Eat To Save The Environment?

If you want to save the environment, start off by looking at what you put in your mouth.
Whatever your diet, and whatever reasons you have for eating the foods you do, there are clear consequences to what ends up on your plate.

Foods are not inherently neutral in the context of the earth, and most have an environmental toll. A few, however, can give mother nature a helping hand and reverse the chronic degeneration
underway on much of the earth. Your food can actually save the environment.
Our world has finite resources, though from the perspective of a single person it can seem impossibly vast and abundant.
Water, which is so critical to all life on earth, is one such resource. Ask an inhabitant of the perennially drought-stricken western United States if they have enough to go on if you have any doubts.
We can't save the environment without water.

The soil we walk on seems infinite, but billions of tons of topsoil have been lost in the last 50 years
due to unsustainable land management practices. We cannot save the environment if we can't feed
ourselves.
Our world is also vulnerable to toxic fungicides and pesticides which are liberally spread over crops,
endangering us and polluting the earth. We can'tsave the environment if we continue to pollute it.
It's clear that one diet actually helps the planet, and that's a raw, organic, fruit-based diet that also
includes plenty of vegetables as well as nuts and seeds.
Below, and in subsequent articles, I hope to show you why adopting such a diet is best not only for
you, but for the earth as well.
Eat all you care for, but choose foods that save the environment.

The Destruction of Our

Forests: Can Meat Eaters
Save The Environment?
If we lose our topsoil, our tenure on this planet is over- It's as simple as that. The fall of numerous
mighty civilizations of antiquity can be traced to the loss of something as simple as dirt. When crisis
came, these groups choose not to save the environment of their lands.

NOW thanks to your hacking my trees to the ground, there's not

enough truffula fruit to go 'round. The Lorax - Doctor Seuss
In 1938, Walter Lowdermilk, an official in the Soil Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, went on a world tour. He headed around the globe to see how older civilizations had
dealt with the erosion that was then ravaging U.S. farms. Some groups had managed their land well and were still thriving, others had not, and the consequences were stunning, he later said in a
report.

Lowermilk described a spot in Syria where old ruins sat atop barren rock in the section of his report entitled "A Hundred Dead Cities".
"Here, erosion has done it's worst," he wrote. "...If the soils had remained, even though the cities were destroyed and the populations dispersed, the areas might be re-people again and the cities
rebuilt, but now that the soils are gone, all is gone."
But despite such lessons, we're not listening. The United States loses seven billion tons of topsoil a year, which could coat an area roughly the size of Connecticut. About Eighty five
percent of this is caused by livestock grazing and the clear cutting of forests to create pastures and fields to grow food for animals. (1)
By 2005, 260 million acres of forest had been clear-cut for animal agriculture in this country. (2) With the population growing and per capita meat consumption increasing, deforestation is only
increasing.
It's clear that our other conservation measures will not equal the good that simply giving up meat would bring about.

Destroying South America

In South America, our meat obsession is causing the destruction of the rain forests, the greatest source of biodiversity on the planet, and an absorber of vast quantities of carbon dioxide. The United
States imports 200 million pounds of beef from Central America every year.

There are few natural pastures in this heavily-forested land, so they're steadily being carved out of pristine woodland. A Smithsonian study estimates that the need for grazing land and grain feed
leads to the destruction of a land area equivalent to seven football fields in the Amazon basin every single minute (3).
This means that if you eat a hamburger carved from an animal raised in South America, you're meal has contributed to 55 square feet of rain forest destruction. (3)

We cannot continue this rate of forest destruction if we're to have any hope of saving the
environment.

No Trees, No Topsoil, No Dice

Without these trees, the world loses an important source of soil stabilization. The grasses that take
their place have a tenuous root system and are eaten by livestock. The hooves of grazing animals
further churn up and destabilize the earth. Wind and rain can then blow or carry the soil away, with
most of it ending up washed out to sea.

Studies analyzing the effect topsoil loss on crop productivity find that losing an inch of topsoil
reduced corn and wheat yields an average of 6 percent. An inch of topsoil takes centuries to form
without human intervention, so losses at current levels are irreversible on a human-scale time
frame. (4) We are reducing our ability to feed ourselves as the population continues to grow, as well

as slowly degrading out breadbasket into something similar to what Lowdermilk saw in Syria.
If you find this a ridiculous claim, and you say that Middle-Eastern Syria has nothing to do with with
the Midwest, then I invite you to look at pictures of the dust bowl. In the 1930s, farmers were
plowing from "fencerow to fencerow".
They cut down trees and didn't allow the land to go fallow. When a two-year drought hit, the soil
just blew away. The humanitarian toll of this disaster is well recorded by history, and it wasn't until
the land was stabilized with tree, grass, and windbreak plantings that some degree of normalcy
returned to the region
But the U.S. is still bleeding topsoil at an alarming rate, and the dust bowl can happen again. The
middle east, after all, was covered with forests and renowned for its orchards until man cut them
down. (5)
An unbroken forest once stretched from Main to Texas, but much of that is gone too, with more
being cut down all the time.

Meat Wastes Our Water and

Pollutes What's Left
The production of meat consumes an amount of water equivalent to all other uses of water in
the U.S. combined. (6) Besides what livestock drink, water irrigates the grains they eat until
they're slaughtered. Each pound of beef requires 1939 gallons of water,but a pound of
potatoes requires only 64 gallons. (13) Animals must be supported for months and years before
they're ready to be slaughtered, making them an extremely inefficient foodstuff.

If you shower for 7 minutes every single day, at 2 gallons of water per minute coming out of your
flow shower head, that equals 100 gallons a week. Eating a single quarter-pounder
hamburger, then, at 484 gallons of water, is the equivalent of giving up four weeks of
luxurious showers.

low-

The only more wasteful agricultural system imaginable would befeeding meat-fed humans to
cannibals.
Livestock feces is also a huge pollutant, and regularly gets into our water supply.
People in the U.S. produce 12,000 pounds of excrement per second, and we've got sewage
in just about every municipality to handle it. The country's livestock produce 250,000 pounds of
excrement per second, and almost none of it is treated (7)
Even the EPA identifies animal excrement and animal agricultural chemicalpollutants as a major
contribution to the destruction of the environment (8) The manure created from the billions of
killed for food has to go somewhere, and it often ends up in rivers and streams, killing millions of
Manure and agricultural chemicals seep into our waterways and groundwater, eventually making
into the oceans and creating massive dead zones, or areas so toxic that neither plant or animal life
survive there. These spots, like the dead zone created where the Mississippi spews animal waste
Gulf of Mexico, are visible from space.

systems

animals
fish (9).
its way
can
into the

If we want to save the environment, we need to control our water use and pollution.

Meat Squanders Fossil Fuels

and Causes Global Warming
Everyone is talking about the harm that our C02 emissions are doing to the environment. We fret
what's coming out of the tailpipes of our cars and the pollutants being spewed into the air by coalpower plants. These are all valid concerns, but few stop to think about the fossil fuels burnt to
our food.
It turns out that eating 2.2 pounds of beef is responsible for more greenhouse gas and other
pollution emissions than driving for 150 miles while leaving a 100-watt bulb on for nearly 20 days.

about
fired
produce

Driving a hybrid car instead of an gas guzzler would conserve around a ton of carbon dioxide per
great thing if you're trying to save the environment.

year. A

A diet without meat and dairy, though, actually conserves a ton and a half. A hybrid will cost you
and a leg, but giving up unhealthy, expensive meat and dairy will cost you nothing, and help you
the environment. (11)

an arm
save

Save The Environment: A

Slightly Better Way

(10)

It's absolutely clear that the single easiest thing a person can do to help save the
environment is to give up meat and dairy. This will free up millions of acres now used for
animal agriculture that could then be replanted with trees.
Here's some food for thought:(12)

Percentage of food grown in United States eaten by human beings: 20

Percentage of food grown in United States eaten by livestock: 80

Percentage of U.S. agricultural land used to produce beef alone: 56

Number of pure vegetarians who can be fed on the amount of land

needed to feed 1 person consuming meat-based diet: 20

Number of people who could be adequately fed by the grain saved if

Americans reduced their intake of meat by only 10%: 60 million

Cost of common hamburger meat if water used by meat industry was not
subsidized by U.S. taxpayers: $35 a pound

Leading source of pesticide residues in the U.S. diet: Meat55%

Second leading source of pesticide residues in the U.S. diet: Dairy

products23%

Total pesticide residues in U.S. diet supplied by vegetables: 6%

Total pesticide residues in U.S. diet supplied by fruits: 4%

The Best Way To Save The

Environment:
Beyond grain-based vegetarianism, a diet of raw fruits, nuts, and vegetables will actually
regenerate the earth.
In terms of water, it's clear that fruits use the least:
Water Used To Produce 2.2 pounds of:(13)

2.2 pounds Beef - 16,000 Gallons

2.2 Pounds Cheese- 1,321 Gallons

2.2 Pounds Eggs- 872 Gallons

2.2 Pounds Barley- 343 Gallons

2.2 Pounds Potatoes- 142 Gallons

1 Apple- 18 Gallons

1 Quart OJ -5 Gallons

Orchards absorb C02, thus reducing the problem of global warming. They also stop soil erosion with their extensive root systems and start to regenerate it through the annual leaf die off. Leaves fall
to the ground, rot, and add to the topsoil. Jim Sloman, author of "A Global Vision," writes, "If the earth were covered with orchards (much like Tikopia) it would be possible to feed humanity using
even less water and soil while most likely greatly increasing overall health."

He mentions Tikopia, an island settled 3,000 years ago. By 100 B.C., Tikopia was throttling towards
destruction, much like the Easter Island civilization that wiped itself out by destroying its own trees.
(14).
The difference is that Tikopia pulled back from the brink. Its people halted the practice of clear
cutting their forests for agriculture and in its place turned the entire island into a huge fruit orchard,
with dozens of fruit varieties. They even unanimously decided to slaughter all the pigs becuase it
took so much food to raise them. (13)
In their own small way, they were able to save the environment, and in doing so saved themselves.

Fruit Is The Way To Go to

Save The Environment
What the people of Tikopia did was brilliant.
Fruit crops yield the most usable food per acre, as well as the highest pound yield per acre, and the
entire U.S. population could be fed on a quarter of the current agricultural land if they were turned
into orchards.(15)
We can feed two and a half times more people with an acre of fruit trees than with an
acre of grain. (15)
Its through these kind of efficiency increases that we can really start to save the environment.
For a practical example, a mature apple tree will produce 20 bushels a year. A half acre of apple
trees would yield enough fruit to provide about 115 apples, or 12,677 calories per day, more than
enough to feed a person.(16). On a half acre, grains can produce 14 cups of cooked grain, or 9,583
calories a day (brown rice).(17).
Apples are an example of a low-calorie fruit at about 112 calories for a large apple. When you
change the fruit to avocados, which yield 364 calories per fruit, or 41,860 caloriesper 115 fruit, you
see how orchards are the superior choice for land use.
Right now, America's animal-centered eating habits require that 3.5 acres be set
aside to support each citizen, a huge waste. (17)
These lands could be better used as forests, forested parks, or other recreational spaces.
This does not even touch upon the huge energy savings brought about when a civilization doesn't have to cook its food (statistics sought).
Though this simple dietary shift was can go a long ways toward saving the environment.

Save the Environment, Eat A Raw Food Diet

If you're at all environmentally aware, you can't help but look at a meat habit with some sense of disgust. Its toll on the earth is simply too great. We can't save the environment while eating meat at
this volume.
Even a grain-centered vegetarian diet has its flaws.
The best way to go, for your own health, and for the health of the planet, is a delicious diet of fruits, vegetables, nuts, and seeds.
Eat Fruit, save the environment. Simple as that.
And remember, it's tasty, as well as healthy. The raw food diet that will save the environment can also fight disease.