Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

41246 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

136 / Monday, July 18, 2005 / Notices

change that are filed with the Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) expire at the close of business on the
Commission, and all written filed with the Securities and Exchange next Friday that is a business day
communications relating to the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the (‘‘Short Term Option Expiration Date’’).
proposed rule change between the proposed rule change as described in If a Friday were not a business day, the
Commission and any person, other than Items I and II below, which Items have series could be opened (or would
those that may be withheld from the been substantially prepared by the expire) on the first business day
public in accordance with the Exchange. ISE filed Amendment No. 1 immediately prior to that Friday.
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be with the Commission on April 25, The proposal would allow the
available for inspection and copying in 2005.3 This notice and order requests Exchange to open up to five Short Term
the Commission’s Public Reference comment on the proposal from Option Series for each Short Term
Room. Copies of such filing also will be interested persons and approves the Option Expiration Date. The strike price
available for inspection and copying at amended proposal on an accelerated for each series would be fixed at a price
the principal office of the Exchange. All basis. per share, with at least two strike prices
comments received will be posted above and two strike prices below the
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s approximate value of the underlying
without change; the Commission does Statement of the Terms of Substance of
not edit personal identifying security, or the calculated index value
the Proposed Rule Change in the case of an index class, at about
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that The Exchange proposes to establish a the time that Short Term Option Series
you wish to make available publicly. All pilot program to list and trade option was opened for trading on the Exchange.
submissions should refer to File series that expire one week after being No Short Term Option Series on an
Number SR–Amex–2005–035 and opened for trading (‘‘Short Term Option option class would be opened in the
should be submitted on or before Series’’). The Exchange proposed that same week in which a monthly option
August 8, 2005. the pilot program extend one year from series on the same class is expiring,
the date of this approval. The text of the because the monthly option series in its
V. Conclusion proposed rule change, as amended, is last week before expiration is
For the foregoing reasons, the available on ISE’s Web site (http:// functionally equivalent to the Short
Commission finds that the proposed www.iseoptions.com/legal/ Term Option Series. The intervals
rule change, as amended, is consistent proposed_rule_changes.asp), at ISE’s between strike prices on Short Term
with the requirements of the Act and the principal office, and at the Option Series would be the same as
rules and regulations thereunder. Commission’s Public Reference Room. with the corresponding monthly option
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s series.
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11 that the The Exchange believes that Short
Statement of the Purpose of, and
proposed rule change, as amended (SR– Term Option Series would provide
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Amex–2005–035), is hereby approved investors with a flexible and valuable
Change
on an accelerated basis and as a pilot tool to manage risk exposure, minimize
program, through July 12, 2006. In its filing with the Commission, ISE capital outlays, and be more responsive
included statements concerning the to the timing of events affecting the
For the Commission, by the Division of purpose of and basis for the proposal
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated securities that underlie option contracts.
authority.12
and discussed any comments it received At the same time, the Exchange is
on the proposal. The text of these cognizant of the need to be cautious in
Jill M. Peterson,
statements may be examined at the introducing a product that can increase
Assistant Secretary. places specified in Item IV below. ISE the number of outstanding strike prices.
[FR Doc. E5–3785 Filed 7–15–05; 8:45 am] has prepared summaries, set forth in For that reason, the Exchange proposes
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P sections A, B, and C below, of the most to employ a limited pilot program for
significant aspects of such statements. Short Term Option Series. Under the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s terms of the pilot program, the Exchange
Statement of the Purpose of, and could select up to five options classes
COMMISSION
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule on which Short Term Option Series may
[Release No. 34–52012; File No. SR–ISE– Change be opened on any Short Term Option
2005–17] Opening Date. The Exchange also could
1. Purpose list and trade any Short Term Option
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Series on an option class that is selected
The Exchange proposes to establish a
International Securities Exchange, Inc.; by another exchange with a similar pilot
pilot program to list and trade Short
Notice of Filing and Order Granting program. The Exchange believes that
Term Option Series, which would
Accelerated Approval to a Proposed limiting the number of option classes on
expire one week after the date on which
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 which Short Term Option Series may be
a series is opened. Under the proposal,
Thereto to List and Trade Short Term opened would help ensure that the
the Exchange could select up to five
Option Series addition of the new series through this
approved option classes 4 on which
July 12, 2005. Short Term Option Series could be pilot program would have only a
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the opened. A series could be opened on negligible impact on the Exchange’s and
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 any Friday that is a business day (‘‘Short OPRA’s quoting capacity. Also, limiting
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Term Option Opening Date’’) and would the term of the pilot program to a period
notice is hereby given that on March 7, of one year would allow the Exchange
2005, the International Securities 3 Amendment No. 1 revised the settlement times and the Commission to determine
for the proposed Short Term Options Series. whether the Short Term Option Series
4 Short Term Option Series could be opened in
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). program should be extended, expanded,
any option class that satisfied the applicable listing
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). criteria under ISE rules (i.e., stock options, options and/or made permanent.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
on exchange traded funds (as defined under ISE As originally proposed, all Short
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Rule 502(h)), or options on indexes). Term Option Series would be p.m.-

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:11 Jul 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 136 / Monday, July 18, 2005 / Notices 41247

settled. However, in Amendment No. 1, Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,8 which Electronic Comments
the Exchange revised the proposal to requires, among other things, that the
provide that Short Term Option Series rules of a national securities exchange • Use the Commission’s Internet
listed on currently approved option be designed to remove impediments to comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
classes shall settle, with respect to a.m. and perfect the mechanism of a free and rules/sro.shtml); or
or p.m. settlement, in the same manner open market and a national market • Send an e-mail to rule-
as do the monthly expiration series in system and, in general, to protect comments@sec.gov. Please include File
the same options class. investors and the public interest. Number SR–ISE–2005–17 on the subject
The Exchange represents that it has The Commission believes that listing line.
the system capacity to adequately and trading Short Term Option Series,
handle the new option series Paper Comments
under the terms described in the
contemplated by this proposal. The Exchange’s proposal, will further the • Send paper comments in triplicate
Exchange provided the Commission public interest by allowing investors to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
information in a confidential new means of managing their risk Securities and Exchange Commission,
submission to support that exposures and carrying out their Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
representation. investment objectives. The Commission Washington, DC 20549–9303.
The Exchange proposed that the pilot also believes that the pilot program
program extend one year from the date strikes a reasonable balance between the All submissions should refer to File
of this approval. Exchange’s desire to offer a wider array Number SR–ISE–2005–17. This file
of investment opportunities and the number should be included on the
2. Statutory Basis subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
need to avoid unnecessary proliferation
The Exchange believes that the of option series that could compromise Commission process and review your
proposed rule change is consistent with options quotation capacity. The comments more efficiently, please use
Section 6(b) of the Act 5 in general, and Commission expects the Exchange to only one method. The Commission will
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) monitor the trading and quotation post all comments on the Commission’s
of the Act 6 in particular, because it is volume associated with the additional Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
designed to prevent fraudulent and option series created under the pilot rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
manipulative acts and practices, to program and the effect of these submission, all subsequent
promote just and equitable principles of additional series on the capacity of the amendments, all written statements
trade, to foster cooperation and Exchange’s, the Options Price Reporting with respect to the proposed rule
coordination with persons engaged in Authority’s, and vendors’ systems. change that are filed with the
facilitating transactions in securities, Commission, and all written
The Commission finds good cause
and to remove impediments to and communications relating to the
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 9
perfect the mechanism of a free and proposed rule change between the
for approving the amended proposal
open market and a national market Commission and any person, other than
prior to the thirtieth day after its
system. those that may be withheld from the
publication in the Federal Register. The
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Commission recently approved a rule public in accordance with the
Statement on Burden on Competition change proposed by the Chicago Board provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Options Exchange, Incorporated available for inspection and copying in
The Exchange does not believe that the Commission’s Public Reference
(‘‘CBOE’’) to list and trade short-term
the proposed rule change would impose Room. Copies of such filing also will be
options series.10 Because the CBOE
any burden on competition not available for inspection and copying at
proposal was open for a full comment
necessary or appropriate in furtherance the principal office of the Exchange. All
period and CBOE adequately responded
of the purposes of the Act. comments received will be posted
to the issues raised by commenters, the
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Commission does not believe that an without change; the Commission does
Statement on Comments on the additional comment period for ISE’s not edit personal identifying
Proposed Rule Change Received From substantially identical proposal is information from submissions. You
Members, Participants, or Others necessary. The Commission believes should submit only information that
that accelerating approval of ISE’s you wish to make available publicly. All
Written comments on the proposed submissions should refer to File
rule change were neither solicited nor proposal will benefit investors by
furthering competition, without undue Number SR–ISE–2005–17 and should be
received. submitted on or before August 8, 2005.
delay, among the markets that wish to
III. Discussion trade these products. V. Conclusion
After careful review, the Commission IV. Solicitation of Comments
finds that the proposal, as amended, is For the foregoing reasons, the
consistent with the requirements of the Interested persons are invited to Commission finds that the proposed
Act and the rules and regulations submit written data, views, and rule change, as amended, is consistent
thereunder applicable to a national arguments concerning the foregoing, with the requirements of the Act and the
securities exchange.7 In particular, the including whether the proposed rule rules and regulations thereunder.
Commission believes that the proposal change, as amended, is consistent with It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
is consistent with the requirements of the Act. Comments may be submitted by Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11 that the
any of the following methods: proposed rule change, as amended (SR–
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). ISE–2005–17), is hereby approved on an
6 15 8 15U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). accelerated basis and as a pilot program,
7 In approving this proposed rule change, the 9 15U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
through July 12, 2006.
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s 10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52011

impact on efficiency, competition, and capital (July 12, 2005) (order approving SR–CBOE–2004–
information. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 63). 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:11 Jul 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1
41248 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 136 / Monday, July 18, 2005 / Notices

For the Commission, by the Division of NSX’s Chief Executive Officer;6 (B) Independent Directors’ initial terms
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated combine the two Designated Dealer and would begin.
authority.12 one At-Large Member positions on the Further, the Exchange proposed to
Jill M. Peterson, Board into a single ‘‘Member Director’’ adopt provisions to accommodate future
Assistant Secretary. category, which would be defined in Board composition changes, which
[FR Doc. E5–3786 Filed 7–15–05; 8:45 am] proposed Article V, Section 1(a)(ii) of would achieve a Board comprised of a
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P the NSX By-Laws as ‘‘Proprietary majority of Independent Directors,
Members or executive officers of resulting from subsequent closings
Proprietary Member organizations,’’ and under the Termination Agreement.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE which would continue to consist of Finally, the Exchange proposed to
COMMISSION three positions; (C) modify the Member revise the general composition
Director candidate selection process requirements for committees contained
[Release No. 34–52007; File No. SR–NSX–
2005–02] described in Article V, Section 2.2 of the in Article VI, Section 1.4 of the NSX By-
NSX By-Laws to clarify that the annual Laws to provide that the membership of
Self-Regulatory Organizations; election, at which Proprietary Members such committees would be chosen in
National Stock Exchange; Order such a way as to assure the fair
vote for the candidate(s), occurs during
Granting Approval to Proposed Rule representation of the public and, as
the annual meeting of the membership,
Change, and Amendments No. 1 and 2 appropriate, all classes of members, and
which is in January; (D) eliminate the
Thereto, Relating to the Composition to delete references in: (a) Article VI,
existing Public Director 7 category in
of NSX’s Board of Directors and Section 1.4 of the NSX By-Laws to the
favor of an ‘‘Independent Director’’ requirements that at least one member
Committees category, which would be defined in of each committee be a member of the
July 11, 2005. proposed Article I, Section 1(k) of the Board and that all members of the
On March 31, 2005, the National NSX By-Laws as ‘‘a member of the Executive Committee be members of the
Stock Exchange (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or Board that the Board has determined to Board, and (b) Article VI, Section 3.1 of
‘‘NSX’’) filed with the Securities and have no material relationship with the the NSX By-Laws to the requirements
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), Exchange or any affiliate of the that the Securities Committee have at
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Exchange, any member of the Exchange least one Proprietary Member and at
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any affiliate of any such member, least one representative of issuers and
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a other than as a member of the Board’’ investors who is not associated with a
proposed rule change to amend its By- and increase the number of such member or a broker or dealer, and
Laws to make modifications to the directors from three to six positions; (E) certain other composition requirements
composition of its Board of Directors delete provisions relating to the that are no longer applicable.
(‘‘Board’’) and committees. On March procedure for selecting Public Directors The Commission finds that the
31, 2005, the Exchange filed and replace such provisions with the proposed rule change is consistent with
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule procedure for selecting Independent the requirements of the Act and the
change.3 On May 19, 2005, the Directors; (F) combine the CBOE rules and regulations thereunder
Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the Chairman, CBOE President and CBOE applicable to a national securities
proposed rule change.4 The proposed Member Director positions on the Board exchange 8 and, in particular, the
rule change, as amended, was published into a single ‘‘CBOE Director’’ category, requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act 9
for comment in the Federal Register on which would be defined in proposed and the rules and regulations
June 7, 2005.5 The Commission received Article V, Section 1(a)(iv) of the NSX thereunder. The Commission finds
no comments on the proposal. By-Laws as ‘‘executive officers of CBOE, specifically that the proposed rule
In connection with a termination of CBOE members or executive officers of change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5)
rights agreement (‘‘Termination CBOE member organizations’’ and of the Act 10 in particular, which
Agreement’’) entered into between NSX decrease the number of such directors requires, among other things, that the
and the Chicago Board Options from six to three positions; (G) modify rules of an exchange be designed to
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’) on the definition of ‘‘CBOE member(s)’’ to promote just and equitable principles of
September 27, 2004, and in order to delete the requirement, in the case of a trade, to remove impediments to and
conform to recent industry trends and transferable regular CBOE membership perfect the mechanism of a free and
comply with regulatory requirements that is subject to a lease agreement, that open market and a national market
that the Commission may impose upon the lessee and not the lessor be deemed system, and, in general, to protect
self-regulatory organizations, the to be the CBOE member and reorganize investors and the public interest and
Exchange proposed various changes to the list of definitions in alphabetical Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,11 which
its By-Laws. The Exchange proposed the order and renumber the provisions requires that an Exchange be so
following changes relating to Board accordingly; and (H) modify the organized and have the capacity to be
composition, terms of office and provisions relating to Directors’ terms of able to carry out the purposes of the Act
candidate selection: (A) Change the office to, among other things, add and to comply, and to enforce
position on the Board reserved for the procedures to account for when new compliance by its members, with the
President of the Exchange in favor of the Member Directors’ and new Act.
The Commission notes that the
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 6 The President and Chief Executive Officer are
proposal is designed to implement
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). currently the same person.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 8 In approving this proposed rule change, the
7 ‘‘Public Directors’’ are defined as
3 Amendment No. 1 replaced the original filing in
‘‘representatives of issuers and investors who shall Commission notes that it has considered the
its entirety. not be associated with any member of the Exchange proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
4 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange revised the
or with any registered broker or dealer or with and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
proposed definition of ‘‘Independent Director.’’ another self-regulatory organization, other than as a
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51765 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
public trustee or director[.]’’ Article V, Section
(May 31, 2005), 70 FR 33238. 1.1(g) of the NSX By-Laws. 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:11 Jul 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1

Potrebbero piacerti anche