Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Submitted by
Rakshit Kaul
Marketing and Product development,
Mumbai 400063
India
AGENDA
● PRICING OF ACTIVE VISION TERMINAL WITH vWPSM.
PRICE
POINTS R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11
3000 C C C C C C C C C C C
3200 C C C C C C C C C
3400 C C C C C C C B C LEGENDS
3600 C C C C C C B C
3800 B C C C C B C C-CHEAP
4000 B C B B B B C B
4200 B G C B B B G C B-BARGAIN
4400 B C B B B C
4600 V C B B B G-GETTING
4800 V G G
EXPENSIVE
5000 V G G G
5200 G V B G G
5400 G V G G V G V--VERY
5600 G V V G V G V B EXPENSIVE
5800 V V V G V G V G
6000 V V V V V V V V V V V
DEALER
PRICE 3500 3000 4000 4000 3300 2500 3300 3200 3500 4000 2500
OUTPUTS FROM THE vWPSM
The Indifference Price Point (IPP) tends to show the average price for the product
in a market or, if there is a market leader with a predominant share,it can show
the average price that manufacture is charging.
The Optimum Price Point (OPP) is a point where you lose the fewest
number of purchasers because it is either perceived to be too expensive
or too cheap.
The Range of Competitive Prices helps show the full range of viable
pricing strategies. At the high end of the range, producers will begin to
lose market share, but reap higher-than-normal profits. At the low end
of the range, producers will gain share through a low-cost strategy
OUTPUTS FROM THE vWPSM
90
80
70
60
CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGES
CHEAP %
50 BARGAIN %
EXPENSIVE %
VERY EXP %
40
PMC PME
30 IPP
20
OPP
10
0
3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800 6000
PRICE POINTS
Looking at the graph if we move on the left handside of PMC ,percentage of people
who think that the product is cheap increases and percentage of people who think it is
a bargain decreases so we should move on right handside.
Agan if we move on right handside of the PME , percentage of people thinking that it is
getting very expensive increases and who think it is just getting expensive decreases .
Therefore we should ideally stay between PMC and PME .
UNIQUE TARGET PRICE AND DEALER PRICE
UTP=[(C+V)/2+(B+G)/2]/2
Further weighted average mean of all the responses is calculated and specific no.s for
C,B,G, and V are calculated to have a better understanding of the product perception with
respect to its pricing.
Now while pricing the product looking at the graph on next page, clear cut picture can be
ascertained as to where does the product lie on the perception map of the consumer.
For eg: if we price it at 4000 then product is lying between cheap and bargain but nearer to
to the bargain perception of the consumer.
W A M OF v W M
100 1
C B G E
0 0
3468 4243 5220 5696
PRICE
FOLLOWING IS THE VOLUME COMMITMENT OF THE
DEALERS AT VARIOUS PRICE POINTS
From the above responses avg revenue per month and avg units per month can be calculatd at
various price points for all the responses from which demand as a function of the price can be
drawn and demand elasticity can also be found out.
For the graph given below demand is max for price 3500 and then reduces gradually . Price
band 3500-4000 has the highest elasticity(7%) signifying that a unit change in price there wil
have a greater impact on demand than in any other band , say between band 5500-6000, where
elasticity is only 1% ,so not much change in demand will happen there.
From the above data it is possible to calculate the avg revenue per month and avg units sold
per month .
For eg. At price point INR 3500 (dealer price) revenue per month will be INR 91666 and units
sold per month will be around 26.14.
DEMAND & ELASTICITY AS A FUNC OF PRICE
DEMAND ELASTICITY
100
100
90
7% dy/dx=elasticity
80
70 65
60
5%
50
% DEMAND
% DEMAND
40
38
30 3%
22
20 2%
10 1%
10
4
0
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500
PRICE
AVG VOL(NO.S) & REV (INR)/ MONTH
100000
91666 28
90000
80000 24
70000 68571
20
60000
16
50000 AVG REV PER MONTH
42589 AVG UNITS/MONTH
40000 12
30000
30357
8
20000 17678
11071 4
10000
0
26.17 17.08 9.42 6 3.17 1.83 0
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
PRICE
RATING FOR OVERALL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ON A
SCALE OF 5.
QUALITY PRICE BRAND DESIGN VALUE 1 POOR
R1 2 4 1 2 2
R2 4 4 4 3 4 2 OK
R3 2 2 2 2 1 3 FAIR
R4 2 3 2 2 2
4 GOOD
R5 2 3 2 3 3
R6 3 4 4 3 4 5 EXCELLENT
R7 2 3 2 2 3
R8 3 4 3 2 3
R9 2 4 3 3 3
R10 4 2 3 3 2
R11 3 3 3 2 2 OVERALL
AVERAGE 2.64 3.27 2.64 2.45 2.64 2.73
MEDIAN 2 3 3 2 3 3
MODE 2 4 2 2 2 2
SKEW 0.85 -0.57 -0.02 0.21 -0.02 0.45
STD DEV 0.81 0.79 0.92 0.52 0.92 0.79
OBSERVATIONS
Overall on an average and most commonly , products and services are rated more close to
FAIR.
PRICE being the only parameter rated more than FAIR all others being rated close to FAIR.
RATING FACTORS
QUA LITY
PRICE
FACTORS
BRA ND
DESIGN
V A LUE
CORRELATION ANALYSIS
100
90
As can be seen in the graph
80
price has the maximum
70
correlation with the percieved
60
value by the customer and
PERCENTAGE 50 CORRELATION
second in line falls brand , WITH VALUE
40
That means price and brand are
30
the major factors in determining
20
the percieved value by the
10
customer. 0
QUALITY PRICE BRAND DESIGN
FACTORS
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE OF THE PRODUCTS
Following is the response of the dealers for the products offering the competitive
advantage and rating them on a scale of 5
PRODUCTS VTS VDP C TALK RDU 4 ZONE PANIC SWITCH PORCH UNIT
AVERAGE 3.73 3.09 2.73 2.73 2.91 2.82 2.55
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FROM PRODUCTS
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
RATING
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
VTS VDP C TALK RDU 4 ZONE PANIC SWITCH PORCH UNIT
PRODUCTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
SOCRATIC Inc.
WIKIPEDIA.
RESEARCHINFO.COM
SURVEYZ.COM