Sei sulla pagina 1di 37

AHSS FORMING SIMULATION FOR SHEAR

FRACTURE AND EDGE CRACKING

Ming Chen
United States Steel Corporation

D.J. Zhou
Chrysler LLC

www.autosteel.org

Outline

AHSS characteristics
Conventional formability evaluation
Edge cracking
Stretch bending at tight radius
Solutions
Tool/Process modifications
Optimized material selection

www.autosteel.org

Automotive Sheet Steels

SF590

www.autosteel.org

AHSS Characteristics
(Advantages)

High tensile strength


High crash energy absorption
High dent resistance
Good combination of strength and formability
High stretch limit and durability (Stretch
flange high strength steel)

www.autosteel.org

AHSS Characteristics
(Disadvantages)

Edge splitting
Stretch bending in tight radius
Springback
Tool wear & deflection
High press and binder force
Weldability

www.autosteel.org

Simulation
and Prediction

Conventional formability evaluation


Edge cracking
Stretch bending at tight radius
Case studies

www.autosteel.org

Conventional Simulation
Prediction

www.autosteel.org

DP600 Panel Forming

Draw split

www.autosteel.org

DP780 Forming

www.autosteel.org

DP980 B-pillar Reinf

www.autosteel.org

Edge Stretch Cracking


Suspension Member

Edge Stretch in draw in plane

Stretch flanging out of plane

www.autosteel.org

Poor Correlation in
Predicting Edge Cracking

www.autosteel.org

Forming Limit Curve and


Hole Expansion Limit
Forming Limit Diagram

160

FLD

140
Major Strain %

Deformation Mode at
stretch edge is Uniaxial
tension
Point A: Limit of ideal
edge condition
Point C: Limit in worse
condition

Tension

120

100
80

60

40
20
0

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10

10

Minor Strain %

www.autosteel.org

20

30

40

50

Simulation of Conical
Punch Hole Expansion

16

Expan D(mm)

15

Plot of strain mode along edge


Strain path along uniaxial tension

Inner D

14

Test

13
12
11
10
9
8
0

Punch (mm)

www.autosteel.org

10

Hole Expansion Test

(HER)

D f D0
D0

X 100

www.autosteel.org

Lowest HER
DP600
590Y - Conical

Hole Expansion Ratio

Burr
Burr
Upout

BurrDown
in
Burr

100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
Ream

Laser

1.1%

6.4%

13.6%

Clearance

Lowest HER for limit in production environment


www.autosteel.org

20.7%

Case Study 1

www.autosteel.org

Major Strain Exceeds


Edge Stretch Limit

Principal Strain 24.5 %

DP600
www.autosteel.org

Case Study 2
DP780 Steel Flanging

www.autosteel.org

Scallop Pre-form

Max stretch is 22% which exceeds the edge


stretch limit
www.autosteel.org

Modify Pre-form

undeform locations for


stretch in flanging stage

deform locations in pre-form stage

www.autosteel.org

Modified Pre-form

No edge stretch
in pre-form
(Major strain =10.5%)

www.autosteel.org

No Pre-form

(Major strain =15.5%)

www.autosteel.org

Comparison of
Different Pre-forms

Major strain = 22%

Modified pre-form
Major strain = 10%

No pre-form
Major strain = 15%

www.autosteel.org

Stretch Comparison of
Different Pre-forms
Edge Stretch Comparison
0.24
0.2

Major Strain

Scallop Pre-form
0.16

No Preform
Modi Preform

0.12
0.08
0.04
0
0

0.01

0.02

0.03

Time (ms)

www.autosteel.org

0.04

Optimal Material Designed


for High Edge Stretch
Application

SF590 for stretch


greater than 100%

www.autosteel.org

Stretch Bending Fracture

DP980

DP980 Coil#: GE656163010


Severe cracking

DP780

www.autosteel.org

Poor Prediction
Correlation

DP780

www.autosteel.org

Stretch Bending Limit


Study for AHSS

www.autosteel.org

Stretch Bending Limit

www.autosteel.org

Material Improvement
Steel

YS
(MPa)

UTS
(MPa)

Total
Elongation (%)

Yield
Ratio

(5)

High Yield

0.086

744

1023

12.2

0.73

25

Low Yield

0.098

632

1011

14.2

0.63

18

Stress-Strain curves
True stress in MPa

1000
800
600
400

LY
LY
DP

200
0
0.00

HY
0.10

True strain

www.autosteel.org

0.20

0.30

Improved HER
AHSS Hole Expansion
35
Regular
LY

Hole Expansion (%)

30

Process2
HY

25
20
15
10
5
0
0.0

1.6
Pre-strain (%)

www.autosteel.org

4.4

Improved Stretch
Bending

DP780HY

DP780LY

www.autosteel.org

Improved Local
Formability

DP980LY

DP980HY

www.autosteel.org

Summary
Conventional FLD is suitable for general
deformation mode only
Utilize appropriate hole expansion limit in the
simulation for edge stretch
Check major strain in stretching edges
Check R/T ratio in stretch bending
Optimal material selection based on specific
applications
www.autosteel.org

References

M. F. Shi, X.M. Chen, Stretch Flange-ability Limits of


Advanced High Strength Steels, SAE Technical paper #
2007-01-1693
A. Konieczny and T. Henderson, On Formability
Limitations in Stamping Involving Sheared Edge
Stretching, SAE Technical paper # 2007-01-0340
M.S. Walp, A. Wurm, J.F. Siekirk, and A.K. Desai,
Shear Fracture in Advanced High Strength Steels,
SAE Technical paper # 2006-01-1433

www.autosteel.org

Questions & Comments

www.autosteel.org

Potrebbero piacerti anche