Group Assignment

Group No : ______________________________
Total = _______ /70
CSFF

Introduction
(5 marks)

Marks
Problem &
solution
(5 marks)
Marks
Project
Planning
(5 marks)
Marks

Feasibility
Report
(10 marks)

Marks

Intake: ____________

Fail
No evidence
in
documentation
or softcopy

Marginal Fail
Done but missing critical
information such as business
process, overview of proposed
system and project objectives.
Mostly irrelevant information.

Pass
Brief introduction.
Some missing / vague
description of business
process, overview of proposed
system and project objectives.
Some irrelevant information.

Credit
Clear, complete yet very basic
introduction.
All business process, overview
of proposed system and project
objectives made but briefly
discussed/identified.
No irrelevant information.

0 1
No evidence
in
documentation
or softcopy

2
Done but missing critical
information such as problems,
solutions or assumptions.
Mostly irrelevant information.

3
Brief introduction.
Some missing / vague
description of problems,
solutions or assumptions.
Some irrelevant information.

4
Clear, complete yet very basic
introduction.
All problems, solutions or
assumptions made but briefly
discussed/identified.
No irrelevant information.

0 1
No evidence
in
documentation
or softcopy

2
Gantt chart available but
missing major elements.
Charts created without using
appropriate software.

3
Gantt Chart done using the
appropriate software. Only
basic tasks are depicted. No
breakdown of subtasks etc.
Illogical sequencing of tasks.
Unrealistic timelines.

0 1
No evidence
in
documentation
or softcopy

2
Done but missing major
components of PIECES
framework.

3
Feasibility study done.
Brief / illogical explanation of
operational feasibility with
regards to PIECES
framework.

4
Gantt charts done using the
appropriate software with
breakdown of tasks clearly
shown.
Realistic timelines and
sequencing of tasks.
Some minor errors.
4
Logical explanation of
operational feasibility with
regards to PIECES framework.
Some minor errors in either
component.

0 1 2 3

6 7

Distinction
Clear, complete and
detailed introduction.
Detailed and precise
description of business
process, overview of
proposed system and
project objectives.
All relevant information.
5
Clear, complete and
detailed introduction.
Detailed and precise
description of underlying
problems, solutions and
assumptions.
All relevant information.
5
All criteria listed in
previous grade achieved
with no / minimal errors.

5
All criteria listed in
previous grade achieved
with no / minimal errors.
Relevant and detailed
explanation for PIECES
framework.
Evidence of other
feasibility studies carried
out over and above the
existing requirements.
8 9 10

CSFF
Systems
Analysis
(5 marks)

Fail
No evidence in
documentation or
softcopy

Marks

0 1
No evidence in
documentation or
softcopy

Design
Diagram
(15 marks)

Marks

0 1 2 3 4 5
No evidence in
documentation or
softcopy

Interface
Design
(20 marks)

Marks

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Marginal Fail
Done but functional and
non functional
requirements are rather
vague, incomplete,
irrelevant or incorrect.
2
Some diagrams were
available.
Missing diagrams and / or
components.
Diagrams produced are
not related to findings of
the investigation phase.
Many major errors in
diagrams related to
naming conventions,
violation of diagramming
rules.
Totally illogical diagrams
produced.
6 7
Some forms, reports or /
and database designs were
available. Physical
designs were either in
documentation only or in
prototype only. Physical
designs do not map with
the logical design at all.

8 9

Pass
Brief functional and non
functional requirements
presented. Some vague or
irrelevant information.

Credit
Rather detailed functional and
non functional requirements with
some minor errors.

Distinction
Clear and detailed
functional and non
functional requirements with
no / minimal errors.

3
All diagrams available with
many minor errors related to
naming conventions, violation
of diagramming rules. Some
illogical components within
the diagrams.
Diagrams related to the
findings in the investigation
phase.

4
All logical diagrams available
with some errors or illogical
components. Diagrams closely
related with the findings of the
investigation phase.

5
All logical diagrams
available with no or minor
errors. Diagrams closely
related with the findings of
the investigation phase.

8
Some forms, reports or / and
database designs were
available in documentation
and in prototype. Some of the
physical designs do map
accurately with the logical
design. No explanation for the
design in documentation.

9 10
Most forms, reports or / and
database designs were available
in documentation and in
prototype. Most of the physical
designs do map accurately with
the logical design. Simple design
overall. Some explanation for
the design in documentation.

11 12 13 14 15
All forms, reports or / and
database designs were
available in documentation
and in prototype. All
physical designs do map
accurately with the logical
design.
Professional outlook of the
whole system.
Clear and detailed
explanation of the design in
documentation.

10

11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20

CSFF

Overall
Documentation
Standards
(5 marks)

Marks

Comments:

Fail
Mostly poor
documentation
standards with
missing
components such
as table of
contents,
referencing, page
numbering,
captioning, poor
command of the
language, etc.
0 1

Marginal Fail
Some missing / poor
documentation standards
such as table of contents,
referencing, page
numbering, captioning,
poor command of the
language. Referencing
done does not adhere to
Harvards Name
Referencing style.
2

Pass
Overall average
documentation standards in
table of contents, referencing,
page numbering, captioning,
command of the language, etc.

Credit
Good documentation standards
in most areas such as table of
contents, referencing, page
numbering, captioning,
command of language.

Distinction
Excellent documentation
standards. Overall
documentation has a
professional outlook.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Student Name (ID): ______________________________

Individual Assignment : Total = _______ /20
CSFF

Fail
No evidence in
documentation.

Marginal Fail
One investigation
technique was selected.
Application of the
technique was available
but no / minimal
justification for
selection. No / brief
conclusion / findings.
Almost all the questions
are not related to the
system development
project. Missing / poor
standards such as the
layout, grammar,
sequencing of question,
etc.

Pass
One investigation technique
selected Some justification for
selection and some conclusions
were drawn from findings.
At least half of the questions are
related to the system
development project. Average
standards in the layout, grammar,
sequencing of question, etc.

Credit
One investigation technique
selected Justification for
selection and conclusions
were drawn from findings.
Majority of the questions are
related to the system
development project. Good
standards in the layout,
grammar, sequencing of
question, etc.

Distinction
One investigation technique
selected. Clear and detailed
logical justification for
selection and conclusions
were drawn from findings.
Almost all the questions are
related to the system
development project.
Excellent standards in the
layout, grammar,
sequencing of question, etc.
.

0 1 2 3
No evidence in
documentation.

4
Some data dictionary
entries and ELH are
available.
Certain elements are
missing. Data dictionary
and ELH entries are not
related to the DFDs and
ERD produced.
.

5
All data dictionary and ELH
entries available with many
minor errors related to naming
conventions, violation of data
dictionary rules
Data dictionary and ELH entries
are related to the DFDs and ERD
produced.

6 7
All data dictionary and ELH
entries available with hardly /
some minor errors. Data
dictionary and ELH entries
are closely related to the
DFDs and ERD produced.

8 9 10
All data dictionary and ELH
entries available with
minimum errors. Data
dictionary and ELH entries
are closely related to the
DFDs and ERD produced.

6 7

8 9 10

Requirement
Gathering
(10 marks)

Marks
Design
(10 marks)

Marks

Intake: ____________

0 1 2 3

Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Student Name (ID): ______________________________

Individual Presentation : Total = _______ /10
CSFF
Project
Knowledge /
Professionalism
(10 marks)

Marks

Fail
Not able to explain own
component of the
project. Unable to
provide answers to any
questions posed with
regards to own
component of the
project. Mostly
inaccurate / illogical
answers / explanation
provided.
0 1 2 3

Marginal Fail
Able to provide some
information and / or
answer some questions
pertaining to only the
individuals own aspects
/ components of the
project done. Some
inaccurate / illogical
answers / explanation
provided.
4

Intake: ____________
Pass
Able to provide all information /
answer all questions posed on
individuals own component of
the project done. Answers given
accurate but with some
hesitation.

Credit
Able to provide all
information and / or answer
all questions with regards to
own component of the project
as well as assist some team
members when not able to
explain their components /
answer questions posed.
Answers questions accurately
confidently.
6 7

Distinction
Able to provide all
information and / or answer
all questions with regards to
own component of the
project as well as assist
most / all team members
who were not able to
explain their components /
answer questions posed.
Answers questions
accurately and confidently.
8 9 10

Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________