Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
direct assessment-this refers to the direct nature of the assessment and the student shows
directly how to apply the knowledge. In contract, a student would indirectly show knowledge in a
multiple-choice type test.
Why do We Need Authentic Assessment? Preparing Students for the Real World
While multiple-choice tests can be valid indicators or predictors of academic performance, too often
our tests mislead students and teachers about the kinds of work that should be mastered. Norms are
not standards; items are not real problems; right answers are not rationales. Multiple-choice tests also
encourage memorization of facts, rather than acquiring specific skills standards are designed to
enforce.
What most defenders of traditional tests fail to see is that it is the form, not the content of the test that
is harmful to learning; demonstrations of the technical validity of standardized tests should not be the
issue in the assessment reform debate. Students come to believe that learning is cramming; teachers
come to believe that tests are after-the-fact, imposed nuisances composed of contrived questions-irrelevant to their intent and success. Both parties are led to believe that right answers matter more
than habits of mind and the justification of one's approach and results. This type of assessment also
sends a message to students that information is learned for a test, and as soon as the test is
completed, students often do not see the importance of retaining this information.
A move toward more authentic tasks and outcomes thus improves teaching and learning: students
have greater clarity about their obligations (and are asked to master more engaging tasks), and
teachers can come to believe that assessment results are both meaningful and useful for improving
instruction.
When students leave high school or even college they are expected to be able to function in our world
based on a certain standard set of skills. Those life skills often do not include knowledge on ancient
civilizations or chemical composition. It is great for students to have a well rounded education and a
plethora of content knowledge, but if they cannot apply their skills to any content or task, teachers or
schools have not prepared them for the real world.
Click on the video below to learn more about authentic assessment in "Assessment Overview:
Beyond Standardized Testing"
Students are asked to develop responses rather than choose from a list of possibly correct
answers
Takes a direct approach to evaluate projects and the process of creating the final product
1.
Authentic activities have real-world relevance: Activities match as nearly as possible the
real-world tasks of professionals in practice rather than decontextualized or classroom-based tasks
2.
Authentic activities are ill-defined, requiring students to define the tasks and sub-tasks
needed to complete the activity: Problems inherent in the activities are ill-defined and open to
multiple interpretations rather than easily solved by the application of existing algorithms. Learners
must identify their own unique tasks and sub-tasks in order to complete the major task.
3.
4.
Authentic activities provide the opportunity for students to examine the task from
different perspectives, using a variety of resources: The task affords learners the opportunity to
examine the problem from a variety of theoretical and practical perspectives, rather than allowing a
single perspective that learners must imitate to be successful. The use of a variety of resources rather
than a limited number of preselected references requires students to detect relevant from irrelevant
information.
5.
6.
Authentic activities provide the opportunity to reflect: Activities need to enable learners
to make choices and reflect on their learning both individuall and socially.
7.
Authentic activities can be integrated and applied across different subject areas and
lead beyond domain-specific outcomes: Activities encourage interdisciplinary perspectives and
enable students to play diverse roles thus building robust expertise rather than knowledge limited to a
single well-defined field or domain.
8.
9.
Authentic activities create polished products valuable in their own right rather than as
preparation for something else: Activities culminate in the creation of a whole product rather than
an exercise or sub-step in preparation for something else.
10.
Scoring Guides/Rubric: A scoring scale is used to assess student performance along a taskspecific set of criteria. A list of required elements are grouped together to make the scoring guide with
point specific designations.
Authentic Task: An assignment given to students designed to assess their ability to apply
standard-driven knowledge and skills to real-world challenges.
Oral Interviews: The teacher asks the student questions about the subject matter
Story or Text Retelling: Student retells main ideas or selected details of text experienced
through listening or reading.
Projects/Exhibitions: Student works with other students as a team to create a project that
often involves multimedia production, oral and written presentations, and a display.
Teacher Observations: Teacher observes and documents the students attention and
interaction in class, response to instructional materials, and cooperative work with other students.
1.
2.
3.
Evaluates how effectively students can directly apply knowledge to a variety of task
4.
5.
Disadvantages
Focuses on analytical skills and the integration of Time-intensive to manage, monitor, and coordinate
knowledge
Promotes creativity
1.
Identify which standards you want your students to meet through this assessment.
2.
Choose a relevant task for this standard, or set of standards, so that students can
demonstrate how they have or have not met the standards.
3.
Define the characteristics of good performance on this task. This will provide useful
information regarding how well students have met the standards.
4.
Create a rubric, or set of guidelines, for students to follow so that they are able to assess their
work as they perform the assigned task.
with the aid of online rubric-makers. Before teachers create a rubric it is best to do a search for the
specific rubric to save time. For example, input letter writing rubrics into a search address box and
numerous letter writing sample rubrics will be displayed.
Making rubrics are time consuming in the initial stages but are worth the investment. Rubrics are a
wonderful tool to ensure a more authentic assessment of student work. The assessment tool gives
students a framework on expectations and teachers a framework on what is being graded.
A rubric provides a teacher with a scale of where the student's current knowledge and
performance are currently at as well as what they may need to improve upon.
A rubric provides a student with their own guidelines while they are working on an
assessment. They are able to guide themselves, as well as assess their own work or the work of their
classmates using the rubric provided to them.
A teacher can work with his or her students to develop assessment criteria for a rubric. This
way, students are taking part in the evaluation process and feel more of an attachment to what they
are working on. They need to live up to their own standards (criteria) as well as that of the teacher.
Usually takes longer to plan, complete, and evaluate than other methods of assessment
Sources/References:
Funderstanding-Authentic Assessment
Authentic Assessment Toolbox
certain types of judgments and why authentic assessments have become more
popular in recent years.
We do not just want students to know the content of the disciplines when they
graduate. We, of course, want them to be able to use the acquired knowledge
and skills in the real world. So, our assessments have to also tell us if students
can apply what they have learned in authentic situations. If a student does well
on a test of knowledge we might infer that the student could also apply that
knowledge. But that is rather indirect evidence. I could more directly check for
the ability to apply by asking the student to use what they have learned in some
meaningful way. To return to an example I have used elsewhere, if I taught
someone to play golf I would not check what they have learned with just a
written test. I would want to see more direct, authentic evidence. I would put my
student out on a golf course to play. Similarly, if we want to know if our students
can interpret literature, calculate potential savings on sale items, test a
hypothesis, develop a fitness plan, converse in a foreign language, or apply other
knowledge and skills they have learned, then authentic assessments will provide
the most direct evidence.top
Can you think of professions which require some direct demonstration of relevant
skills before someone can be employed in that field? Doctors, electricians,
teachers, actors and others must all provide direct evidence of competence to be
hired. Completing a written or oral test or interview is usually not sufficient.
Shouldn't we ask the same of our students before we say they are ready to
graduate? Or pass a course? Or move on to the next grade?
1
0
In Step 1 of creating an authentic assessment, you identified what you wanted your students to
know and be able to do -- your standards.
In Step 2, you asked how students could demonstrate that they had met your standards. As a
result, you developed authentic tasks they could perform.
In Step 3, you identified the characteristics of good performance on the authentic task -- the
criteria.
Now, in Step 4, you will finish creating the authentic assessment by constructing a rubric to
measure student performance on the task. To build the rubric, you will begin with the set of
criteria you identified in Step 3. As mentioned before, keep the number of criteria manageable.
You do not have to look for everything on every assessment.
Once you have identified the criteria you want to look for as indicators of good performance, you
next decide whether to consider the criteria analytically or holistically. (See Rubrics for a
description of these two types of rubrics.)
1
1
are 1) observations are thorough, 2) predictions are reasonable, and 3) conclusions are based on
observations. Labels (limited, acceptable, proficient) for the different levels of performance are
also included. Under each label, for each criterion, a descriptor (in brown) is included to further
explain what performance at that level looks like.
Criteria
Limited
Acceptable
Proficient
made good
observations
most
observations are observations
absent or vague are clear and
detailed
all observations
are clear and
detailed
made good
predictions
predictions are
absent or
irrelevant
most
predictions are
reasonable
all predictions
are reasonable
appropriate
conclusion
conclusion is
absent or
inconsistent
with
observations
conclusion is
conclusion is
consistent with
consistent with
most
observations
observations
As you can imagine, students will be more certain what is expected to reach each level of
performance on the rubric if descriptors are provided. Furthermore, the more detail a teacher
provides about what good performance looks like on a task the better a student can approach the
task. Teachers benefit as well when descriptors are included. A teacher is likely to be more
objective and consistent when applying a descriptor such as "most observations are clear and
detailed" than when applying a simple label such as "acceptable." Similarly, if more than one
teacher is using the same rubric, the specificity of the descriptors increases the chances that
multiple teachers will apply the rubric in a similar manner. When a rubric is applied more
consistently and objectively it will lead to greater reliability and validity in the results.
Assigning point values to performance on each criterion
As mentioned above, rubrics are very flexible tools. Just as the number of levels of performance
can vary from criterion to criterion in an analytic rubric, points or value can be assigned to the
rubric in a myriad of ways. For example, a teacher who creates a rubric might decide that certain
criteria are more important to the overall performance on the task than other criteria. So, one or
more criteria can be weighted more heavily when scoring the performance. For example, in a
rubric for solo auditions, a teacher might consider five criteria: (how well students demonstrate)
vocal tone, vocal technique, rhythm, diction and musicality. For this teacher, musicality might be
the most important quality that she has stressed and is looking for in the audition. She might
consider vocal technique to be less important than musicality but more important than the other
criteria.So, she might give musicality and vocal technique more weight in her rubric. She can
assign weights in different ways. Here is one common format:
Rubric 1: Solo Audition
0 1 2 3 4 5 weight
vocal tone
vocal technique
x2
1
2
rhythm
diction
musicality
x3
In this case, placement in the 4-point level for vocal tone would earn the student four points for
that criterion. But placement in the 4-point box for vocal technique would earn the student 8
points, and placement in the 4-point box for musicality would earn the student 12 points. The
same weighting could also be displayed as follows:
Rubric 2: Solo Audition
Very
Good
Excellent
vocal technique 0
10
rhythm
diction
musicality
12
15
vocal tone
In both examples, musicality is worth three times as many points as vocal tone, rhythm and
diction, and vocal technique is worth twice as much as each of those criteria. Pick a format that
works for you and/or your students. There is no "correct" format in the layout of rubrics. So,
choose one or design one that meets your needs.
Yes, but do I need equal intervals between the point values in a rubric?
No. Say it with me one more time -- rubrics are flexible tools. Shape them to fit your needs, not
the other way around. In other words, points should be distributed across the levels of a rubric to
best capture the value you assign to each level of performance. For example, points might be
awarded on an oral presentation as follows:
Rubric 3: Oral Presentation
Criteria
never
sometimes
always
volume is appropriate
enthusiasm is evident
summary is accurate
In other words, you might decide that at this point in the year you would be pleased if a presenter
makes eye contact "sometimes," so you award that level of performance most of the points
available. However, "sometimes" would not be as acceptable for level of volume or enthusiasm.
1
3
Here are some more examples of rubrics illustrating the flexibility of number of levels and value
you assign each level.
Rubric 4: Oral Presentation
Criteria
never
sometimes
usually
volume is appropriate
enthusiasm is evident
summary is accurate
In the above rubric, you have decided to measure volume and enthusiasm at two levels -- never or
usually -- whereas, you are considering eye contact and accuracy of summary across three levels.
That is acceptable if that fits the type of judgments you want to make. Even though there are only
two levels for volume and three levels for eye contact, you are awarding the same number of
points for a judgment of "usually" for both criteria. However, you could vary that as well:
Rubric 5: Oral Presentation
Criteria
never
sometimes
usually
volume is appropriate
enthusiasm is evident
summary is accurate
In this case, you have decided to give less weight to volume and enthusiasm as well as to judge
those criteria across fewer levels.
So, do not feel bound by any format constraints when constructing a rubric. The rubric should best
capture what you value in performance on the authentic task. The more accurately your rubric
captures what you want your students to know and be able to do the more valid the scores will be.
1
4
Proficiency
Developing
Inadequate
volume is inappropriate
An obvious, potential problem with applying the above rubric is that performance often does not
fall neatly into categories such as mastery or proficiency. A student might always make eye
contact, use appropriate volume regularly, occasionally show enthusiasm and include many errors
in the summary. Where you put that student in the holistic rubric? Thus, it is recommended that
the use of holistic rubrics be limited to situations when the teacher wants to:
1
5
Quick, holistic judgments are often made for homework problems or journal assignments. To allow
the judgment to be quick and to reduce the problem illustrated in the above rubric of fitting the
best category to the performance, the number of criteria should be limited. For example, here is a
possible holistic rubric for grading homework problems.
Rubric 7: Homework Problems
+ (1 pt.)
- (0 pts.)
Although this homework problem rubric only has two criteria and three levels of performance, it is
not easy to write such a holistic rubric to accurately capture what an evaluator values and to cover
all the possible combinations of student performance. For example, what if a student got all the
answers correct on a problem assignment but did not show any work? The rubric covers that: the
student would receive a (-) because "little or no work was shown." What if a student showed all
the work but only got some of the answers correct? That student would receive a (+) according to
the rubric. All such combinations are covered. But does giving a (+) for such work reflect what the
teacher values? The above rubric is designed to give equal weight to correct answers and work
shown. If that is not the teacher's intent then the rubric needs to be changed to fit the goals of the
teacher.
All of this complexity with just two criteria -- imagine if a third criterion were added to the rubric.
So, with holistic rubrics, limit the number of criteria considered, or consider using an analytic
rubric.
1
6
Check if it is manageable.
By the last suggestion I mean to imagine that a student had met specific levels of performance on
each criterion (for an analytic rubric). Then ask yourself if that performance translates into the
score that you think is appropriate. For example, on Rubric 3 above, imagine a student scores
That student would receive a score of 15 points out of a possible 20 points. Does 75% (15 out of
20) capture that performance for you? Perhaps you think a student should not receive that high of
a score with only "sometimes" for the summary. You can adjust for that by increasing the weight
you assign that criterion. Or, imagine a student apparently put a lot of work into the homework
problems but got few of them correct. Do you think that student should receive some credit? Then
you would need to adjust the holistic homework problem rubric above. In other words, it can be
very helpful to play out a variety of performance combinations before you actually administer the
rubric. It helps you see the forest through the trees.
Of course, you will never know if you really have a good rubric until you apply it. So, do not work
to perfect the rubric before you administer it. Get it in good shape and then try it. Find out what
needs to be modified and make the appropriate changes.
Okay, does that make sense? Are you ready to create a rubric of your own? Well, then come into
my workshop and we will build one together. I just need you to wear these safety goggles.
Regulations. Thanks.
(For those who might be "tabularly challenged" (i.e., you have trouble making tables in your word
processor) or would just like someone else to make the rubric into a tabular format for you, there
are websites where you enter the criteria and levels of performance and the site will produce the
rubric for you.)
1
7
TECHNIQUES in assessment
Learning is . . . a dynamic process in which learners actively construct knowledge
. . . the acquisition and organization of information into a series of increasingly
complex understandings . . . influenced by context (Holt 1992). Educators who
view learning in this way realize that quantitative methods of evaluating learners
do not "measure up." Authentic forms of assessment present a more qualitative
and valid alternative. Authentic assessments (AAs) incorporate a wide variety of
techniques "designed to correspond as closely as possible to `real world' student
experiences" (Custer 1994, p. 66). They are compatible with adult, career, and
vocational education. After all, apprenticeship is a time-honored form of
authentic learning: skills taught in context. "High-performance workplaces"
demand critical thinking, self-directed learning, and individual responsibility for
career development (Borthwick 1995; Jones 1994)-which the process of AA can
develop. This Practice Application Brief describes types of authentic assessment,
explains some of the advantages and challenges they present, and highlights
some best practices in design and implementation, with specific examples from
adult, career, and vocational education.
1
8
the learner (Hayes et al. 1994). The items are chosen according to a set of
standards or objectives connected to the curriculum or learning event. They
should represent a documented history of learning and an organized
demonstration of accomplishment. Portfolios can serve as a catalyst for
reflection on one's growth as a learner and a means of identifying areas for
improvement (ibid.). They can serve as a tool for presenting oneself to potential
employers (Borthwick 1995; MacIsaac and Jackson 1994).
What's Good about AAs?
Many of these methods are worlds away from traditional tests and grading. What
advantages do authentic techniques provide? Well-designed AAs demonstrate a
rich array of what learners know and can do; they display both the products and
the processes of learning, making learners aware of the processes and
encouraging ownership. Authentic assessments are adaptable, flexible, ongoing,
and cumulative, depicting learner growth over time (Custer 1994; Holt 1992).
Because they should be closely aligned with the curriculum, they connect
thinking and doing, theory and practice, in authentic contexts. Assessment
should become an integral part of teaching and learning; other learning
opportunities may arise during assessment. "The process of assessment is itself
a constructivist learning experience, requiring students to apply thinking skills, to
understand the nature of high quality performance, and to provide feedback to
themselves and others" (Rudner and Boston 1994, p. 7). The feedback and
results enable teachers and learners to consider the next steps for improving
both teaching and learning.
Although they raise concerns about subjectivity, AAs allow multiple human
judgments of learning. Teachers, peer reviewers, and community members may
all be involved in various performance ratings, and-a critical element-learners
evaluate and monitor themselves. Alternative assessments can accommodate
varied learning styles and serve the purposes of instruction, not other reasons
for evaluating students (comparing individuals, comparing programs,
demonstrating accountability, etc.).
Authentic assessments do pose certain challenges. They require abandoning
traditional notions about testing and evaluation and they change teacher and
student roles. They are time consuming for teachers to prepare and implement,
because they require clarity in goals, outcomes, criteria, and expectations and
assurance that all stakeholders understand (Hayes et al. 1994). To ensure that
evaluation standards are applied consistently, teachers and other raters need
careful training (Borthwick 1995). Students need to be prepared for selfmonitoring and reflection (Jones 1994). Some may be more comfortable with the
traditional boundaries of grades and testing at set times.
AAs are potentially more equitable in accommodating learning styles and
acknowledging multiple ways of demonstrating competence. However, not all
schools and districts may have access to some of the resources needed to
develop them, and they impose demands that may challenge some students
(Rudner and Boston 1994). Authentic assessments do not necessarily have to
replace other forms of evaluation but can be used to augment and broaden the
RAIN GWENNETH WATERS
1
9
2
0
2
1