Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Wear
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wear
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 September 2010
Received in revised form
28 November 2010
Accepted 29 November 2010
Keywords:
Exhaust valve system
Wear
Oxidative
Corrosive
Adhesive
a b s t r a c t
The increasing demands from environmental legislations are changing the conditions that the valve
system is exposed to in heavy duty engines. Increased pressures, higher temperatures and lower amounts
of soot which can build up a protective lm are some of the increasing challenges which the system has
to endure.
Three pairs of valves and valve seat inserts with the same material and design properties but with
different service condition have been analyzed with a variety of analytical instruments to gain information
of how the wear occurs.
The wear mechanisms found were a combination of oxidation, where many different oxides were
found, adhesive wear, which was seen both in form of material transfer and ow lines. On top of Sample
Mild and Hard there were tribo lms of thickness varying from 1 to 5 m consisting of Ca, O, P, S and Zn.
The lm has in all cases protected the underlying surface from wear but in some cases seems to have a
corrosive impact instead.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The exhaust valve system of modern combustion engines experiences a very complex contact situation including frequent impact
involving micro sliding, high and varying temperatures, complex
exhaust gas chemistry and possible particulates. The wear rate has
to be extremely low, and the individual wearing events operate at
a very minute scale that is hard to detect even in scanning electron microscope. These difculties have resulted in that very little
is known about why present well-working systems really work. The
current system congurations are based on extensive testing and
decades of gradual development rather than on knowledge-based
design.
The tribological situation in the exhaust valve system is
expected to be severe for engines that will follow the Euro 6 emission regulation, which is briey compared to earlier legislations in
Fig. 1. Due to enhanced combustion and cleaner fuels, almost no
combustion products are formed that might ease the wear conditions. The wear of the contact surfaces is thus expected to become
more aggressive, which in the case of the exhaust valve could lead to
change in the combustion conditions and increasing emission levels. Obviously, this sharpens the requirements for reduced wear,
to keep the emissions low throughout the life of the engine, and
presents a great challenge.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 18 471 6376; fax: +46 18 471 35 72.
E-mail address: peter.forsberg@angstrom.uu.se (P. Forsberg).
0043-1648/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.wear.2010.11.039
2478
C
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Mn
Mo
Ni
S
Si
V
W
Others
Valve [%]
VSI [%]
1.75
Bal
25.5
Max 1.5
0.5
0.6
22.5
0.801.30
15.022.0
3.55.5
10.020.0
Balance
0.31.5
9.014.0
0.150.75
0.52.0
1.32.3
2.54.5
<3
1.1
12
Fig. 2. Valve seat and insert, both with a contact angle of 45 . Contact surfaces
marked grey in the magnication.
Fig. 3. Typical microstructure of the tested samples before testing imaged with
BSE-SEM on polished cross sections. To the right is the Stellite F and to the left is the
AR20. Material composition marked. Note the different magnications of the two
materials.
Origin
Operated condition
Sample Mild
Consumer truck
Sample Hard
Consumer truck
440,000 km mildly
driven
210,460 km relatively
hard driven
723 h (equals 400,000
hard km or 800,000
mild km)
Fig. 4. Showing examples of analyses performed on the valve contact surface. SEM
overview image to the left and a surface topography overview map to the right. A
surface prole plotted from the bottom up in the surface map. Note the strongly
exaggerated y-axis which is magnied 40 times in comparison to the x-axis.
2479
Fig. 6. Surface characterisation of the valve from Sample Mild. SEM overview image
to the left and a surface topography map in the middle. The chart to the right shows
the surface prole along the red line (from bottom and up) in the topography map.
(For interpretation of the references to color in this sentence, the reader is referred
to the web version of the article.)
3. Analysis
Fig. 5. Wear depth is measured via image processing of optical microscope. Prole from picture in white compared to an unworn reference. Grey area represents
removed material. Wear depth is marked with white arrow.
Surfaces and polished cross sections were analyzed with several instruments. Scanning electron microscopes (SEM) were used
for imaging. SEM with backscatter detector in composition mode
(BSE) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was used
to get compositional information. The distribution of all elements
detected was mapped, while only the most interesting are presented in Section 4.
3D topography measurement was performed using white light
interference microscopy (WYCO). Due to the rotation of the valves,
the wear scars become almost uniform all around the contact. The
3D topography scanning was performed over a 0.9 mm wide track
along the sliding direction of the valve and VSI, as shown in Fig. 4.
The Focused Ion Beam (FIB) was used to create small scale, wellpolished cross sections. The ion beam is very mild to the surface,
which reduces the composition changes, smearing, etc. compared
to the conventional grinding/polishing process. Prior to preparing
the cross section, a thin layer of Pt is deposited to protect the outermost surface from the milling ion beam. These Pt-layers, deposited
in two steps, are visible in the cross sections as a light upper layer
with a slightly darker layer beneath, with a total thickness of about
0.50.8 m.
An optical microscope was used to estimate the wear depth on
each sample. Cross section pictures were processed to show only
the contours of the samples. The contours were compared to an
unworn reference Sample and the wear was measured, see Fig. 5.
4. Results
4.1. Valve from Sample Mild
The valve surface appeared spotty, with bright and darker areas,
as shown in Fig. 6. The dark areas correspond to a thin tribolm on
the surface while the bright areas indicate bare valve material. The
Fig. 7. Cross section of the valve surface in Sample Mild. SEM to the left. EDX maps to the right illustrate the signal strength for different elements. Brighter areas represent
higher element concentration in that area.
2480
Fig. 8. Cross section of the valve surface where the deformed microstructure reveals
plastic ow on the outermost layer. The ow pattern is pointing towards the outer
radius of the valve. On top of the affected microstructure there is a thin oxide of
about 1.5 m. BSE SEM.
Fig. 9. Cross section showing a 0.5 m thick tribolm with embedded carbon particles. FIB SEM cross section.
Fig. 12. Surface characterisation of the valve from Sample Hard. SEM overview
image to the left and a surface topography map in the middle. The chart to the right
shows the surface prole along the red line (from bottom and up) in the topography
map. (For interpretation of the references to color in this sentence, the reader is
referred to the web version of the article.)
Fig. 10. Surface characterisation of the valve seat insert from Sample Mild. SEM
overview image to the left and a surface topography map in the middle. The chart
to the right shows the surface prole along the red line (from bottom and up) in the
topography map. (For interpretation of the references to color in this sentence, the
reader is referred to the web version of the article.)
Fig. 11. Cross section of the seat surface in Sample Mild. SEM to the left. EDX maps to the right illustrate the signal strength for different elements. Brighter areas represent
higher element concentration in that area.
2481
Fig. 13. Surface overview and composition analyse of the valve in Sample Hard from area marked by white rectangle in Fig. 12. The small pits are areas where the surface
lm has aked off and exposes the underlying metal.
Fig. 14. Cross section of the valve surface in Sample Hard. A smooth, 5 m thick tribolm covers the seemingly unaffected valve material.
close to the outer edge of the valve seat. The FIB cross section in
Fig. 16 reveals two layers on top of the original microstructure. The
outermost layer is a dark smooth tribolm composed of Ca, O, P, S
and Zn that covers the entire surface. Beneath this layer, in the left
part of this section, there is layer of iron oxide with a rough, almost
etched-like surface. Severe cracks have developed in the valve seat,
as revealed by Fig. 17. The cracks appear to propagate towards the
inner radius.
Fig. 15. Surface characterisation of the valve seat insert from Sample Hard. SEM
overview image to the left and a surface topography map in the middle. The chart
to the right shows the surface prole along the red line (from bottom and up) in the
topography map. (For interpretation of the references to color in this sentence, the
reader is referred to the web version of the article.)
Fig. 16. FIB cross section of the valve seat insert from Sample Hard. The outermost
bright layer is the deposited protective platinum. The tribolm is around 1 m and
the oxide up to 2 m thick.
Fig. 17. Optical micrograph of a polished cross section of the valve seat insert from
Sample Hard showing large cracks that have propagated towards the inner radius
of the VSI.
2482
Fig. 18. Surface characterisation of the valve from Sample Engine Cell. SEM overview
image to the left and a surface topography map in the middle. The chart to the right
shows the surface prole along the red line (from bottom and up) in the topography
map. (For interpretation of the references to color in this sentence, the reader is
referred to the web version of the article.)
Fig. 19. Cross section of the valve from Sample Engine Cell prepared at the position
of the 20 m ridge seen in Fig. 18. The original Stellite structure is covered by a layer
of ner structure, with a thickness that matches the height of the ridge. An oxide
layer has formed on top of the ridge. SEM-BSE.
Fig. 20. Cross section of the valve in Sample Engine Cell. SEM to the upper left. EDX maps to the right illustrate the signal strength for different elements. Brighter areas
represent higher element concentration in that area.
Fig. 21. The valve seat insert from Sample Engine Cell is relatively rough with deep
trenches and raised ridges. Note that the surface prole of the valve seat matches
that of the valve in Fig. 18. SEM overview image to the left and a surface topography
map in the middle. The chart to the right shows the surface prole along the red line
(from bottom and up) in the topography map. (For interpretation of the references
to color in this sentence, the reader is referred to the web version of the article.)
Fig. 22. Cross section of the valve seat insert in Sample Engine Cell. SEM to the left.
EDX maps to the right illustrate the signal strength for different elements. Brighter
areas represent higher element concentration in that area.
2483
6. Conclusions
Based on the analyses performed and information given in published papers it can be concluded that:
2484
[2] Y.S. Wang, et al., Wear and wear mechanism simulation of heavy-duty engine
intake valve and seat inserts, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
7 (February) (1998) P5365.
[3] D. Godfrey, R.L. Courtney. Investigation of the mechanism of exhaust valve
seat wear in engines run on unleaded gasoline. SAE paper no. 710356, SAE:
Warrendale, PA, 1971.
[4] E.P. Becker, et al., Trends in tribological materials and engine technology, Tribology International 37 (2004) 569575.
[5] G.A. Schoonveld, R.K. Riley, S.P. Thomas, S. Schiff, Exhaust valve recession with
low-lead fuel. SAE paper no. 861550, SAE, Warrendale, PA, 1986.
[6] Valve Seat Recession Group, Eliminating lead from gasoline: report on valve
seat recession, Partnership for clean fuels and vehicles, United Nations Energy
Programme; http://www.unep.org/pcfv/pdf/VSR-FinalDraft.pdf.
[7] R. Lewis, et al., Investigation of wear mechanisms occurring in passenger car
diesel engine inlet valves and seat inserts, SAE paper no. 991216, 1999.
[8] K.J. Chun, et al., A study of wear in engine exhaust valve depending on valve
materials using a laboratory simulator, SAE paper no. 070944, 2007.
[9] Y.S. Wang, et al., The effect of operating conditions on heavy duty engine seat
wear, Wear 201 (1996) 1525.
[10] C.A. Mantey, et al., Exhaust valve & valve seat insertdevelopment for an industrial LPG application, SAE paper no. 091602, 2009.
[11] A. Ramalho, et al., Effect of temperatures up to 400 C on the impact-sliding of
valve-seat contacts, Wear 267 (2009) 777780.
[12] X. Liang, et al., A new wear tester to determine valve seat insert wear resistance,
SAE paper no. 991319, 1999.
[13] T. Ootani, et al., Impact wear characteristics of engine valve and valve seat insert
materials at high temperature (impact wear tests of austenitic heat-resistant
steel SUH36 against FE-base sintered alloy using plane specimens), Wear 188
(1995) 175184.
[14] S.K. Schaefer, et al., Evolution of heavy duty engine valvesmaterial and design,
Valvetrain System Design and Materials (1997) 129139.
[15] M.I. Karamangil, et al., Investigation of the effect of different carbon lm thickness on the exhaust valve, Heat Mass Transfer 44 (2008) 587598.