Sei sulla pagina 1di 52

DIGIMAT for Automotive

March 2011

Outline
Introduction
e-Xstream
DIGIMAT

Paradigm Shift: From CAE to Multi-Scale Modeling


Automotive Case Studies
Material Engineering
Structural Engineering

DIGIMAT outlook

Conclusions

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

DIGIMAT
Is
The nonlinear multi-scale material
modeling platform
Used by
Material Engineers
Structural Engineers
At
Material Suppliers
Tier 1 (Material Users/Any Industry)
OEM (Material Users/Any Industry)
For
Material Engineering
Accurate & Efficient FEA of
Composite Structures

Developed by e-Xstream engineering :


- Provider of Simulation Software & Engineering Services
- 100% Focused on Advance Material Modeling
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

DIGIMAT Users
Material Suppliers

Composites
Plastics
Rubber
Other: Nano Materials, Hard Metals, Graphite, Ceramics,

Material Users (i.e. OEMs & Tier Suppliers)

Automotive
Aerospace
Consumer (Electronics) Products
Defense
Industrial Products
Medical Devices
Other: Academic, R&D Institutes,

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Key Benefits
Material Engineers:
To Understand & Optimize Material Behavior
To Support the Internal/External Users of the Materials
To Reduce Material Testing (Time & Cost)
To Improve Material Understanding
To Promote Material Usage

Structural Engineers
To Predict Structural Behavior
To improve FEA Predictivity & Accuracy
To Bridge the Gap between the Process & Structure
To Reduce Structure Prototyping & Testing (Time & Cost)
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Automotive Composites
Matrix
Thermoplastics: PP, PA,
Thermosets: Epoxy,

Reinforcements
Fibers: Glass, Carbon, Natural,
Chopped (Short or long)
Distribution of Orientation (e.g. induced by injection)
Random
Continuous
UD
Woven

(Nano) Particles: Glass Bead, Mineral, Nano-Clay,

Manufacturing Processes
Molding: Injection, Compression (SMC, BMC)
RTM, vaRTM, RTM lite
Hand Layup
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

From CAE to Multi-Scale Modeling

PARADIGM SHIFT

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Reinforced Thermoplastics

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Standard FEA of a Reinforced Plastic Part


LS-DYNA

Element

Angle
& Loading

Strain-Rate

Temperature

Test Data:
Tenstion, Compression, Shear,
Postulated Material Models:
Elastic, Elasto-Plastic,
Simplified behavior:
Isotropic, Homogeneous,

Material

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Process Material Structure

Material Processing
Moulding: Injection,
Compression,...
Drapage, AFP, ...

Material
Microsturcure

Material
Chracteristics

Chopped fibers
Continuous fibers:
UD/Woven
Nano, ...

Mechanical

Thermal
Electric, ...

Part/Vehicle
Performance

Material Engineering
Digimat-MF, FE, MX
Digimat-MX, MAP, CAE
Structure Engineering
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

10

Injection: Part Filling & Fiber Orientation

Skin
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Core
Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

11

Reinforced Thermoplastics
xx

yy zz

xx yy zz

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

12

Nonlinear Mutli-Scale Modeling

FE model

Element

Test (or RE) Constituent Materials


Micromechanical Material Models
Stongly Couple to CAE
Accurate behavior

Material

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

13

From FEA to Multi-Scale Modeling


Process FEA
Injection Molding

Material Testing &


Modeling

Structural FEA

Drapage
Source: Campus

Source: Rhodia

Press Forming
Source: Rhodia

Compression Molding
EXPRESS
CADPRESS
e-Xstream
engineering,
2011 of their respective owners
Saturday,
19, exhaustive.
2011
14
Note: ThisMarch
list is not
The LogosCopyright
are Trademarks
or Registered
Trademarks

Improved MF Modeling
Composite behavior

Constituents Behavior

Constituents Behavior

Strong,
2-Way Coupling

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Material Engineering

Promising Material Candidates

Structure Engineering

DIGIMAT: Workflow

15

Automotive
Case Studies

MATERIAL
ENGINEERING
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

17

Mechanical: Youngs Modulus fct Angle


50

360

50

gate

Tensile specimen

100

Thickness=2,1mm
11000

Digimat
Experience

10000

8000
7000
6000

PA66+50w%GF, measured

16000

PA66+50w%GF modelled with Digimat, modelled a2


PA66+50w%GF modelled with Digimat, measured a2

Modulus (MPa)

Modulus (MPa)

9000

18000

14000

12000

10000

8000

5000

6000

4000

4000

20

Saturday, March 19, 2011

40

60

Angle ()

80

100

20

40

60

angle ()

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

80

100

18

Mechanical: Nonlinear Stress-Strain


360
gate

50
50

Tensile specimen

100

200
180

True stress (MPa)

160

0_exp
15_exp
30_exp
45_exp
60_exp
90_exp
0 Digi
15_Digi
30_Digi
45_Digi
60_Digi
90_Digi

140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0

Saturday, March 19, 2011

0,02

0,04

True
strain 2011
Copyright e-Xstream
engineering,

0,06

0,08

19

Thermo-Mechanical: E & CTE as fct (T)


Material: IXEF 1002

CTE Vs Temperature
0,00025

0.7928

0.0157

0.0525

0.0157

0.1789

0.0064

0.0525

0.0064

0.0283

Thermal expansion [C-1]

Average Orientation Tensor


0,0002

a11 Exp
a22 Exp
a33 Exp
a11 Digi
a22 Digi

0,00015

0,0001

a33 Digi
0,00005

0
0

50

100

150

200

250

Temperature [C]

Temperature

E11 Digi (MPa)

E11 Exp (MPa)

Diff.

E22 Digi (MPa)

E22 Exp (MPa)

Diff.

29 C

12 031

11 803

-1.91%

7 480

7 223

-3.57%

120 C

4 073

3740

-8.93%

1 281

1 257

-1.96%

Courtesy of Solvay:

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

20

Mechanical: UD Continuous Fiber CFRP

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

21

Thermal: Thermal Conductivity


Materials : thermal conductivity (isotropic)
Kerimid 601:
0.23
W/mK
Al2O3 :
30.7
W/mK
2-phase Microstructure : Kerimid matrix with Al2O3 fibers
matrix : Kerimid
inclusions : Al2O3 fibers
volume fraction : from 0.0 to 0.4
AR = 6
orientation : random in xy-plane (Random2D)

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

22

Electric : Electric Conductivity


Materials :
electrical conductivity (isotropic)
PE:
2.5 E-14 S/cm
Carbon : 50 S/cm (effective particle*)
Microstructure : 2-phase
matrix : PE
inclusions : Carbon
VF: 0 50%
AR: 1, 5.5 & 33
Orientation: Random3D

*
value obtained
from
composite
fraction e-Xstream
1.0 [Cai]
Copyright
Saturday,
March
19,
2011 with inclusion volume

engineering, 2011

23

Mechanical: Inter-Phase Debonding


Damage in the inter-phase
(macro strain 1%)

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

24

Electric: Electrical percolation in CNT

0.04

Max. Percolation threshold vs. Aspect ratio

Percolation threshold

0.035

Straight
Curved -

0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0

0
Saturday, March 19, 2011

50

Aspect
100ratio

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

150

200
25

STRUCTURE
ENGINEERING
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

26

Technical Front End


DIGIMAT Material Model
PP-Matrix :
E= 1500 MPa

= 0.3
Fibres :
E = 72000 MPa

= 0.22
Volume Fraction = 19.46 % (40 % Weight Fraction)
Aspect ratio : 100 (Long Fibers)
Orientation : MOLDFLOW 5.1

www.renault.com

FEA Model

# Elements =12632 (S3R)


# Nodes = 6365
# DOF = 38190
Material : PP-LGF with DIGIMAT 1.6
Initial Stresses: MOLDFLOW 5.1

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Courtesy of:

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

27

Technical Front End: Stiffness


P2: 20daN
P3 : 20daN

P1: 20daN

Fixed

Structural Stiffness (MDA-Test)/Test

P1

-3.75%

P2

+8.07%

P3

-6.97%

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Courtesy of:

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

28

Eingen Frequency [Hz]

Technical Front End: Vibration

Test
MDA Predictions

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

19

18

Mode Number

Courtesy of:
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

29

Airbag Container: Stiffness


Injection Molding Mesh:
Number of nodes/Elements: 584,123/3,369,976

Structural Mesh:
Number of nodes/Elements: 368,852/194,794

Material:

AKULON K224-PG8 (40% Glass filled


Impact Modied Polyamide)
Matrix: Impact Modified Polyamide

type = elastoplastic
Young Modulus = 2350 MPa
Poisson Ratio = 0.38
Yield stress =30 MPa

Fibers: E-Glass
Type = elastic
Density = 2.54 E+3
Young Modulus = 72 000 MPa
Poisson Ratio = 0.22
Weight fraction = 40%
Aspect ratio (L/D) = 20
Orientation = Injection Molding (.xml)

RF @ Imposed D

Experimental Force

DIGIMAT to Abaqus

Linear
(to 10.5mm)

~ 6477 N

6203.49 N

Cyclic
(to 7mm)

~ 4765N

3949.18 N

CourtesyMarch
of: AUTOLIV
Saturday,
19, 2011 & DSM

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Difference

-4.2%

-17 %
30

Quasi-Static/Monotonic: Elasto-Plastic
DIGIMAT Material

Courtesy
of: AUTOLIV
Saturday, March
19, 2011 & DSM

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

31

Impact: Elasto-ViscoPlastic DIGIMAT


Material

Courtesy
of: AUTOLIV
Saturday, March
19, 2011 & DSM

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

32

Airbag Container: Failure


Akulon K224-PG6

Failure

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

Courtesy of :TRW & 33


DSM

Von Mises Stress (Pa)

Airbag Container: Failure

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Failure area

t = 0.0054 s

t = 0.0084s

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

t = 0.0088s

Courtesy of :TRW & 34


DSM

Roof System Bearing: Local Stiffness

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

35

Roof System Bearing: Global Stiffness

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

36

Oil Pan
Thermo-elasto-viscoplastic
PAGF oil pan
Reverse Engineering
Boundary conditions
Displacement / Force
Temperature load
Pressure
Creep

Oil Pan: Anisotropic Creep


Thermo-elasto-viscoplastic
PA/GF35 oil pan
Vastly different results
Isotropic:
dmax = 4.1 mm
Anisotropic: dmax = 3.1 mm

dISO

dANISO

Sun Roof Front Panel

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

39

Sun Roof Pannel: Stiffness


LC 1

LC 2

LC 4

LC 3
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

40

Lower B Pillar Insert


Part size : # 600 * 170 * 85 mm
Thickness : from 2 to 5.2 mm
Part weight : 2.4 kg
Material : PA6GF35

Dr. F. Braymand, L&L Products


Improved Physical Property Prediction of Short
FRP (Session 5)
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

41

DIGIMAT Nonlinear Anisotropic Material

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

42

Lower B Pillar Insert: Modal Analysis

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

43

Lower B Pillar Insert: Crash & Failure

Good failure
location

Bad failure
location

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

44

M.M.I Beam

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

45

Digimat-CAE: Impact Model (MMI Beam)


Mass of 18 kg

3 m/s for 5 gates


4,8 m/s for 2 gates

Failure at the same time


Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

46

Digimat-CAE: Force & Failure (MMI Beam)

Failure in experimental and MMI

Failure with isotropic approach

Good correlation in force and failure


Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

47

CPU Performance: Crash (Explicit)

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

48

CPU Performance: Quasi-Static (Implicit)

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

49

Technology
Roadmap

Performance
Thermal
Stiffness
Vibration
Crash
Electric
Creep

Fatigue
Failure

Materials
Plastics (LFT)
Rubber
Hard Metals
Nano
HoneyComb
Carbon

FEA
Structural/Implicit
Structural/Explicit

UD & Woven
composites

Saturday, March 19, 2011

DIGIMAT

Processes

Multi-Scales

Injection Molding

Macro

Fiber Drapage
Auto. Fiber Plac

Micro
Nano

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

50

DIGIMAT Dev Plan 2011


DIGIMAT 4.2 (Jul. 11)
Consolidate

DIGIMAT 4.3 (Dec. 11)


Consolidate

Fast/Easy/Robust

Fast/Easy/Robust

FEA

FEA

MSC: Marc
LSTC: Dyna Implicit

MSC: Nastran
ANSYS OEM

Materials

Materials

LFT
CFRP

LFT
CFRP

Process: Drapage

Process: Drapage

Simulayt

FiberSim

Perfromance: Strength
Fatigue

Perfromance: Strength
Fatigue

nCode: DesignLife
LMS: VirtualLab Durability

FEMFAT

Crash

Crash
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

51

Conclusions
Composite materials offer a great opportunity for weight and
emissions reduction + many other advantages
There is no unique composite solution
Material
Thermoplastic vs. Thermosets
Carbon vs Glass vs
Chopped vs continuous fibers

Manufacturing Process
Injection vs. RTM vs. Compression vs. Drapage

The two main barriers to using composites


Price
Familiarity

Nonlinear Multi-Scale Modeling Technology can help


Understanding composite behavior Increase Familiarity
Optimizing composite design Reduce the material bill
Reducing the overall time & cost of developing composite
materials & structures
Saturday, March 19, 2011

Copyright e-Xstream engineering, 2011

52

Potrebbero piacerti anche