Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
trying to take over Russia. Indeed, it could be said they had great control
already in Russia.
Then the incident in the Ukraine and Eastern Ukraine, that which was
the traditional territories of Russia, the East Crimean regions, the Crimean
regions and Eastern Ukraine regions, coming back to the Russians. At
least the Crimea did so, and the civil war that is occurring in Eastern
Ukraine is about this as well.
But there has been much interference, much propaganda that has
painted Russia as the enemy.
Taking this forward now to the situation in Syria, the irony and
paradox here is that the NATO ones through such spokespeople as John
Kerry are saying that the only real solution is to bring peace to this region,
then these ones are doing the exact opposite. That there is sufficient
evidence to prove that America has been funding and training ISIS, the
Islamic State, these Jhidadists. That they have been supporting them by
leaving equipment, military equipment there and that they have also,
through their bombing, been attacking not only ISOL targets but other
targets where civilians have been killed. The latest is of course the
bombing of the hospital in that region, in the Iraq region.
While they speak of bringing peace to the region, instead their
actions and the support of the very ones that they have labeled as the
dreaded enemy are of a nature that not only supports them, but promotes
them.
Now you have the situation of Putin coming in to the situation of
Syria, coming in to support the legitimate president Bashar al-Assad. That
most believe that this one is a despot, a dictator, an evil tyrant. Why is
this so? It is so because the propaganda has painted him to be this.
The agenda of the powers-that-were is about creating instability in
that region, requires that Bashar al-Assad be the enemy, be the tyrant
that must be deposed.
But the people were relatively free. Their standard of living quite
high, they had security, they had homes, they had institutes that
2
supported them, they were happy in their country until this plan was
launched to disaffect that stability, to disconnect it.
This was not only a plan for Syria but for the whole region, Libya
being the first that came under the new agenda creating instability in that
region. That what is now the case with Libya now that Gaddafi has been
removed and executed is a country in strife and turmoil, total upheaval.
That it is not exactly what was promised by the aligned countries that
participated in the overthrow.
That the bigger plan went then to Syria, to overthrow Bashar alAssad to create a similar situation in Syria, leaving it also affected as
Libya. But Bashar al-Assad refused to abdicate and went against those
ones and their plans, so much so that the efforts of the United States and
its allies had to finally come to a point where they were intervening
themselves, bombing Syria, a nation that was not and is not at war with
the NATO countries, the Western backed countries, and yet these ones are
creating the instability in this region under the guise to help the poor
Syrians and Iraqis, but is this so?
Then you have this new piece that has been added, this piece of
Russia entering, Putin supporting Assad and making a difference.
Ironically, in a way of bringing a stability back to the government, more
has been achieved in a relatively short time than has been achieved in
over a year of bombing of Syria by the NATO backed nations.
That this would create, if Bashar al-Assad's forces were able to quell
the rebels and the rebellion, a stable situation in Syria where those who
are homeless would again be able to build and rebuild their homes and
their lives. Those who have fled would perhaps even return if such
stability could be brought back to Syria and those who were and are the
real enemies be dealt with and driven out. This is what Russia is offering.
This was against that which America and England and the NATO
backed countries wished to achieve, for they have a long term agenda
and it is very crucial to them to create this instability, disharmony in that
region, not only Syria, but Iraq, Iran and other Middle East countries, even
Egypt. That this is being thwarted by the Russians' participation in this
conflict.
3