Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Krauss
the Paula Cooper Gallery.[6][7] Although Benglis image
is now popularly cited as important example of gender
performativity in contemporary art, it provoked mixed
responses when it rst appeared.[8] Krauss and other Artforum personnel attacked Benglis work in the following
months issue of Artforum, describing the advertisement
as exploitative and brutalizing, and soon left the magazine
to co-found October in 1976.[9]
Early life
Krauss was born to Matthew M. Epstein and Bertha Luber [2] in Washington D.C. and grew up in the area, visiting art museums with her father.[3] After graduating from
Wellesley in 1962, she attended Harvard,[4] whose Department of Fine Arts (now Department of History of Art
and Architecture) had a strong tradition of the intensive
analysis of actual art objects under the aegis of the Fogg
Museum.
3 Academic career
In the late-1960s and early-1970s Krauss began to contribute articles to art journals such as Art International
and Artforum which, under the editorship of Philip
Leider, was relocated from California to New York.[5]
She began by writing the Boston Letter for Art International, but soon published well-received articles on Jasper
Johns (Lugano Review, 1965) and Donald Judd (Allusion
and Illusion in Donald Judd, Artforum, May 1966). Her
commitment to the emerging minimal art in particular set
her apart from Michael Fried, who was oriented toward
the continuation of modernist abstraction in Jules Olitski, Kenneth Noland and Anthony Caro. Krausss article
A View of Modernism (Artforum, September 1972), was
one signal of this break.
Founding October
4
4.1
Critical approach
Greenbergian tradition
Krausss attempts to understand the phenomenon of modernist art, in its historical, theoretical, and formal dimensions, have led her in various directions. She has, for example, been interested in the development of photography, whose history-running parallel to that of modernist
painting and sculpture-makes visible certain previously
overlooked phenomena in the high arts, such as the role
of the indexical mark, or the function of the archive. She
has also investigated certain concepts, such as formlessness, the optical unconscious, or pastiche, which organize modernist practice in relation to dierent explanatory grids from those of progressive modernism, or the
avant-garde.
Like many, Krauss had been drawn to the criticism of
Clement Greenberg, as a counterweight to the highly subjective, poetic approach of Harold Rosenberg. The poetcritic model proved long-lasting in the New York scene,
with products from Frank O'Hara to Kynaston McShine
to Peter Schjeldahl, but for Krauss and others, its basis
in subjective expression was fatally unable to account for
how a particular artworks objective structure gives rise
to its associated subjective eects.
Greenbergs way of assessing how an art object works,
or how it is put together, became for Krauss a fruitful resource;[12] even if she and fellow Greenberger,
Michael Fried, would break rst with the older critic,
and then with each other, at particular moments of judgment, the commitment to formal analysis as the necessary if not sucient ground of serious criticism would
still remain for both of them. Decades after her rst
engagement with Greenberg, Krauss still used his ideas
about an artworks 'medium' as a jumping-o point for
her strongest eort to come to terms with post-1980 art in
the person of William Kentridge. Krauss would formulate this formalist commitment in strong terms, against
attempts to account for powerful artworks in terms of
residual ideas about an artists individual genius, for instance in the essays The Originality of the Avant-Garde:
A Postmodernist Repetition and Photographys Discursive Spaces. For Krauss, and for the school of critics who
developed under her inuence, the Greenbergian legacy
oers at its best a way of accounting for works of art using public and hence veriable criteria.
CRITICAL APPROACH
4.4
Freudian theory
4.5
Interpreting Pollock
Curator
Krauss has been curator of many art exhibitions at leading museums, among them exhibitions on Joan Mir at
the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum (197073), on
6 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Critical Perspectives in American Art, pp. 2527. 6.5 Reviews of Krausss work
Introduction by Hugh M. Davies. Amherst: Fine
Arts Center Gallery, University of Massachusetts, 6.5.1 The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other
Amherst, 1976. Rosalind Krauss text is followed
Modernist Myths
by illustrations of works by Donald Judd, Robert
Artschwager and Joel Shapiro. An Exhibition se Bois, Yve-Alain. Art Journal (Winter 1985), pp.
lected by Rosalind Krauss, Sam Hunter and Mar369.
cia Tucker. Fine Arts Center Gallery, University of
Massachusetts/Amherst, April 10, 1976 May 9,
Carrier, David. Burlington Magazine (November
1976, American Pavilion, Venice Biennale, summer
1985), 127(992): 817.
1976.
Owens, Craig. Analysis Logical and Ideological.
Death of a Hermeneutic Phantom: Materialization
Art in America (May 1985), pp. 2531. Reprinted
of the Sign in the Work of Peter Eisenman. In Peter
in Beyond Recognition: Representation, Power, and
Eisenmans Houses of Cards, pp. 166184. New
Culture, pp. 268283. Berkeley: University of CalYork: Oxford University Press, 1987.
ifornia Press, 1992.
6.3
Man in a Mold. Review of James Lord, Gia- 6.5.2 The Optical Unconscious
cometti: A Biography. In The New Republic, Dec.
16, 1985, pp. 2429.
Roger Kimball, Feeling Sorry for Rosalind
Krauss, New Criterion 1993
Post-History on Parade. Review of three books by
Arthur Danto. In The New Republic, May 25, 1987,
Reviews of The Optical Unconscious
pp. 2730.
Only Project. Review of Richard Wollheim, Paint- 6.5.3 The Picasso Papers
ing as an Art. In The New Republic, September 12
& 19, 1988, pp. 3338.
Marilyn McCully, The Fallen Angel?" review of
The Picasso Papers in New York Review of Books,
April 8, 1999.
6.4
About Krauss
6.5.4
6.6
References
8.1
Text
8.2
Images
8.3
Content license