Advertising discourages people from being different individual by making us want

to be look the same to what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary society, the rapid and ceaseless integration of mass media into
human life has facilitated the worldwide coverage of advertising. It is indisputable
that advertising has a certain influence on consumers purchasing behavior. Some
people hold the view that this practice frustrates purchasers uniqueness. From my
perspective, I disapprove of this idea and I aim to clarify this in my essay.
First of all, there appears an increasing emphasis on the individualism in modern
society. The majority of people have their own personality and taste. As a result,
advertising can hardly provoke the sense of sameness. This is truly the case among
the young generation. It is the unique and outstanding features that they want to
express to their peers as well as to their outer world rather than, for example, the
ready-to-make outfits that are sold in every corner of any markets or shopping
malls. Noticeably, there are millions of catchy images of weird and exclusive but
highly appreciative costumes among the youth expected in the public nowadays.
This apparently opposes the idea of advertisings deterring the uniqueness.
What is more, the monopoly of a sole product in the market, which can lead to the
issue, is never experienced in the modern and extremely active economyics in the
present days. Therein competitiveness is known as an indispensable component.
Admittedly, the fierce competitiveness among the branches creates consumerfriendly market, which offers customers a the variety of product options.
Therefore, advertising does not impoverish but diverses the options.
By the way of conclusion, although it is a common belief that advertising has
negative influences on shaping customers behavior, I still believe that advertising
can not have much influence on the customers decision for the practice of the
individualism and the competitiveness of the market.
Some people think a crime should always have a fixed punishment, like life for
murder, whereas others think you should take the circumstances of the crime into
account. What is your viewpoint?
In recent years, the crime rate has dizzily increasingly risen. It is believed that
punishment is an effective tool to alleviate this situation. Some argue that a general
punishment should be applied to a certain kind of crime, whereas others hold the

view that consideration ought to be taken prior to court judgement. In my essay, I

intend to look at both sides of the argument and give my view.
On the one hand, many people believed that it is beneficial to attach permanent
punishments to a specific type of crime. Indisputably, the use of the available
patterns is considered as a way to save national budget. Understandably, It is non essential to misspend the amount of money and time to investigate every single
case. Moreover, the resolution and firm in executing the legal documents deter
citizens from throwing themselves in danger spot. It means that illegal actions are
immediately paid the price by penalties without consideration much.
On the other hand, there are others who claim that stereotypical penalty is not
equitable for several reasons. First, despite the identical criminal results, the nature
of each crime may never overlap. Indeed, the case of the crime is the result of a
sequence of numerous incidents, for no one was born with the bad record.
However, the practice of a punishment that suits for all ignores these humanitarian
elements and may even worsen the situation. What is more, the idea of fixed
punishment is becoming obsolete for the increasingly developed crime.
Understandably, the standard of living and the advances of science inevitably
partly contribute to a the variety of new and more sophisticated degrees of crime.
Hence, certain punishments for all is not likely to satisfy the societys expectation
of an effective tool to reinforce the mighty of law.
In conclusion, regarding to the importance of the consolidation laws to an extent, I
strongly concern that we should look deeply into the roots of illegal action before
condemning or publicizing the final penalty. This way of thinking is a clear
evidence of spawning a more humane system society in the future.