Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Learning Objectives
2. Colonialism
3. Exploitation of India Under British Rule
a. Merchant Capital and the Exploitation.
b. Industrial Capital and the Exploitation.
c. Finance Capital and the Exploitation.
4. Drain Theory
5. De-industrialization
6. References
Learning Objectives
After study this chapter, you will learn:
1. Meaning of Colonialism
2. Exploitation by Britisher
3. Drain theory
4. Effect on various sectors
India provided a platform to Britain for providing raw material for factories
and also a market for finished goods. British officials have perfect
opportunity to establish their hold through wars, forced treaties, annexations
of and alliances with the various regional powers. Britishers introduced new
administrative and economic policies, which helped them to establish their
control in the country. They collect huge revenue through their land revenue
policies from poor farmers. They also forced farmers to produce various cash
crops and raw material for British industries. Britian control the political
system of India such that its trade with India only.
They improved transport and communication system in India so that they
can do easy trade with India. They also developed English education system
so that Indians would assist the Britishers in ruling India and strengthen
their political power.
But, the
Development
of
cotton
and
jute
industry
and
plantation
The Britishers did not want to establish any manufacturing industry in India.
But few industries, which wont be established anywhere, encouraged by
them. One of them was cotton and jute industry and the british government
was earning profit from this industry. Tea, coffee and indigo plantation were
few other industries set up by Britishers.
3. Revenue and expenditure policies of the Britshers
There was a need of maintaining a big army of Britisher for retaining political
pressure in India. Expenditure on army was highest, almost one-third of the
total expenditure of government. This expenditure was paid by Indian
Dadabhai Naoroji
marking the difference between the rulers of India in the past and the
British, for under the former there was no drain of wealth from the country.
The wealth of the people remained within the country and was spent inside
it. Individual citizens might suffer but the country as a whole did not lose;
the loss of one citizen became the gain of another. The British, on the other
hand, took wealth out of the country and spent it abroad.
Dadabhai calculate the economic drain of India during 1835 to 1872.
Economic Drain (1835-1872)
_____________________________________________________
Years
Yearly Average
_____________________________________________________
1835 to 1839
5,347,000
5,930,000
1845 to 1849
7,760,000
1850 to 1854
7,458,000
1855 to 1859
7,730,000
1860 to 1864
17,300,000
1865 to 1869
24,600,000
1870 to 1872
27,400,000
Source: Naoroji, Dadabhai, Poverty and Un-British Rule in India, 2nd Edition, Ministry of Information
and Broadcasting in India, Government of India, New Delhi, !966, p.31
From the above table, it was clear that there was huge amount of economic
drain from India to England and it was increasing from time to time.
The drain consists of two elements---first, that arising from the remittances
by European officials of their savings, for their expenditure in England for
their various wants both there and in India; from pensions and salaries paid
in England; government expenditure in England and India, the second that
arising from similar remittances by non-official Europeans. As the drain
prevents India from making any capital, the British by bringing back the
Capital which they have drained from India itself, thereby further exploit and
drain India, the source of the evil being the official drain. The opinions of
various people on the types of drain include the extortions of the
government,appropriations of revenues by the company.
High amounts of drain carried on for a long period would impoverish any
country. Annual drain as calculated by Montgomery Martin in 1838 at 12%
compound interest to the enormous sum of 2,000,000 for fifty years, to
to
speculations,
Great
to
Britain
pay
the
to
meet
interests
the
of
deficiencies
debts,
to
of
support
commercial
the
home
Indians had become miserable and they had started to make appeals to
government for their needs, as the very fabric of the society was destroyed.
The drain had affected the whole country and people were getting poorer.
Such a drain had reduced India to a land of famines and had resulted in the
impoverishment of the prosperous nation. So, great an Economic Drain out
of the resources of a land would impoverish the most prosperous countries
on Earth, it has reduced India to a land of famines more frequent, more
widespread, and more fatal, than any before in the history of India or of the
world. As a result, the economic drain had impoverished an industrious,
peaceful, and once prosperous nation.
2. De-industrialization
The British rule led to the de-industrialisation in India as argued by
nationalists. Before the British rule, India was exporting cotton but during
colonial rule, India became an importer of cotton. Hence, Indian artisans,
craftsmen and important trading centres collapsed. The main reason for this
was all the manufacturing actions existed was destroyed under the impact of
imports of cotton manufacture. Amiya Bagchi observed: for more than
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi
of
improper
planning,
there
was
unbalanced
regional
development.
Period II (1915-39):
In this phase, number of crises happened in the world, which affects the
pattern of development of industries in India. For instance, First World War
of 1914 to18, the post-war boom of 1919 to 20, the fluctuating exchange
rates between 1921 to 27, the worldwide depression of 1929 to 33. There
was a setting up of various commissions for industrial development such as
Indian Industrial Commission of 1916, The royal (Whitley) Commission on
Labour of 1929 etc.
Immediately after the First World War, the economies of foreign countries
were in very bad condition. Hence, British ruler made some political and
economic concessions. These economic concessions took the shape of future
industrialization.
British imports were also affecting due to foreign competition. Hence, with
the development of some industries within India was much better than
displacing Imports of British. For this, Industrial Commission and the
industries.
Commission(1922)
Hence,
with
the
recommendation
of
Fiscal