0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
548 visualizzazioni2 pagine
The document defines and provides examples of an "impossible crime" under Philippine law. An impossible crime is committed when a person intends to commit an offense but it is inherently impossible to accomplish due to the circumstances or inadequate means. The examples given are: 1) A theft where the stolen wallet is found empty, making it impossible to gain anything from the crime. 2) A man kills his already-dead wife and her lover, making murder or homicide impossible as one cannot harm a corpse. The penalty for an impossible crime is arresto mayor or a fine, considering the social danger and degree of criminality shown.
The document defines and provides examples of an "impossible crime" under Philippine law. An impossible crime is committed when a person intends to commit an offense but it is inherently impossible to accomplish due to the circumstances or inadequate means. The examples given are: 1) A theft where the stolen wallet is found empty, making it impossible to gain anything from the crime. 2) A man kills his already-dead wife and her lover, making murder or homicide impossible as one cannot harm a corpse. The penalty for an impossible crime is arresto mayor or a fine, considering the social danger and degree of criminality shown.
The document defines and provides examples of an "impossible crime" under Philippine law. An impossible crime is committed when a person intends to commit an offense but it is inherently impossible to accomplish due to the circumstances or inadequate means. The examples given are: 1) A theft where the stolen wallet is found empty, making it impossible to gain anything from the crime. 2) A man kills his already-dead wife and her lover, making murder or homicide impossible as one cannot harm a corpse. The penalty for an impossible crime is arresto mayor or a fine, considering the social danger and degree of criminality shown.
What then is an impossible crime? Is it an offense which is not most
likely to transpire? Or is it not penalize? Heres a sample scenario. In a public crowded place, a person with intent to gain, illegally and successfully took the wallet belonging to another, but unfortunately upon searching the entries of the wallet not even a single centavo was found inside. Another example, a wife and her paramour were unintentionally found by her husband, who came from a long and tiring work assigned in the other town, as both were naked and seemed to have been fall in a deep sleep. And because of what he saw, his heart crushed and without any doubt took his gun and shot both his wife and the other man. Eventually, based on the forensic investigations and police reports conducted, it was found out that his wife and the paramour were already dead three hours before the husband came to their house. This two examples fall under the category of what is defined by the Revised Penal Code as an impossible crime. This crime is committed by any person performing an act which would be an offense against persons or property, were it not for the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment or on account of the employment of inadequate or ineffectual means. 1 In the first example, the crime committed is against the property of another. The purpose of gaining was not accomplished considering that no money was found inside the wallet. Hence, there is an impossibility of crime of theft. A crime against the person is what transpires in the second example. Killing an already dead person can neither fall under the crime of murder nor homicide since you can no longer inflict or employ harm or injury to a cadaver. As such, there is an impossibility of a crime of murder or homicide. And the penalty to be imposed in case of failure to commit the crime because the means employed or the aims sought are impossible shall be arresto mayor or a fine from 200 to 500 pesos. This is when the person intending to commit an offense has already performed the acts for the execution of the same but nevertheless the crime was not produced by reason of the fact that the act intended was by its nature one of impossible accomplishment or because the means employed by such person are essentially inadequate to produce the result desired by him, the court, 1 Article 4 Pag. 2 of the Revised Penal Code
having in mind the social danger and the degree of criminality shown by the offender shall be penalized by the law.2