Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
com
ScienceDirect
Solar Energy 104 (2014) 5259
www.elsevier.com/locate/solener
Abstract
Low emissivity coatings can signicantly reduce radiative heat losses of glass panes for solar energy use. Their eectiveness is strongly
dependent on their optical properties, which need to meet the requirements for the specic application. The paper analyzes the performance of newly developed, highly transmitting and spectrally selective glass coatings based on transparent conductive oxides (TCO) for
the use in at plate collectors: Uncovered, single-glazed and double-glazed designs are taken into consideration. As functional layers both
tin-doped indium oxide and aluminum-doped zinc oxide have been investigated. Collector eciencies and annual collector yields are
presented and compared to those of state-of-the-art collectors. Theoretical calculations are complemented by measurements on collector
prototypes. The results show that a signicant performance increase is accessible both in single-glazed collectors with low or non-selective
absorbers and in double-glazed collectors with highly selective absorbers.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Coated glass; Low emissivity; Flat plate collector
1. Introduction
Spectrally selective glass has been investigated since long
time both for active and passive solar energy use. In the literature, particularly works from the 70 s and 80 s of the
last century have discussed low emissivity (low-e) coatings
for glass covers to improve the performance of dierent
collector types (Goodman and Menke, 1975; Apfel, 1975;
Fan and Bachner, 1976; Yoshida, 1978; Frank et al., 1983).
Due to the successful development of highly selective
metal absorbers, able to reduce radiation heat losses more
eectively than low-e glazings, the proposed approaches
were neither put into practice nor followed up. The use
of a low-e cover in a single-glazed collector with a selective
absorber, which represents the most common design today
on the market, does not provide for any improvement, but
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 5151 999 501; fax: +49 5151 999 500.
53
Nomenclature
AZO
AR
ITO
G
Gd
TA
TSky
ae
e
se
the costs of commercially available collector covers, ranging from 8 to 10 /m2 for low iron, tempered glass and
1520 /m2 for high performing antireective glass, have
to be regarded as reference for the development of new
products. A comprehensive economical analysis should
consider the details of the specic application (collector
type, collector area, solar system conguration, etc.) and
goes beyond the intention of the present work.
On the basis of these requirements, we are currently
investigating and optimizing within an ongoing project in
cooperation with industry partners two coating systems
based on transparent conductive oxides for the use in
highly ecient double-glazed collectors (Foste et al.,
2011, 2013): aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) and tindoped indium oxide (ITO). The two systems dier in terms
of performance, stability and cost: the ITO coating exhibits
a higher chemical resistance as well as a lower emissivity at
a comparable solar transmittance, thus providing for a better thermal insulation. Due to the limited availability of
this material, the AZO coating, however, has to be favored
with regard to ecology and economics.
Our investigations on the AZO system have shown
promising results in laboratory (Ehrmann and ReinekeKoch, 2012); currently we are working at scaling the coating to large sizes while maintaining the achieved performance and durability. The ITO-coated pane is a special
architectural glass, manufactured by the German company
Euroglas, which is being adapted and optimized for the use
in thermal collectors. The coating is originally intended for
the use on the outer side of highly insulated multiple glazing to avoid condensation and it is, therefore, particularly
resistant against weathering and mechanical loads (class
A according to EN 1096-2, 2012). Long-term temperature
stress tests at ISFH conrm its very good durability: our
tests have been carried out with a self-developed rig, which
enables to reproduce a targeted temperature distribution
over a collector-sized glazing. Two ITO panes have been
exposed for 1200 h to a prole, which is expected in
stagnating double-glazed collectors, with maximum temperatures up to 160 C. We evaluated the eects of the
accelerating ageing by visually inspecting the glass and controlling its optical properties, without reporting any form
of degradation of the coating. On the basis of calculated
annual temperature occurrences in a solar system for space
heating with high solar fraction (single family house, 30 m2
collector area, 2 m3 storage unit) we estimate a minimum
54
Fig. 1. Left: optical properties of spectrally selective glass with high solar transmittance for architecture (LBNL, 2012) and solar collector applications in
comparison. Results for type-1 glass are based on own measurements, results for type-2 glass are obtained by adding 0.02 to the solar transmittance of the
corresponding type-1 panes. Right: schematic composition of the newly developed glass.
55
Table 1
Optical properties of the glass types used for the theoretical calculations.
Glass design
Name
Solar transmittance se
Emissivity e
REF
AR
AZOmin
AZOmax
ITOmin
ITOmax
0.90
0.96
0.85
0.87
0.84
0.86
0.84
0.84
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.20
56
Fig. 2. Left: schematic design of the investigated uncovered collector. Right: measured eciency curves of an uncovered collector prototype at dierent
wind speeds. The collector consists of a sheet-and-tube copper absorber (plate thickness = 0.3 mm, tube spacing = 120 mm, tube diameter = 10 mm) and a
low-e glass pane (KGlasse from Pilkington: thickness = 4 mm, se = 0.71, e = 0.18), which are mechanically xed to each other. The aperture area
amounts to 2.30 m2. For comparison, the eciency curve of a typical non-selective uncovered collector is also depicted in the graph (product Polysol 11
from the company Bomin Solar GmbH, measured at ISFH according to EN 12975-2 as reported in Rockendorf et al., 2001). To enable the comparison of
selective and non-selective collectors the curves refer to the solar irradiance G and not to the net irradiance.
Fig. 3. Calculated eciency curves of the optimized uncovered collector at dierent wind speeds. The commercial glass KGlasse is replaced by the
prototype glass ITOmin. The pane is supposed to be bonded face-to-face and thus properly thermally coupled to the heat exchanger, which in this case
serves as absorber as well. For comparison, the eciency curves of a typical uncovered product and of the measured prototype collector are depicted in the
graph as in Fig. 2.
57
Fig. 4. Left: investigated collector design. Right: calculated eciency of a single-glazed at plate collector with a non-selective absorber (ae = 0.95,
e = 0.85) and dierent glass covers (REF, AZOmin and ITOmax refer to the values reported in Table 1). The collector features 50 mm backside insulation.
Fig. 5. Percentage increase in annual gross yield of a single-glazed at plate collector at an inlet temperature of 40 C by substituting the common low iron
glass cover (REF) with low-e coated glass (left: AZOmin; right: ITOmax) in dependence of the optical properties of the absorber plate. Simulation
parameters: south orientation, 45 collector slope, weather data of Zurich (Switzerland).
58
Fig. 6. Percentage increase in annual gross yield of a single-glazed at plate collector at an inlet temperature of 40 C by substituting the antireective, low
iron glass cover (AR) with low-e coated glass (left: AZOmin; right: ITOmax) in dependence of the optical properties of the absorber plate. Simulation
parameters: south orientation, 45 collector slope, weather data of Zurich (Switzerland).
Fig. 7. Left: design of the investigated double-glazed collector with low-e glass. The double glazing presents the following assembly: 3.2 mm AR glass,
8 mm argon-lled gap, 3.2 mm low-e glass. The absorber consists of a copper tube-plate meander (plate thickness = 0.3 mm, tube spacing = 95 mm, tube
diameter = 10 mm) and a selective coating (ae = 0.94 0.01; e = 0.05 0.02). Right: eciency curves of double-glazed collectors with two dierent types
of low-e glass compared to those of commercial single- and double-glazed collectors with non-selective cover (Solar Keymark, 2009, 2007). The doubleglazed collectors feature a 70 mm backside insulation, the single-glazed a 50 mm one. The eciency curve based on measurements has been determined
according to EN 12975-2, assuming a Gd/G ratio of 0.15. The uncertainty over the relevant temperature range amounts to less than 0.01.
59
Acknowledgements
Part of the work presented in this publication was
funded by the German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, based on a decision
of the German Parliament (contract number: 0325973).
The authors are grateful for this support and thank the
project partners, especially the at glass manufacturer
Euroglas GmbH, for the fruitful cooperation. The content
of this publication is in the responsibility of the authors.
References
Apfel, J.H., 1975. Optical coatings for collection and conservation of solar
energy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 12 (5), 10161022.
Bertram, E., Glembin, J., Scheuren, J., Rockendorf, G., 2009. Soil regeneration by unglazed solar collectors in heat pump systems. In: Proceedings
ISES Solar World Congress 2009. Johannesburg, South Africa.
Burch, J., Salasovich, J., 2005. An Assessment of Unglazed Solar
Domestic Water Heaters. In: Proceedings ISES Solar World Congress,
Orlando, Florida, 612 August 2005.
Ehrmann, N., Reineke-Koch, R., 2012. Selectively coated high eciency
glazing for solar-thermal at-plate collectors. Thin Solid Films 520,
42144218.
EN 1096-2, 2012. Glass in building Coated glass Part 2: Requirements
and test methods for class A, B and S coatings.
EN 410, 2011. Glass in Building Determination of luminous and solar
characteristics of glazing.
Fan, J.C.C., Bachner, F.J., 1976. Transparent heat mirrors for solarenergy applications. Appl. Opt. 15 (4), 10121017.
Foste, F., 2013. Flat Plate Collector with Selectively Coated Double
Glazing. Leibniz University Hanover, Doctoral Thesis.
Foste, F., Ehrmann, N., Giovannetti, F., Rockendorf, G., 2011. Basics for
the development of a high eciency at-plate collector with a
selectively coated double glazing. Proceedings ISES Solar World
Congress 2011. Kassel, Germany, pp. 8287.
Foste, S., Giovannetti, F., Ehrmann, N., Rockendorf, G., 2013. Performance and reliability of a high eciency at plate collector nal
results on prototypes. In: Proceedings SHC Conference 2013. Freiburg, Germany.
Frank, G., Kauer, E., Kostlin, H., Schmitte, F.J., 1983. Transparent heatreecting coating for solar applications based on highly doped tin
oxide und indium oxide. Sol. Energy Mater. 8, 387398.
Goodman, R.D., Menke, A.G., 1975. Eect of cover plate treatment on
eciency of solar collectors. Sol. Energy 17, 207211.
ISFH, 2012. Personal communication of the test center of the Institut fur
Solarenergieforschung Hameln.
Lampert, C.M., 1981. Heat mirror coatings for energy conserving
windows. Sol. Energy Mater. 6, 141.
LBNL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2012. International Glazing
Database Version 18. <http://windows.lbl.gov/materials/IGDB/>.
Orel, B., Spreizer, H., Fir, M., Surca, Vuk A., Merlini, D., Vodlan, M.,
Kohl, M., 2007. Selective paint coatings for coloured solar absorbers:
polyurethane thickness insensitive spectrally selective (TISS) paints
(Part II). Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 30, 7794.
Rockendorf, G., Sillmann, R., Bethe, T., Koln, H., 2001. Solare
Freibadheizung. ist Energieplan GmbH, Kanden.
Solar Keymark, 2007. Summary of collector testing, Certicate No. 0117S256-F.
Solar Keymark, 2009. Summary of collector testing. Certicate No. 0117S567-F.
Yoshida, S., 1978. Eciency of Drude mirror-type selective transparent
lters for solar thermal conversion. Appl. Opt. 17 (1), 145150.