Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
March 2011
Outline
Introduction
e-Xstream
DIGIMAT
DIGIMAT outlook
Conclusions
DIGIMAT
Is
The nonlinear multi-scale material
modeling platform
Used by
Material Engineers
Structural Engineers
At
Material Suppliers
Tier 1 (Material Users/Any Industry)
OEM (Material Users/Any Industry)
For
Material Engineering
Accurate & Efficient FEA of
Composite Structures
DIGIMAT Users
Material Suppliers
Composites
Plastics
Rubber
Other: Nano Materials, Hard Metals, Graphite, Ceramics,
Automotive
Aerospace
Consumer (Electronics) Products
Defense
Industrial Products
Medical Devices
Other: Academic, R&D Institutes,
Key Benefits
Material Engineers:
To Understand & Optimize Material Behavior
To Support the Internal/External Users of the Materials
To Reduce Material Testing (Time & Cost)
To Improve Material Understanding
To Promote Material Usage
Structural Engineers
To Predict Structural Behavior
To improve FEA Predictivity & Accuracy
To Bridge the Gap between the Process & Structure
To Reduce Structure Prototyping & Testing (Time & Cost)
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Automotive Composites
Matrix
Thermoplastics: PP, PA,
Thermosets: Epoxy,
Reinforcements
Fibers: Glass, Carbon, Natural,
Chopped (Short or long)
Distribution of Orientation (e.g. induced by injection)
Random
Continuous
UD
Woven
Manufacturing Processes
Molding: Injection, Compression (SMC, BMC)
RTM, vaRTM, RTM lite
Hand Layup
Saturday, March 19, 2011
PARADIGM SHIFT
Reinforced Thermoplastics
Element
Angle
& Loading
Strain-Rate
Temperature
Test Data:
Tenstion, Compression, Shear,
Postulated Material Models:
Elastic, Elasto-Plastic,
Simplified behavior:
Isotropic, Homogeneous,
Material
Material Processing
Moulding: Injection,
Compression,...
Drapage, AFP, ...
Material
Microsturcure
Material
Chracteristics
Chopped fibers
Continuous fibers:
UD/Woven
Nano, ...
Mechanical
Thermal
Electric, ...
Part/Vehicle
Performance
Material Engineering
Digimat-MF, FE, MX
Digimat-MX, MAP, CAE
Structure Engineering
Saturday, March 19, 2011
10
Skin
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Core
Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011
11
Reinforced Thermoplastics
xx
yy zz
xx yy zz
12
FE model
Element
Material
13
Structural FEA
Drapage
Source: Campus
Source: Rhodia
Press Forming
Source: Rhodia
Compression Molding
EXPRESS
CADPRESS
e-Xstream
engineering,
2011 of their respective owners
Saturday,
19, exhaustive.
2011
14
Note: ThisMarch
list is not
The LogosCopyright
are Trademarks
or Registered
Trademarks
Improved MF Modeling
Composite behavior
Constituents Behavior
Constituents Behavior
Strong,
2-Way Coupling
Material Engineering
Structure Engineering
DIGIMAT: Workflow
15
Automotive
Case Studies
MATERIAL
ENGINEERING
Saturday, March 19, 2011
17
360
50
gate
Tensile specimen
100
Thickness=2,1mm
11000
Digimat
Experience
10000
8000
7000
6000
PA66+50w%GF, measured
16000
Modulus (MPa)
Modulus (MPa)
9000
18000
14000
12000
10000
8000
5000
6000
4000
4000
20
40
60
Angle ()
80
100
20
40
60
angle ()
80
100
18
50
50
Tensile specimen
100
200
180
160
0_exp
15_exp
30_exp
45_exp
60_exp
90_exp
0 Digi
15_Digi
30_Digi
45_Digi
60_Digi
90_Digi
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
0,02
0,04
True
strain 2011
Copyright e-Xstream
engineering,
0,06
0,08
19
CTE Vs Temperature
0,00025
0.7928
0.0157
0.0525
0.0157
0.1789
0.0064
0.0525
0.0064
0.0283
a11 Exp
a22 Exp
a33 Exp
a11 Digi
a22 Digi
0,00015
0,0001
a33 Digi
0,00005
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Temperature [C]
Temperature
Diff.
Diff.
29 C
12 031
11 803
-1.91%
7 480
7 223
-3.57%
120 C
4 073
3740
-8.93%
1 281
1 257
-1.96%
Courtesy of Solvay:
20
21
22
*
value obtained
from
composite
fraction e-Xstream
1.0 [Cai]
Copyright
Saturday,
March
19,
2011 with inclusion volume
engineering, 2011
23
24
0.04
Percolation threshold
0.035
Straight
Curved -
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0
Saturday, March 19, 2011
50
Aspect
100ratio
150
200
25
STRUCTURE
ENGINEERING
Saturday, March 19, 2011
26
= 0.3
Fibres :
E = 72000 MPa
= 0.22
Volume Fraction = 19.46 % (40 % Weight Fraction)
Aspect ratio : 100 (Long Fibers)
Orientation : MOLDFLOW 5.1
www.renault.com
FEA Model
Courtesy of:
27
P1: 20daN
Fixed
P1
-3.75%
P2
+8.07%
P3
-6.97%
Courtesy of:
28
Test
MDA Predictions
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
18
Mode Number
Courtesy of:
Saturday, March 19, 2011
29
Structural Mesh:
Number of nodes/Elements: 368,852/194,794
Material:
type = elastoplastic
Young Modulus = 2350 MPa
Poisson Ratio = 0.38
Yield stress =30 MPa
Fibers: E-Glass
Type = elastic
Density = 2.54 E+3
Young Modulus = 72 000 MPa
Poisson Ratio = 0.22
Weight fraction = 40%
Aspect ratio (L/D) = 20
Orientation = Injection Molding (.xml)
RF @ Imposed D
Experimental Force
DIGIMAT to Abaqus
Linear
(to 10.5mm)
~ 6477 N
6203.49 N
Cyclic
(to 7mm)
~ 4765N
3949.18 N
CourtesyMarch
of: AUTOLIV
Saturday,
19, 2011 & DSM
Difference
-4.2%
-17 %
30
Quasi-Static/Monotonic: Elasto-Plastic
DIGIMAT Material
Courtesy
of: AUTOLIV
Saturday, March
19, 2011 & DSM
31
Courtesy
of: AUTOLIV
Saturday, March
19, 2011 & DSM
32
Failure
Failure area
t = 0.0054 s
t = 0.0084s
t = 0.0088s
35
36
Oil Pan
Thermo-elasto-viscoplastic
PAGF oil pan
Reverse Engineering
Boundary conditions
Displacement / Force
Temperature load
Pressure
Creep
dISO
dANISO
39
LC 2
LC 4
LC 3
Saturday, March 19, 2011
40
41
42
43
Good failure
location
Bad failure
location
44
M.M.I Beam
45
46
47
48
49
Technology
Roadmap
Performance
Thermal
Stiffness
Vibration
Crash
Electric
Creep
Fatigue
Failure
Materials
Plastics (LFT)
Rubber
Hard Metals
Nano
HoneyComb
Carbon
FEA
Structural/Implicit
Structural/Explicit
UD & Woven
composites
DIGIMAT
Processes
Multi-Scales
Injection Molding
Macro
Fiber Drapage
Auto. Fiber Plac
Micro
Nano
50
Fast/Easy/Robust
Fast/Easy/Robust
FEA
FEA
MSC: Marc
LSTC: Dyna Implicit
MSC: Nastran
ANSYS OEM
Materials
Materials
LFT
CFRP
LFT
CFRP
Process: Drapage
Process: Drapage
Simulayt
FiberSim
Perfromance: Strength
Fatigue
Perfromance: Strength
Fatigue
nCode: DesignLife
LMS: VirtualLab Durability
FEMFAT
Crash
Crash
Saturday, March 19, 2011
51
Conclusions
Composite materials offer a great opportunity for weight and
emissions reduction + many other advantages
There is no unique composite solution
Material
Thermoplastic vs. Thermosets
Carbon vs Glass vs
Chopped vs continuous fibers
Manufacturing Process
Injection vs. RTM vs. Compression vs. Drapage
52