Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Notices 57907

pursuant to Section 12(d) of the without change; we do not edit personal of 2005 was 392.67 shares; (iv) in the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 identifying information from past 25 years, the number of outstanding
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d) submissions. You should submit only shares of the Issuer has decreased from
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common information that you wish to make 1,713,990 to 983,707; (v) currently, the
stock, no par value (‘‘Security’’), from available publicly. number of outstanding shares of the
listing and registration on the American The Commission, based on the Issuer owned by persons or entities
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’). information submitted to it, will issue other than the Board of Directors or
The Issuer stated that it determined it an order granting the application after management of the Issuer is 471,245
is the best interest of the Issuer to the date mentioned above, unless the shares; (vi) these burdens and costs of
withdraw the Security from Amex and Commission determines to order a maintaining an Amex listing and
list the Security on the Nasdaq National hearing on the matter. registration under the Act, including the
Market (‘‘Nasdaq’’). For the Commission, by the Division of costs of management time, outside
The Issuer stated that it has met the Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated accounting and legal services have
requirements of Amex’s rules governing authority.5 substantially increased; (vii) the
an issuer’s voluntary withdrawal of a Jonathan G. Katz, burdens and costs are in addition to the
security from listing and registration by Secretary. opportunity costs to the Issuer of
complying with all the applicable laws [FR Doc. 05–19805 Filed 10–3–05; 8:45 am] management time and effort that would
in effect in the State of New Jersey, the BILLING CODE 8010–01–P be required to meet the internal control
state in which it is incorporated. documentation and monitoring
The Issuer’s application relates solely requirements of Section 404 of the
to the withdrawal of the Security from SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as the
listing on Amex and from registration COMMISSION substantial, additional, outside
under Section 12(b) of the Act,3 and accounting and legal costs involved in
[File No. 1–10219]
shall not affect its obligation to be same; (viii) various rules and
registered under Section 12(g) of the Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application regulations imposed on the Issuer
Act.4 of Vulcan International Corporation To resulting from its being listed and
Any interested person may, on or Withdraw Its Common Stock, No Par registered will adversely affect its
before October 21, 2005, comment on Value, From Listing and Registration relations with the outside certified
the facts bearing upon whether the on the American Stock Exchange LLC public accounting firm which has been
application has been made in the sole certified public accounting firm
accordance with the rules of Amex, and September 27, 2005.
utilized by the Issuer for over 80 years;
what terms, if any, should be imposed On September 6, 2005, Vulcan and (ix) the Board of Directors
by the Commission for the protection of International Corporation, a Delaware
anticipate that the Security will be
investors. All comment letters may be corporation (‘‘Issuer’’), filed an
quoted on the Pink Sheets, an electronic
submitted by either of the following application with the Securities and
quotation service for over-the-counter
methods: Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
securities, following the deregistration
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Electronic Comments and delisting from Amex, to the extent
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
that market makers continue to
• Use the Commission’s Internet (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
demonstrate an interest in trading the
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
Security.
rules/delist.shtml); or stock, no par value (‘‘Security’’), from
• Send an e-mail to rule- listing and registration on the American The Issuer stated that it has met the
comments@sec.gov. Please include the Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’). requirements of Amex’s rules governing
File Number 1–11906 or; On August 29, 2005, the Board of an issuer’s voluntary withdrawal of a
Directors (‘‘Board’’) of the Issuer security from listing and registration by
Paper Comments approved resolutions to withdraw the complying with all the applicable laws
• Send paper comments in triplicate Security from listing and registration on in effect in Delaware, the state in which
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Amex. In making its decision to it is incorporated.
Securities and Exchange Commission, withdraw the Security from Amex, the The Issuer’s application relates solely
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC Board stated the following reasons: (i) to the withdrawal of the Security from
20549–9303. Various changes and circumstances listing on Amex and from registration
All submissions should refer to File have caused the Board to reevaluate the under Section 12(b) of the Act,3 and
Number 1–11906. This file number merits of maintaining the Security’s shall not affect its obligation to be
should be included on the subject line Amex listing and registration under the registered under Section 12(g) of the
if e-mail is used. To help us process and Act; (ii) the Board of Directors Act.4
review your comments more efficiently, determined that any beneficial effect on
please use only one method. The the Issuer being listed on Amex and Any interested person may, on or
Commission will post all comments on registered under the Act are before October 21, 2005, comment on
the Commission’s Internet Web site substantially outweighed by current and the facts bearing upon whether the
(http://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml). increasing burdens and costs attendant application has been made in
Comments are also available for public on such listing and registration; (iii) the accordance with the rules of Amex, and
inspection and copying in the average daily trading volume of shares what terms, if any, should be imposed
Commission’s Public Reference Room. on Amex during the entire year 2004 by the Commission for the protection of
All comments received will be posted was 437.58 shares and the average investors. All comment letters may be
trading volume for the first six months submitted by either of the following
1 15 U.S.C. 78l(d). methods:
2 17 CFR 240.12d2–2(d). 5 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).
3 15 U.S.C. 78l(b). 1 15 U.S.C. 78l(d). 3 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
4 15 U.S.C. 78l(g). 2 17 CFR 240.12d2–2(d). 4 15 U.S.C. 78l(g).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:55 Oct 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM 04OCN1
57908 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Notices

Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE does not object to the proposed fee
COMMISSION increases, provided Nasdaq implements
• Use the Commission’s Internet the planned enhancements on the
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ [Release No. 34–52517; File No. SR–NASD–
2005–059]
schedule outlined in the Release.8 The
rules/delist.shtml); or commenter is concerned that changes in
• Send an e-mail to rule- Self-Regulatory Organizations; priorities and other factors or events
comments@sec.gov. Please include the National Association of Securities could delay the implementation of the
File Number 1–10219 or; Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving planned enhancements to the MFQS.9
Proposed Rule Change and However, the commenter urged that the
Paper Comments Amendment No. 1 Thereto, and Notice proposed fee increases only be assessed
of Filing and Order Granting once the planned enhancements are
• Send paper comments in triplicate implemented.10 The commenter does
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Accelerated Approval to Amendment
No. 2 to the Proposed Rule Change, To not believe that its recommendation that
Securities and Exchange Commission, the proposed fee increases be assessed
Amend NASD Rule 7090 To Modify the
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC once the planned enhancements are
Annual Listing and Administrative
20549–9303. Fees implemented would impede the
All submissions should refer to File completion of the planned
Number 1–10219. This file number September 27, 2005. enhancements.11
should be included on the subject line I. Introduction III. Nasdaq Response to Comments
if e-mail is used. To help us process and On May 10, 2005, the National In response to the comment letter,
review your comments more efficiently, Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Nasdaq amended the filing.12 In
please use only one method. The (‘‘NASD’’), through its subsidiary, The response to the commenter’s request
Commission will post all comments on Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), that the proposed fee increases only be
the Commission’s Internet Web site filed with the Securities and Exchange assessed once the planned
(http://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml). Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant enhancements are implemented, Nasdaq
Comments are also available for public to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities amended the implementation date of the
inspection and copying in the Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule changes proposed in Amendment No. 1.
Commission’s Public Reference Room. 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule Specifically, Amendment No. 2
All comments received will be posted change to amend NASD Rule 7090 addresses the commenter’s concern by
without change; we do not edit personal (‘‘Mutual Fund Quotation Service’’) to stating that the proposed rule change
identifying information from modify the annual listing and will be implemented on the later date of
submissions. You should submit only administrative fees. On June 8, 2005, either January 1, 2006 or on the date all
information that you wish to make Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to the of the proposed enhancements to the
available publicly. proposed rule change. The proposed MFQS system have been implemented.
rule change, as modified by Amendment
The Commission, based on the No. 1, was published for comment in IV. Discussion and Commission
information submitted to it, will issue the Federal Register on June 21, 2005.3 Findings
an order granting the application after The Commission received one comment After careful review of the proposal,
the date mentioned above, unless the on the proposal.4 On September 14, the comment letter, and Nazdaq’s
Commission determines to order a 2005, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 2, response, the Commission finds that the
hearing on the matter. which incorporated its response to the proposed rule change, as amended, is
For the Commission, by the Division of comment.5 This order approves the consistent with the requirements of the
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated proposed rule change, as modified by Act and the rules and regulations
authority.5 Amendment No. 1, and provides notice thereunder applicable to a self-
of filing and grants accelerated approval regulatory organization.13 In particular,
Jonathan G. Katz,
of Amendment No. 2. the Commission believes that the
Secretary.
II. Summary of Comments proposed rule change, as amended, is
[FR Doc. 05–19804 Filed 10–3–05; 8:45 am]
consistent with Section 15A(b)(5) of the
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P The Commission received one Act,14 which requires, among other
comment letter on the proposed rule
things, that the rules of the association
change.6 The commenter stated that it
provide for the equitable allocation of
supports the planned enhancements to
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
the MFQS.7 In addition, the commenter
among members and issuers and other
1 15
persons using any facility or system
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
which NASD operates or controls. The
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51836 Commission notes that the Nasdaq
(June 13, 2005), 70 FR 35753 (June 21, 2005) (the proposal, as amended, will not be
‘‘Release’’). implemented until the later of either
4 See letter from Peter G. Salmon, Director—

Operations & Technology, Investment Company 8 Id. at 2.


Institute, to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
9 Id.
Commission, dated July 12, 2005 (‘‘ICI Letter’’).
10 Id.
5 See Amendment No. 2 Amendment No. 2
11 Id.
changed the proposed implementation date from
July 1, 2005 to the later date of either January 1, 12 See footnote 5, supra.
2006 or on the date all of the proposed 13 Inapproving the proposed rule change, the
enhancements to the Mutual Fund Quotation Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
Service (‘‘MFQS’’) have been implemented. impact on efficiency, competition and capital
6 See footnote 4, supra. formation. 15 U.S.C. 78s(f).
5 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(1). 7 See ICI Letter at 1. 14 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(5).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:55 Oct 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM 04OCN1

Potrebbero piacerti anche