Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Part I
Submitted by Elizabeth Dyas
Many of the questions we receive are related to the h-index. Today we bring you a guest post by Meshna Koren, Second Line Support Manager
for Scopus (also known as "she who knows all about Scopus").
The h-index is an index that attempts to measure both the productivity and impact of the published work of a scientist or scholar. In Scopus,
the h-index is not a static value; it is calculated live on a set of results each time you look it up. The calculation was suggested by Hirsch and it can
be summed up as:
A scientist has an index h if h of his/her Np papers has at least h citations each, and the other (Np h) papers have no more than h citations
each.
In Scopus you can calculate it on any set of results; it does not have to be papers belonging to just one author. Just run a random search: TITLEABS-KEY(mars water ice), select all results, click View Citation Overview and therein you will see the h-index value for that set (see image).
This means that 84 documents from this set have been cited at least 84 times, but the 85th document has been cited less than 85 times.
Tomorrow we may load new articles (Scopus loads new content daily!) which cite any one article in this set, and the h-index may rise because of
that.
What you do need to know about Scopus is that we do not have references for records of articles that have been published prior to 1996 (though
this will be changing in the relatively near future, read more on the Scopus Cited References Expansionproject!).
The references are needed to calculate citations; if my article A cites your article B, but Scopus doesn't have references of my article A, well, your
B won't show as being cited. There's no danger if you published in 1996 or later because you couldn't have been cited before that time, but if you
published in 1982 we may be showing a lower citation count for that article. And if you look at the above screenshot again, we do warn you
there: "Scopus does not have complete citation information for articles published before 1996."
Obviously, nobody cares about an h-index for articles about water and ice on Mars; people want to be able to evaluate another author's work! So
they'd run a search more like this instead: AU-ID(26643014200) or AU-ID("Baker, Victor R." 26643014200) which would return all articles that
were written by Mr. Baker. We get the results, we calculate Citation Overview and we look at the great h-index of 40.
This is a high value for one author. It means the author participated (we do not distinguish in the order of author names when calculating
citations, all authors are equal in this regard) in the authoring of 40 articles of which each has been cited at least 40 times. Think about that for a
momentthat's some impact!
Still, this value may still be unfair. Because for all these articles: AU-ID("Baker, Victor R." 26643014200) AND PUBYEAR BEF 1996 we may be
displaying a low citation count thats too low (though this will be changing, read more on the Scopus Cited References Expansion project).
To even things out, we display an h-index value on author profile page that only uses documents published in 1996 or later. And when visiting
this page, a user may be shocked to find that the value is only 26.That's a big difference, it must surely be wrong!
But it isn't; if you read what the value represents, we state that "The h-index considers Scopus articles published after 1995." and that is not
quite the same thing as "not having complete citation information for pre-1996 content". And if you follow the link to Citation Overview, you will
see the same 5,120 total citations given to Baker's papers, but the h-index here also says: "The h-index considers Scopus articles published after
1995."
But why... which one is now correct? They both are! It really depends on what you want to evaluate.
It can be confusing when an author first sees the high and then the low value; and it looks to them like something broke or citations got lost (or
we are just being mean). Sometimes we receive feedback that we should simplify things and decide on one method and discard the rest.
But it's all a matter of choice. Author pages show the h-index for content published in 1996 or later because we are confident that we can
present a comprehensive, fair and relevant overview. At the time Scopus was launched it was shown that most people are actually interested in
the research and impact over the last 10 years. Not that the previous stuff doesn't matter, it does, just not as often.