Top British Climate Scientist Acknowledges Ongoing

Geoengineering Interventions
By James Hodgskiss
Global Research, October 31, 2015
Chemtrails Project UK 17 October 2015
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/top-british-climate-scientist-acknowledges-ongoing-geoengineering-interventions/5485739

Professor Tim Lenton (Chair in Climate Change/Earth Systems Science,

University of Exeter) provided one of the many positive outcomes of this
summers climate change conference in Paris.
You may have missed this major admission from Professor Lenton which we
originally broke in our Paris Report, so we revisit it here and round off with a
little more discussion.
His revelations occurred on day 2 of the climate change conference in Paris
that ran from 7th to 10th July, 2015.
As you will see from the transcript and video excerpts, below, Professor
Lenton initially denied that geoengineering activities were already occurring
but, when pressed further, he threw in the towel and conceded that the
geoengineering of our skies was indeed already happening.

For any newcomers to this topic, we are officially told by Her Majestys Government that geoengineering
which includes releasing vast amounts of toxic substances into the sky from aircraft in a supposed bid to block
out the sun and reduce global warming is just a proposal, and that any current geoengineering experiments
are being performed only on a small scale.
Transcript of Geoengineering-related Discussions
Olga
Raffa, Chemtrails
Project
UK: My
names
Olga
Raffa,
from
ClimateChangeSense.org. I represent a large group of people who are wondering
why programmes such as weather modification and ongoing geoengineering
programmes throughout the World have not been taken into consideration with a lot
of the research done. And we notice, on a daily basis, that our environment is being
tipped through the aerosols being dumped into the atmosphere blocking our sun. And
there seems to be a lot of aluminium in the environment within the bees now have
aluminium, and its destroying their, well, theres a bee collapse obviously with the
insects and the biodiversity. Aluminium found in whales. So we recognise this is a
military programme. And the EMFs so youve got your cell towers, your HAARP
which is putting heat into the atmosphere, into the ionosphere and seems to be
moving the jet streams. Have you done any research and published on the tipping points that this is doing and
will cause in the future. Thank you.
Prof. Tim Lenton, University of Exeter: Not precisely on those interventions, but I
am someone whos obviously worked on tipping points and also on trying to evaluate
these well, I would think of them more as proposed, existing proposals for
geoengineering inverventions either in the camp of sunlight reflection methods or
large-scale carbon removal methods. Ive been on my own journey with my thinking
about that but, as Ive said publicly and in the literature, Im now of a view that the
risks posed by large-scale attempts to reflect sunlight back to space far outweigh
the potential benefits in terms of reducing risk of higher temperatures and associated
tipping points. So I still feel that theres a space for and theres a need, in fact, to look
at the options for carbon removal as I think we may need that later this century. But
thats not what youre most concerned about.
The next Q&A covers another subject raised by another attendee, before the geoengineering topic is rekindled
by Dr. Colin Pritchard.
Dr. Colin Pritchard, University of Edinburgh: My question is again for Tim. Colin
Pritchard, Edinburgh University. Hi, Tim. Thank you very much for your very cogent
explanation. I would basically agree with you on geoengineering except, may I infer
that you prefer an enormous global-scale uncontrolled experiment in geoenginerring
as opposed to a small-scale uncontrolled [sic] one. At the moment we are in the
former. And it seems to be a little bizarre to prefer the former to the latter.
Prof. Tim Lenton, University of Exeter: Im certainly not
preferring carrying on with our current uncontrolled
experiment. And Im not whats the right word Im not
monolithically set against things that are being discussed
under the banner of geoengineering. So its quite a
nuance I think thats quite a nuance discussion to have, perhaps over lunch,
because it really depends on the options youre considering. So youve got some
things which would be reflective roofs and road surfaces that are very practical, local
adaptation options against urban heat islands that, if you did on a large enough scale,
could have some measurable effect on regional climate and I think are very sensible.
So we have to just be I think we have to be nuanced on specific proposals, specific
technologies. But I think we can perhaps all agree that certainly none of us want to continue the current
uncontrolled experiment. I guess, knowing the numbers, we realise that we would like the strongest mitigation
efforts possible but we now know that additional things including carbon removal from the atmosphere may
we may want to develop that capability because we may need it as part of the risk management portfolio.
Video Excerpt
Lasting 4 minutes 24 seconds (if you cut out the interjecting question/answer by skipping from 1:26:16 to
1:29:59), here are the above exchanges from the official footage:

Object 1

The original, full video from this session last 1 hour 39 minutes 43 seconds.
Conclusion
Its Happening
Professor Lentons U-turn on whether geoengineering activities are already
underway, although spectacular, is actually quite understandable.
Geoengineers proposing to spray aerosols from aircraft to block out the sun when the
same effects, were told, are already being achieved with ordinary condensation
trails is the ludicrous scenario currently being served up by Her Majestys
Government (HMG) one that does not merit the vast amounts of taxpayers money
that has already been invested in geoengineering.
It appears the fine line being walked by Professor Lenton and company is that, on
one hand, they must not be seen emboldening ridiculous claims such as the ordinary
condensation trails one made by HMG but, on the other hand, trying not to bite that same hand that is feeding
them financially. I believe it is this dilemma that we witness Professor Lenton struggle with as it best explains his
initial denial then later admission that geoengineering is already occurring.
It is reasonable, therefore, to conclude that the money received by these establishments is adversely affecting
the quality of their work. They are compromised.
So too the media, creating their nonsensical pro-environmental fanfare for the IPCC as they set about
hammering the final few nails into our New World Order coffin, with virtually no mention of the real scientists and
the real campaigners who, with no financial incentive, continue to spread the truth about the underlying
phenomenon of global warming.
Such individuals those with the intelligence, independence and decency to stand against the mainstream
deception are ensuring that the cracks of Agenda 21 and the NWO continue to progress

Object 2

until the whole system is inevitably exploited for what it is.

Its Being Ignored
The second major issue that is confirmed for us by Professor Lenton (and as
confirmed elsewhere) is that these geoengineering activities that we now agree
exist have not been taken into account in the IPCCs climate models or in other
mainstream climate research.
With the warming effects that persistent aircraft trails can have on surface
temperatures already acknowledged by the IPCC but not included in their climate
models, scientists such as Professor Lenton must realise that the geoengineering
elephant in the room must now be addressed if these scientists and their work is
to emerge with any credibility whatsoever.
The question we witnessed Dr Pritchard raising was especially helpful as it ultimately
caused Professor Lenton to concede, but one is left wondering to what extent other institutions are benefiting
from adopting the flawed stance that the climate is changing due to human activity, but lets ignore the climatic
effects of years of geoengineering.
More specifically, if UK universities are being rewarded with vast amounts of research money to facilitate the
nonsense of geoengineering, then how lucrative must be the benefits of upholding the underlying global
warming alarmism that we already know to be flawed? To look at it another way, how many millions would it cost
them if they allowed the wheels to come off the global warming bandwagon? Ethics aside, it is clear why their
main incentive is to promote the paired issues of global warming and geoengineering. Money talks.
By way of contrast, consider the 30,000 independent US scientists (of which 9,000 had PhDs) that signed the
Oregon Petition:
We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was
written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed
limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and
technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or

other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic
heating of the Earths atmosphere and disruption of the Earths climate. Moreover, there is
substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many
beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.
With no financial motivation for these scientists, what prevailed was the opportunity for truth and transparency.
No threat required. No spotlight required.
Learn more about the global warming deception that is facilitating the geoengineering crime at our sister
site, Climate Change Sense.
Theres No Way Forward
For Professor Lenton himself, now that he has conceded geoengineering is
contributing to climate change, is he going to continue his absurdly flawed promotion
of geoengineering also being a solution to climate change?! Or will he find the
necessary resources to investigate geoengineering and chemtrails as a causal factor
of climate change and maybe even reconsider his stance on global warming? With
no financial incentive, such a change in direction may appear unlikely but, given his
own admission, how else can his work be taken seriously?
The same questions, of course, apply to all mainstream climate scientists and the
IPCC, because what Professor Lentons words have done is invalidate his work, his
departments work and that of the IPCC. This is because we now have official
acceptance that geoengineering is happening and its effects are not being taken into
account, which is rendering the whole anthropogenic global warming claim an utter shambles.
For Professor Lenton and every other climate scientist now unable to plead ignorance, without the necessary
change in direction, will their work eventually be subject to charges of fraud?
We know we live in a World rife in corruption and there is no reason to presume the scientists, politicians and
journalists involved in the global warming and geoengineering scandals should be any exception to the rule.
Shamefully, the only sacrifice they appear willing to make is to permit the current, growing threat to their own
children and grandchildrens physical health.
Such sacrifice appears to be made for the purpose of simply securing their own personal salaries and
livelihoods. In todays climate of financial hardship and debt, it can be understood how simply getting
themselves over the line may be a priority for the me generation, but any assumption that their offspring may
enjoy a net benefit seems especially shortsighted.
Sadly, all too often, cash is king. But if their ultimate motive does boil down to financial security, you would
expect these intelligent people to engage their foresight and acknowledge the imminent ramifications of being
so closely associated with and facilitating what may deservedly go down as the greatest crime of modern
history. A crime that, by their own admission, is now unfolding before us.
May this article serve as a call for these scientists to turn their attentions to the bigger picture and to change
their course of action accordingly, so they are no longer:
Damaging the health of themselves and their own families.
Risking prosecution for accepting the known-fraudulent offerings of the IPCC whilst laying the foundations
for and/or promoting geoengineering crimes.
Paving the way for the One World Government / New World Order that permeatesUnited Nations Agenda
21 and as promoted by the Pope.
Standing by and watching the destruction of our wildlife, plant life, human life, our food, our water, our
land and our oceans. Facilitating the attempted destruction of Mother Nature.
This article has been written to urge these scientists and others in positions of influence to make proper,
responsible use of their opportunity to no longer stand aside and facilitate but to stand strong, to break the
hush and to do what they can to bring these disastrous geoengineering crimes to an end. Be the change the
World so desperately needs.
To read more:
http://www.chemtrailsprojectuk.com/cracked-top-climate-scientist-admits-to-ongoing-geoengineering/
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not

be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.