Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
drilling perpendicular to the surface for the first 1/16 of an inch and then reposition,
while the drill is still running, to the correct position as shown in the pictures.
4. Cover the threads on the " male threaded pipe to female hose connector (Part 7)
John V. Milewski
December 21 2003
About 4 months ago I started drinking what I call magnetic water as
believe that this magnetic water has the reverse effect, but at a
much smaller amount and it takes months to see the effect but the
positive effect is there and is real.
The apparatus for making this water is very simple. It consists of an
empty new one gallon, in paint can, in which is placed an empty one
liter soda bottle that has the top cut off at the level where it starts to
get narrower. In the space between the inner wall of the paint can
and the empty one liter container, magnetite is poured. This makes
a cylinder of powdered magnetite about one and one half inches
thick surrounding the one liter size hole in the center. Into this hole
is placed a standard bottle of store bought spring water that is about
710 ml size (that's a 3 cup volume of water). It fits in very nicely.
You make up a minimum of five of these units. Take one bottle out
every day and drink the water.
What I think is happening is that the magnetite which is a strong
magnetic suscepter is concentrating the earth's magnetic fields into
it's cylindrical shape and the shape effect, in turn, sets up a
magnetic spiral vortex in the core of the cylinder in which the water
is stored. This in turn activates the water with the magnetic energy.
I think this is the activating force for change in our bodies toward
regeneration, as we drink it, and the hair color restoration is the first
sign of this happening. A second sign is that my fingernails are
growing faster and stronger and my skin seems to be getting
smother and softer, in spots, with less skin tags.
like it. Bob S was really happy because he saved $950.00!with Teflon
tape and screw it into place.
Look into inlet port to be sure the hole is clear of solvent cement
E. Addition of m-state exit port and main water outlet.
1. Cut two pieces of the 3/8" braided poly rope (Part 8) 12 inches long. Obtain a
piece of wire (Part 9) twelve inches long, copper or steel, what ever. Next get the 1/2
X 4 PVC pipe (Part 4) and ream out one end with a razor knife to about 1/8 to
eliminate the sharp edge and make the end like a small funnel.
Pulling the braided poly rope through the pipe nipple and coupler
Ready to remove the pull wire from the poly rope loo
Now take the pipe out of the vice and take off the threaded coupler to expose the poly
rope coming through the pipe. Cut the wire on one end as close as possible to the poly
loop and pull the wire out. Grab the tail end of the poly rope and pull it back till the
loop is flush with the end of the pipe.
Using the vise to pull the poly rope back till it is flush
4. Examine the end of the poly rope that is still projecting out of the end of the pipe.
The rough end of the poly rope is now cut off flush. At this point there are several
ways you can finish the top end of the m-state exit port depending on the availability
of various fittings at your hardware store. These ways are illustrated below.
Different ways of finishing off the top end of the m-state exit port
For the purposes of this document we will describe the method illustrated in the center
above. Put the threaded coupler back on the pipe nipple opposite the end with the
folded end of the poly rope.
5. Take the 1/2 "threaded nylon to tubing barb (Part 10) and ream or carve out the
inside on the " threaded end as shown below.
Vorte
F. Magnet structure assembly.
1. The magnetic assembly consists of four parts. Two ring magnets (Part 12), one 1"
floor flange (Part 13) and one 1" X 2" galvanized pipe nipple (Part 14 ).
2. Assemble the pipe nipple into the floor flange.
this circle in order to locate the position for the legs. The first spot is at top center and
the other two at 5 " distance from the point where it intersects the circle.
Next take the three end caps and sand the ends to form a flat on the end.
5.
Put the vortex assembly with magnets and flange in place in the leg assembly.
9. Now add the 18 inch length of " clear plastic tubing (Part 19). The unit is now
complete.
Part description
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
11.
TOOL LIST
2. Electric drill
3. inch drill
bit
4. 2 1/4 hole
saw
5. Razor knife.
Vortex Trap
All magnetic traps rely somewhat on vortex effects but this particular trap uses a
vortex a bit more actively. The vortex trap uses something called the "vortex tube
phenomenon".
Following is a description of the vortex tube phenomenon from the Vortec web site at:
http://www.iscsales.com/vortec/spotcooling.html#vortex
Fluid that rotates about an axis -- like a tornado -- is called a vortex. A vortex tube
creates a vortex from compressed air and separates it into two air streams -- one hot
and one cold. Compressed air enters a cylindrical generator which is proportionately
larger than the hot (long) tube where it causes the air to rotate. Then, the rotating air is
forced down the inner walls of the hot tube at speeds reaching 1,000,000 rpm. At the
end of the hot tube, a small portion of this air exits through a needle valve as hot air
exhaust. The remaining air is forced back through the center of the incoming air
stream at a slower speed. The heat in the slower moving air is transferred to the faster
moving incoming air. This super-cooled air flows through the center of the generator
and exits through the cold air exhaust port."
Vortex tubes can also be used to separate oil from water. When oil and water are spun
together in a vortex tube the water, being heavier tends to follow the path of the hot
air in the example cited above and the oil being lighter follows the cold air path and
exits through the cold air exhaust port.
The materials used to make a non-transparent PVC version of this trap cost less
than $20. They are as follows:
1 - brass adaptor which goes from 1/4" male pipe thread to 1/8" compression
fitting
2" of 1" od. Plastic rod
3 long stainless steel set screws.
2 feet of 1/8" polyethylene tubing with brass insert for compression fitting
Hack saw
1 5/16" reamer, drill bit or hole saw
Flat file
1/2" pipe tap
Using a hack saw blade, saw a 1" deep notch or slot down into the end of the
PVC pipe so that the notch or slot enters the wall of the pipe at a tangent to the
inside wall of the pipe. This notch is where the water will enter the pipe and it
is important that it directs the water into the pipe obliquely (see pipe end view
in cross-section picture above for detail).
Notch/Slot Detail
Smooth and trim this notch/slot.
Taper the inside of the other end of the 1" PVC pipe using a pipe deburring tool
similar to the one illustrated above.
Run the pipe tap into the PVC reducer from each end.
Thread one of the nylon reducers into the PVC reducer from the inside using
some Teflon tape to insure a good seal.
Names of part
Place the polypropylene fabric disks into the outside threaded portion of the
PVC reducer and thread the other nylon reducer in till it compresses the fabric
against the inner nylon reducer. Be sure to use Teflon tape on the threads.
The polypropylene fabric is not essential, it just improves yield a bit. In the
vortrap (which is the only trap to use the fabric) the fabric serves two functions.
It slows down the exit of the "good" water and it shows a preference for the
oilier m-state water over ordinary water.
The ORMUS elements, when they are in solution in water, are in an oil form.
This oil form appears to be soluble in water till it reaches a certain
concentration where it will separate from the water on its own. Since the fabric
has a preference to absorb oil this allows it to pass oily m-state water through
more readily than the less oily waste water.
The filter also slows the exit flow down. This helps to prevent mixing of the mstate water with the fresh water coming in from the hose. It also helps to keep
the output from the "good" end to a rapid drip. Intuitive testing indicates that a
rapid drip is approximately the output speed that results in the highest
concentration of ORMUS in the output flow.
Careful design, using sophisticated fluid dynamics modelling algorithms, might
be able to eliminate the need for the filter but these sorts of design tools are
Solvent weld the completed PVC reducer assembly into the other end of the 1"
tee.
Thread the close pipe nipple into the tee using Teflon tape.
Drill and tap three equally space holes around the circumference of the 1"
coupler about 1/4" in from one end.
Solvent weld the other end of the 1" coupler onto the free end of the PVC pipe.
Get one end of the 2" long plastic rod turned down to a cone shape.
Insert the tapered end of the rod into the open end of the 1" coupler and fix it in
place by tightening the set screws through the coupler.
Cut two pieces of the magnetic tape so that they fit along the exposed length of
the PVC pipe. Attach them on opposite sides of the pipe.
Thread the pipe to hose adapter onto the pipe nipple in the tee using Teflon tape
to seal the threads.
You use this trap by hooking the hose adapter to a hose and adjusting the pressure
going in so that you get a good vortex of water coming out of the coupler end of the
trap and a slow drip of "water" out the end of the polyethylene tube. You can also
adjust the tapered rod in and out of the coupler in order to get things just right.
Experiments
Try different directions of vortex by changing the slot design.
Some experimenters have noticed that stronger additional magnets improve the
apparent quality of the "good" output water. One experimenter has placed 56 3800 gauss magnets around the long pipe on his trap! He was unable to find
fabric so he modified his trap to have a lower back pressure so that the "good"
output flow would still be a drip. Here are some of his comments on his
design:
I set the device to produce a steady drip on the outlet with an occasional
air bubble. The presence of the bubbles indicates cavitation and ariation
of the water entering the tube and subsequently a vortex. I did not make
a clear tube type. At this slow outlet rate it took over two hours to fill a
one-gallon jar. I calculated flow rate on the hose to be very close to 200
gallons per hour. This makes the potential concentrate in the jar roughly
400/1. This would make one glass of the water equivalent to about 400
non-concentrated glasses.
The magnets are Radio Shack "High Energy" magnets as advertised in their
catalogue (pn: RS 640-1877). They measue 3/8 inch deep, 7/8 inch wide, and 1 7/8
inches long and are made of strontium ferrite. The data sheet specifies they are 3800
gauss per sqare inch with an attraction force of about 8 pounds. This makes it
necessary to tape them very securely. If allowed to snap together they will break. He
purchased a quantity (50) from Radio Shack ONLINE for a 10% discount. Locally
they will usually have up to 10 on hand. They cost $.99 each but they seem to be out
of stock.
When this gentleman added the additional magnets he and his wife noticed that
the m-state water had become "milky". They sent this picture:
Here are their comments on this. First the comments from the lady who is
writing the Trap Water Diary:
The picture attached is our m-state water from the vortex trap that now
has 56 magnets on it, will have more pics later on tonight to send ya too.
The sight of the sun shinning thorugh the m-state water is totally
awesome and it really is milky looking.
The original inventor of the magnetic trap concept says that he has also gotten a
similar cloudy water by running the trap water from the first trap through a
second trap stage. While this results in a significant reduction of the overall
volume of product, the output of the second stage is much more potent than the
output of the first stage. It would seem that the key to this sort of concentration
in a single stage is the addition of lots of strong magnets.
Afraid to be known,
I can know neither myself nor any other,
I will be alone.
Where else but in our common ground,
Trap
These slots are angled so that they move the water in a counter clockwise direction.
The outer tube is 12 inches of one inch schedule 40 PVC pipe. The slots in the outer
tube are the same as the inner slots except that they are at the top. You must cut them
so that they also spin the water counterclockwise.
All of the slots on both tubes are tangental to the inside circumference of the pipe and
they are about 2 3/8" long on the outside tapering down to 1 1/2" on the inside.
Three slots are cut in the inner and outer pipes by raising a table saw blade into them.
The slots were cut with a 5 1/2" inch diameter thin kerf saw blade which was raised
into the tube. You cannot lower the tube into the blade as this will cause the tube to
kick back at you. It is best if the tube is clamped to the fence of the table saw and the
blade is raised into it.
All of the slots start about 3/4" from the end of the pipes.
The two tubes are assembled one inside the other using a couple of 3/4" male slip to
1/2 inch female thread bushings. The end away from the thread must be reamed out so
that the inner 1/2 inch pipe will fit inside. This bushing will not fit inside every brand
of one inch PVC pipe so you may have to check around to find one which fits.
Before these are assembled and solvent welded together a piece of oil absorbent fabric
must be rolled tightly and inserted into the inner pipe so that it extends from the top of
the inner pipe almost down to the slots at the bottom. This fabric should be a nice tight
fit as it must resist the full pressure of the water pushing against it.
The inlet water is directed into the four upper slots on the outer tube by a one inch
compression tee. This part might be a little difficult to find as it is not generally
carried by consumer hardware stores. You are more likely to find it at a plumbing
specialty shop.
The rest of the trap illustrated in the pictures is just there to get the water to and from
the trap portion. I made my trap with more valves and unions than necessary in order
to have something that I could easily modify while it was connected to my home
water system.
The metal tank in the picture is a small pressure tank which also provides a
magnetically shielded space for the ORMUS water that has been captured by the trap.
This pressure tank holds about a gallon of liquid and provides full pressure till it is
empty.
Eventually I want to have all my domestic water run through this trap and have a
spigot mounted on my sink for the ORMUS trap water.
I used four ceramic ring magnets on my trap. These magnets are four and a half inches
in diameter with a 1.75 inch inner hole. They are about half an inch thick. These
magnets are oriented so that their upper face attracts the south end of a compass
needle.
This should be enough to get folks started with this trap design.
Following is some information about the water from this trap:
The static pressure at my tap is about 90 psi. I cannot measure active pressure into the
trap without making extensive modifications to it but the active pressure going into
my three stage Tiny Trap is about 40-50 psi.
Between 10:20 AM and 11:20 AM on 5-15-01 I measured the volume of water use
and the volume of trapped water. I got 3.21 liters of water from the trap after running
it for one hour. This matches the amount I got in the same length of time a few days
ago. My water meter indicated that I used 75.95 cubic feet (2038.24 liters) of water in
this same hour. I did not use any other water in my house. This figures out to a ratio of
approximately 635 units of total source water to 1 unit of trap water.
I also calibrated my pH meter and measured the pH of the different water components.
These measurements were:
Source
pH
Tap water
7.16
Trap water
7.26
Waste water
7.22
7.66
On the left is the old trap water which I collected three days ago. In the center i
ordinary tap water. And on the right is the trap water which I just collected
These are images of the first water that I made with this tra
Notice the cloudy look and green tint in the wate
Several years ago (in the late 1980s) I was working with an inventor who had
developed a very efficient ozone generator. This generator was so efficient and
produced such good ozone that we were able to get it to clean up toxic mine drainage
water to where it would meet state drinking water standards. This was the first and
only ozone generator that the Bureau of Mines ever tested which could do this.
At my prompting my inventor friend decided to clean up a mine waste pool in our
area. His process worked quite well but he was getting some strange "snotty" looking
material in the treatment system. If this snotty material was left to dry in the dark, it
would become a powder which would "fly" away if you tried to touch it. If it was
dried in sunlight, it would disappear in a flash of light as soon as it became dry.
An accident involving the mine clean up process put my friend off of further
investigations into the snotty material.
In 1995 I heard a recorded lecture of David Hudson talking about his discovery of the
ORMUS materials. In this lecture he told about how these materials would fly away if
you put your hand near them and they would disappear in a flash of light if you left
them to dry in the sunlight. I put two and two together and realized that Hudson's
materials were probably the same as the materials that my friend had discovered.
Since 1995 we have been working with the ORMUS materials and ozone. We have
found that these materials have an affinity for oxygen and water. David Hudson
postulates that this affinity is due to a common resonance frequency between these
materials. David Hudson in his Portland workshop said:
"This little zero point frequency I showed you between the positron and the electron;
if you follow that right up the electromagnetic spectrum, it agrees with the molecular
frequency of hydrogen dioxide, or water. So there is an affinity for this material and
water. That's why it is normally taken in water. When you come to understand that
your body is, in fact, mainly water. That, literally, this material when you distill water
it distills with the water as the oridide, the iridide, the ruthidide, just like chlorine. And
so if you distill water thinking you are getting high purity water, it goes with the
water. And it literally changes the bond angles of the water. That one iridium atom
controls 56 waters of hydration around itself. And all the bond angles of all 56 waters
are altered when iridium is present. I haven't carefully studied the research work of
people working with water but I strongly suspect that their water isn't completely pure
and they are finding that the bond angles can be changed. There is something else
besides H2O in the water."
In other lectures Hudson makes a similar correlation with oxygen.
We are finding that the ORMUS elements are common in water. In fact, it looks like
they determine some of the familiar properties of water as we know it. Ultra-pure
water made from pure hydrogen burned in pure oxygen does not behave anything like
the water we know. The ORMUS elements effect the viscosity, boiling point, freezing
point and surface tension of water.
spinning more rapidly than ordinary atoms. This high spin pulls the electron cloud in
toward the nucleus of the atom, sort of like an ice skater pulling her arms in to
increase the rate of her spin.
As these electrons get closer to the nucleus they pair up into what is called "Cooper
pairs" of electrons. (The Cooper pairing phenomenon is named after one of the
gentlemen who received a Nobel prize for its discovery.) These electrons, when they
are Cooper paired, are no longer available for ordinary shared electron bonding
between different elements. This means that they can no longer form ordinary
chemical compounds.
Methods have been developed to convert metal to ORMUS. In one way or another
these methods induce the high spin state and the Cooper pairing of electrons in the
individual atoms or diatoms. It is also possible to convert ORMUS to metal using
different methods.
Each of the elements, that can be transformed this way, keep their individual
elemental properties through the transition from metal to ORME and to metal again.
Some of these properties are common to both the metallic state and the ORMUS state.
For example, the m-state rhodium gives water a sticky feel. This is also true of the
metallic form--rhodium hydroxide. Also, rhodium seems to be useful as a catalyst in
the ORMUS state and in the metallic state.
Though these elements don't form chemical compounds which are bound by electron
sharing, they do seem to be involved in chemical compounds in some special ways. I
believe that they should be suspected to be present in any chemical compound which
cannot be synthesized. Chlorophyll would be an example of this type of compound. I
understand that the "secret" ingredient in chlorophyll is the ORMUS form of copper.
Since these elements are not bonded by shared electrons, how might they be bonded?
I know of a couple types of bonds which might apply. I will discuss one of these types
of bonds, as it relates to ozone.
All of these concepts are discussed in greater depth in Hudson's lectures and in Gary's
article titled "Paranormal Observations of ORMEs Atomic Structure".
Superconductivity is a property of certain substances which are in a special quantum
state called a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC). A BEC is a large group of atoms
which behave as a single atom due to their being in a common state. In the case of the
ORMUS elements, their superconducting nature creates an energy field around each
atom. This energy field is called a Meissner field. A Meissner field resonance couples
individual ORME atoms to the point where many atoms can act like a single atom.
This resonance coupling between ORME atoms allows you to perform a sort of
shadow chemistry on them.
It appears that there are varying degrees of ORMEishness. An ORME diatom can
have all of its electrons paired up or it can have only a portion of its electrons paired
up. If you have an ORME diatom which is partially paired this will leave some
electrons available for conventional electron bonding with other elements. This
ORME diatom will then have one foot in the ORMUS world and one foot in the metal
world. You can use these partial ORMEs to manipulate the full ORMEs chemically.
Imagine that you want to collect all the loose male dogs in your town. It might be
difficult to chase them all down individually but there might be a simpler way to do
this. You could find a female dog in heat and use a known property of male dogs to
collect them. You would put the female dog on a leash and lead her through town and
pretty soon you will be leading all the loose male dogs around too. These male dogs
are not on your leash but they are attracted to the female dog and they will follow you
because you are leading her.
In a similar way we can do chemistry on the partial ORME and use the partial ORME
to lead the full ORMEs around. To do this you must coax the ORMUS atoms into a
chemical box.
We believe that the simple methods to chemically concentrate the ORMUS elements
from water that are described in the ORMUS document
athttp://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/ormus/ormus2.htm use this principle. The
sodium atoms provided with the lye appear to form a three atom cluster or a triangle.
We believe that this triangular molecule provides a nice tight comfy inner space for
the ORME to hide in. Similar ring molecules made of carbon, oxygen and chlorine
have also been used to trap and chemically manipulate the ORMUS elements. The
oxygen ring molecule is the diozone molecule.
Though you cannot get an electron handle on the ORMUS elements, if you get them
in a diozone "box" you can use the electron handles provided by the diozone to put
them where you want them. Once you get them where you want them you must
remove the diozone ring in such a way as to leave the ORMUS atom intact and
functional, but that is another story.
Here are some of Gary's comments on the value of O6 for working with the ORMUS
materials:
anu each). The triangular H atoms are not identical in the types
of their constituent quarks; each hydrogen in the diatom has the
same mass, but differs from the other as a consequence of their
quark components. When dissociated into monatoms, the two
separated hydrogen atoms are stable (ie do not spontaneously
dissociate further) but I would suggest that they would prefer to
be paired.
Diatomic oxygen is also an ovoid, containing two spiral shapes, looking very much
like helices of 5 turns each, with each being "wound" in the opposite direction.
Leadbeater noted that the positive variety of ozone (+-+) tends to rise, though no
tendency to move either up or down is noted for the negative variety. This is further
confirmed in that for observations performed at high altitudes, nearly all the ozone
found in the atmosphere is of the positive type. In any practical ozone generation
system, equal amounts of each type will be formed. While I have not tried it, it
appears that it should be possible to separate these according to species, once formed,
by placing ozone gas in a potential gradient (- on the upper electrode surface) that
draws the two types apart. Ozone that is thus separated by species is substantially
more stable and far less explosive in nature than ordinary heterogeneous ozone.
Oxygen is a very energetic and active element, and is capable of mediating several
type of energies, some of which are not as yet recognized by Science.
You have previously said:
>There is a large gap in our knowledge of the mechanism by
This is a conjugate molecule, which might be termed di-ozone, and consists of six
oxygen helices, arranged at the corners a hexagonal cell, alternating +-+-+-. It is
reminiscent of the phalanx of rocket engines at the base of a Delta launch vehicle.
Di-Ozon
In oxides of the smaller members of the dumbbell atomic family, e.g. sodium, the
oxygen spiral actually situates so it winds round or encircles the main central body of
the dumbbell.
Sodium Hydroxide
From copper upwards in the dumbbells, and also the bars group, it cannot do this
(oxygen is too small in diameter for them to fit), and so contents itself with a side-byside arrangement, like a catamaran's outrigger. In the case of dumbbells, the oxygen
and dumbbell axes always align in parallel. For a heavy dumbbell atom like gold, it is
like a tiny woman, dancing with a huge fat man - there just isn't any good way to hold
on, and this is (in simple terms), how gold resists oxidation so well.
I previously stated
>Simple glancing thermal collisions knock the monatomic atom
>into a rapid spin, and that is how the high spin [super
>deformed] state leading to ORME transition is most commonly
>achieved.
Now, I may finally say some things about the particular ORMEs generating
mechanism you are concerned with.
In most cases, even when a single oxygen is paired with a dumbbell, the axial dipole
of the oxygen has a marked effect on the configuration of the dumbbell. For example,
a copper hydroxide molecule [Cu(OH)2] is flanked by 2 OH groups, each of which
consists of an oxygen spiral with a hydrogen triangle (composed of 3 quarks) floating
over each end; these two OH's stand on opposite sides of the copper main body.
Copper Hydroxide
The effect of the forces from the ends of the oxygens in this configuration is to repel
and displace the funnels on each end of the copper, into a shape like an oriental fan or
peacock tail, standing straight out like a Mohican haircut, on each end of the copper.
This funnel displacement takes place, even after the forces at the ends of the oxygens
have been mediated and toned down by the hydrogen groups.
When gold meets an O6 complex, something of like nature occurs to its funnels. As
they approach, the O6 and gold polarly align, and the gold dumbbell slips into the
center of the hexagonal O6 cell, which enlarges somewhat to accommodate the gold.
Like flowers held in the blast of a jet engine exhaust, the funnels at each end of the
gold then stand straight out, along the main axis of this complex, under the powerful
combined action of the forces emanating from the ends of the synchronized oxygens.
The effect of this phenomena would be like what happens when an ice skater swings
her arms to go into a spin. At first the spin is slow till she brings her arms up above
her head, then the spin becomes more rapid along her long axis.
Gary continues:
The 6 oxygens each contain counter-rotating spirals. These all come into phase lock
when an O6 molecule forms, so that all 12 spirals are rotating in a synchronous
fashion in the molecule, speaking in regards to the rotational phase relationships of the
main charge carriers, which are uniformly located, one per turn, on the helix of each
spiral. This intra- molecular phase resonance is responsible for the great power of the
O6 group, which thus exceeds the sum of its parts in its oxidizing potential. As can be
seen, physical structure has a lot to do with atomic interaction and bonding
potentialities.
With the funnels of an O6-embraced gold dumbbell standing straight out, it at this
point has precisely the same super- deformed physical configuration as a dumbbell in
high spin [around the short axis]. This then, constitutes the basis of the mechanism
responsible for the formation of Cooper pairing, and genesis of the ORMEs state, that
occurs from exposing specific elements to high energy ozone. A very similar process
occurs when bars family elements are exposed to O6. For compounds such as gold
chloride, there are additional complexities, but in general terms, basically the same
type of phenomena occurs.
The highly dipolar nature of this complex is what lies behind, and is responsible for,
the magnetic properties of ozonated ORMEs (or ORMEs di-ozonides) and their salts.
There are a number of variations to the structure I've just described. For example, the
O6 group acquires hydrogen ions to form hydroxyl groups (similar to those of copper
hydroxide, described earlier) when in water.
Even the tetroxides of platinum group elements like Ru and Os are relatively volatile,
and the di-ozonides are even more volatile. When di-ozone is combined with salt
complexes of these metals, the resultant compound is more stable, but is still anxious
to be elsewhere, as soon as it gets a chance. For instance, in aqueous solution,
volatility increases due to dissociation.
Following laws of partial pressure and osmotic diffusion, volatized ORMEs (fully
capable of tunneling), will ignore barriers to other molecules, and go to where the
closest, most attractive reactants are, following the path (as they see it) of least
resistance: straight through into the gas tank, the crankcase, and the grease spots on
the floor. The more combustive energy a substance has, the more the di-ozone portion
will be attracted to it.
When the oxygens have reached their destination, they may or may not abandon the
ORME they are attached to. There is a wide range of events that could happen at this
point. But as you have seen, in some cases metal will be deposited, and some ORMEs
will also remain, gelling the material. The absorption of "gold gas", or di-ozoneORMEs complex into silica gel, which has a natural affinity for ozone, is based on the
same principle; its affinity for di-ozone is greater still, in proportion to the increased
O6 reactivity.
When kept in solution in a beaker as di-ozone ORMEs complexes, when they leave
the liquid phase at the fluid interface, they do not go straight up into the atmosphere
above the liquid, but depart from the liquid along a vector which is dependent on their
departure velocity vector, and this vector is random through a 180 degree umbrella.
Because of the pseudo two dimensional interface between the container and the liquid,
this will naturally tend to be an area where significant migration activity occurs.
Because of this, the number of ORMEs exiting along or immediately near the edges of
the glass container will be greater than for any other part of the liquid surface. It is
also obvious that particles exiting in this region will tend to strike the inner wall of the
container, just at or above the liquid level, since a large number of their possible
departure vectors will point them at that region, for that exit zone, around the edge
where the liquid/container interface or meniscus is.
Some percentage of the ORMEs hitting this region of the inner container wall will
tunnel, rather than rebound. Should the tunneling ORMEs deozonate, as a result of
local conditions in the amorphous structure of the glass, then the resulting gold atom
will become stuck there, and its "appearance" will result in a localized stress riser, as a
dislocation in the glass structure. After enough of these stress dislocations have
accumulated in the same region, the glass will crack. In this case it cracks in a nice
clean ring.
Tunneling was occurring in other parts of Jim's glass beaker walls also, but this was
taking place at random locations, so the points of added stress were spread out and
more-or-less evenly distributed. Hence no cracking anywhere else. Glass containers
should not be used to store ORMEs solutions for prolonged periods.
There is 6 inches of string to bridge two points 10 inches apart. Either the string must
be made longer, the points brought closer, or some of both. The string is the karmic
cost of the knowledge, and the span is the knowledge gap to be bridged. The
prospects look good that this can be done.
I encourage you to continue to actively pursue a course that will remove those
obstacles. Continue the active exchange and brokerage of information. Continue
looking for a way to obtain FEs to support this purpose.
Anything you can do to augment the flow of additional knowledge into the equation
from sources such as yourself, Jim, or your other contacts and associates, will allow,
and lead to, expanded scope of discussions, and interpretive explanations to promote
your understanding. Keep up your efforts, Barry. The karma of this thing is beginning
to melt like the wicked witch after Dorothy dowsed her.
Gary
In another post Gary wrote:
Dissolution in acids may occur with partial ORMEs; a sample may be *nothing but*
partial ORMEs and still completely dissolve in acid. Whether partials will dissolve in
acids depends on the particular element involved, the degree of partiality, and the
energy flowing through the paired valence circuits. You and Hudson presently lack
means of quantitatively determining either of these last two parameters. You can use
acid to eliminate partial content from your samples. But there are other
considerations. Acids may also react with the oxygens in ORMEs-di-ozonides, with
deleterious consequences, as explained in a moment.
You must be careful to properly distinguish the differences between sample types.
There are several very distinct materials, which must be differentiated between if you
wish to avoid problems.
Sample
Approx. Color
1 ORMEs
[white]
2 Partial ORMEs
[wide variations]
4 ORME di-ozonides
[*white]
[*varies typ.gray-white]
[widevariations]
* Presumed colors
Copper is an exception, its partial colorations also reflecting the natural copper-red, in
lesser degrees of partiality (2 & 5). The material Jim is collecting in his traps is 1, 2,
and 3. The other materials, made by Jim from metals, or from ozonating trap material
or chemical compounds are 4, 5, and 6.
As you can see from the above table, the fact that Hudson remains unconvinced of the
existence of partial ORMEs, as well as lacking familiarity with di-ozonides, is not
particularly important from a color standpoint (criteria #1). But the presence of
oxygen in the complex can alter the expected results, depending on the chemical
processes (etc.) samples are subjected to. The reasons for this may perhaps help guide
Jim toward fruitful directions of experimentation.
There are essentially two ways that an ORME-di-ozonide can lose its oxygens, to
become a "normal" (ie de-ozonated) ORME. The O6 can come off, just as it got on,
by slipping off one end of the dumbbell or bars element. It is like a girl slipping a
continuous circular bracelet off her wrist. But doing this exposes the funnels or bars
on the exiture end of the ORME to powerful disrupting forces from the O6 molecule
as it departs, and often causes Cooper pairs to be broken during the separation
process. This is its favored way of coming off in many chemical processes, in the
absence of other factors.
The other means of losing the oxygens is for the O6 complex to open up, like a hinged
bracelet, so they come off without passing over the end of the ORME within. The O6
breaks apart and comes off in pieces, in either O3 or O2 molecules. This is much less
likely to disrupt any Cooper pairing that is present; the captive ORME will then most
likely still continue to be an ORME, after it is freed from the oxygens that were
girdling it.
In many of the operations Jim has used to remove the oxygens, "pinning" the ORME,
as you are terming it, the transformation into a metallic or partially metallic state (low
order partial ORME) is actually the result of the oxygens blowing apart the Cooper
pairing as they slide off, going after carbon for example, rather than chemical
destabilization of the ORME's paired valencing. Once one end of a gold ORME's
Cooper pairing is ruptured in this way, energy transients inside the atom often blow
apart those funnel pairings on the other end as well, as the remaining valence circuits
attempt to (often impossibly) assume a greater amount, or in some cases to maintain
the entirety, of the atom's Meisner flux by themselves. It appears that stages of
Hudson's ORMEs analysis also causes this result.
Jim has noted that ozonated ORMEs seem to represent a metastable state, and this is
why. Some processes remove the oxygen in a way that breaks the Cooper pairing,
ending in a metal. Others remove the oxygen, in a manner so as to typically leave the
ORME intact, which then, of course, shows itself very inert and recalcitrant to any
further chemical manipulations, typical of ORMEs David Hudson has been working
with.
There are some other factors which are important, and may be of help. You have
learned that, because the di-ozone complex is highly dipolar, (as you have repeatedly
observed first-hand with your various magnet experiments), it is susceptible to
alignment and orientation by an external field. By aligning the O6/ORMEs complex
with a polarizing field perpendicular to an electric field, the oxygens may be broken
off and removed, laterally. I suggest approaching this by applying the electric field in
an aqueous electrolytic cell, with a perpendicular magnetic field.
Fully paired ORMEs do not react chemically, except as in the case of O6 and some
other unusual constructs. You may reasonably conclude that the ORMEs involved in
Hudson's chemistries are partials.
Anyone duplicating Hudson's procedures may wish to do metrics to quantify, or keep
track of, chlorine-in and chlorine-out (for example), to see how much is actually being
bound to the ORMEs you are working with. This is an indirect means of monitoring
the partialities present. Comparing the molar quantities of chlorine binding to the
ORMEs, with the molar quantity of the gold present, will give you an idea of the
number of partial valences engaging in binding reaction. You may release and
measure the chlorine from ORMEs chloride, and deduce from that how many active
partial ORME valences are present. That will only involve the partials engaging in
binding, and would not tell anything about the amount of non-reacting higher order
partials or 100% ORMEs which may also be present. But measuring released
reactants is valuable, if the ORMEs were made from metal in the first place, so the
molar amount of gold, etc., present is known a priori. Things may then be
meaningfully deduced as to the relative number of non-reactive valences.
Wrapping an O6 around an ORME charges it just fine, in just about the twinkling of
an eye. I might go so far as to say it is the Ne Plus Ultra method for ORMEs
formation; at least it is the key first step in the process. It is getting the O6 off again
without trashing everything that I have been gradually and gently leading your
attentions towards.
Charging an ORMEs system is different than charging ORME atoms individually, but
there are some similarities and carry over, when individually charged atoms are
combined into contiguity.
__________________________________
You should also be aware that there is more than one form of O6. The O6 I have been
discussing with you, with its unique ring shape, is the only one which has any
usefulness relative to ORMEs. Others also exist. Though these others are more
common, they are far less interesting than the O6 ring. But the different forms all have
the same mass and charge, though certainly not the same thermal stability or
reactivity. So you must be discriminating in deciding which kind you have, by the way
you measure them.
Because the O6 ring shares the same mass and charge as the transient O6 ozones,
because of its relative rareness (except in the FE), because of its short average life,
and because of its ability to "blend in" with its O3 cousins (which always accompany
it in large numbers), these factors have conspired to prevent scientists from noticing it,
and hence from doing any work to identify it, up until very recently.
Left to itself, (ring) O6 is very stable; ie, it doesn't show the same tendency to
spontaneously decompose, as O3 eventually does. But it makes up for it by reacting
with all sorts of things, and doing so usually causes it to break up (most ORMEsforming metals being notable exceptions, in which cases it remains intact).
O5, O7, etc., are variations of O3 chains (see below), involving some O2s tacked on,
and are rather transient forms.
In water, O6 will react vigorously with most types of impurity materials present in the
water, but not much with the water itself. You may reflect, that Jim's initial gold
recovery attempt, starting him on his present path of destiny, would have been an
abject failure, if O6 reacted with water to an appreciable degree.
Once the impurities have been oxidized, the remaining O6 may persist for quite a
while, depending on how much remains at that point, but will eventually diffuse out of
the water into the atmosphere, where it soon finds something to oxidize. The rate of
diffusion depends on the temperature of the water. Also remember, a little O6 goes a
long way -quite a bit farther than O3- for a water taste-test.
___________________________________
>From a conversation with Jim you transcribed, speculating
on the fundamental cause underlying the high activity of
the FE's output gas:
>Barry- Ok, well what's the difference between that ozone
>and other ozone?
>
>Jim- It is eager to react. It's unstable. It's been
>pumped up to the point. . . It's a balloon that's over
>inflated and it wants to pop.
>
>Barry- Ok, is it because you've got O4,O5 and O6 or is
>it because . . .?
>
>
>Jim- Ah, don't know.
Despite Jim's view that this is due to some alteration of O3, the high activity is due
primarily to the presence of O6, and to a much smaller degree to some other oxygen
forms which, though less active than O6, are still a bit more active than O3. It is not
because of a change in common O3's energy. Refer to an earlier email, for an
explanation of the reasons why O6 has eluded recognition.
The uses of the O6 ring are great and manifold. It is a very powerful oxidizer. Its
potential uses range all the way from creating and super-activating ORMEs, to
recovering gold from sea water, to powering giant booster rockets. It will supplant and
replace ozone in many existing applications, due to its superior oxidizer properties.
Many new things will be discovered that were impossible before shall become known.
It will save and prolong countless lives, help clean up the planet, avert great suffering,
and make the future a brighter vision.
So much from it... and such a tiny little thing it is, too, all bright, pure, and sparkling.
We believe that there are many useful interactions between oxygen and the ORMUS
elements in the body. We suspect that hemoglobin is partially composed of ORMUS
rhodium and that an increased availability of ORMUS rhodium in the body will
facilitate oxygen transport. I have personally noticed this in that when I am
Previously in this article I quoted Gary as proposing that the oxygen vortex, when
arrayed in a hexagram with their axes all pointed in the same direction, would "blow"
the valence funnel arms of the gold diatom away from the short axis of the diatom.
This would promote the pairing of these valence funnel arms.
I imagine this would look like a fat ballet dancer who starts spinning with arms out
but encounters a blast of air from below which blows his arms up above his head
where he can easily clasp his hands. The difference, in this case, is that the ballet
dancer would have twelve arms above his head and twelve arms below his feet. In
the Paranormal Observations article Gary described this thus:
"Each element in the dumbbell shaped group has a total of 24 valence funnels;
there are 12 at each end of the atom, representing 6 sets of half valences. The 12
funnels are arranged a bit like blades of a ceiling fan, which rotate on the major
elliptical axis of the central body, hence the dumbbell look. The ends of the
valence funnels are slightly staggered, alternating up and down slightly as you
go around the atom."
An image of a dumbbell group atom can be seen below:
The oxygen atoms in the O6 (or possibly O12) hexagon array around the gold diatom
would be in spin coherence as I described in my 1999 article titled Patterns of Motion.
This array of oxygen atoms might look something like one or more of the arrays
pictured below:
Oxygen
Oxygen 12
Di-Ozone
Apparently, anti-gravity like effects have recently been measured emitting above and
below the spin axis of Bose-Einstein condensates in spin coherence. See:
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1999/10/taming_gravity/
This anti-gravity like force was discovered by Dr. Ning Li who calls it "AC Gravity".
I suspect it may also be related to the spin fields (scalar waves) that Alexandr
Shpilman has as