Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contents
1.0 background of the company and the financial risk committee..................................................2
2.0 The sources of the financial risk in Air Asia........................................................................3
2.1 Credit risk.............................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Market Risk............................................................................................................ 4
2.3 Liquidity risk.......................................................................................................... 5
2.4 Operational risk....................................................................................................... 6
3.0 Air Asia in managing risk.............................................................................................. 7
4.0 Conclusion and recommendation..................................................................................... 8
5.0 References.......................................................................................................... 10
educated of real issues on inner controls, administrative consistence and danger taking. The
Board has gotten confirmation from the Group Chief Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer
and Group Chief Financial Officer that the Group's danger administration and inward control
framework is working sufficiently and successfully, in every material viewpoint, taking into
account the danger administration and inner control arrangement of the Group. The Board is of
the perspective that the danger administration and inner control framework set up for the year
under survey is sound and satisfactory to shield the shareholders' venture, the enthusiasm of
clients, controllers and representatives and the Group's advantages.
2.0 The sources of the financial risk in Air Asia
Financial risk are derives from various way which is credit risk, market risk, liquidation risk and
operational risk.
2.1 Credit risk
Ordinary credit risk emerges through the likelihood of default on an obligation, a venture, or
indeed, even a receipt. At the point when a budgetary commitment is not completely released, a
misfortune results. The measure of the misfortune may be everything that is owed, or a part
thereof. Another wellspring of credit danger emerges from budgetary contracts, including
subordinates. Subsidiaries are contractual assertions between two gatherings (counter
gatherings), and they incorporate swaps, advances, prospects, and alternatives. The estimation of
these agreement is gotten from the worth of a fundamental resource, for example, a swapping
scale, record, interest rate, or product cost. Subordinates and other money related exchanges
make a specific test for credit hazard administration. (Horcher, 2004)
Cash flow from operating ratio= cash flow from operations (CFO) / current liability (CL)
Year
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
CFO
784000
1594000
1404000
1324000
961000
CL
501000
589000
695000
783000
792000
1.5649
2.7068
2.0201
1.6909
1.2134
2010
2011
2012
2013
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
COGS
58000
69000
60000
76000
74000
AI
168000
177000
176000
184000
166000
Inventory turnover
0.345
0.340
0.341
0.413
0.446
Inventory turnover
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
turnover
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
year
Current asset (RM billion)
Current liability (RM billion)
Current ratio
2009
2.87
1.84
1.5598
2010
3.54
2.19
1.6164
2011
3.4
2.39
1.4226
2012
2.92
2.57
1.1362
2013
2.53
4.11
0.6156
Current ratio
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Category 1
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2798.3
3216.0
3641.1
3814.5
3992.4
912.9
1137.2
666.1
745
773.1
3.0653
2.8280
5.4663
5.1201
5.1641
2011
2012
2013
2014
financial instruments, particularly through operational activities (Boyabatli & Toktay, 2004).
Secondly is derivative.
FRS139 is a bookkeeping standard presented in Malaysia with impact from 1 January 2010
which is related with representing subsidiary money related instruments. On account of AirAsia,
this standard applies to intrigue rate swaps, forward cash trades and fuel supporting exchanges.
The presentation of FRS139 carried Malaysia into line with International Accounting Standards,
which have been embraced by most of the world's created countries including all European
nations, Singapore and Australia (AirAsia, 2011).
FRS139 obliges that all subsidiary money related instruments are indicated on the organization
accounting report at their fair value' at every reporting date, with reasonable worth comparing to
'market value'. Changes in reasonable quality between every reporting date are reflected in the
organization salary proclamation either as an addition, where there is an increment in reasonable
worth, or an expense, where there is a lessening in reasonable quality. These progressions are
thought about the detail 'Different losses/ (additions) net' furthermore as a major aspect of
'finance Income' or 'Finance Costs' relying on the subsidiary's way. These adjustments in
reasonable worth are bookkeeping sections just and are particular from the bookkeeping passages
made on settlement of the money related instrument which happen dynamically amid the
contractual existence of the instrument. A significant number of the monetary instruments to
which AirAsia is a gathering have a long contractual life as they identify with the airplane's
financing. (AirAsia, 2011)
4.0 Conclusion and recommendation
There is five steps in managing risk which is identified the risk, measuring the risk, selecting the
risk managing technique, implementing the selected risk technique and monitoring and reporting
the implementation.
The initial steps in viable credit risk administration is to pick up a complete comprehension of an
organization general credit risk by survey risk at the individual, client and portfolio levels. While
organization make progress toward a coordinated comprehension of their danger profiles, much
data is frequently scattered among specialty units. Without an exhaustive danger evaluation,
organization have no chance to get of knowing whether capital holds precisely reflect dangers or
if advance misfortune saves enough cover potential transient credit losses. Powerless
organization are focuses for close investigation by controllers and financial specialists, and in
addition weakening losses.
For the way to decreasing advance losses and guaranteeing that capital holds properly mirror the
danger profile is to execute an incorporated, quantitative credit hazard arrangement. This
arrangement ought to get organization up and running rapidly with straightforward portfolio
measures. It ought to additionally oblige a way to more modern acknowledge risk administration
measures as requirements advance. The arrangement ought to include:
-
Better model administration that compasses the whole displaying life cycle.
Real-time scoring and breaking points observing.
Robust anxiety testing abilities.
Data representation capacities and business insight devices that get vital data under the
control of the individuals who need it, when they require it
5.0 References
AirAsia. (2011). press release - Sustained profitability at operational level.
Boyabatli, O., & Toktay, L. B. (2004). Operational Hedging: A Review with Discussion.
Singapore: Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business.
Horcher, K. A. (2004, June 1). Credit Risk Management: New Techniques, Part 1. Professional
Development Network, pp. 1-4.