Ansi Hi 9 6 1

ANSI/HI 9.6.
1-1998
American National Standard for
Centrifugal and
Vertical Pumps
ANSI/HI 9.6.1-1998
for NPSH Margin
9 Sylvan Way
Parsippany, New Jersey
07054-3802
www.pumps.org
This page intentionally blank.
Copyright 2000 By Hydraulic Institute, All Rights Reserved.
ANSI/HI 9.6.1-1998
American National Standard for
Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps

for NPSH Margin
Secretariat
Hydraulic Institute
www.pumps.org
Approved March 3, 1998
American National Standards Institute, Inc.

Recycled
paper
American
National
Standard
Approval of an American National Standard requires verification by ANSI that the

requirements for due process, consensus and other criteria for approval have been met
by the standards developer.
Consensus is established when, in the judgement of the ANSI Board of Standards
Review, substantial agreement has been reached by directly and materially affected
interests. Substantial agreement means much more than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires that all views and objections be considered,
and that a concerted effort be made toward their resolution.
The use of American National Standards is completely voluntary; their existence does
not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he has approved the standards or not,
from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standards.
The American National Standards Institute does not develop standards and will in no
circumstances give an interpretation of any American National Standard. Moreover, no
person shall have the right or authority to issue an interpretation of an American
National Standard in the name of the American National Standards Institute. Requests
for interpretations should be addressed to the secretariat or sponsor whose name
appears on the title page of this standard.
CAUTION NOTICE: This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at
any time. The procedures of the American National Standards Institute require that
action be taken periodically to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard. Purchasers of
American National Standards may receive current information on all standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute.
Published By
Hydraulic Institute
9 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, NJ 07054-3802
www.pumps.org
Copyright 1998 by Hydraulic Institute

All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form,
in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without prior
written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America

ISBN 1-880952-25-4
Contents
Page
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
9.6.1
Pump NPSH margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
9.6.1.1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
9.6.1.2
Suction energy level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
9.6.1.2.1
Suction energy factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
9.6.1.2.2
Suction energy determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
9.6.1.3
Cavitation damage factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9.6.1.4
NPSH margin ratio recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9.6.1.5
Application considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9.6.1.5.1
Petroleum process pumps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9.6.1.5.2
Chemical process pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9.6.1.5.3
Electric power pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.6.1.5.4
Nuclear power/cooling tower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.6.1.5.5
Water/wastewater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9.6.1.5.6
General industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.6.1.5.7
Pulp and paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.6.1.5.8
Building services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.6.1.5.9
Slurry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.6.1.5.10
Pipeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.6.1.5.11
Waterflood (injection) pumps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.6.1.6
Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Appendix A
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
iii
Foreword (Not part of Standard)

Purpose and aims of the Hydraulic Institute
The purpose and aims of the Institute are to promote the continued growth and
well-being of pump manufacturers and further the interests of the public in such
matters as are involved in manufacturing, engineering, distribution, safety, transportation and other problems of the industry, and to this end, among other things:
a) To develop and publish standards for pumps;
b) To collect and disseminate information of value to its members and to the
public;
c) To appear for its members before governmental departments and agencies
and other bodies in regard to matters affecting the industry;
d) To increase the amount and to improve the quality of pump service to the public;
e) To support educational and research activities;
f) To promote the business interests of its members but not to engage in business of the kind ordinarily carried on for profit or to perform particular services
for its members or individual persons as distinguished from activities to
improve the business conditions and lawful interests of all of its members.
Purpose of Standards
1) Hydraulic Institute Standards are adopted in the public interest and are
designed to help eliminate misunderstandings between the manufacturer,
the purchaser and/or the user and to assist the purchaser in selecting and
obtaining the proper product for a particular need.
2) Use of Hydraulic Institute Standards is completely voluntary. Existence of
Hydraulic Institute Standards does not in any respect preclude a member
from manufacturing or selling products not conforming to the Standards.
Definition of a Standard of the Hydraulic Institute

Quoting from Article XV, Standards, of the By-Laws of the Institute, Section B:
An Institute Standard defines the product, material, process or procedure with
reference to one or more of the following: nomenclature, composition, construction, dimensions, tolerances, safety, operating characteristics, performance, quality, rating, testing and service for which designed.
Comments from users

Comments from users of this Standard will be appreciated, to help the Hydraulic
Institute prepare even more useful future editions. Questions arising from the content of this Standard may be directed to the Hydraulic Institute. It will direct all
such questions to the appropriate technical committee for provision of a suitable
answer.
If a dispute arises regarding the contents of an Institute publication or an answer
provided by the Institute to a question such as indicated above, the point in question shall be referred to the Executive Committee of the Hydraulic Institute, which
then shall act as a Board of Appeals.
v
Revisions
The Standards of the Hydraulic Institute are subject to constant review, and revisions are undertaken whenever it is found necessary because of new developments and progress in the art. If no revisions are made for five years, the
standards are reaffirmed using the ANSI canvass procedure.
Scope
This standard applies to centrifugal and vertical pump types. It describes the benefit to pump life when the NPSH available is greater than the NPSH required by a
suitable margin, and suggests margins for various applications.
Units of Measurement
Metric units of measurement are used; corresponding US units appear in brackets. Charts, graphs and sample calculations are also shown in both metric and US
units.
Since values given in metric units are not exact equivalents to values given in US
units, it is important that the selected units of measure to be applied be stated in
reference to this standard. If no such statement is provided, metric units shall govern.
Consensus for this standard was achieved by use of the Canvass

Method
The following organizations, recognized as having an interest in the standardization of centrifugal pumps were contacted prior to the approval of this revision of
the standard. Inclusion in this list does not necessarily imply that the organization
concurred with the submittal of the proposed standard to ANSI.
A.W. Chesterton Company
Agrico Chemical Corp.
Ahlstrom Pumps, LLC
Alden Research Lab
Bechtel Corporation
Black & Veatch
Brown & Caldwell
Camp Dresser & McKee
CH2M Hill
Chas S. Lewis & Co., Inc.
Crane Pump & Systems
DeWanti & Stowell
Dow Chemical
DuPont Engineering
Electric Power Research Institute
Engineering Devices Resource Group
ENSR Consulting & Engineering
Essco Pump Division
Fairbanks Morse Pump
Florida Power Corporation
Floway Pumps
Flowserve Corp.
Fluor Daniel, Inc.
Grundfos Pumps Corp.
Ingersoll-Dresser Pump
ITT Industrial Pump Group

ITT Flygt Corp.
Iwaki Walchem Corp.
J.P. Messina Pump & Hydraulics
Consultant
John Crane, Inc.
Johnston Pump Co.
Lawrence Pumps, Inc.
M. W. Kellogg Co.
Malcom Pirnie, Inc.
Marine Machinery Association
National Pump Co.
Monsanto Co.
Montana State University
Montgomery Watson
MWI, Moving Water Industries
Oxy Chem
National Pump Co.
PACO Pumps
Patterson Pump Co.
PC Garvin & Associates
Price Pump Co.
Raytheon Engineering & Constructors
Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates
vi
Sewage & Water Board of New Orleans

Skidmore
South Florida Water Management
Southern Company Services, Inc.
Sta-Rite Industries
Stone & Webster Engineering
Sulzer Bingham Pumps, Inc.
Summers Engineering, Inc.

Systecon, Inc.
The Process Group, LLC
Union Pump Co.
US Bureau of Reclamation
US Army Corp of Engineers
Although this standard was processed and approved for submittal to ANSI by the
Canvass Method, a working committee met many times to faciliate the development of this standard. At the time it was developed, the committee had the following members:
CHAIRMAN - Allan Budris, ITT Industrial Pump Group
OTHER MEMBERS
Ronald Brundage, ITT Flygt
Fred Buse, Ingersoll-Dresser Pump Co.
Greg Case, Price Pump
R. Barry Erickson, ITT Industrial Pump Group
Herman Greutink, Johnston Pump
Al Iseppon, Sta-Rite Industries
Ray Perriman, Sundstrand Fluid Handling
Robert Stanbury, Flowserve Corporation
vii
HI Pumps Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for NPSH Margin 1998

9.6.1 Pump NPSH margin
9.6.1.1
Introduction
HI Pumps Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for NPSH Margin
The noise, the vibration and possibly the reliability of a

centrifugal or vertical pump and mechanical seal may
be significantly affected if an appropriate Net Positive
Suction Head (NPSH) margin is not provided by the
system above the published Net Positive Suction Head
Required (NPSHR) by the pump.
The NPSH Margin is defined as the NPSH Available
(NPSHA) at the pump inlet, minus the NPSH Required
by the pump. The NPSH Margin Ratio is the NPSHA
divided by the NPSHR. The Net Positive Suction Head
Available (NPSHA) is the total suction head available,
over the vapor pressure of the liquid pumped corrected
to the center line of the impeller (or impeller inlet vane
tip datum if vertically mounted), and measured at the
inlet to the pump.
the service life of the pump. The full published pump

head will not, however, be achieved (by definition)
when the NPSHA equals the NPSHR of the pump. The
head will be 3% less than the fully developed head
value (see Figure 9.6.1.1). It can take up to 2.5 times
the NPSHR value just to achieve the 100 percent head
value. Just because the definition uses the word
Required, does not mean that providing that much
NPSHA will necessarily give satisfactory pump life. It is
also recognized that, as the suction energy of a centrifugal pump increases, so does the need for a larger
NPSH margin above the 3% NPSHR of the pump, to
avoid excessive noise, vibration, and possible cavitation erosion and seal damage.
NPSHA = hatm + hgs + hvs + Zs hvp

Where:
hatm =
atmospheric pressure head
hgs =
suction gage head
hvs =
suction velocity head
zs =
hvp =
Figure 9.6.1.1
suction elevation head

liquid vapor pressure head
See the ANSI/HI 1.6 Centrifugal Pump Tests for further details on the definitions of NPSHA and NPSHR.
By Hydraulic Institute definition, the NPSHR of a pump
is the NPSH that will cause the total head (first stage
head of multistage pumps) to be reduced by 3%, due
to flow blockage from cavitation vapor in the impeller
vanes. NPSHR is by no means the point at which cavitation starts; that level is referred to as incipient cavitation. The NPSH at incipient cavitation can be from 2 to
20 times the 3% NPSHR value, depending on pump
design. The higher ratios are normally associated with
high suction energy pumps or pumps with large impeller inlet areas.
The 3% head drop criteria was selected for the
NPSHR value based on the ease of determining the
exact head drop off point. Most standard low suction
energy pumps can operate with little or no margin
above the NPSHR value, without seriously affecting
Most pump manufacturers use the industry standard

3% head drop for NPSHR values and provide the
NPSH Margin recommendations separately. A few
manufacturers do include the NPSH Margin in their
pump NPSHR curves which then supersede the
guidelines spelled out in this standard. Unless advised
otherwise, however, the user must assume that there
is no margin in the published NPSHR, and that it is
based solely on the 3% head drop criteria.
9.6.1.2
Suction energy level
The suction energy level of a pump increases with the

casing suction nozzle size, the pump speed, the suction specific speed and the specific gravity of the
pumped liquid. Anything that increases the velocity in
the pump impeller eye, the rate of flow of the pump, or
the specific gravity, increases the suction energy of the
pump. The suction nozzle size is used for simplicity
because it approximates the impeller eye diameter and
ties to the rate of flow of the pump. The rpm ties directly
to the inlet tip speed of the impeller and relative inlet
1

velocities, and the suction specific speed is also
dependant on rpm and rate of flow. The NPSHR in the
suction specific speed is appropriate as a measure of
suction energy in that larger impeller eye diameters
are normally required for lower NPSHR values, which
increases the impeller tip speed.
9.6.1.2.1 Suction energy factors
The overlap of the impeller vanes. Overlap values less than approximately 15 degrees, such as
found on two or three vane impellers (see
Figure 2), can allow the high discharge pressure
(energy) to recirculate into the impeller suction at
low rates of flow. Overlap is defined as the angular
amount that the trailing edge of one vane (low
pressure side) overlaps the inlet leading edge of
the following adjacent vane (at the outer diameter).
Many factors are known to contribute to the suction

energy level, and resulting NPSH margin requirements
of a pump, more than used in the above definition.
Those used in the above definition are factors which
are typically available from standard pump manufacturers technical literature. Manufacturers of custom
engineered pumps may use alternate evaluation methods to establish NPSH margin requirements and these
would supersede the guidelines spelled out in this
standard. For general information a list of suction
energy factors is provided below:
15
VANE
OVERLAP
The peripheral velocity at the O.D. of the impeller eye. Values below approximately 15 m/sec. (50
ft/sec) are generally considered low suction
energy, while values above approximately 35 m/
sec. (120 ft/sec) are considered high suction
energy.
The suction specific speed of the pump (S = n
Q/(NPSHR)). Suction specific speed values
below approximately 8,000 metric (7,000 U.S.
units) generally represent low suction energy,
while above approximately 23,000 metric (20,000
U.S. units) are considered high suction energy.
See Figure 9.6.1.3 for suction specific speeds
between these values. (Note: Q is the BEP rate of
flow entering the impeller eye. In double suction
pumps, use one half total rate of flow. NPSHR is
based on 3% head drop at BEP.)
The specific gravity of the liquid pumped. The

higher the value the higher the suction energy.
Thermodynamic properties of the liquid. Cold

water has one of the highest energy levels for
imploding cavitation bubbles. See section on Electric Power pumps for more details.
ROTATION
The geometry of the pump inlet. The greater the

variation in velocity across the impeller inlet and
the higher the magnitude of velocities, the higher
the energy level. For this reason, radial inlets, as
found in split case pumps have higher suction
energy levels due to the right angle turn in front of
the impeller.
IMPELLER
VANE
Figure 9.6.1.2
The incidence angle between the inlet impeller

vanes and the approaching liquid. Typically an
impeller is designed to have a zero incidence
angle at design rate of flow. Higher or lower rates
of flow cause a mismatch between the angle of the
approaching liquid and the impeller vane inlet tips.
The greater the incidence the greater the turbulence and suction energy.
The geometry of the inlet piping to the pump.

The turbulence (added suction energy) that is generated at the pump inlet from piping turns and
large changes in pipe diameter adds to the suction
energy at the pump inlet.
Operation away from the best efficiency point

(BEP) of the pump. At reduced rates of flow the
pump may operate in its suction recirculation
region. Operation off BEP rate of flow also
increases the incidence angle to the impeller
vanes, and suction recirculation adds to the suction energy level. See ANSI/HI 9.6.3-1997, Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for Allowable Operating
Region, for more information.
2

9.6.1.2.2 Suction energy determination
This is a complex situation and a single equation or
relationship has not been developed, which will accurately tie all of these factors together to predict pump
noise, vibration, erosion, and reduced mechanical seal
life from cavitation, and the NPSH margin level
required to avoid these undesirable effects. Recommended margin ratios can typically range from one to
five times the NPSHR value of the pump, with the
higher values applying to high and very high suction
energy pumps, and continuous operation outside the
preferred operating region of the pump. The attached
graph (Figure 9.6.1.3) is a simplified method for identifying high suction energy pumps. Pumps above the
appropriate suction specific speed curve as shown in
Figure 9.6.1.3, are considered high suction energy
pumps. Very high suction energy pumps can be
defined as pumps whose actual impeller operating
speeds are in the range of 1.5 to 2.0 times the values
shown in Figure 9.6.1.3, or higher. As an example, an
end suction pump with a 10" suction nozzle size and
9,500 suction specific speed is shown to start high
suction energy at 1,800 RPM. If this pump were to be
operated at 3,600 RPM (2 times 1,800) the pump
would be considered to have very high suction energy.
Figure 9.6.1.3A (metric)
It must be stressed that the impeller eye diameter is

actually a better factor for identifying the suction
energy level of a pump than the suction nozzle diameter. The nozzle size was chosen for Figure 9.6.1.3
because it is more often available to the pump user,
and normally has a close relationship to the impeller
eye. Therefore, reducing the suction nozzle size, without a corresponding reduction in the impeller eye
diameter, will not reduce the true suction energy of a
pump. It could even increase cavitation.
Generally speaking, high suction energy pumps are
susceptible to noise and increased vibration, but will
not suffer significant erosion damage (especially with
more erosion resistant impeller materials) when sufficient NPSH Margin is not provided. Very high suction
energy pumps will more likely experience erosion
damage from cavitation under inadequate NPSH margin conditions.
Figure 9.6.1.3B (US units)

Notes for Figure 9.6.1.3:
For two vane impellers and impeller trims with less

than 15 degrees vane overlap, (see Figure
9.6.1.2) increase suction nozzle size by one or two
sizes before using Figure 9.6.1.3.
Inducers, which are generally beyond the scope of

this document, should have the suction nozzle
decreased by at least one size before using
Figure 9.6.1.3.
For axial split case (side Suction) pumps,

decrease nozzle size by one size, before using
Figure 9.6.1.3.
3
For pump speeds higher than 3600 rpm, the suction nozzle sizes should be increased, proportional to the increase in speed, and enter the
graph at 3600 rpm. For example, increase the
nozzle size by 2 times if the speed is doubled.
For vertical turbine (line shaft diffuser) type

pumps, the Impeller Inlet eye diameter should be
obtained from the supplier and used as the suction
nozzle size, when using Figure 9.6.1.3.
gas may be to quiet the pump, since the cushioning may more than offset the added cavitation.
However, with very high suction energy pumps,
the force of the collapsing cavitation bubbles may
be too great for any real cushioning, so the noise
and damage will increase with increasing gas
content.
Additives in the liquid. Additives in the liquid

which increase vapor pressure can increase cavitation damage. For example, cooling tower water
treatment agents.
The corrosive properties of the liquid. This can

accelerate the damage.
Solids/abrasives in the liquid. Adding abrasives

to the high implosive velocities from the collapsing
vapor bubbles increases the wear rate.
There are other factors which, although not affecting

the suction energy of the pump, will affect the degree
of cavitation erosion damage (and sometimes noise)
within a pump when sufficient NPSH margin is not provided above the NPSHR of the pump. These nonsuction energy factors are:
The duty cycle of the pump. Cavitation damage

is time related. The longer a pump runs under cavitation conditions, the greater the extent of damage. Fire pumps, which run intermittently, rarely
have a problem with cavitation damage for this
reason.
9.6.1.4
Multistage pumps, such as used for boiler feed

and pipeline services, are excluded from this figure due to the typically large shaft diameters in the
impeller eye, which distorts the relationship
between the impeller eye diameter and the suction
nozzle size.
9.6.1.3
Cavitation damage factors
The impeller material. Rigid plastics and composites are normally the least cavitation resistant
materials. Cast iron and brass will experience the
most damage of commonly used metals, while
stainless steel, titanium and nickel aluminum
bronze will have much less damage, under the
same cavitation conditions.
Pump size. Large pumps (impeller inlets over
450 mm (18 in) in diameter can be more prone to
cavitation damage than smaller pumps.
The gas content of the liquid. Small amounts of
entrained gas (1 to 2%) cushion the forces from
the collapsing cavitation bubbles, and can reduce
the resulting noise, vibration and erosion damage.
The lack of any entrained gas can have the opposite effect. Warmer liquids tend to release less dissolved gas, which increases the noise level of a
pump. On the other hand gas can collect in the
inlet of a pump which will block portions of the flow
area, thus increasing the inlet velocity of the liquid
and creating even more cavitation. This increases
the apparent NPSHR of the pump. The net result
of these two counter effects of gas content on
pump noise and vibration will vary based on the
suction energy level of the pump. In the case of
low to high suction energy levels, the net effect of
NPSH margin ratio recommendations
Field experience is the most accurate predictor of

future performance. Table 9.6.1.1 offers suggested
minimum NPSH margin ratio guidelines (NPSHA/
NPSHR), within the allowable operating region of the
pump (with standard materials of construction). The
table is based on the experience of the many pump
manufacturers with many different pump applications.
Vertical turbine pumps often operate without NPSH
margin without damage, but with slightly reduced discharge head.
High and very high suction energy pumps that operate
with only the minimum NPSH margin values recommended in Table 9.6.1.1 will normally have what is
considered acceptable seal and bearing life. They
may still be susceptible to elevated noise levels and
erosion damage to the impeller. This can require more
frequent impeller replacement than otherwise would
be experienced had the cavitation been totally eliminated. It will typically take an NPSHA of 4 to 5 times
the 3% NPSHR of the pump to totally eliminate cavitation. This ratio can reach 20 for very high suction
energy pumps, and a low of 2 for some pumps with low
suction energy levels. There are studies that show that
the maximum cavitation damage can actually occur at
4

NPSHA values twice the NPSHR or more for very high
suction energy pumps.
In addition to the minimum NPSH Margins recommended in Table 9.6.1.1, extra margin may be required
to account for changes in the pump geometry which
can increase NPSHR, such as wear that can open
impeller wearing ring clearances and increase the
internal flow through the impeller eye. The NPSHR
may also be affected by the gas content of the liquid
pumped. Added NPSH Margin may be needed to
cover uncertainties in the NPSH available or the actual
operating rate of flow. If a pump runs further out on the
curve than expected, the NPSHA of the system may
be lower than expected and the NPSHR for the pump
will be higher, thus giving a smaller (or possibly negative) NPSH Margin. (See ANSI/HI 9.6.3-1997, Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for Allowable Operating
Region). All pumping systems must be designed to
have a positive margin throughout the full range of
operation. Optimum pump performance also requires
that proper suction/inlet piping practices are followed,
according to the Hydraulic Institute Standards (see

ANSI/HI 9.8-1998, Pump Intake Design), to ensure a
steady uniform flow to the pump suction at the
required suction head. Poor suction piping can result
in separation and turbulence at the pump inlet, which
decreases the NPSHA to the pump and causes added
cavitation. NPSHA Margins of two to five feet are normally required (above those shown in Table 9.6.1.1) to
account for these uncertainties in the actual NPSHR
and NPSHA values, and this added margin requirement could be even greater depending upon the severity of the conditions. If the application is critical, a
factory NPSHR test should be requested.
NPSH Margins are not normally a consideration for
most standard vertical turbine pumps, since they generally have Low Suction Energy, and cavitation noise is
normally not an issue. NPSHA must, however, be
equal to or larger than the NPSHR over the allowable
operating region of the pump, including at low water
level. The determination of the minimum submergence
required to avoid the formation of sump vortices
Table 9.6.1.1
Minimum NPSH margin ratio guidelines (NPSHA/NPSHR)
Suction energy level
Application
Low
High
Very high
Petroleum
1.1a
1.3c
Chemical
1.1a
1.3c
Electric power
1.1a
1.5c
2.0c
Nuclear power
1.5b
2.0c
2.5c
Cooling towers
1.3b
1.5c
2.0c
Water/waste water
1.1a
1.3c
2.0c
General industry
1.1a
1.2b
Pulp and paper
1.1a
1.3c
Building services
1.1a
1.3c
Slurry
1.1a
Pipeline
1.3b
1.7c
2.0c
Water flood
1.2b
1.5c
2.0c
a) Or 0.6m (2 feet), whichever is greater.

b) Or 0.9m (3 feet), whichever is greater.
c) Or 1.5m (5 feet), whichever is greater.
5

around the pump inlet must be considered independently from NPSHA, since they are a separate phenomena. (See ANSI/HI 9.8-1998, Pump Intake Design).
Low Suction Energy Single Stage Overhung, Vertical and Multistage Pumps: For all hydrocarbon liquids use an NPSH Margin Ratio of 1.1.
9.6.1.5
High and Very High Suction Energy Single Stage

Overhung, Single Stage Double Suction Multistage Pumps: For all hydrocarbon liquids use a
NPSH Margin Ratio of 1.3.
Application considerations
9.6.1.5.1 Petroleum process pumps

Pumps used for petroleum (hydrocarbon) services can
usually survive with relatively small NPSHA margins
for several reasons:
1) Processes are typically steady, with few system upsets (transients) or quick flow change
demands.
2) Process requirements are typically well known
and demands can be planned and predicted.
3) Most hydrocarbon liquids have relatively low
vapor volume to liquid volume ratios. This
means that, if the liquid should vaporize at or
near the pump suction (impeller inlet), the volume of the resulting vapor does not choke the
impeller inlet passages as severely as does
water vapor during cavitation. This results in a
smaller drop in developed head for the same
NPSH margin.
The majority of vertical turbine pumps in the petrochemical industry are normally installed in a barrel or
can as shown in Figure 2.6 of the Hydraulic Institute
standard ANSI/HI 2.1-2.2, Vertical Pumps for Nomenclature and Definitions. The NPSHA must exceed the
NPSHR over the expected range of operation. Normally, the customers will give a margin value which will
vary from 0 to approximately 1.5m (5 feet). The
NPSHA is normally given at ground level or pump inlet
level. The manufacturer then determines the length of
the pump required to achieve sufficient NPSHA at the
first stage impeller inlet to account for the NPSHR,
pump inlet losses (inlet to eye of first impeller) and
margin.
9.6.1.5.2 Chemical process pumps
Pumps for these applications frequently share the following characteristics:
1) Operation frequently occurs at a wide variety
of rates of flow.
4) Less energy is released when hydrocarbon

vapor bubbles collapse (velocity from implosion is less), and this means less damage
occurs as a result of cavitation. It is, therefore,
not as critical that cavitation be avoided, as
might be the case with other liquids.
2) Materials of construction are often stainless

steel impellers.
3) They may operate with relatively low NPSHA.
Hydrocarbon liquids, especially mixtures of hydrocarbon liquids, because of their relatively low vapor volume, are sometimes associated with a hydrocarbon
correction factor. This correction factor is applied to
the water NPSHR values to correct for the fact that
the vapor volume of flashed hydrocarbon liquid is
substantially less than that of flashed water and,
thus, has the effect of reducing the amount of NPSH
required by the pump at a given rate of flow before
cavitation results in a 3% drop in the developed head
(first stage head) of the pump.
This favorable vapor bubble size situation with hydrocarbons should be taken into account when determining the NPSHA Margin requirements for petroleum
pumps. The margins can be lower than for other applications. Typical NPSH Margins for pumps on hydrocarbon services are as follows:
4) Operators are frequently located remotely

from the pumps.
These factors emphasize the need to apply large
NPSH margins when selecting pumps.
Taking these issues into consideration, the following
NPSH Margin guidelines are proposed for Chemical
Process pumps to account for the many uncertainties:
For low suction energy pumps, the margin should

be 10% of the NPSHR or 0.6m (2 ft), whichever is
greater.
For high suction energy pumps the margin should

be 30% of the NPSHR or 1.5m (5 ft), whichever is
greater. NPSH tests are recommended if the
6

pump specific speed is above 2,300 metric (2,000
U.S. units).
If a pump is applied to the right of BEP, careful consideration should be given to ensuring that, at the maximum flow rate permitted by the system, and its
controls, the NPSHA is in excess of the NPSHR of the
pump.
If the above criteria cannot be met and there is no prior
experience with the specific pump in the application,
NPSH tests should be conducted on the pump. One
test should be conducted at the rated conditions and
must demonstrate that the NPSHR (3%) is equal to or
less than the rated NPSHR. Tests should also be conducted at four additional rates of flow at approximately
even intervals from the minimum to maximum anticipated rates of flow to fully define the NPSHR (3%)
characteristic curve.
9.6.1.5.3 Electric power pumps
Power plant pumps are water pumps. Cold water is
one of the most difficult liquids to pump in that cavitation can cause severe damage. Unlike hydrocarbon
liquids handled by petroleum pumps, water, when it
vaporizes (flashes), expands tremendously. This
results in higher impact velocities when the vapor bubbles implode, thus higher suction energy. One pound
of water at room temperature which occupies 4.5104
cubic meters (0.016 cubic feet), will flash to over
34 cubic meters (1200 cubic feet) of vapor. This is a
volume ratio of 75,000 to 1. For typical hydrocarbon
liquids, this volume ratio is one-half to one-tenth that of
water.
Hot water, on the other hand, can act similar to hydrocarbon liquids. When water is heated to 250-300 F,
the vapor volume characteristics become similar to
that of a typical hydrocarbon. This means that the
effects of flashing are diminished; however, the opportunities for system transients increase significantly
with temperature.
system upsets, or transients, for flashing to occur in

the suction line to the pump, causing loss of suction
flow and allowing the pump to run dry. A common
side effect of a pump running dry is rapid mechanical
seal face wear, general seal deterioration and premature, sometimes catastrophic failure.
Other pumps in the power plant are not usually
exposed to such severe transients as those in the
boiler water system. Condensate pumps and heater
drain pumps are usually isolated from severe system
upsets. They too, however, have special demands or
operating requirements which impact on NPSH and
NPSH Margin requirements. Since they are typically
required to operate with very low NPSHA, they are
designed to function, and survive, with a certain
amount of cavitation present. Some systems operate
on what is termed cavitation control, i.e. the pumps
operate with cavitation at all times.
In such a system, the pump is constantly under some
degree of cavitation which results in a reduced pump
developed head. The quantity of flow through the
pump, and system, is controlled by the intersection of
the pump reduced headrate-of-flow curve and the
system curve. For such an application, there is no
NPSH margin; and the pump must be designed to
withstand constant cavitation. This means it must be of
rugged construction to offset the detrimental effects of
cavitation related vibration, and the materials of construction must be capable of withstanding the erosion
associated with cavitation.
Vertical turbine type pumps used as condensate
pumps are normally installed in a barrel or can as
shown in Figure 2.6 of ANSI/HI 2.1-2.2, Vertical
Pumps for Nomenclature and Definitions.
9.6.1.5.4 Nuclear power/cooling tower
Pumps in nuclear power plants share the following
characteristics and requirements:
a) Nuclear Reactor Duty:
In addition to possible severe vaporization effects, typical power plant operating cycles are not stable. Most
pumps in these services do not remain at constant
flow rates for extended periods of time. The pump flow
demands vary widely with power demands. Because
of varying power demands, system upsets may occur
which result in rapid changes in pump flow demands
and, many times, severe changes in pump suction
pressure. This is especially true for pumps in the boiler
water systems such as boiler feed pumps and boiler
feed booster pumps. It is not unusual, during such
1) Users are more frequently requesting NPSHR

curves based on a 1% head drop.
2) The NPSHA Margin, over NPSHR (3%), is
often incorporated in the NPSH Required
curve by the manufacturer.
3) High horsepower reactor cooling pumps, also
called primary heat transport pumps, are of
low to high suction energy levels.
7

4) Reactor cooling pumps normally operate at
high temperatures and suction pressures, they
will operate at ambient temperature and low
suction pressures during transients and
commissioning.
b) Boiler Feed Duty:
1) NPSHR based on a 3% head drop is specified.
2) Suction energy levels are between low to very
high.
c) Cooling Tower Duty:
Cooling tower water typically has modified chemistry due to water treating agents. These additives
can increase the vapor pressure, which results in
a lower NPSHA than calculated for pure water.
This reduction can be as high as 1.8 meters (6.0
feet), although the exact number must be experimentally determined.
9.6.1.5.5 Water/wastewater
The following considerations apply to pumps for this
application:
1) During variable speed operation, all possible
wet well levels, pump speeds, and rates of
flow exist. It is important that the pump can
function properly over the full operating range
of the system curve. A flow duration diagram
can be used to determine where the pump will
operate most frequently. In the on/off mode of
operation, the speed and rate of flow will be
relatively constant, but the sump level will vary
between a maximum water level and a minimum water level. The change of the water
level in the sump will also change the pumps
total head, also slightly changing the speed
and rate of flow of the pump, but the duty point
will be nearly constant compared to variable
speed operation.
2) Actual system head curves often differ from
the calculated values. This will cause the
NPSH Margin calculation to be incorrect. It is,
therefore, very important to ensure that the
calculated system head curves be as close as
possible to the actual. For existing systems, it
is possible to measure the head at a number
of points to develop the system head curve.
Two system curves should be calculated for
new installations: one for the system as it will
be installed; and a second to represent the

condition of the system after some increase in
pipe roughness has occurred.
3) Many pumps are installed in wastewater applications with elbows mounted in front of the
impeller eye. When suction elbows are necessary, it is best to use reducing or long radius
elbows.
4) Materials of construction are typically cast iron
(wastewater) or cast iron / bronze fitted
(water). These materials are preferred for
water/wastewater, but they do not stand up
well under heavy cavitation. The protective
layer that is built up under normal operation is
destroyed by cavitation, causing abnormal
material removal rates. It is advisable to
change to tougher materials such as stainless
steel or aluminum bronze alloys if the pump
must withstand destructive cavitation levels,
however, this will not help the seals or bearings.
5) Pump stations often operate unattended, and
the malfunction of a pump must be avoided. A
failed pump station processing water or wastewater will cause considerable inconvenience
to the public, and should be designed to be as
trouble-free as possible.
6) Single, two and three vane impeller designs
are common in wastewater applications, with
no or minimal vane overlap. Increase the suction nozzle sizes by one or two sizes for
pumps with one to three vane impellers before
using Figure 9.6.1.3.
7) Vertical Turbine barrel or can type pumps on
water booster services are generally applied
with little or no NPSH Margin, since they are
mostly low suction energy applications.
The above items are listed to illustrate the uncertainies
related to the NPSHA calculations, and at the same
time demonstrate the importance of accuracy when
determining the required NPSHA. It seems as though
the simple answer would be to over-compensate by
adding margin on top of margin, guaranteeing that the
pump would run far from the point of cavitation. Even
though an excessive amount of NPSHA is often not
detrimental to the pump, putting margin on top of margin would add to the cost of the pump stations. It is
also important to note that there are a number of people involved in the supply chain from the specifier to
the end user, and each one may add a margin of their
8

own. Some pump manufacturers include a margin in
their published NPSHR curves. If everyone was to add
a margin, the result of this excess margin would
increase the cost of the pump stations dramatically.
NPSH Margins are suggested for stock consistencies

up to 6%:
For Low Suction Energy pumps use an NPSHA

Margin Ratio (NPSHA/NPSHR) of 1.1 or a margin
of 0.6m (2 ft), whichever is greater.
For High Suction Energy pumps, or pumps having

Specific Speeds greater than 2300 metric (2000
US units), use an NPSHA Margin Ratio of 1.3 or a
margin of 1.5m (5 ft), whichever is greater.
9.6.1.5.6 General industrial

Pumps for this application are used to pump a great
variety of liquids, ranging from water to concentrated
chemicals. These pumps are often sold as standard
catalog, pumps. They are generally low suction energy
designs.
9.6.1.5.8 Building services

Due to the variety of liquids pumped through an
extreme range of temperatures, the specifier must
carefully calculate the NPSHA in the system, taking
into account the vapor pressure of the liquid at the
extreme operating temperature. The use of hose connections and the associated piping bends must be
accounted for. The use of hose or tubing connections
with internal diameters smaller than the pump suction
inlet should not be used on the suction side of the
pump.
NPSHA on tank draining applications should be calculated for the lowest possible level of the liquid in the
tank during the pumping process.
Another consideration in the NPSH Margin of catalog
type pumps is the common changes in flow rates
experienced during process changes, as well as the
physical expansion of process systems to meet higher
production rates. In general an NPSHR versus rate of
flow curve has a parabolic shape. This may cause
large changes in NPSHR especially if the pump is
being run to the right of the best efficiency point.
Due to the low suction energy of most general industrial pumps, operation of the pump without any NPSH
margin does not normally cause substantial damage
to the internal components of the pump. Typical problems are frequent replacement of the mechanical seal
as well as the front motor bearings (on close coupled
pumps) due to the intense vibration caused by the collapsing bubbles, when in fully developed cavitation.
9.6.1.5.7 Pulp and paper
For horizontal end suction stock process pumps situated close to the suction chest, and operating in the
continuous allowable operating region, it is normal to
add sufficient NPSH Margin to account for the uncertainties in the actual NPSHR and NPSHA from poor
suction piping and entrained air. The following minimum
Fluid systems for the building trades or HVAC Industry

are comprised of both closed and open pumping systems. NPSH is generally not a concern when designing closed pumping systems. The typical closed
system is filled and then pressurized to a fill pressure
of 4 to 10 psig. If an inadequate NPSH available
(NPSHA) condition should occur, it can usually be
remedied by increasing the fill pressure.
For open systems, NPSH margin is a very important
consideration. As a guideline, the NPSHA for open
systems should exceed the pump manufacturers
stated NPSH-required (NPSHR) by a minimum of
0.6m, (2 ft) or 1.1 times the NPSHR for Low Suction
Energy Pumps. For High Suction Energy pumps the
margin ratio should be increased to at least 1.3, or a
minimum of 1.5m (5 ft). Pumps operating at these
established minimum NPSH margins may experience
some degree of impeller erosion and/or noise but
these effects should be minimal. System construction
may contribute to the problem of noise, and cavitation.
Increasing the NPSH margin will improve pump operation and reliability.
9.6.1.5.9 Slurry
Pumps used in slurry service are frequently constructed of either hard metals or elastic materials. It is
also common for the slurry concentration and flow
rates to change rapidly, imposing significant loads on
the impeller, shaft and bearings. Because of this, and
the erosive nature of many slurries, slurry pumps are
of an extremely rugged design, making them relatively
insensitive to the mechanical effects of cavitation.
Also, to minimize erosive effects, slurry pumps often
operate at low speeds (less than 1200 RPM). As a
result of this, they normally fall into the Low Suction
Energy category, and have NPSHR values below 6m
(20 ft).
9

vii)
Slurries are typically water based and at ambient temperatures. Suction flow is usually gravity fed. Consequently the NPSHA is normally in excess of 9m (30 ft),
giving NPSHA/NPSHR ratios in excess of 1.5.
9.6.1.5.11
The recommended NPSH Margin Ratio for slurry
pumps is 1.1 or a margin of 0.6m (2 ft) whichever is
greater. For applications where the margin is less,
characteristics of the slurry, and the NPSHR performance of the pump, should be reviewed to assure satisfactory performance.
9.6.1.5.10
Pipeline
For this paper, pipelines are defined as hundreds of

miles in length for the transport of hydrocarbons or
water. Pumps used for pipeline service normally share
the following application criteria:
1) Customers more often request the NPSH
Required values to be based on a 1% head
drop.
2) The NPSHA Margin, over NPSHR (3%), is
often incorporated in the NPSH Required
curve by the manufacturer.
3) Some pipeline designers and operators
request two NPSH Required curves. One
being the conventional NPSHR curve based
on a 3% head drop, and a second based on
the NPSH required to guarantee a 40,000
hour impeller life.
4) Specifications frequently require that the
NPSHA exceed the NPSH Required (40,000
hrs) over the full Allowable Operating Region
for the pump (Minimum to Maximum Flow).
5) There is no standard method for determining
the NPSH Required for 40,000 hours impeller life, however it is a function of:
i)
Suction Energy Level.
ii)
Material of impeller.
iii)
Acidity of pumpage (pH).
iv)
Temperature of pumpage.
v)
Suction Specific Speed.
vi)
Operating rate of flow vs pump best efficiency point.
The NPSH Required (0%) vs NPSHR

(3%) ratio throughout the Allowable Operating Region flow range.
Waterflood (injection) pumps
Water injection pumps for flooding of oil wells typically

operate against relatively constant systems. The system requirements vary with time, but normally these
variations are gradual and do not impact on operating
NPSH Margins. For sizing of the pumps initially,
NPSHR considerations are based on a) expected flow
rate requirements (changes) over the planned life of
the injection project and b) the nature of the suction
source for the pumps. Assuming that any changes in
the nature of the suction source would also be gradual,
the NPSH Margins required by the pumps are relatively small in order to ensure satisfactory, consistent
pump performance.
Typical NPSH Margins for injection pumps are set
based on the following criteria, considering variations
which could occur during the life of the injection
project:
1) Pump NPSHR at maximum expected flow
rate.
2) Minimum NPSHA expected at this maximum
flow rate.
The NPSH Requirement based on 40,000 hours minimum impeller life is being requested more frequently
in this market.
9.6.1.6
Summary
In summary, the following key points should be understood about cavitation in a centrifugal pump, NPSH
Margin requirements, and how they are affected by the
Suction Energy level of the pump:
Cavitation exists when NPSHA is at and substantially above the NPSHR of a pump.
The Suction Energy level of a pump (as installed in

a system) determines if the cavitation that frequently exists in a pump will cause noise, vibration
and/or damage to the pump.
Low Suction Energy pumps can normally operate

at or near their NPSHR with little or no problems
from cavitation, except for the 3% head drop.
10
High Suction Energy pumps are likely to be noisy

with higher vibration and will possibly experience
less than optimum pump life, if sufficient NPSH
Margin is not provided.
High Suction Energy pumps are more susceptible

to problems from poor suction inlet piping.
Entrained air, or dissolved air which comes out of

solution in the impeller eye, can quiet the noise
and vibration of High Suction Energy pumps at low
NPSH Margins.
Very High Suction Energy pumps will be noisy, will

have high vibration and are likely to experience
reduced pump life if sufficient NPSH Margin is not
provided. Very High Suction Energy pumps are
very susceptible to problems from poor suction
inlet piping.
11
HI Pumps Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for NPSH Margin Index 1998
Appendix A
Index
This appendix is not part of this standard, but is presented to help the user in considering factors beyond this
standard.
Note: an f. indicates a figure, and a t. indicates a table.
Additives in liquid, 4
BEP See Best efficiency point
Best efficiency point, 2
Building services pumping systems, 9
Cavitation, 3, 6, 10
damage factors, 4
Chemical process pumps, 6
Cooling towers, 7
Corrosive properties of liquid, 4
Electric power pumps, 7
Gas content, 4
Impeller eye diameter, 3, 4
Impeller material, 4
Impeller vanes
incidence angle, 2
overlap, 2f., 2
Industrial pumps, 9
Inlet geometry, 2
Inlet piping geometry, 2
Multistage pumps, 4
Net positive suction head available, 1, 1f.
Net positive suction head margin
See NPSH margin
Net positive suction head required, 1, 1f.
NPSH margin, 1, 10
building services pumping systems, 9
chemical process pumps, 6
cooling towers, 7
defined
electric power pumps, 7
general industrial pumps, 9
guidelines, 4, 5t.
nuclear power pumps, 7
petroleum process pumps, 6
pipeline pumps, 10
pulp and paper pumps, 9
ratio, 1
slurry service pumps, 9
and vertical turbine pumps, 6
water/wastewater pumps, 8
waterflood (injection) pumps, 10
NPSHA See also Net positive suction head available
NPSHR See Net positive suction head required
Nuclear power pumps, 7
Peripheral velocity, 2
Petroleum process pumps, 6
Pipeline pumps, 10
Pulp and paper applications, 9
Pump duty cycle, 4
Pump size, 4
Slurry service pumps, 9
Solids/abrasives in liquid, 4
Specific gravity, 2
Suction energy, 10
determination, 3, 3f.
factors, 2
Suction energy level, 1
Suction specific speed, 1
Thermodynamic properties, 2
Vertical turbine pumps, 6
and inlet eye diameter, 4
and NPSH margin, 6
Water/wastewater pumps, 8
Waterflood (injection) pumps, 10
13
M118

Ansi Hi 9 6 1

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Ansi Hi 9 6 1

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

ANSI/HI 9.6.

American National Standard for

for NPSH Margin

This page intentionally blank.

Copyright 2000 By Hydraulic Institute, All Rights Reserved.

American National Standard for

Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps

Approved March 3, 1998

American National Standards Institute, Inc.

Copyright 2000 By Hydraulic Institute, All Rights Reserved.

Approval of an American National Standard requires verification by ANSI that the

Copyright 1998 by Hydraulic Institute

Printed in the United States of America

Copyright 2000 By Hydraulic Institute, All Rights Reserved.

Pump NPSH margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Suction energy level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Suction energy factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Suction energy determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Cavitation damage factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

NPSH margin ratio recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Petroleum process pumps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Chemical process pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Electric power pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Nuclear power/cooling tower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Pulp and paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Waterflood (injection) pumps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

This page intentionally blank.

Copyright 2000 By Hydraulic Institute, All Rights Reserved.

Foreword (Not part of Standard)

Definition of a Standard of the Hydraulic Institute

Comments from users

Consensus for this standard was achieved by use of the Canvass

ITT Industrial Pump Group

Sewage & Water Board of New Orleans

Summers Engineering, Inc.

CHAIRMAN - Allan Budris, ITT Industrial Pump Group

This page intentionally blank.

Copyright 2000 By Hydraulic Institute, All Rights Reserved.

HI Pumps Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for NPSH Margin 1998

HI Pumps Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for NPSH Margin

The noise, the vibration and possibly the reliability of a

the service life of the pump. The full published pump

NPSHA = hatm + hgs + hvs + Zs hvp

atmospheric pressure head

suction gage head

suction velocity head

suction elevation head

Most pump manufacturers use the industry standard

Suction energy level

The suction energy level of a pump increases with the

Copyright 2000 By Hydraulic Institute, All Rights Reserved.

HI Pumps Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for NPSH Margin 1998

9.6.1.2.1 Suction energy factors

Many factors are known to contribute to the suction

The specific gravity of the liquid pumped. The

Thermodynamic properties of the liquid. Cold

The geometry of the pump inlet. The greater the

The incidence angle between the inlet impeller

The geometry of the inlet piping to the pump.

Operation away from the best efficiency point

HI Pumps Centrifugal and Vertical Pumps for NPSH Margin 1998

Figure 9.6.1.3A (metric)

It must be stressed that the impeller eye diameter is