Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
M.E. civil(Structural engineering) from, BVM engineering college, Gujarat Technological University
Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand,Gujarat,India.
2
Associate Professor at Structural engineering departmentt, BVM engineering college, Gujarat Technological University
Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand,Gujarat,India.
Abstract The design of structures subjected to natural
hazards such as earthquakes and typhoons demands safety
of structures which is governed by the natural frequencies
and the amount of damping in each mode of vibration. The
dynamic behavior of structures is governed by the
fundamental natural frequency and the amount of damping
exhibited by each mode of vibration. Fundamental
frequency of a building and its damping has a remarkable
effect on the magnitude of its response.
As per IS 1893:2002 The approximate fundamental
natural period of vibration (T), in seconds, is a function of
Height of a building and Plan dimension of a building.
In this Research work objective is to show that natural
time period is also a function of number of floors and not
only the height of the building, which is not mentioned in IS
1893:2002.
II.
I. INTRODUCTION
III.
B ACK GROUND
237
P ROBLEM FORMULATION
Plan dimension : 70 m 70 m
Height of building : 90 m for sample model
(varies from 60 m to 90 m)
Height of each storey : 3m (constant)
Number of bays along X-direction: 14 nos.
Number of bays along Y-direction: 14 nos.
Length of each bay(in X-direction): 5m
Length of each bay(in Y-direction): 5m
Number
of
floors
varies
as
:20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30.
Column size: 450 mm 450 mm (may be
changed as per actual design)
Beam size: 300 mm 600 mm (may be changed
as per actual design)
238
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
[1 ] Mills, R.S. Small-scale modeling of the nonlinear response of
steel-framed buildings to earthquakes Design for Dynamic
Loading and Modal Analysis, Construction Press, pp.171177.(1979)
[2 ] Krawinkler, H. and Benjamin.J. Wallace., Small-scale model
experimentation on steel assemblies Report No.75, The John A.
Blume Earthquake Engineering Centre, Department of Civil
Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford.(1985)
[3 ] Lagomarsino, S., Forecast models for damping and vibration
periods of buildings J. of Wind Eng. and Ind Aerodyn. Vol. 48,
pp.221-239,(1993)
[4 ] Tamura, Y., Suganuma, S. , Evaluation of amplitude-dependent
damping and natural frequency of buildings during strong winds.
J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aerodyn., Vol. 59, pp. 115-130.(1996)
[5 ] Goel, K.R.and Chopra, K.A. Period formulas for momentresisting
frame
Buildings,
J.of
Struct.Eng.,
ASCE,Vol.123,pp.1454-1461. (1997),
[6 ] D.E. Allen and G. Pernica, Control of Floor Vibration,dec (1998)
[7 ] Bhandari, N. and Sharma, B. K., Damage pattern due to
January,2001 Bhuj earthquake, India: Importance of site
amplification and interference of shear waves, Abstracts of
International Conference on Seismic Hazard with particular
reference to Bhuj Earthquake of 26 January 200I,
NewDelhi,(2001),.
[8 ] IITK, KANPUR, INDIA (EARTHQUAKE TIPS-10) (2002).
[9 ] IS 1893:2002 indian standard code of practice for earthquale
resistant design.
[10 ] L. Govinda Rajul, G. V. Ramana, C. HanumanthaRao and T. G.
Sitharaml ,site specific ground response analysis,(2003)
[11 ] Kim, N.S., Kwak, Y.H.and Chang, S.P, Modified similitude law
for pseudo dynamic test on small-scale steel modelsJ.of
Earthquake Eng. Society of Korea, Vol.7, pp. 49-57. (2003)
[12 ] Tremblay, R. and Rogers, C.A. Impact of capacity design
provisions and period limitations on the seismic design of lowrise
steel buildings Intl.J.of Steel Struct., Vol. 5, pp.1-22. (2005)
[13 ] Technical paper by Dr V Kanwar, Dr N Kwatra, Non-memberDr
P Aggarwal, Dr M L Gambir, Evaluation of Dynamic Parameters
of a Three-storey RCC Building Model using Vibration
Techniques , July 04, (2007)
As per the analysis carried out for all the load cases
manual concrete design is done for the maximum axial
force for column and maximum bending moment for
beams considering all load cases including earthquake in
direction X. As per this revised design, sizes for all
column as 1000*1000 mm and all the beams as 300*600
mm.
With this revised sizes further STATIC ANALYSIS
has been carried out for the variation of each number of
floors and height for sub-sequent model.
As the number of floors increases, height of building
will be increased and due to this, variation in natural
frequency will be obtained. The results obtained for
variation in number of floors and height of building is as
shown in table 1.
Table 1
Results for Natural Time period for Different models.
Sr
no
No.
of
floors
storey
height
(m)
Height
of
building
(m)
1
2
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
60.00
63.00
66.00
69.00
72.00
75.00
78.00
81.00
84.00
87.00
90.00
Natural time
period
T(second) (as
per STAAD
analysis)
0.6454
0.6777
0.7100
0.7422
0.7745
0.8068
0.8391
0.8713
0.9036
0.9359
0.9681
Natural
frequency
(=2/T)
9.7301
9.2668
8.8454
8.4609
8.1084
7.7840
7.4847
7.2075
6.9501
6.7104
6.4867
239