Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Search HOME TRIBUNE BUSINESS SECTION SIGN UP FOR BIZWRAP GET BUSINESS ALERTS
Boeing to speed up production of 777s, 747s... Chicago retail sales have biggest drop since...
A worker at Caterpillar's plant in Mossville, Ill. (José Moré/Chicago Tribune)
Dow Jones Newswires | Caterpillar Inc. said the health-care overhaul legislation being considered by the
U.S. House of Representatives would increase the company's health-care costs by more than $100 million in
the first year alone.
In a letter Thursday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Republican Leader John Boehner of
Ohio, Caterpillar urged lawmakers to vote against the plan "because of the substantial cost burdens it would
place on our shareholders, employees and retirees."
Caterpillar, the world's largest construction machinery manufacturer by sales, said it's particularly opposed to
provisions in the bill that would expand Medicare taxes and mandate insurance coverage. The legislation
would require nearly all companies to provide health insurance for their employees or face large fines.
The Peoria-based company said these provisions would increase its insurance costs by at least 20 percent,
or more than $100 million, just in the first year of the health-care overhaul program.
"We can ill-afford cost increases that place us at a disadvantage versus our global competitors," said the
letter signed by Gregory Folley, vice president and chief human resources officer of Caterpillar. "We are
disappointed that efforts at reform have not addressed the cost concerns we've raised throughout the year."
Business executives have long complained that the options offered for covering 32 million uninsured
Americans would result in higher insurance costs for those employers that already provide coverage.
Opponents have stepped up their attacks in recent days as the House moves closer toward a vote on the
Senate version of the health-care legislation.
A letter Thursday to President Barack Obama and members of Congress signed by more than 130
economists predicted the legislation would discourage companies from hiring more workers and would cause
reduced hours and wages for those already employed.
Caterpillar noted that the company supports efforts to increase the quality and the value of health care for
patients as well as lower costs for employer-sponsored insurance coverage.
"Unfortunately, neither the current legislation in the House and Senate, nor the president's proposal, meets
these goals," the letter said.
Previous articles on Caterpillar from the Chicago Breaking Business blog and the Tribune Archives.
Click here to sign up for breaking news, business and sports alerts.
Categories: Construction, Economy, Government, Health care, Politics Tags: Caterpillar, Health care bill, Peoria
I wonder how many employees have been rehired by Cat since the messiah's photo op. This health bill should
make the decision much easier as to whether to site more manufacturing capacity in the US.
Maybe the libs in all their brilliance can create some more free money and extend unemployment benefits in
perpetuity. Idiots.
As if this were all about reducing the price or increasing the quality of care. It's about providing handouts to get
people hooked and Vote "D"...
Could we please fast-forward to November already - hopefully most of this damage can be undone...
Frickin socialist, progresive, communists just dont get it that sooner or later they run out of other peoples
money to spend.
Why do you think they Comrade Pelosi and Chairman Obama are lying, breaking the Oath of Office to
"Protect and Defend" the Constitution... Because it gives them ULTIMATE POWER over your very LIFE! They
can tell YOU how much you as a person anre "woth" in health care spending, they can tell you that YOUR
lifestyle choices COST TOO MUCH and must be "changed" for the "good of all" and to "control costs"...
They will CONTROL all YOUR once personal and private decisions reguarding they type and amount of
HEALTH CARE, life and death, decisions that YOU use to make for yourself and your family! You, the
PEOPLE, the CITIZEN, will no longer be ALLOWED to make ANY decisions on what you buy, who your
Doctor is, how much it costs... You are NOW a servant to Obama and the radical left!
You MUST, or pay and fine and go to JAIL, buy a Obama approved health care policy! YOU MUST or the
18,000 NEW I.R.S. folks that this bill also hires WILL TRACK YOU DOWN AND FINE YOU AND PUT YOU IN
JAIL for NON-COMPLIANCE to Obama... Can anyone here say Castro, Cuba, Russia???
Please someone show me, please you libs here in Kumpania, (and you and I know who you are), show me in
The Constitution where it says that the Federal Govmt. can FORCE and MANDATE that a private citizen
MUST purchase ANY PRODUCT or SERVICE or face FINE AND JAIL! Where is it???
You can't show it because IT IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION, actualy just the OPPOSITE is in the
Constitution... "CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAWS..." (look up the exact wording)
Most of you far left radicals do NOT care what is in the Constitution because it is written to PREVENT the
massive intruision of the FEDS and Obama into our daily lives... You want a NANNY STATE, WOMB TO
TOMB care...
Let me ask 3 questions and see if we can get ANYONE with the corage of their convictions to reply...
Most radical libs are cowards and will not stand on ANY principals, but let's see...
1) Would you buy a car that you have NOT SEEN... Pay for it for 4 years BEFORE you can drive it???
**** No one, not even Obama knows what is in the current fraud of a bill, you will start paying new "fees" and
TAXES, no matter what your income lvl is right away, but the "benifits do not even start for 6 to 8 YEARS!!!
So would you?
2) Are you OK and agree to let Obama and the far left in Congress RATION CARE and CUT Medicare and
DICTATE YOUR CHOICES in reguards to YOUR health care and lifestyle???
*** There are "Panels" (have been called "Death Panels") of so called health care experts, and YES IT SAYS
THIS EXACTLY IN THE BILL, that will DECIDE how much you as a person are WORTH SPENDING ON...
They, this unelected board, WILL tell Doctors what treatments and medicines YOU can get based on AGE,
HEALTH, LIFE EXPECTANCY, NORMS and "other factors".... FACT: ALL COUNTRIES THAT HAVE
SOCIALIZED MEDICINE ARE BROKE, ALL HAVE RATIONING, ALL HAVE POORER CARE than America!
FACT !!! And now those same things are comming to YOU and our once great Country!
Already, in many States and Cities we see the TIP OF THE ICEBERG as to what this can and WILL mean...
Cities charging TAXES and FEES on salt intake, calories intake... Telling folks what they CAN and CAN NOT
EAT... Or rights ARE under assualt... THEY WANT TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF OUR LIVES... In
califorian for example, they are now MANDATING what COLORS of cars can be sold... NO MORE BLACK
CARS, they are bad for Global Warming... In NJ and NY they are TAXING sodas and telling PRIVATE
resturants that they can no longer serve SALT in the foods... Have you ever tasted many foods WITHOUT
salt??? They SUCK !!! So are you ready for this type of control???
3) Why Dems, are you willing and ready to have HUGE WAITS to see ANY Doctor, go on WAITING LISTS for
proceedusres, have YOUR choices removed and be at the MERCY of a nameless, faceless Govmt agency?
Dive and Ihealu will tell ANYONE who asks about socilized, Govmt run health care... THEY HAVE IT IN
GERMANY and FRANCE and BRITON and CANADA... It is HORRIBLE.... LONG waits, HUGE TAX
BURDENS, POOR CARE QUALITY... Lack of new drugs, lack of new inovation... POOR OVERAL CARE!
This is NOT about affordable health care, it's about a HUGE NEW GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER,
GOVERNMENT CONTROL of YOUR LIFE!!!
*** Why, oh why, do we want what have been PROVEN to be a DISASTER in EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY
that has gone this route to happen to THE BEST health care in the world??? In Canada and France and
England and from ALL OVER rich and affulent people FLOCK to AMERICA for threatments, why ?, because
we have THE BEST Doctors, Hospitals, Medicines... THIS IS ALL ABOUT TO CHANGE and NOT for the
better... RATIONING has and IS accuring right now in Germany, France, Spain, Canada, Cuba all over the
world... WE CAN NOT AFFORD THIS MASSIVE GOVMT TAKE OVER OF 1/6 or 20% of our economy...
4) What gives you the "right" to tell me what I can and can not do, what I must and must not purchase, what I
MUST spend my money on... Oh, and PLEASE, PLEASE use the lie that this Communist regiem is using
about "that people must now buy care insurance. it's the same thing". NOPE, a lie... IF I do NOT own or dive
a car, I ride a bike or take mass transit, I DO NOT HAVE TO BUY ANY INSURANCE!!! This bill says I MUST,
at the point of a gun, jail and fines, I MUST comply with Obama and purchase a " Obama approved" plan... I
have NO rights, NO choice...
IS THIS AMERICA ??? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT ??? ARE YOU READY TO 'CONFORM' or be
PUNISHED???
Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the rest of the left HATE America as it is and as it has been... THEY HATE
AMERICA'S CONSTITUTION, they are now showing it for all to see by VIOLATING it... They are, and you that
support this massive freedom buster of a bill, TRAITORS to our founding, TRAITORS to persona liberty and
TRAITIORS to freedom of choice...
I doubt that ANY of you have the stones to reply, but who knows, maybe you have the convictions of your
Marxist leaders to stand up and say, YES, I WANT TO BE A SLAVE TO BIG GOVERNMENT... YES, I
WANT THEM TO DECIDE FOR ME WHAT IS BEST... YES, I LOVE WAITING IN LINES FOR LIFE SAVING
SURGERIES AND DOCTOR VISITS and YES, I LOVE BEING TOLD WHAT TO DO BY MY SAVIOR
OBAMA!
We'll see... AT LEAST I HAVE THE PRIDE AND STONES TO POST MY FEELINGS, FACTS AND
OPINIONS FOR ALL TO SEE... I AM NOT A SLAVE, NOR AFRAID...
I WILL NOT PAY MY TAXES THIS YEAR ( go snitch to the secret police, like Russian neighbors did to each
other ), I WILL NOT BUY MANDATED INSURANCE... MY MONEY WILL NOT GO TO FUND ABORTIONS !!!
MILLIONS of real AMERICANS just like me, will refuse to BREAK THE CONSTITUTION, we will NOT become
slaves without a fight, a fight like has only been seen ONCE before in America, how will Obama put MILLIONS
IN JAIL to enforce his will on the masses...
70% WANT HIS BILL KILLED in ALL the latest polls, they want some reforms, BUT NOT THIS BILL!!!
Our so called "Leaders" our so called "Representatives" have been BOUGHT, BRIBED and PAID OFF...
WE THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN IGNORE, OUR WISHES ARE IGNORED all in the name of the LARGEST
POWER GRAB IN AMERICAN HISTORY !!!!!!!
We are about to let the VERY SAME folks that have RUINED SOCIAL SECURITY, BANKRUPTED
MEDICARE AND MEDICADE, BROKEN AND MISMANAGED THE POST OFFICE, TRASHED AMTRAC and
ANY NUMBER OF OTHER BROKEN AGENCIES run HEALTH CARE !!!!
WTF ARE WE DOING AMERICA ???? Let's let the MOST CORRUPT PEOPLE tell US ALL what to do, when
to do it and what to pay for it...
Companies that do stay will lay people off right and left and salaries will decrease.
Obama honestly believes if they dont pass this they lose at the polls but if they do they win? He is either truly
stupid or is playing russian roulette with the democrat congress and they are playing along like good
lemmings.
This is the kind of bill that has the potential to put the democrats in the minority for 50 years
Companies that do stay will lay people off right and left and salaries will decrease.
Obama honestly believes if they dont pass this they lose at the polls but if they do they win? He is either truly
stupid or is playing russian roulette with the democrat congress and they are playing along like good
lemmings.
This is the kind of bill that has the potential to put the democrats in the minority for 50 years
Second I propose legislation for every one voting for the health care bill that would make them directly
responsible for the rest of their life after they get out of office. If the health care bill destroys our country's way
of life and bankrupts our financial system then we should be able to prosecute them for financial terrorism and
treason.
If our congressmen and women believe in this bill so much then they would be willing to put some skin in the
game like their own futures and fortune. Would they be willing to risk future prosecution for destroying our
country?
http://bit.ly/bejrX1
Alex in DE replied to comment from MattinIOWA | March 19, 2010 9:31 AM | Reply
You have to be kidding me...So in a world where people are out of jobs; you think by taking more money from
the major companies that EMPLOY people should be just raked over the coals and sucked dry of any money
they have left? Good luck with Communism...because that's where this eventually heads.
Libs want ALL private jobs to fail. This is their next step into the socialist empire they want.
No need to vote any more. Obama's so smart we don't need any chacks-n-balances anymore. Soon, voting
will be banned.
BigKev replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 9:32 AM | Reply
Well your useless libtard talking point is an example of someone who has no business sense. If it is going to
cost $100m to fund mandated health coverage where does the company go to find that money? Payroll
because it is the biggest expense for a firm. That means no new hires, no pay raises (possibly), and more
likely are layoffs. Most profits a comapny like CAT makes go to reinvesting in the company, stock holders,
and such. If the mandate eats into that proft margin then sooner or later the comapny will have to reduce its
size or go under. I hope you work for a company like this and enjoy your pink slip if this bill passes.
Just be glad its not your job they will have to cut to pay for this criminal bill, they are a for profit company at
least until the democrats have something to say about it.
Here's a guy close to the situation up North - things don't look good for the US of A...
"State Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill, an independent candidate for governor making a play for fiscally
conservative voters, said yesterday that the state’s universal health care law is bankrupting Massachusetts
and will do the same nationally if Congress passes a similar plan."
Your anticipated response: Only rich American tax payers are shareholders.
My dose of reality: Wrong. Everyday American tax payers are shareholders directly, and indirectly (through
mutual funds, IRA's, and pension funds). THEY will pay for this $100 million. It would be equally ignorant to
pretend Caterpillar is the only major corporation that will suffer.
Your animosity for XXX (I won't pretend to know what it is) clouds your vision of reality.
by Derek Sheriff
Joshua Lyons wrote about the health care debate last November:
“It is imperative that we take our eyes off the specifics of the proposed healthcare legislation (i.e. death
panels, etc.) and focus on the authority granted [or not granted] to our federal representatives by the people.”
and
“Unless we unify around properly granted authority..we’ll continue a losing back-and-forth game of arguing the
issues where the ball keeps getting pushed down the field a few more inches toward the Nanny State end
zone.”
He was right when he wrote those words last year and the fact of the matter is that the situation remains
unchanged today.
No Authority
Obama may have embraced a few Republican ideas as part of his new plan, but that doesn’t amend the
Constitution. The fact that the president wrote that he would continue to draw on the best ideas from both
parties, and that he is open to these proposals doesn’t mean that he is open to the proposal that Congress
has no authority under Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution to event enact most of what will be contained in
his final plan. His reaction to such a proposal would probably be similar to Nancy Pelosi’s reaction when she
was confronted with it. With undisguised hubris, she asked the reporter, “Are you serious?”.
When one looks at the larger picture, the details of Obama’s new “health care package”, or whether or not it is
passed with bipartisan support, matters little. What is far more important, now and in the future, is that people
question the constitutionality of every bill proposed by Congress.
Sadly, many opponents of big government can’t see the forest (the larger constitutional objection), for all the
trees, (death panels, debt, job losses, higher taxes etc.) How many Republicans who participated in Obama’s
recent bi-partisan dog and pony show actually objected to the new plan on constitutional grounds? This needs
to change right now. The details of the so called “package” should be ignored or at least take a back seat. We
should instead focus on the question of constitutional authority and limit the scope of this debate immediately.
Much more is at stake here than health care freedom, after all.
Our opponents would like nothing more than to distract us from the issue of constitutionality. But by refusing
to be redirected, we can retain the high ground and dictate the terms of battle, as it were. This will also help to
educate and prepare those who believe in limited government to resist not only this act of federal usurpation,
but all such acts.
Weak Arguments
It’s essential, both in the long run and the short run, that we educate people about just what the U.S.
Constitution does and does not authorize our federal government to do. It’s not very difficult to show anyone,
who still has any regard at all for the Constitution, just how flimsy the arguments made by federal
consolidationists like Nancy Pelosi are.
Arguments that consolidationists employ usually involve an extreme metamorphosis of the “General Welfare
Clause”, or it is claimed that since Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce and,
“..every aspect of the heath care system has an effect on interstate commerce, the power of Congress to
regulate health care is essentially unlimited.”
Go back and read that statement again. Nancy Pelosi claims UNLIMITED power to regulate your health care!
Someone should point out to her that a government without limits is a tyranny! Affirmation number six of the
Tenth Amendment Center’s 10-4 Pledge points out what constitutional scholars like Rob Natelson and Kevin
Gutzman have been saying for years:
“The “Interstate Commerce Clause” in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, does not permit Congress to
regulate matters that merely affect commerce among the States. It only permits Congress to regulate trade
among the States.”
Unless we emphasize and stick to the point that Congress has only those specific, limited powers
enumerated in Article 1 Section 8, we are really just debating over who should be in control of what amounts
to an unlimited, unrestrained, unaccountable central government. It doesn’t matter which party controls such a
leviathan because it will eventually end up controlling and regulating every aspect of our lives.
But doesn’t Congress have implied powers that can be inferred from the “nessecarry and proper clause”? Yes,
of course, but this clause only empowers Congress to use the minimum amount of power nessecarry to carry
out those powers that are already enumerated in Article 1 Section 8. Affirmation number five of the Tenth
Amendment Center’s 10-4 Pledge explains it very succictly:
Novel interpretations of the “commerce clause” favored by federal consolidationists can never be reconciled
with its original meaning as understood by the Constitution’s framers and ratifiers. Any layperson who has
spent just a little time studying the ratification debates between the federalists and anti-federalists, can see
right through the arguments of today’s would be nationalists and will realize just how dubious their claims of
unlimited power to regulate really are.
It’s only been through the dumbing down of several generations and the repeated use of partisan “divide and
conquer” tactics that the consolidationists in Washington, D.C. have even been able to perpetrate their
“commerce clause” fraud for so long.
Unfortunately for them, however, the people of the several states and a majority of their legislators in many
states, are now more alert and better informed about the 10th Amendment than they have ever been in recent
memory.
A good place to start learning exactly why the proposed national health care “reform” is unconstitutional,
would be this article written by a leading constitutional scholar, Rob Natelson, Professor of Law at The
University of Montana: Pelosi’s Misleading Statement on the Constitutionality of Government Health Care
Don’t be distracted or become bogged down in this debate. Emphasize the Constitution above all else and
QUESTION AUTHORITY!
Derek J. Sheriff [send him email] is the state chapter coordinator for the Arizona Tenth Amendment Center.
His blog and podcast “Principles of ‘98″ can be found at www.PrinciplesOfNinetyEight.Com
But what does he know - he's only the treasurer - probably did not go to Harvard and is not a very smooth
talker..
JR replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 9:39 AM | Reply
If this bill gets passed... there will still be major cost increases in healthcare every year. The bill does not
address cost increases, only insuring a large portion of the uninsured.
Sounds like an awful company. A very immoral one to boot. That or they're cooking the numbers to make their
faulty case.
liberals suck replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 9:40 AM | Reply
Turbin already said premiums would not go down. Isn't he yours?
We can't compete so we will close up shop, watch stupid Hollywood movies knocking us or buy crap we don't
need from Wal Mart.
What our enemy couldn't do, Obama and the dems did, destroy America.
Sounds like an awful company. A very immoral one to boot. That or they're cooking the numbers to make their
faulty case.
It will be chaos when America defaults on it's debt in a few years. Buy Land and gold
We can't compete so we will close up shop, watch stupid Hollywood movies knocking us or buy crap we don't
need from Wal Mart.
And to my Jewish relatives in America and Israel. Think Obama and Clinton are still your friend??? (And yes, I
mean blood relatives being Jewish myself)
What our enemy couldn't do, Obama and the dems did, destroy America.
markevin13 replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 9:42 AM | Reply
Wow! You are one paranoid, ill-informed nut job.
I hope you're not a gun owner because you seem like a very dangerous, unstable person.
I'm a CAT shareholder and would easily agree to contribute my 16 cents to help this POOR corporation try to
survive. CAT currently has over 624,000,000 shares outstanding. If you divide $100 million by 624 million, this
results in a cost per share of 16 cents. In other words, this isn't even worth discussing.
Yeh - TTM earning of 1.43 per share - 16 cents is 11.2% of their earnings - how will they cover this additional
cost?
If this is going to cost them 11.2 or their earning, just think of how this will crush smaller business...
Better off just selling your shares before they go to zero under zero...
-Regulate the ins companies with respect to profitability and rate increase limitation.
These five actions alone would help to curtail rate increases, allow more people to have access to insurance
(albeit maybe not all 30M of them), and be employer friendly all without creating ANOTHER government
entitlement program.
Another remark - I have not heard any of the talking heads ask anyone in Congress why Congress thinks they
can run a new entitlement when they can't run the existing ones - SS and MED..
Jobs, Jobs,
We don't need no stinking jobs,
Please democrats. Pass this bill. It will be the end of the democrat party for decades. I just hope it can get
repealed before the worst of the damage hits.
sesn replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 9:46 AM | Reply
you are an idiot for thinking that. I hope u lose your job. The reason u want this to pass is because u want
health insurance because you probably dont have a job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BkKtPCTrg4
But... its free. BTW, I just recieved my bonus check - a full 38% was confiscated due to taxes! The province I
live in uses over half of its budget to pay for health care, and it still sucks! Why any of you want our style of
rationed health care is beyond me. And yes, for those of you wondering, I have lived in the US and Japan, and
in each case the health care speed and quality was far superior to ANYTHING I have ever recieved in Canada.
So go ahead, go broke trying to model your health care after ours! We can't even get it right with 38 million
people, it will be interesting to see how the government of the US will get it right with almost 400 million to
look after.
I hope you like paying taxes! I hope you like NOT seeing a doctor even more, cause that is what will happen!
The bill isnt as bad as some idiots would have you believe, and isnt as good as others would have you believe.
There is no free lunch, The bill will cut out some inefficiencies, and have savings for some, and costs for
others. All in all not the end of the world, or shniy rainbow land.
Grow up people. Get your facts straight before opening your mouths.
To be honest with you, I see Canada as an insanely successful country. It's not bankrupt, their education
system is better then ours and their businesses are chugging along. They also enjoy a lower unemployment
rate despite what some of your far-right people say about the effects of health-care overhaul.
Passing health-care in this country isn't going to make us poorer or worse off. A country like china has just
recently vowed to provide coverage to all 1.3 billion people. Yet this nation, with all it's morally superior acting
GOP naysayers continues to insist healthcare is bad for us. That it's "socialist" as if socialism was inherently
evil. As if people don't understand that the U.S. military is a socialist program, built on socialist concepts and
theories.
Seriously, get a grip. The sun will still rise in the East and set in the West. Our corporations will continue to
do wonderfully and our nation's people will be healthier and better for having expanded coverage.
They need to pin the real costs in the memory of the voters, and those who will be adversely affected by this
plan - which is most of us. Make it indelible. "sorry you are loosing your job because of our required
compliance with the democratic health care reform..." "sorry your costs are going up 20% because congress
determined a family of four should pay $13,000"
Unfortunately the much of their ranks believes the repeated mantra...if you like your healthcare you can keep
it - they fail to mention ALL plans (yes, even exiting ones) will have to comply with all mandates and that
employers will be subject to audit. Woops...big ommission there....
ADDRESS the 14 or 15 Congressional members who are supposedly wavering! They are the ones
who can vote against this job-robbing bill.
HoustonGal replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 9:55 AM | Reply
Amen, Brother.
Socialized medicine is the death knell for both America's free enterprise system and the individual American's
Life. I have personally experienced Socialized Medicine at work in the UK. It ruined my arm and killed several
close friends and relatives do to lack of treatment and delays. It killed the company for which I worked.
Many of us escaped from the socialist country of the UK. Now where are we to go?
MotherRedDog | March 19, 2010 9:55 AM | Reply
Did CAT think about that when he was holding hands with the "One"?
This is disgusting.
Boccieri (d OH) now telling people that he is going to vote YES. Illegal, disgusting, immoral.
The commie-filth inside our government better take note that the peasants are shaprening their pitchforks!
Donna replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 10:02 AM | Reply
It's not corporate trickery it is the facts. These facts hold true for all businesses not just CAT so those other
jobs you reference will not be there either.
Jeff Pappalardo replied to comment from BS | March 19, 2010 10:03 AM | Reply
BS: Why is it up to the corporations to pay for everyone's healthcare? Where in the constitution does it
mandate corporations are responsible for healthcare? They only offer it now to be competitive with hiring good
employees. A corporation's sole purpose is to create wealth for the owners and shareholders, not provide a
welfare system.
As far as taxes increasing, -- they have already without anyone even being aware. Last year States mandated
that companies now insure Domestic Partners, and "children" who were between 23 and 29 and were without
insurance. Then the Federal Govt dropped the bomb,...yes, by the way -- those employees who now had
coverage for either of the situations, the "Fair Market Value", was now added to their taxable income,... so
they got to "donate" gobs more taxes to the Fed, and State Govt. And the Companies,...they got to pay their
portion of the increased health care, and in addition, the FICA portion of the increased taxable income has to
be matched by the Company. It is a crime, and I am sick to my stomach over the travesty, dishonesty,
bullying, in my Country..... and we cannot stop it!
And yes, should I get the chance, I will vote for Mitt in 2012.
Carey Dye replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 10:06 AM | Reply
A fool is one who uses his investments to help the poor by funneling it thorough wasteful socialist programs.
These "poor" people will never see your measly $0.16 per share by the time it gets to them.
The problem with Socialists is they don't follow thoughts to their logical conclusion. Instead, the want you to
"hope" things will be fine.
No thanks.
Jeff Pappalardo replied to comment from BS | March 19, 2010 10:09 AM | Reply
BS: Why is it up to the corporations to pay for everyone's healthcare? Where in the constitution does it
mandate corporations are responsible for healthcare? They only offer it now to be competitive with hiring good
employees. A corporation's sole purpose is to create wealth for the owners and shareholders, not provide a
welfare system.
The republicans knew full well what a liberal president and liberal house would do if given the chance, and they
warned everybody who would listen.
You who refused to pay attention and voted for these democrats are to blame. I hope this keeps you up at
night and reminds you what needs to be done in November.
I love you idiots, pushing for socialization, as if government is your mommy. Walmart has GREAT benefits,
inlcuding 401(k) and stock options, on top of dental and vision- all aside from their medical plan. I know many
people who work for them, and have been by choice for YEARS. The only people who dis Walmart are those
who know nothing about their workforce, nor know anything about business. (Like your president.) Pray tell
how much more than the federal minimum wage a Walmart worker should make being a cashier? These
people drag items across an electric scanner, and then make change. Why is it your business to dictate their
salaries? I suppose it's just sad that people make a minimum wage, and you don't like it, so Walmart is evil.
You know, Starbucks and Dunkin Donuts only pay the minimum wage, too? Same with Mickey D's. (And they
all have a healthcare plan, too...) Damn evil corporations.
pevo98 replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 10:14 AM | Reply
How many shared do you own? I mean if you've got a hundred or so shares, then sure, it's no big deal for you
to pay $0.16 per share per year. But when you're talking about Pension plans that are heavily invested in
these type stocks, to the tune of THOUSANDS of shares, it starts to add up here and there. And you're
talking about only ONE company that may be in a plan's portfolio. Sure it's only $0.16 for CAT, but what if it's
$.50 for GE, and say $1.25 for EXXON. Perhaps another $1.75 for RUBBERMAID. Nickle by nickle this bill will
drain capital from EVERYONE's pocket, not just "BIG BUISNESS"
I'd bet you'd be the first in line to whine and complain if your pension plan didn't turn a profit each year.
Krissy replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 10:17 AM | Reply
Wow! Amen. I thought I was reading my very own thoughts. So glad you voiced them. I was born in Moline, IL
(home of John Deere tractor) and that place is a ghost of a community.Moved from Los Angeles in 94 and
then in 96 moved to Atlanta Georgia. Last summer..to the great state of TEXAS. I cannot get to DC this
weekend, but my prayers to God is that someone, will stand up in this government and STOP this takeover.
God Bless America
The reason why some people aren't able to afford the increasing Insurance Premiums is because the
insurance companies are having to pay the inflated costs passed to them by healthcare provider's (hospitals,
clinics, physicians, Labs, diagnostic facilities, etc)... the reason why these healthcare provider's are inflating
their charges is because of the gov't mandates levied on them to "provide free or heavily discounted care" to
those without insurance which includes illegals, welfare recipients, etc. They are also experiencing annual
Medicare reimbursement reductions, which force them to increase their fees for svc's to those paying patients
and those who have insurance companies to offset their losses. Believe what you want out there, but
taxpayers and those paying insurance premiums are already subsidizing free healthcare to those without, and
this Reform will not change a thing except where "we" will be taxed from
Actually, it may be the smart move, anyway. Caterpillar sells a huge number of its large bors Diesel Engines
and Generators to the Oil Drilling Industry. And with Obama's penchant to kill the Oil business in the U.S.,
both on and Offshore, the biggest players have already moved overseas. Ensco, TransOcean, Halliburton,
Weatherford. All gone to Switzerland and Dubai, along with a million jobs and their annual orders for billions in
American manufactured products.
That Obama sure knows how to run jobs and business out of the country.
CAT Shareholder replied to comment from Zero is not a hero | March 19, 2010 10:26 AM | Reply
Zero - Your 11.2% calculation uses CAT's 2009 EPS which, due to the GREAT RECESSION was the lowest
in the past 7 years. Using CAT's 2008 EPS of $5.66, this $100m amounts to less than 3%. Using CAT
analyst's expected 2010 earnings, $100m would amount to 6.3%, but none of these calculations consider the
income tax impact which would reduce their headline $100m amount to less than $70m.
Further, no logical parallels can be drawn between CAT's very generous healthcare benefits and those offered
by almost all small businesses. Therefore, the anticipated impact to one major industrial corporation does not
translate into similar consequences for any small business.
What the fock is unclear about this socialist's words? This bill must be killed, for the sake of our children's
and grandchildren's freedom.
Caterpillar can:
(a) charge more for their products. This will mean selling less, and will eventually lead to layoffs.
(b) move more jobs outside of the US to where labor costs and benefit costs are lower. Eventually, could even
move its corporate headquarters outside the US to avoid government penalties for offshoring of jobs.
The market will find its own solution to the problems being created by Congress. They have no idea of how
markets work.
Dan replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 10:31 AM | Reply
You obviously have never ran a business.
Mike Decker replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 10:35 AM | Reply
Cat Shareholder,
anyone who writes they don't care if a company they hold loses $100,000,000 a year can not be a very good
investor. how many stocks do you have in the company? 1, 10, 100? a $0.16 addational loss PER YEAR
does not come out of the stock price, it comes out of yearly earings per share and the cash holdings in the
company. Earings / Share for Cat is currently listed at $1.43 so a $0.16 loss should devalue the stock price
by about 11%-12%. since the market cap is currany approx. $37 B a 12% drop in value is a loss to the share
holders and comany value of $4,440,000,000.
you really think that the company executive will allow that to happen? nope, it would be way cheaper to move
the jobs over seas even after the initial cost of bulding new plants.
remind me never to let you handle my market accounts. people like you are the reason why no one can guess
where the market will be going. you invest without understanding market priciples AT ALL.
Where were you when this maggot was running for office?
WeThePeople replied to comment from Harry | March 19, 2010 10:39 AM | Reply
Harry, we can make a difference!
We have to elect representatives who agree to do the will of the people, who stand by the promises they make
while campaigning, who will not be bribed, threatened, or coerced into voting for something their constituents
do not want.
We need to make 2010 the year we start getting rid of the politicians who don't do what we tell them to do.
The work for US. WeThePeople
thanks very much, personally i like to read post of people who are actually involved and know what they are
talking about instead of opinionated blowhards who have no idea what the issues are but just wants to scream
and shout because glen beck says so, educate yourself on the issues then post a coherent assesment of the
situation. is that so hard to ask, if you know nothing about business or the stock market since CAT is publicly
traded you have no idea of how this would impact that company so your rant is just that an ill informed rant
about nothing. if these companies have so little money for health insurance then where do they get the
millions to compensate the ceo's that run them into the ground, and i don't want to hear the "against profits"
bs the profits needs to be shared with the employees also since they are the ones doing the work to build
these companies to where they are today not the ceo's or other corporate heads or shareholders. you take
away the lowly paid work force from these companies and see what these bright,smart and overpaid
executives and shareholders do
"PEORIA, Ill.— Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE: CAT) [end of Q4] announced sales and revenues of $32.396 billion for
2009"
So, what's $100,000,000 divided by $32,396,000,000? It's 0.3% of their revenue! and that's ONLY for their core
manufacturing business. It doesn't include their financing business and other subsidiaries.
$100,000,000 sounds like a LOT of cash, but it's all relative to the size of the total operation. 0.3% of revenue
(not profits, just revenue) is not mouse nuts, but it's not a mountain either. Suck it up and give your
employees the benefits they deserve Cat!
Most of the arguments here are useless without looking at the specifics of CAT's complaint.
CAT Shareholder replied to comment from pevo98 | March 19, 2010 10:43 AM | Reply
Our CAT holdings exceed 15% of our portfolio. Whether we look at an individual with 1 share of CAT or CAT's
largest institutional owner, with 87m shares, 16 cents amounts to about 1/4 of 1% of the market value of those
shares. In either case, this is a small fraction of the expense ratio charged by the average mutual fund or
pension administrator.
Check your premise, contradictions do not exist. - Francisco Domingo Carlos Andres Sabastien D'anconia
if you announce an impact of 16 cents a share on profits your stock is going to TANK.
their earnings per share (EPS) estimate for this year is 2.67
of course they are just going to pass this extra cost on in the form of layoffs, price increases and moving more
cost to their employees.
Scott replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 10:48 AM | Reply
And what about the 1/4 of 1% that ALL of their suppliers are raising their prices to cover their share of health
care, pretty soon you're talking about $1 Trillion dollars.
Zman replied to comment from MattinIOWA | March 19, 2010 10:50 AM | Reply
Typical short-sighted liberal comment.
CAT Shareholder replied to comment from ReddiKilowatt | March 19, 2010 10:52 AM | Reply
I did read the article carefully, and noted that CAT only mentioned their anticipated additional cost for the first
year. If they have calculated added costs for future years, they should announce that information publicly.
However, I can't devote any more time to this issue because the weather is great and I'm going out to hug
some trees.
I commonly don't have a job, and that is the President's fault, particularly if the office is held by a Democrat.
I complain about socialism, but I am not quite certain what it is. I did, however, see it on a sign once at an
event, and it sounds bad. I was able to attend that event because I have no job.
I have healthcare insurance since I still live with my parents. No one else should have it, though, because this
is not a nanny state. You should fend for yourself, just like me.
I am currently sitting in my underwear, eating Cheetohs, and perusing Web sites looking for other anonymous
places to post. You can find me on sports Web sites, as well, complaining about how all athletes are
overpaid.
Robert replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 10:54 AM | Reply
You are a morn and fantasy land participant. Give them your money for healthcare but get your hand out of my
pocket. I work hard for a living. I don't care to provide yours as well.
What other nation imposes all the types of taxes we have and still can compete.
For me, this indicates that there is something sinister going on here with Obama. Just How did an unknown
flop-eared mulish type individual jump from nothing into the office of president of the United States almost
insantly? Something very weired here. I have heard that Obama believes in VOO DOO powers,could he have
found a way to hypmotise people of this nation by casting his evil VOO DOO powers on many of the people
who looked him in the eye? Just too many things that does not fit into what would be cosidered normal
occurrences.
They could always reduce those right? That does not include the nearly $10 million they were all paid.
I'm not sure exactly how rich somebody can get. Don't you think a $5 million salary is pretty good (regardless
of how long they work)?
I'm pretty torn about this. I wonder what Komatsu's bonuses are.
Comrade Boris replied to comment from BS | March 19, 2010 10:58 AM | Reply
Very well said Comrade BS...be assured you'll be promoted to a high position in our Party. We need
members like you to speak out the evils of the Capitalist Pigs!!! Together now...LONG LIVE the hammer and
sickle!!! Spread the Wealth!!! Hail Secretary General Obama!!!
Dhraga replied to comment from GoWestYoungMan | March 19, 2010 10:58 AM | Reply
Remember that *most* of the Komatsu products made for the US (and Canada) are made in the US and
Canada.
So they will have the same onerous taxes and madates thrown on them...
but Komatsu may simply say we will build them in Japan now....
it will be cheaper.
Seriously... so they make thousands of bulldozers and they are responsible for what people use them for? So
we should shoot your mother for releasing an idiot to the world??? You have no common sense. You should
try to go back to school and get an GED so you understand what is really going on and until then leave the
conversations that actually know what they are talking about.
The only alternative is of course to pass the cost along to you, meaning huge price increases for everything
across the board and essentially a large additional income tax. If you think the legislation is a good idea, you
have very little economic foresight.
But the quality and cost of healthcare won't suffer, they tell us.
*Ahem* The last time I made a trip to the Post Office, I was looking to see what time it was, and sure enough,
the clock had been hidden from view around a corner. So, instead of finding ways to run a more efficient mail
system, they hide the clock.
JDS replied to comment from John | March 19, 2010 11:02 AM | Reply
You are wrong. The CEO from CAT refuted just about everything Obama said regarding the hiring of new
employees.
news flash elbeau and other closet socialists - revenue is not profit, and your cries for redistributing wealth are
pathetic. you obviously come from the same (political) school of finance as the marxists running washington
now, or maybe you just skipped finance 101 all together?
if and when they pass this bill, it will be the end of the best medical system on the planet - sure everyone will
have "insurance" and the government is going to say what the fair cost of procedures and treatments is and
how much they will pay - but when 20-40% of doctors and medical professionals simply quit who will you see
when you're sick? you and the additional 30 million "needy"? hmmmm?
they have similar economic programs in hugo's paradise and other marxist countries - sure the price of basic
products is set at a "fair price" by the gummint, it's just a shame that nobody will produce or sell it at that
marxist set price, so none of it is available to anyone except the elite marxists - cool huh?
ask the marxists running cuba why there is a shortage of food on an island surrounded by ocean and fish?
can't be those evil fish companies making an evil profit, not in a communist country... so what could the
problem be?
AnJ1 replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 11:05 AM | Reply
@tank johnson - haven't you heard? We're at nearly 10% unemployment without counting the people who have
given up looking. Count them and it's closer to 16%. Employees are less concerned about being kept "happy"
and more concerned with being kept on. Tank is a typical liberal who regards a business as sort of a fact of
nature, like the sun rising in the morning, rather than the result of groups of people putting their assets and
ass*s on the line in the hope of making money. Those people will change their minds when the hope of
making money evaporates, and then the business evaporates. In case you haven't noticed, that is what's been
going on for the last two years.
I only have one employee. I pay her $30 an hour but provide her no health insurance. She buys her own, just
like I do. If this bill passes and gets implemented and I'm required to buy her insurance and my own cost goes
up because of all the added mandates, either her hourly rate will go down enough to cover the cost, plus the
cost of hiring the accountant to make sure I'm doing things right, or she'll be out of a job and I'll take my nest
egg and retire. (Which, by the way, will lessen competition in my field, harming consumers, and will lessen
demand for the products my business buys, harming other businesses.) I'm not going to keep a business
open as a charity draining my retirement funds.
Liberals think only employees can go on strike. Liberals don't understand that productive people will not just
allow themselves to be drained dry. We can and do go on strike, too.
Tim lil Wayne replied to comment from Tim Wayne | March 19, 2010 11:06 AM | Reply
Tim Wayne | March 19, 2010 11:02 AM | Reply
Like little babies CAT will threaten to take their ball and go home - this is the childish threat from all our
wonderful coporations that have made billions doing business in America. They would rather cut their nose off
to spite their face than distribute the profits equitably. Greed is a primitve emotion.
By this you mean they should give their profits from their work to those that choose to do nothing? Have a
401k? Well you will pay for it when they lose money and along with all the other companies that have to pay
more to insure those that do not even work for their company. I hope you are one of those that were are will be
laid off. Get your hand out sir, wouldn't want you to work for your own money. I pay for my families ins, do not
intend to pay for yours as well.
If you need a teet to suck on in order to live. I am sure the England, China, France and Canada would be more
and happy to have you.
Comrade Boris replied to comment from Amazed | March 19, 2010 11:08 AM | Reply
DEAR AMAZED - It is my honor to inform you that Comrade BS is now a highly valued operative in our Party.
Comrade BS doesn't need an education like you. Comrade BS may end up enlisting to our secret police boot
camp someday - so be nice? DA?
What's next? Maybe we should adopt Greece as our 58th state and use them as our model of economic
growth.
The Obama bill will end private health insurance within five years (which is their plan). Then we will have to go
before their panels which were in the stimulus bill (Section XIV).
Shazam replied to comment from MattinIOWA | March 19, 2010 11:23 AM | Reply
More likely, it'll be the people at the end of the assembly line who feel the pinch. Seems that whenever
legislation is passed to "stick it to the wealthy" they find a way to maneuver around it. Think...Jobs moving
overseas, closing plants here, limiting hours of US employees, transitioning to contracted employees, etc.
etc. etc.
I looked at the health care bill and it will create 17,000 MORE IRS jobs! SEVENTEEN THOUSAND MORE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE JOBS! You like the IRS????? You want a bigger and stronger IRS?? You
want bigger and more powerful federal governmetn??? Their job will be to track you down if you don't buy
insurance.
STOP THEM!
larryd replied to comment from MattinIOWA | March 19, 2010 11:23 AM | Reply
Another moocher heard from.
KyBlessed replied to comment from RBH | March 19, 2010 11:30 AM | Reply
Bingo. That's their goal. The willful, purposeful managing of the decline and destruction of government the way
the Founders envisioned it.
For those who think Caterpillar employees want to look for new jobs, perhaps instead of collecting welfare and
medicare you should try to get a job yourself, since O-job took office a lot of jobs have gone away and they
are NEVER coming back. So when the people you desperately count on to allow you to stay at home and
play video games or make uninformed comments on websites, are themselves unemployed where will you get
your check from? Will you get it from those magical Obama dollars?
So when this house of cards come crumbling down, all you bums are going to have to find a survival skill set,
the productive workers are not going to foot the bill much longer. So enjoy your PS3 and cartoon network
while you can soon you will be begging in the street, then starving in it, then dying in it. (as the universe
intended for all non-productive creatures.)
Sam Beezor | March 19, 2010 11:31 AM | Reply
If this passes, remember it in November and get it repealed.
Duh! The healthcare system is causing bamkruptcy in Massachusetts. I seriously doubt Romney would be
welcome there.
The government health destruction bill will pass because Pelosi and Slaughter will "deem" it so. By hook and
crook, despite the rule of law and the Constitution, America will be forced to swallow this disaster. We are
done. We are now officially a third world country.
They currently give their employees great healthcare, it's the fact they have to now pay for the healthcare of
those that do not even work for them, or yet work at all... Atleast know what you are talking about before
inserting foot in mouth.
If this bill doesn't pass, you will see companies dropping health coverage anyway, because it costs too much.
I have health insurance and when my son went into the hospital for one day, the hospital billed $10,000.
Insurance covered 60%, I still owed $4k. And i'm paying $7200/year for this "great" insurance. Something has
to be done.
And by the way, the US has one of the lowest tax rates in the world. Most of the other countries pay
significantly higher taxes. Companies move their operations overseas because they don't have to pay for
healthcare (Foreign govt's pay for it) and wages are lower.
So you are ok with your company taking money from you to give to those that make less then you... or is it
just the rich that worked hard you think should have moeny they EARNED taken from them? So let's say you
make $50,000, you should give 25% of your check to those in your city that make less then you... let's make
it fair for those that are sitting in Govnt housing, eating taxpayer bought food, while they drive their caddy's
with the big spinner wheels.
First they complain that the government is shouldering too many costs with this new health care. Then they
complain that private industry is being made to pay for it?
Seems to me, Caterpillar would just prefer their poor workers to have no decent coverage at all. Nice one. Did
you learn that behavior on Wall Street?
CM replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 11:40 AM | Reply
CAT Shareholder - you have no idea what you are talking about. Stop pretending to understand economics or
an equity market valuation, because you obviously know nothing.
If this bill doesn't pass, you will see companies dropping health coverage anyway, because it costs too much.
I have health insurance and when my son went into the hospital for one day, the hospital billed $10,000.
Insurance covered 60%, I still owed $4k. And i'm paying $7200/year for this "great" insurance. Something has
to be done.
Hmmmm so it still ok for a company to have to cover the insurance cost for those that do nothing for their
company. Go down the street and give out paychecks to guys and ask them to do nothing for it. I bet you do
not hand out many checks before you realize your going to be broke... then again that may be giving your
education level a big benifit of doubt. The poorest people are still living in great comfort to the poorest in the
rest of the world. Look up some time. I am tired of paying 45% in taxes and see very little in return for it. Yet I
was at a store the other day and watched a guy buy all this food with his food stamps and then bought a 50"
flat screen tv with cash in his pocket and then walk out to see him putting it in a brand new car. Glad I could
make it easier for him to afford that 50" tv that he had the money for but didn't have the money to put food on
his table.
And by the way, the US has one of the lowest tax rates in the world. Most of the other countries pay
significantly higher taxes. Companies move their operations overseas because they don't have to pay for
healthcare (Foreign govt's pay for it) and wages are lower.
Working in Cat's Shadow replied to comment from MattinIOWA | March 19, 2010 11:47 AM | Reply
Mixed News for Caterpillar
By WEEK Producer
Caterpillar announced on Thursday that North American sales for February were down 30% from the year
before.
That's actually an improvement, since sales for December and November were off 40% from the previous year.
Caterpillar this week also said it was eliminating 121 jobs in Clayton, North Carolina, the company's wheel-
loader and back-hoe plant. But, the announcement was expected.
Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad here
Caterpillar is moving back-hoe production to England, and plans to make all of its wheel-loaders at an
improved Clayton facility.
The announcement came the same day Caterpillar announced it planned to hire 500 workers at its generator
plant in Newberry, S.C., over the next 4 years.
If anyone has a job that I can put on my unemployment application as trying to get a job... that would be great
so I can collect more unemployment. Thanks in advance!
Bravo Republicans, I'll give you this. You guys are great at coming up with these brilliantly branded fear-
phrases! You've got regular people calling for Nancy Pelosi to be hung. Way to go! Long live fear!
gary replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 11:53 AM | Reply
You clearly have no clue, CAT shareholder. The cost will not be 16 cents for each share, it doesn't work that
way. The cost is 100M of company profits, which will be paid by employees - cutting salaries and jobs. Or the
company will decide to start moving out of the
US. Period. This company will not just swallow this cost, and neither will any other.
^ IDIOT
A. Raise prices and loose sales, which leads to a smaller company that lays people off. This makes the
unskilled employees who cant find work angry with the company
B. Reduce salary and benefits which makes the un-skilled, uneducated screwdriver operator mad at the
company. This is not an option as they are a union.
Didnt some bill put all the caterpillar workers back to work? What happended to the Columbia deal?
Heres an idea...what if all the earth moving companies formed a union, so if one company was being struck
against, all the earth moving companies could have a lock out.
OR.....how about competing unions of unskilled, uneducated, screwdriver operators? If one union gets to
greedy or abusive, using its money and votes to attack industry, the entire union could be replaced by another
union of unionized unskilled, uneducated screwdriver operators who were not quite as abusive or greedy?
My earlier post was just to dumb for many to comment on. I do admit I like the idea of having the Gov't tell me
what surgery I can have and the ones too expensive and will just give me pills to deal with the pain. That is
what I want for my family but I am sorry for making it sound like it was a plan for all. After all, the gov't only
announced that it changing the testing for having women tested for brest cancer to every 2 years starting at
age 40 instead of the current plan to test every year starting when 30... I like this idea cause my wife is a pain
in the butt and I just hope she gets cancer and we wont know about it till it's to late do anything. The new
breast cancer policy issued by the govn't is something that will save many lives by having less tests done to
detect the cancer. Remember ladies, the govn't doesnt even want you to do a self check... cause you might
find something and demand it gets treated.
natb1 replied to comment from Craig | March 19, 2010 12:02 PM | Reply
Well put Graig @ 10:40AM.
Someone bump this post to the top. Better yet, PRINT THIS ON YOUR FRONT PAGE TOMORROW!
BigDawg replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 12:06 PM | Reply
Man you have alot of time on your hands. Should you be working?
BG replied to comment from Tim Wayne | March 19, 2010 12:07 PM | Reply
"Like little babies CAT will threaten to take their ball and go home - this is the childish threat from all our
wonderful coporations that have made billions doing business in America. They would rather cut their nose off
to spite their face than distribute the profits equitably. Greed is a primitve emotion."
What's childish is the expectation that other working people, investors, and producers owe you the results of
their capital and labor. The definition of greed is expecting something for nothing. Producers are not slaves
that you can force to work for your benefit, while you contribute nothing. You don't understand the basics of
economics. What do you thinks works better then capitalism? Have any concrete examples? Cat will move
those jobs overseas not because they are childish, but because they want to stay in business. A lot of others
wont have the option and will close the doors. More still will get out of business becauses the effort to keep a
business going isnt worth it anymore in this kind of environment. When that point is reached, where are you
going to find all of that "other peoples money". You are about to get an education in economics whether you
want to or not, you are just not intelligent enough to realize it.
Move all production overseas to China so that CAT can pay $20/day wages and Chinese government will pay
the healthcare bill for employees and keep 1/2 the profits that CAT generates.
Gary replied to comment from Barry | March 19, 2010 12:11 PM | Reply
Hey Barry. He is. Read his books? Know anything about his mentors? No president, in the history of the
United States, has bashed private industry like this moron. He is what he is. Face it. The best we can hope
for is to make sure his every legislative move like Obamacare, cap-and-tax, card check, immigration reform,
gets bogged down in details and the morass of D.C. politics. Then, neuter him in November (wait, he can't be
neutered...he has none), rendering him harmless and finally do away with him in November 2012. His
presidency is a plague on the U.S. He will go down as the absolute worst president in the history of this
country.
Bill replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 12:12 PM | Reply
Tank, what happens when the invisible hand can't find a job to lead the associate to? In order to stay in
business the company has to turn a profit. If the cost of doing business goes up $100m one of two things have
to happen. A, the company cuts costs and raises prices or B, they go out of business. It sounds to me like
you would like an option C, let the government run the business. They can't even turn a profit with the US
Postal Service let alone a business that produce goods and or delivers a service.
Respectfully,
Bill
Bob replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 12:12 PM | Reply
You are wrong. It is all about their shareholders. Those are the people that own the company. Corporations do
not exist to employee people. Corporations exist to create goods and services and to return a profit to those
who have risked their own personal capital to see a return on that investment. People have many choices as
to who they work for and they are free to go and work for another entity. You speak like a true SEIU member.
Workers of the world unite
Top Gun replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 12:15 PM | Reply
Cat Sharholder
That math works for 1 share. I think you are missing the big picture.
Soon-to-be Former Small Business Owner | March 19, 2010 12:18 PM | Reply
Remember that Barrack Obama-Bin Ladin is a Harvard-trained "Constitutional lawyer".
Kinda makes me wonder whose constitution he studied to model his presidential style after - Kenya,
Indonesia, Soviet Union, North Korea, Israel, or just plain Sharia Muslim?
President Boogerhead replied to comment from Brent | March 19, 2010 12:18 PM | Reply
Brent, maybe you should explain things in simpler terms so the other members of our great Democrap party
can understand what you are saying. After all, most of our members never made it past the sixth grade, failed
Hooked on Phonics, and depend on what's left of the work force in America to support them. Handouts for
everyone. Twinkie anyone?
It's interesting how you say liberals are emotional, because all I see on this site is Conservatives screaming in
fear about the communist takeover.
And while the corporate tax rate in the US is high, the personal tax rate is very, very low.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_rates_around_the_world
AND of course as most conservatives here will tell you, the corporate tax rate in this country is really ZERO,
because they pass the tax onto the consumer anyway.
President Barack Stalin replied to comment from Gary | March 19, 2010 12:25 PM | Reply
Gary, are you saying that I once again misled the American people during my state of the union address,
when I told everyone that "I got the message" and would instead focus on the severe high unemployment
affecting this country? You really didn't take me seriously, did you?
royl replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 12:25 PM | Reply
You know nothing of corporate finance, economics, stock ownership, etc...
Pete replied to comment from RBH | March 19, 2010 12:26 PM | Reply
RBH.
I too own a Temp Staffing Firm, in Wisconsin.
We do offer health and dental insurance to our approximate 300 employees and pay 50% of premium. Only a
small number of employees have chosen to participate in the plan. If this CRAP BILL is passed, guess what ?
there will be 300 more unemployed in our county, because we cannot afford what those IDIOTS in DC are
proposing. We will close our doors too.
I say IMPEACH OBAMMA, POLOSI AND REID NOW AS THEY ARE THE DRIVING FORCE OF THIS
FARCE !!
It's a client electorate they want, Turkeys won't vote for Christmas (or Thanksgiving), equality advisers,
diversity advisers, green advisers, fines for your garbage can being an inch over the limit, spied on with
millions of cameras, funding Islamist groups (and paying their welfare / housing etc.) and on and on it goes
with NuLabours fascist regime.....not forgetting that the policy of unrestricted immigration was admitted as
"rubbing the nose of the right and tories (conservatives) in it"....least you still have arms there all we have is a
millions of "welfare junkies" and cowards who still vote the fools in (well that is unless they had their vote
stolen and used as a postal vote).
And where do the companies go? To capitalist countries like China, Mexico, and Thailand.
Oh, wait...
My mistake. They just go to wherever labor is cheapest and where they can pollute at will. Who cares about
those foreigners anyway?
Common Sense replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 12:28 PM | Reply
CAT Shareholder you may want to look at the P/E ratio. You will have to take your $.16 times the P/E to get
the price drop per share. Then take that times the number of shares you have. Quite a bit more than $.16.
tim martin replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 12:29 PM | Reply
Mark:
Thanks for the courage of your convictions and for the clarity of your argument.
Gary replied to comment from President Barack Stalin | March 19, 2010 12:30 PM | Reply
Oh, if only you were the anointed one replying! Has anyone checked to see if he has a forked tongue?
His big caveat to our deal was that he insisted that we not outsource any significant part of our business, but
rather find ways to do it in America, with American jobs, cost effectively. Of course that thrilled us as we want
to create jobs We worked hard on the business plan and demonstrated to his satisfaction how we make it
work.
I just got off the phone with him and our funding deal is on hold.
The investor's attorneys and accountants are informing him that the new 3.7% tax on investment included in
the health care bill along with expected increased costs per employee makes our deal unworkable.
It was like a kick in gut for both of us. We're going to try to work it out, but frankly, given our desired to create
new American jobs, I don't see how that model will ever work given what's apparently coming.
Winston Churchill
http://tinyurl.com/yd84ql2
We got rid of Hussein in Iraq, now is a time to get rid of Hussein in Oval Office
Kramer replied to comment from CW Jones | March 19, 2010 12:42 PM | Reply
Which will be "essentially" passed on to the consumer in higher costs, which could make the consumer think
twice about making a purchase which in turn could cause the company to think twice to about hiring
someone.
Well by continuing to support this dictator who is pure evil and also support his special staff of the US
congress, his CZARs, his appointees and his bilderberg group you are already doing just that. Not only are
you doing that just like the Jones town massacre victims you are also signing the death warrant to this
country and every single person who believes in freedom, justice and the right to live there lives anyway they
want. But it goes so much deeper than that because you are signing the death warrant to the world and all
further generations.
I know you will not read this and only the people who understand and can read well but you better listen now
because you are just days away from the first death camps here in America. This bill set up a committee that
Congress can not regulate that will determine what doctor services you can and not have with no recourse. It
also determines that when an illness is to much to fix then no services will be given expect to inform the
person they are going to die.
There are a lot of brain dead people on this board. I can see them now, hunkered down in their bomb shelters
with their shotguns at their side watching Glenn Beck waiting for the coming "social justice" truth squads to
try to ship them off to Death Camp.
HA HA!
Aside from your comment about screaming conservatives (did you so object when liberals were screaming
down everything Bush did?) I see you have some basic understanding of macro econ. It is true that
corporations don't truly pay taxes but rather pass it along in the form of higher prices and keeping costs to a
minimum. Higher prices expose you to competition. This article is about a corporation taking on additional
costs because of government intervention. We are not talking about personal tax rates but since you brought
it up lets talk about it. Have you ever wondered why America's GDP is over $14 trillion and the next closest is
Japan with $5 trillion? It is because our personal tax rates are lower than most other industrialized countries.
Look at smaller examples within our own boarders. Michigan - high personal tax burden, high corporate tax
rate, unionized labor force, and over 10% unemployment. Texas - low personal tax burden, low corporate tax
rate, largely non-unionized workforce, and about 8% unemployment. Leaving money in the pockets of those
who earn it creates sustainable demand, which in turn creates jobs. Taxes are necessary, we know. But if
you want to pay the high tax rates of Europe then prepare yourself for their constant 15% unemployment rate.
(Nevermind the unconstitutionality of it...much of what the federal government does is outside its constitutional
purview. They don't really care about that--even if the rest of us do.)
Chris replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 12:54 PM | Reply
uhhh...over 90% of full time Walmart employees has employer paid health insurance. Get your facts straight
you moron.
Gary replied to comment from Mein Kampf | March 19, 2010 12:55 PM | Reply
Hey Mein Kampf:
When the U.S. debt is downgraded and we have to pay higher interest rates to sell our debt and then we have
to monetize the deficit and 50-60% of your earning go to pay taxes and the remainder is used to pay for things
that cost more each month...when that happens (we are now at 100% of GDP in debt...not very far from where
Greece is) we'll see if you think this is all a joke. Deficit when Bush entered office: $5.5 trillion. Deficit when he
left office after 8 years, with demoncrat congress for last 2 years): $9 trillion. Deficit under Obama in 12
months in office: $13 trillion. 50% increase in 1 year. H/C bill does not account for $500 billion of expenses,
doctors leaving industry, people trying to use more medical, driving up cost.. and on and on and on. Social
security went in red this year...8 years earlier than forecast. You, sir, will have a different post in the not too
distant future.
GREEDY CATERPILLAR
I know many tradespeople who will not be hiring this year because they fear the added costs.
rick replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 12:59 PM | Reply
Tank is obviously a big 'ol union guy. Great organization back in the day. Now they walk hand in hand with
Obama and are doing everything they can to take advantage of the average citizen. They aren't proud
Americans, they are out for themselves very much like the thug on the corner. Unions took over and ruined
most of our manufacturing and now they are trying to take over our government and within two Obama terms it
too will be ruined.
IMPEACH OBAMA
I didn't make the "emotional, juvenile and shallow arguments" comment, you did. And all I see are people
talking about communists, evil and kool-aid.
As for tax rates, your Michigan/Texas comparison is specious at best and a fallacy at worst. Firstly,
Michigan's economy is heavily tied to the automobile industry, which as you know, hasn't been fairing well.
We're you aware that over $4000 of the cost every car produced in America is due to health care costs?
Detroit has to compete against Japanese imports where healthcare is covered by the government through
taxes!!! I wonder how the Japanese have been able to produce cars that have outsold GM and Chrysler. It's not
the tax rate that is driving unemployment.
Texas' rate is 1% of GROSS REVENUE, whereas most other states charge an INCOME (Net Revenue) tax
significantly higher in percentage terms. Not all of the states have a high unemployment rate.
http://www.bls.gov/web/laumstrk.htm
Wisconsin's rate is 7.9% and Illinois' rate is 3%. Yet Wisconsin's unemployment rate is only 8.5% (about the
same as Texas) while Illinois is over 11%. Should I argue that higher tax rates mean less unemployment?
Barack Bozo replied to comment from wes koschke | March 19, 2010 1:09 PM | Reply
Wes, don't worry because Cat doesn't make lawnmowers so just keep on buying the Hondas.
Hiring more full-time employees would be an option, but not when I'm facing the FACT that taxes MUST go up
to balance the budget because, God knows, we WON'T cut spending. BTW, eliminating the entire defense
budget won't balance the budget (not even if we hadn't spent a dime on Irag or Afghanastan). Eliminating
entitlements will. And eliminating entitlements won't cost as many jobs!
Fortunately, I can make a living any where. If CAT moves off shore, I may just follow them. Enjoy what's left of
the US after those who have funded the largess move on.
If Democrats pass this bill against the clear will of the American people we should run every last one of them
out of Congress.
Would anybody on this post buy a used car from Obama, Pelosi or Reid? The answer to that question says
all we need to know about their "transparency", their "veracity" and this joke of a 2,300 page tree-wasting,
eco-enemy bill.
Kool-Aid, Inc. replied to comment from Chris | March 19, 2010 1:13 PM | Reply
Oh, wowie, wow, wow. Chris claims that over 90% of Walmart's full time employees have health insurance.
Hey Chris, how many of Walmart's employees are actually full time, 50%, 40%, 30%? Moron!
I can't believe so many people are fired up about this article when its impossible to tell if the numbers being
presented here are accurate. Everyone needs to go ahead and chill out...
CAT should shut down its doomed US operations and move to South Korea or China.
The Captain replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 1:27 PM | Reply
Wow you'd pay sixteen cents a share no problem, that's nice. But what about next year? Or the Year after?
What if the shares are only worth ten cents, would you pay twenty-two cents a share and have a deficit of six
cents? How much would you pay for someone else? Could you mail me $1600 for my 10k worth of shares
since I don't want to pay for someone Else's health-care since mine is over 4000k a year.
Steve replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 1:33 PM | Reply
Where will those employees who leave go? I'm an employer, and I'll lay off, cut hours, hire temps, or make
other adjustments just as other employers will. There won't be anywhere else to go. Think you'll have a job?
People tend to focus on the small picture of their lives. Companies don't relocate off shore just because of
labor costs. If labor cost was the only driving reason, automation and productivity would drive the marketplace.
Companies would find ways to make their products more efficiently. When you add all the pieces together,
moving off shore becomes attractive.
If we reduce the burden on business, without allowing a return of the abuses of years past, companies will
move back, providing good jobs with insurance. The cost to the taxpayer? NOTHING!! The root problem is
JOBS!!!! Most of the 30 million without insurance would have insurance if they could get a decent job.
Those who can't work are already covered under Medicaid. The elderly are covered under Medicare. If there
were more jobs, there would be more money to improve the coverage for those who need these programs.
John Kennedy said it best. "It is counter intuitive that raising taxes decreases government revenues while
lowering taxes increases government revenues." Not an exact quote, but close enough for my purpose here.
Darren replied to comment from The Truth | March 19, 2010 1:40 PM | Reply
Best, most insightful post yet..
Dick Knose replied to comment from BS | March 19, 2010 1:48 PM | Reply
Who was paying for before Cat? we the American public, who'll will pay once cat starts paying, we the
American public. It look's more and more if we don't, we'll be faced with jack-booted brownshirt's all marching
in goose step, with an IRS patch on their shoulder to the American public's door to collect the money. How,
layoff's, cuts in income, more costs for unemployment, and other social services sensitive to situations like
this.
Richard
http://victorgamez.com/
No matter the angle Obamacare is examined from, the conclusion reached is always the same: Obamacare is
harmful and reckless.
http://haikme.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/the-opacity-of-hope/
Ken Jackson | March 19, 2010 1:56 PM | Reply
If Caterpilar can't do the job, then there are quite a few companies that are willing to. I'd love to see us bring in
some foreign companies like Hyundai (who has some great equipment) -- I think you'll suddenly see Caterpilar
singing a different song.
Source:
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=CAT&officerId=27963
The Republican Party MUST draft a specific bill that hits these points, introduce it, and then publicize it
everywhere. It is not enough just to piss over the democrats plans- a specific alternative must be shown.
PatRice replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 2:18 PM | Reply
Right Tank, lots of better paying jobs around right now. Idiot.
Obama is all politics and no sense of who and what makes our country great.
This bill is a jibs killer and will cost Obama his 'majority' which he can't marshall anyway. Clinton-1994 all over
again.
Patriot101 replied to comment from voice of reason | March 19, 2010 2:19 PM | Reply
Uh, actually voice of reason, the US has one of the highest federal corporate tax rates in the world. Maybe
your own income taxes are low and everyone is paying for you.
Just google Congresswoman Louise Slaughter New York. And make sure that you call her Rochester, New
York office.
Tell them, Debra suggested that you call and give your thoughts of the "Slaughter Solution" and all else that
Louise Slaughter did to further the health care bill along.
:o)
Patriot101 replied to comment from melt | March 19, 2010 2:42 PM | Reply
They did not make $30B, they grossed $30B. They made $895M last year. So all other things being equal,
CAT would recognize an 11% decrease in profit if this $100M figure is accurate. I am not an accountant, but
perhaps it might be a less if some of those expenses can be deducted...
"I have received over 18,000 emails asking one basic question: If the bill is so good for America, why then do
you have to suspend rules, bride congressman and seek to pass the measure without actually voting on it
using reconciliation?"
Obama responded with "....well..I get 40,000 that blah blah blah.."
The man-child is the most radical elected official and what he is attempting is clearly unconstitutional. The
founders, our Constitution is very clear and intentionally deliberate on how bills become laws. Remember the
cartoon when we were kids "I'm just a bill on Capital Hill.." I am sure these morons have never seen it.
boomer replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 2:49 PM | Reply
Brilliant, 16 cents a share. With your statement I assume you own a whopping 1 share. I would bet you that
there are numerous shareholders that own millions of shares. Even a few thousand shares could hurt people.
Thats only the first year. Wait until 2014 when everything else kicks in.
juanito replied to comment from melt | March 19, 2010 2:52 PM | Reply
CAT had total revenue of $32B, that isn't profit. Heaven forbid anyone should be allowed to make a profi.
People should be rewarded for taking risks, risks are what business owners and shareholders assume when
they invest their money in the companies they own.
Democrats see no difference between a right and armed robbery wealth redistribution in their attempts to
provide Democrat voters with redistributed wealth and representation without taxation. Freedom of speech, of
religion, the right to keep and bear arms and property are individual rights. Armed robbery wealth redistribution
(redistributing other people's property in cash or to buy goods or services for others) is never an individual
right. If you have to steal private property (e.g. income) belonging to others to get what you want (including
voting for government officials to do it for you) then what you want is not your right, it's merely your self-
serving, greedy, covetous desire. When Democrats call something a right, what they mean is that they are
going to misuse government to deny your right, e.g., they are going to misuse government to steal your private
property to give themselves what they think they are entitled to at your expense. When Democrats run it,
government is nothing but organized crime, which is fitting since DOJ, voting and other statistics prove
Democrats commit almost all crime. Blacks alone, who voted 96% for Obama, commit 2/3 of all violent crime.
Democrat voters vote for Democrat politicians to be their proxy armed robbers to "legally" steal for them what
they don't already illegally steal for themselves. While Democrat voters are thieving illegally, Democrat
politicians are thieving "legally" for them. It's a built-in advantage for Democrats since all Republicans offer is
to steal less of our private property than Democrats do. Democrats get the power they want, but destroy
America in the process, which is what Democrats means by "fundamentally transform America."
Andrew replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 3:11 PM | Reply
If an employee could better, he/she will. That will always be the case, whether the employer treats them fairly
as well. I run a small business where my salespeople can't realistically make more than $200k/year. If I have
an employee who is good enough to make $500k/year, he'll leave me and go sell for someone else, regardless
of what benefits I provide. The real point is that many employees work where they work because of necessity.
Do you think many workers at the DMV could get jobs elsewhere? They're lucky they have jobs at all. You
mentioned Wal-Mart; sorry to say it, but many of the workers there are either going to school or a stay-at-
home parent who need flexibility, OR are a person who chose not to get educated. Who's fault is that? So
when you say employees are going to rise up and leave, I say let them. If they could, they would have already,
and how nice their employer is is irrelevant.
Create Jobs, Not Government jobs | March 19, 2010 3:22 PM | Reply
The Dems will not Stop Taxing People to Death until 98% of America is on Welfare and seeking Food
Stamps.
All we can do is Vote them all out and reverse the damage
once the Republicans are back in power.
Employer in Ohio replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 3:24 PM | Reply
hey tank.
you see the unemployment rate and the number of underemployed. finding workers in a supply heavy labor
market will be no problem for cat. you happen to notice the gnp related to manufacturing is continuing to drop
due to cheap labor overseas. you can't keep stacking the disadvantage against the american worker in a
global market. Demand drive the reason companies like CAT exist. they exist to make a profit. Guess what.
they're first goal is not to be an employer. that's a byproduct.
take your economics 101 again.
Employer in Ohio
Akela replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 3:26 PM | Reply
tank johnson - "And the next thing you know every corporation will look like Wal-Mart where a large number of
employees are paid so little and the bare bones benefits are so pathetic that it leads to employees getting
coverage thru Medicaid and other state health insurance programs."
And just WHERE is it that you find ANY company that is required to provide employees with benefits that will
satisfy YOU???????
So thanks to these crooks, we'll all be mandated at the point of a gun to buy insurance (nice way to pay off
big insurance, and big pharma, dems!) that has massively increased in cost due to Obama-Pelosi-Reit and
your local democrat's rigid ideology demanding federalized health care. The already sky-high unemployment
numbers will increase dramatically, plus you'll lose your employer provided healthcare (as you shift to being
an independent contractor, they kick you out and pay penalties that cost less than your Obamacare cost
inflated healthcare, or you lose your job).
The shrinking middle class in this country cannot afford this, and this is yet another attack by the elitist
democrats on the middle class. Just wait 'till the tax bill comes for this latest orgy of federal spending by the
democrats, and they institute rationing because the system is bankrupt from day one.
I can't believe anyone would consider voting for a democrat at any level, after this latest breach of public trust -
seriously after a year of the public saying clearly and consistently we don't want this, keep it modest/sensible,
focus on lowering costs as the best way to increase the coverage of the uninsured we the people are
contemptuously ignored...
Only morons vote democrat (that's been true for a while, but there is simply no denying it now).
and then they continue to increase the amount the government then needs in income tax percentage from
"you" to keep going.
China will need less workers, as they will have less to export to the US..... or we'll all have to live off nothing
but Chinese "products" that are Junk and are cheap and barely get the job done
Everyone needs tp be aware the as a wage earner (W2) employee, the company you work for must match the
scoial security and medicare taxes that are taken out of your paycheck.
So, if you make $100, and you owe $10 is taken from your check to what you must pay into social secuity
and medicare, your employer must match that $10 and send the IRS a check for $20
C'mon people. Quit regurgitating the pathetic diatribe you listened to this morning on talk radio. Sure, this
legislation may cause some problems, but it will also solve some, and the sky will not fall.
When they thought up Medicare several decades ago, the sky seemed to be falling then too...but if the
government hadn't taken on the load of the uninsurably unhealthy back then, then no insurance companies
would have survived. Read your history. Now we have a system where the government is already paying for
60% of the actual medical bills that get paid all for the sole purpose of relieving the system of the burden of
high risk patients. This itself already constitutes the biggest subsidy the insurance companies could EVER
ask for...and yet they have the right wing all up in arms defending them like they're some kind of government
victim in all this. Oh please.
And no, I'm not some closet socialist, or even a left-winger. I was born and raised in Utah, the most
conservative state in the union. I still listen to right-wing radio, but I'm smart enough to see them treating the
conservatives like sheep for their little causes. I'm still a proud Mormon, but thankfully not a complete Utard
anymore.
Our system NEEDS reform. I'd rather see it done at the state level, but that isn't going to happen or it would
have 10 or more years ago. It's nice that Obama has the backbone to do something about it.
Chris replied to comment from Kool-Aid, Inc. | March 19, 2010 3:38 PM | Reply
Kool-Aid, Kool-Aid, Kool-Aid ....I am well aware that Walmart employs a lot of part timers. So I guess, judging
by your comment, you think that Walmart should be required to provide health insurance to part time workers
(i.e. teens)? Well, 1) they do offer it....most part timers (i.e. teenagers) don't buy it because they don't need it
- but don't worry , you'll get your way when Obama and the Dems violate the constitution and force people to
buy something they don't want 2) you show me a part timer at Walmart who ISN'T a teenager or a stay at
home Mom working for extra income (and covered by her spouse's health insurance) and I will show you
someone who, somewhere in their life made the brilliant decision to drop out of high school or did some jail
time or has no other appreciable job skills. Sorry, not my problem and i refuse to pay for their mistakes in life.
We all have equal OPPORTUNITES in this country....but the OUTCOMES are not equal based on what you
decide to do with your own freewill.
And I know you are probably one of the many pro-union robots replying on here or are sympathetic, but let me
let you in a little secret.....when you work at a company that is unionized as a part time worker....you don't
get health insurance either!! I know - I did. I didn't care, though....ya know why? I was a teenager and didn't
need or want the health insurance even if it had been offered.
Look, it's still a free country and you are free to travel to any of the beautiful utopian countries out there with
universal healthcare...please...be my guest....I'll help buy your ticket. But leave the rights and liberties of the
rest of us alone.
Disgruntled American
dont vote dem... replied to comment from Todd | March 19, 2010 3:44 PM | Reply
Todd,
I hear you, but I think what people are saying is that corporations (or other taxable business entities) must
pass on the cost taxes represent (to the consumers of their product or service, if their consumers have
inelastic demand), and/or to their employees (in the form of lower wages). If corporations did not, they would
either have to accept a less than break even return, or go out of business (the former would lead to the latter
over the long term, anyways). So the dems are completely dishonest whenever they say they'll tax
corporations to fund their latest pie-in-the-sky spending programs (not to mention pathologically unable to
consider consequences (intended and unintended) before they jump with your money...
see:
http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/tax-policy/library/integration-paper/06_part_1.pdf
the whole paper is here:
http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/tax-policy/library/integration-paper/
.........
Read much, the 100 million dollars isn't what it will cost to cover their own you dummy, it's what they are
going to have to pay in new taxes to cover people who do not even work for CAT... but reading isn't a skill
most that still support this bill have.... then again over 60% are against this bill.
What you are witnessing is the very beginning of the real demise of capitalism. All of this legislation will have
a cascading effect of jobs and higher taxes that most of us cannot afford....when people cannot feed their
families because there is no work....everything will shut down. Russia, China, Poland, Cuba, Venezuela all
have tried it and it has failed in it's essence.
Imagine millions of people marching to their county government offices,state capitols, DC all up in arms
because "they did not realize" our government wants total control....it is just beginning.
"The legislation would require nearly all companies to provide health insurance for their employees or face
large fines."
That's the part they're complaining about? So they don't provide health care to their employees now?
They have roughly less than 100,000 employees. So that would mean that their cost would increase by more
than $1,000 per employee. Really?? I don't think so, considering the average cost for insurance is about $500
per employee over 55. Assuming 0% of their employees have healthcare now, that figure would only be $50
million. So how can they come up with a figure of $100,000,000?? Answer: it's a made up number.
Consider also that this enormous draining of capital to Federal coffers starts immediately but provides little to
no benefit to the American people for 4 years.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/19/caterpillar-writes-pelosi_n_505993.html
You said, "CAT currently has over 624,000,000 shares outstanding. If you divide $100 million by 624 million,
this results in a cost per share of 16 cents. In other words, this isn't even worth discussing."
If you really are a shareholder then I can only assume that you hold a small percentage of shares. Now let me
explain.
There will be only a small number of people who will hold the majority of the shares in the company. So lets
say you own 20% of all the shares, b/c you are the founder of the company or some other investor. 20% of the
624,000,000 shares is 124,800,000 shares. By your math you have concluded that $100 millions will increase
the cost by 16 cents per share, and that by your estimation this cost is trivial, just plain dumb, no big deal
and by my guess, its those damn riches guys who should pay. Typical I suppose.
If you haven't already guess, 16 cents multiplied by 124800000 is a lot of money! In fact, it is equal to
19,968,000 DOLLARS, but I suppose if you only own 100 shares, then 16 dollars isn't so bad.
I encourage all the lefties to get off the funny farm and come back to reality, but wait there is more.
Suppose CAT employs a person and pays 50,000 dollars to employ that person. This 50k includes all
expenses, but because there are many lefties in the audience I must explain the expenses.
A company uses budgets to employ people. This budget is 50k in this example. The employee's salary is
most likely only 25k-30k if he/she is lucky. Minus all the taxes he/she only makes 20kish, but that is only if
he or she actually pays taxes, b/c as some of you know the poor don't pay taxes and the poverty line (last
time I checked) is around 20k-25k.
Some of you might be asking, where did that 20-25k go? (50k -25kish)
Some of the money goes to health insurance costs, some goes to the government, b/c a employer must pay
a equal amount of taxes that the employee pays, and some of the money goes to other benefits the employee
may wish to pay for. Wait, does that many a employer has to pay taxes on his employees and the employee
pays taxes too, isn't that double taxing?
So do you get the point? 50k is the budget, but the guy only gets 20-30k? Now do you see the problem? I
won't get my hope up.
"Suppose CAT employs a person and pays 50,000 dollars to employ that person. This 50k includes all
expenses, but because there are many lefties in the audience I must explain the expenses."
Back to my original point. 100,000,000 divided by 50,000 = 2000 people! Good job Everyone in Gov.
2000 times the number of companies who will have this problem will = tens of thousands of more job losses.
Vince Brewster replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 4:12 PM | Reply
Just checked CAT's financials for 2009. All the good numbers were down about 40% from 2008: sales, profits,
etc. Profits for 2009 were $1.43/share. Looks to me like $0.16/share in increased healthcare costs would
reduce profits by a further 10%, making the drop from 2008 50% if the $100,000,000 started this year. I call
that significant -- but that's just my opinion.
YOUR GRANDFATHER replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 4:20 PM | Reply
My dearest grandson. Your mis-informed. If a company as big as CAT is hurt by another big government
project like this one other companies will be hurt also. I guess we will have to all be hired on by foriegn
companies to be able to feed our families. I guess the economy wasn't hurt enough already by free trade,
EPA, foriegn employees who work for a nickel an hour, big gov'ment regulations, the second highest tax
burden on the planet. If there are no jobs how is yous and mes gonna sits on da porch and drink a 40 after a
hard week of being lazy on the job? OH LAWDI LAWDI! I bet even a foriegner will be drivin' Miss Daisey ca!
Companies only pay Medicare taxes based how many employees they have and what they earn. Again their
taxes/costs would have to go up by at least $1,000 per employee for that $100 million number to be true, and
that won't happen. So I'm right your wrong.
BOB replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 4:22 PM | Reply
I AM A MAN OF 56 YEARS OF AGE AND NOW I FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT A WOMEN MUST REALLY
FEEL WHEN SHE TRIES TO EXPLAIN WHAT SHE FELT WHEN BEING RAPED. I FEEL LIKE EVERY
PART OF MY BEING IS BEING VIOLATED. EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD READ YOUR POSTING BEFORE
THEY SAY YES FOR O-MAMA-CARE, GROW UP YOU FAR LEFT RADICALS/TRAITORS TO
DEMOCRACY AND LET YOUR VOTE BE COUNTED ON THE SENATE BILL AND I HOPE YOU CAN LIVE
WITH THE RESULTS OF A BROKEN AMERICAN SPIRT. THERE WILL BE ANOTHER 4TH OF JULY IF THIS
BILL BECOMES LAW OF THE LAND AND WHILE WE FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS AGAIN LOTS OF JOB
LOSES WILL BE LOST AND UNBORN BABIES WILL DIE BEFORE EVERY BEING BORN. WHAT A
SHAME THAT THIS IS! ALL THE DEALS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE BEHINE CLOSED DOORS, WHAT A
GREAT THING TO TEACH OUR CHILDREN, CHEAT, LIE, AND STEAL, WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GET
YOUR WAY. OBAMA CLAIMS THAT THIS BILL IS PERSONAL, I TAKE THIS VERY PERSONAL AS WELL.
IF PELOSI CAN PRAY AND THE NUNS SAY ITS OK THAN I CAN PRAY AS WELL THAT THIS BILL WILL
DIE NOW...KILL THE BILL!!!!!!
peter pressure replied to comment from BS | March 19, 2010 4:26 PM | Reply
BS Said: "Its about time they start paying their own way rather than having the US taxpayer subsidize their
profits. Who do you think will pay that $100 million if the company doesn't pay? We will."
BS, I have question for you, who will be paying for the insurance of those 32 million who don't have any?
Why should I be forced to pay for other peoples stuff whether corporate or social welfare?
Your comment is perhaps the most ignorant I have ever read on the internet. Companies must turn a profit or
go out of business. Increasing capital contributions has nothing to do with the income statement. 100,000,000
is the added expense and is the equivalent of adding 1,000 workers at 100,000 per year without any increase
in production. This would result in a hit to the income statement until all capital is depleted. The only solution
is to cut costs equivalent to the added expense. I own a business. There is really on 1 easy expense to cut.
Labor. Before your simple mind responds less labor less healthcare cost so less job loss. Wrong. Companies
operate on a profit margin. Less Labor - less production - less revenue to pay for fixed costs. Factories must
close - move overseas or company is bankrupt. (unless socialist country bails them out and eventually it is
not worth working in exchange for the currency received as all business faces the same prospect as
caterpillar.
I guess you didn't read the number of apx 145 NEW taxes and that is how I failed myself by not knowing how
to read... I will not make any mistakes this time after pointing them out to myself. Sometimes I wonder if I am
bipolar, always fighting myself. Sorry to the rest of you that have to witness my errors, I sometimes see the
way but then sometimes my liberal education fails me.
haha replied to comment from Lhrish | March 19, 2010 4:37 PM | Reply
yeah.. you may want to ask MASS about their healthcare reform bill, because there is serious talk about
repealing it....
m0zone replied to comment from alex | March 19, 2010 4:40 PM | Reply
its a tax its not about insuring anyone far as i know cat workers have full coverage eye/dental/health far as i
know its one of the better companies to work for in usa
everyone will have to pay big diesel company will prob get bent over
haha replied to comment from elbeau | March 19, 2010 4:42 PM | Reply
this is pretty funny...
Medicare is going broke, its costing the government billions... and you point to that as your example? really?
come on....
sad replied to comment from Ken Jackson | March 19, 2010 4:49 PM | Reply
Ken:
WTF, you are tired of US companies... We have one of the highest corporate taxes in the world... we need to
give companies a break, so they can hire people... oh, you must be one of those "I hate business" people...
can you please move to Canada...
Dan replied to comment from tank johnson | March 19, 2010 4:50 PM | Reply
You are so correct, with a rising unemployment rate & illegals willing to work for cheaper than those working
now Corporations like CAT need to worry about the employees happiness.
Those that are willing to listen to Lemmings like you will fall off the cliff like Kenney.
As for corporations bowing to liberals or lemmings they will just close the doors before they run without
making a profit
MNbizman replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 4:59 PM | Reply
16 Cents is Huge. It represents an 11.2% hit to profits. Goof ball.
please read... replied to comment from starvin marvin | March 19, 2010 4:59 PM | Reply
Starvin...
Maybe a look at the patriot act, you would see that the patriot act is only enacted for people who have a FISA
warrant on them.. of course, you aren't bright enough to understand the difference.
However, this healthcare bill affects everyone.... and btw, it allows the government, not to know who you are
talking to, but access to your medical records.. so if you are complaining about privacy... you should hate this
bill...
but you are not able to see that... having your head shoved that far up there...
BTW we locked the other party out of all the meetings so we didn't have to compromise, but thanks for the
offer. The less the public knows and as my top lady said, we have to vote for the bill so you can see what is in
it. We must have a really good bill if you do that plus we are not even going to vote on the bill itself just deem
its passed so none of our dem friends are held accountable for it. I sometimes wonder if I could get the same
drugs my democrat friends are on.
Economic Historian replied to comment from GoWestYoungMan | March 19, 2010 5:03 PM | Reply
HYPOCRISY ALERT!
Turns out that James Owens, the CEO of Caterpillar, is a huge donor to right-wing causes and the Republican
Party. To see a list of money donated, go to:
http://www.newsmeat.com/ceo_political_donations/James_Owens.php
Businesses create jobs. Gov't takes care of and creates more bums
nope replied to comment from jman | March 19, 2010 5:25 PM | Reply
Actually, they were not hand in hand. The CEO of cat, owens was pissed when they said that cat would rehire
people they laid off after the stimulus passed.
NObama2012 replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 5:26 PM | Reply
wow. great comment.
Here is my concern. Is there a provision in the bill that will not let employers hire people based on if they do or
do not have health insurance from another source, or on their own? Will we be forced to provide health
insurance for employees, or just have to close the doors? Will there still be family policies that cover a
working spouse?
Will employers find it harder to terminate people...will there be another hurdle to be able to get rid of
employees based on the fact that we can't terminate them because they might have to go on public health
care insurance.
I keep hearing that in Europe it is impossible to fire an employee. Is that where we are headed? Can't afford to
keep them, but won't be allowed to get rid of them?
Too much uncertainty..and uncertainty doesn't make anyone want to open their wallets.
Thank God the Canadian socialist health care system saved Sarah Palin's life.
Imagine the world with one less Republican Kook Fart to laugh at.
Access to basic health care is a right that all Americans possess and the obligation of all Americans to
provide.
1) $100 million is nothing in the context of a company the size of CAT. It will have zero impact on their
competitive position.
2) CAT is talking about shareholders, retirees, etc. Yes shareholders earning more than $250K a year will now
pay Medicare taxes on the dividends; oh boy.
CAT is merely using the Corporation to advance their own personal financial interests in my opinion.
If that's the case they get what they deserve. I know not all the members are dems or voted for Obama but
lets face fact...their money in the form of union dues went into the pockets of Obama and other dems for their
campaign. I don't feel sorry for them...no one is holding a gun to their heads forcing them to work for a union
company. If they don't like the way the union uses them they should resign...
SG replied to comment from Jeff Boyd | March 19, 2010 6:27 PM | Reply
Jeff,
1) $100M is not 'nothing' to any company. Cat is (at least in my personal experience) providing good health
care to workers and their families. That this proposal will increase the company's health care costs by 20%
doesn't seem to jive with the President's claim that this bill will make health care cheaper.
2) Shareholders making any amount of income would be impacted by a reduction in the dividends the
company is able to pay. $100M less in profits = some amount of reduced dividends.
I truly hope this 'evil rich people must pay' crap stops at some point soon. It is disheartening to see a country
that did quite well using capitalist principles eating itself...
Remember, capital can (and has been) flee to greener pastures. Cat is one of the few major manufacturers
this country has left. If I were on their management team, my response to this certainly wouldn't be to
increase production in this country any time soon. Instead any new capacity I need would be sourced outside
the US where I'm not penalized for hiring people.
And he is so right! I've been watching and reading closely for the last year, as our freedoms have been slowly
but surely taken away. Every few weeks I've observed as new bans, taxes, fines, penalties and restrictions are
enacted by our government. It all started with tobacco, and has now reached the point where the forced
control is downright scary. I knew it would come, but I didn't think it would be this fast and severe. People, we
have already lost the freedom to make so many of our own choices - if this healthcare bill passes we might as
well kiss all of our choices goodbye; the government will not hesitate to dictate every aspect of our lives.
And don't tell me "Oh, that will never happen" - because it is ALREADY HAPPENING, right in front of our
faces.
And don't tell me "Oh, that ban/tax/restriction/penalty/fine isn't where I live" - because it WILL COME to your
area soon.
And the federal government hasn't even taken over our healthcare yet....
oathkeepers.org
Evan B replied to comment from Planwell | March 19, 2010 6:31 PM | Reply
Not many the company is profitable and this is .3% of revenues.
32.3 billion in revenues folks to put things in perspective. Caterpiller exceeds the GDP of many small
countries.
And as for competing with Komatsu Japan has universal healthcare and comparable tax rates.
MX_DOGG replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 6:32 PM | Reply
16 cents off the profit per share numb nut. A big percentage.
Too offset the revenue loss on a 100K machine they would need to to raise prices about $300.
Of course with slighly less income the change wouldn't be taxable so maybe more like $250-$265.
Horrible this is the end of capitalism! Fire the democrats and let the uninsured all die.
In fact, not just BS but ALL of you people buying into this Obama/progressive nonsense.
Is it REALLY necessary to destroy our economy before you finally figure out that you're wrong about
EVERYTHING?
i truley believe that obama,pelosi,reid and the rest of the dems, have made one major error, how can they be
so stupid, they should have disarmed the american people, before enacting this socialist (health care bill)
upon the american public, these idiots are trying to back us into a corner, while were still armed, pay attention
america, more to come
Unions and Liberals blame the shipping of jobs overseas on companies, but they need to start looking in the
mirror.
What happens when a company's costs increase? They will try reduce other costs - can you say layoffs?
Perhaps they will try to pass the costs on to their customers - that nice if their competitors are all American
based. However, CAT's competitors are foriegn based. BOCare just reduced demand for CAT products
worldwide - what happens - more layoffs.
The whole sentence. “Congress shall make no laws touching religion or the rights of conscience.”
Just another example of the scare machine. Either you are liar and are trying to scare people or you are a
complete moron. I am guessing it falls into both. Now, go put your seatbelt on and pay your taxes..
You can't possibly be that dumb, can you? Basic college Economics teaches that "unit profit from
manufactured goods equals sale price less the aggregate expenses associated with producing it." The
expenses includes labor, materials, energy costs, benefits, copier machines in the offices and even the toilet
paper in the company bathrooms.
In other words, health care expenses are going to directly impact the bottom line. Stock shares and dividends,
on the other hand, also constitute a liability that must at some time be paid, yet stock shares have no effect
whatsoever on the company's government mandated insurance costs.
Case in point, it was General Motors "pension & health insurance legacy costs" which pretty much sunk
them. CAT, like GM, is forced to compete in a global market dollar for dollar in an international environment
that doesn't give a damn about costs associated with "American social engineering."
As an expat I still get to vote. Who did I vote for in the last election? I wrote in Ron Paul as he is the ONLY
politician I know of that has a spine and has HONOR. He respects the Constitution something NONE of the
rest do. I don’t care what Ron Paul’s label is, if he ran as a Democrat I would vote for him as the label means
nothing, HONOR means EVERYTHING. In today’s media polished world I know Ron Paul doesn’t look as
good on TV as other do, what is important is his record, look at that and you find someone with a spine.
Last election you had the chance to do the right thing and you threw it away... don’t make that mistake again.
I will be watching from over here.
There's a better chance of Obama's mama sprouting a male appendage before I'm going to pay for mandatory
coverage, to offset costs for the sickly minority and those with defective gene pool.
voice of reason? nah, voice of idiocy replied to comment from voice of reason | March 19, 2010 8:01 PM | Reply
what freakin US are you living in? we have the highest corporate tax rate save sweden (most of our
competition taxes earnings in corporate form only 1x, not 2X like the US - our effective corp rate is 45%), and
that's before the tax increase coming at the end of this year, when Obama and the rest of the democrats hike
taxes by letting the Bush era tax cuts expire...
BKC replied to comment from Evan B | March 19, 2010 8:03 PM | Reply
Most of the CAT apologists here wouldn't know where to FIND an CAT earning statement, let alone read and
comprehend one. Financial research isn't necessary for them because they receive all their news and views
about the world from Fox, Beck and Rush whom they quote endlessly without making any attempt to
determine the truthfulness of their rants.
CAT stock holders including many of its workers have DOUBLED their wealth in 9 months. The market cap
has grown $18 Billion during that time. A $100,000,000 expense is peanuts to CAT. They will stay huge and
profitable after health care reform.
Business always pass down the taxes to the customer, end-user, public, etc. Your comments show that you
are either a liberal, or someone who has never ran a business.
Fei
WHERE WERE THEY WHEN WE TOLD THEM THIS WAS GOING TO HAPEN?!?!?!?
Rich replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 9:37 PM | Reply
Shareholder,
The problem with your simplistic statement is this. You're not going to lose 16 cents per share. You're going
to lose whatever 16 cents is as a percentage of annual earnings. I looked it up and that's 5% of Cat's annual
earnings. At nearly $60/share right now, you're going to lose 5% which is $3 of share price assuming a
constant P/E.
That's still a simplistic view, though. Likely Cat is going to have to layoff and cut capex. It may have to cut or
suspend a dividend. The rate of growth will slow, which may change the multiple from 15X to 10X. At 10X
suddenly your shares are worth 1/3 less, $40/share vs $60.
Just not a week/ two weeks ago I wrote pelosi, obviously her staffers intercept and filter out such
correspondence, because the reply I got back (a template/form mail) had nothing to do with the issue I wrote
her about. But hey at least she does reply back eh? I have yet to hear from my other so called
representatives, except when it comes to wanting donations for their election campaign.
Meanwhile while people tell their opinion of all this across the web, or ask questions, they get labeled
homegrown terrorist by corporate media. A corporate media which has become a CULT by definition
( http://www.neopagan.net/ABCDEF.html ) thanks to the FCC.
Ronny replied to comment from Mark Garnett | March 19, 2010 9:47 PM | Reply
What kind of moron are you?
How can you write "What gives you the "right" to tell me what I can and can not do" and then make a pro-life
argument? Why is it ok for you to tell me and everyone else what to do when it's something you support, but
not accept the same code of conduct when the tables are turned?
Medicare is a government-run health care program. Don't complain about it not having enough money while
you try to make an argument against government-run health care.
And, you should go back to school. Your deplorable spelling and grammar completely discredit any legitimacy
your argument might have had.
The republican party was in control for a plenty of time and didn't solve any of these problems. And, the
republican party has plenty of opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns about the suggested solutions
being proposed by the Democrats who are currently in power.
Not supporting the system and not paying taxes is your prerogative, but you should be aware that you benefit
every day from tax-payer financed government-run agencies and utilities. Before you complain again about the
government's hand controlling you why don't you think about the roads you drive on, the people that put out
the fire you start when you fall asleep with a cigarette in your mouth, and the soldiers oversees fighting your
war. Those are all paid for by my tax dollars. If you don't want to contribute I'm happy to let the fire dept watch
your house burn down while your kids proliferate your ridiculous ideologies because their schools don't have
the money to teach them to read and write better than their daddy do.
As far as I'm concerned you should withdraw yourself from society altogether so that my kids aren't exposed
to your deplorable selfish value system.
Obama has NPD, or Narcissitic Personality Disorder. Some of the symptoms are:
•Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be
recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
•Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
•Believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with,
other special or high-status people (or institutions)
•Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic
compliance with his or her expectations
•Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
•Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
•Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
Obama MUST be removed from office, because no one person is worth the misery of 300,000,000 people.
Impeach him, arrest him, but just get him out of office because it will only get WORSE!
Peter replied to comment from MattinIOWA | March 19, 2010 10:08 PM | Reply
Caterpillar will not pay the $100,000,000.00-- their employees will pay this in increased healthcare costs,
reduced benefits in education (Caterpillar has a very generous policy for its employees), and other reductions
in future earnings.
OK, the Tribune is once again using a great negative headline, no matter which side it takes to get readers.
$48 BILLION
Their profit (from their NYSE report, not their tax form) was just above $3.5 BILLION.
So if it is indeed going to cost them $1000 per employee per year, that means an extra $90 per month per
employee for health insurance.
I can't believe that they could make this a real number versus any anticipated increase in health and
retirement benefits for their union and executive salary commitments.
pd64 replied to comment from CAT Shareholder | March 19, 2010 10:32 PM | Reply
I dont believe you are a shareholder. The purpose of buying a stock is to make a profit. I have never heard of a
shareholder who wants the value of their stock to decline.
IMPEACH the president and begin recall procedings for each and every senator and representative that votes
for this or "Deems" it passed
There are 18 states that allow recalls and it is high time we take america back
By moving for
I don't care what happens to the stock price this week or next week or 6 months from now. I care what it will
be 10 years from now, and care that they keep increasing their dividend (which they will).
A one-time change in profit of less than 1% is easily recovered by slightly changing price margins and will
mean virtually nothing down the road. Healthier workers equals more productive and cheaper worker in the
long term. This is common sense, not rocket science.
As per CAT moving out of the US, Poppy isn't paying attention or know what he's talking about. CAT just
announced that they are considering moving their heavy equipment manufacture back to the United State from
Japan, since it's now cheaper here, and will remain so with a falling dollar and future increasing shipping
costs.
Management of all stripes have tossed the basic employee out the window years ago. The head of Home
Depot has said he would employ nothing but illegal aliens if he could.
Wall Street has been betting on this to pass for weeks and has had a steady upward drift in that time. Never
mind the gas prices increasing since demand is still low and supplies are still high. The speculators still have
to make a buck somehow.
obamau must go replied to comment from jman | March 19, 2010 11:14 PM | Reply
there is NO way in HELLo that this bill wont raise costs on EVERYTHING. obama's shills are out in full force
on all the blogs lately. Go back to your unions where all the rest of the useful idiots are.
Leave a comment
Name
Email Address
URL
STOCK UPDATE
Find Stock Quotes
Symbol or Name
Go
MOVING ON UP
News on Chicago-area
business people who
have been hired,
promoted, honored,
elected or recognized.
• See who's on the
Tom O'Keefe moves up move >>
at Draftfcb • Email submissions >>
CATEGORIES
Advertising/Marketing (14)
Agriculture/Farming (11)
Airlines (75)
Autos (55)
Bank Failures (9)
Banking (69)
Bankruptcy (18)
CAREER BUILDER
Keywords:
Location:
Job Category
Select a Job Category
View All