the rising popularity of healthy beverages, such as water and
fruit juice. The main threat may be the dominance of Coca-Cola and the
increasing number of anti-trust regulations that prevent Coke from
acquiring competing manufacturers. A possible strategy could therefore
be to find small manufacturers of healthy beverages with quality
products. Purchasing these small companies will not raise competition
concerns. Coke might use its strong brand name, manufacturing capacity
and distribution networks to obtain strong market penetration for the
newly acquired beverages.
Tom Spencer 2015
147

The Little Blue Consulting Handbook, 2015 Edition

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

The Little Blue Consulting Handbook, 2015 Edition

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

The Little Blue

3.7 Financial Management ....................................................................... 101

Right size: Downsize.

1.2 Business Terms

maximum price from which the buyer can negotiate downwards.

Break-even analysis is a form of supply side analysis that considers costs

CFA: Stands for Chartered Financial Analyst. For more information,

Comparative advantage: Comparative advantage is an economic

Customer Lifetime Value: Customer lifetime value is a prediction of

Debt to Equity Ratio: A measure of a companys financial leverage

Discouraged worker: A person who does not have a job and is

Believes (reasonably or not) that there are no jobs available in their

Economic indicator: An economic statistic (e.g. the unemployment

Horizontal diversification: A form of diversification where a firm adds

Monopoly: A situation where a market has only one supplier for a

Where r = discount rate; CFt = expected cash flow in year t; g = long

Opportunity cost: What you give up in order to obtain something; the

Where r = discount rate; CFannual = annual cash flow.

If the price elasticity of demand is less than one in absolute value

Contribution Margin: A cost accounting concept that allows a company

Public good: A public good is a good that a person can consume

inventory and so inventory storage costs are minimized. A disadvantage

Real value: A value adjusted for inflation or deflation. For example, if a

count in the sales persons mind as much as a few months or years of

For more information, see 4.10 Rule of 70.

Underemployment: A situation where a persons capacity to work is

1. Real wealth is discretionary time; money is merely the fuel

Figure 1: Situation Analysis

There is a long list of alternative frameworks that could be used to scan

7. Tax issues including corporate, employee, and value added taxes;

2.2 Micro Environment

affect a firms profitability: the customer, the competition and the

publishing industry, and the U.S. Department of Defence in the market

3.2 Examining the Competition

3.2.1 Horizontal Competition

For example, the FOX Broadcasting Company might segment the

3.2.2 Vertical Competition within the Supply Chain

4. The cost to the customer of switching firms;

7. Instability: Diversity of competition (for example, firms from

In assessing the business landscape, it is not enough simply to

How does the companys product offering compare with the

general way of doing business. The organisational aspects of a firm can

3. Firm Level Analysis

SG&A, Rent, R&D,

Distribution Channels: What channels are used to reach

Value chain analysis: Consider value chain activities such as access

Figure 2: Product/market expansion matrix

For more information on growth strategy, see 3.4.1 Product / Market

4. Profitability Framework Cheatsheet

3.2 Competitive Advantage

3. Identify synergies between activities.

Figure 3: The Generic Value Chain

The firms margin or profit depends on its ability to perform these

2. Operations: Manufacturing; the way in which inputs are converted

3. Develop strategies around the activities that provide a sustainable

Product differentiation can be achieved through any part of the value

3.3 Competitive Strategy

Figure 4: Porters Five Competitive Forces that Determine Industry

It is the collective strength of these five forces that determine whether

In addition to industry attractiveness, the second thing which determines

Figure 5: Three Generic Strategies

Stuck in the Middle

3.3.2 Strategy and the Internet

companys product design, for example, will affect the manufacturing