Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
www.elsevier.com/locate/carbpol
Abstract
Solvent extracted oleoresins exhibit a flavor profile, close to the freshly ground spice in a wide spectrum of foods. In spite of their many
advantages over ground spices, their sensitivity to light, heat and oxygen is a disadvantage. One approach to overcome this disadvantage is by
means of microencapsulation. The present work reports on microencapsulation of cardamom oleoresin by spray drying using gum arabic,
maltodextrin, and a commercially available modified starch as wall materials. The microcapsules were evaluated for the content and stability
of volatiles, non-volatiles, entrapped 1,8-cineole and entrapped a-terpinyl acetate for 6 weeks. Gum arabic offered greater protection to the
oleoresin than maltodextrin and modified starch, as seen from the t1/2, time required for a constituent to reduce to 50% of its initial value.
q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cardamom oleoresin; Gum arabic; Modified starch; Microencapsulation
1. Introduction
Spices have occupied an important place in the world of
commerce for many centuries. Among the major spices,
India leads in area and production of black pepper,
cardamom (large), ginger, chilli and turmeric (Sasikumar
& Sharma, 2001). Spice oils and oleoresins are value added
products that are produced worldwide (Premi, 2000). With
most spices, the total extracts or oleoresins are known to
reflect the flavor quality more closely than the distilled
volatile oil (Govindarajan, Narasimhan, Raghuveer, &
Lewis, 1982). Oleoresins are the solvent extracts of a
spice, which contain both volatile components, such as
essential oils; and non-volatile components, such as fixed
oils, antioxidants, and pigments. It is the balance of volatile
to non-volatile resinous matter that is the best indication of
quality and this should be closely similar to that in the
original spice. They gained acceptability during 1970s as
common ingredients for the food manufacturer and their
production and consumption have been steady over the last
few years (Pagington, 1983).
* Corresponding author. Tel.: C91 22 2414 5616; fax: 91 22 2414 5614.
E-mail address: rekha@udct.org (R.S. Singhal).
0144-8617/$ - see front matter q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.03.020
310
Table 1
%Retentiona of 1,8-cineole, a-terpinyl acetate, total volatiles and nonvolatiles in oleoresin stored at 25 8C
Time
(weeks)
1,8-Cineole
a-Terpinyl
acetate
% TV
% NV
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
28.59
27.44
26.87
26.29
25.92
24.80
24.51
50.80
49.25
49.01
48.67
48.09
47.28
46.62
60.71
60.02
59.24
58.58
57.83
56.87
55.45
39.28
39.97
40.75
41.41
42.16
42.94
43.12
1,8-cineole
terpinyl acetate
volatiles
4.62
4.6
ln (% constiuents retention)
311
4.58
y = 0.0145x + 4.6085
4.56
R2 = 0.979
4.54
4.52
y = 0.0128x + 4.5973
R2 = 0.958
4.5
4.48
y = 0.025x + 4.597
4.46
R2 = 0.980
4.44
4.42
0
Time, week
1,8-Cineole
a-Terpinyl acetate
Volatiles
27.72
60.78
47.79
312
Table 3
Recovery of constituents from cardamom oleoresin entrapped in microcapsules prepared from various wall materials
Carrier
materials
% Recoverya
A
Gum arabic
Maltodextrin
Modified
Starch
52.59
42.39
41.44
62.09
52.26
51.22
52.59
42.07
40.80
62.09
51.22
50.17
52.59
41.76
40.48
62.09
50.70
49.66
52.01
41.44
39.52
61.57
49.67
49.66
52.01
41.12
39.21
61.57
49.67
49.15
51.96
39.84
38.89
61.05
49.15
49.15
51.96
39.52
38.57
60.54
49.15
48.11
0 week
1 week
2 week
3 week
4 week
5 week
6 week
a
Results are the mean of two individual determinations, where A, entrapped 1,8-cineole; B, entrapped a-terpinyl acetate. Oleoresin at 5% based on carrier
material used.
Table 4
Recovery of total volatiles (TV) and non-volatiles (NV) from cardamom oleoresin entrapped in microcapsules prepared from various wall materials
Carrier
Materials
Gum Arabic
Maltodextrin
Modified
Starch
a
% Recoverya
0 week
1 week
2 week
3 week
4 week
5 week
6 week
TV
NV
TV
NV
TV
NV
TV
NV
TV
NV
TV
NV
TV
NV
22.98
11.05
14.92
16.45
17.75
16.45
22.98
10.85
14.77
16.45
17.95
16.60
22.88
10.75
14.57
16.55
18.05
16.80
22.83
10.60
14.42
16.60
18.2
16.95
22.73
10.55
14.32
16.70
18.25
17.05
22.73
10.70
14.27
16.70
18.75
17.10
22.58
10.60
14.17
16.85
18.95
17.20
%NV Z Re =S !100
4.6
ln (%1,8-cineole retention)
4.61
R2 = 0.959
4.59
4.58
4.57
yMD = 0.0119x + 4.6109
4.56
R2 = 0.930
4.55
yMS = 0.0123x + 4.6019
R2 = 0.971
4.54
4.53
4.52
0
Time, week
GA
MD
MS
313
4.62
4.61
yGA = 0.0043x + 4.6093
4.6
R2 = 0.878
4.59
4.58
4.57
4.56
4.55
4.54
4.53
Time, week
GA
MD
MS
Fig. 3. Stability of entrapped a-terpinyl acetate (ETA) in microencapsulated cardamom oleoresin prepared from carrier materials under study.
4.61
yGA = 0.0031x + 4.6059
R2 = 0.942
ln (% volatile retention)
4.6
4.59
4.58
4.57
4.56
yMS = 0.0087x + 4.6016
4.55
R2 = 0.967
4.54
0
Time, week
GA
MD
MS
Table 5
Regression analysis of EC, ETA and TV in the microcapsules prepared from microcapsules prepared from various wall materials
EC
ETA
TV
Gum arabic
T1/2 weeks
Maltodextrin
YZK0.0045XC
4.606, R2Z0.959
YZK0.0043XC
4.609, R2Z0.878
YZK0. 0031XC
4.605, R2Z0.948
154
YZK0.0119XC
4.610, R2Z0.930
YZK0.0086XC
4.598, R2Z0.908
YZK0.0067XC
4.604, R2Z0.983
161.6
223.5
T1/2 weeks
58.23
80.58
103.43
Modified starch
T1/2weeks
YZK 0.0123XC
4.601, R2Z0.971
YZK0.0104XC
4.596, R2Z0.914
YZK0.0087C
4.601, R2Z0.967
56.34
66.63
79.65
314
4.65
yMS = 0.0073x + 4.6084
ln(%NV retention)
R2 = 0.958
4.64
yMD = 0.0064x + 4.6088
R2 = 0.962
4.63
4.62
yGA = 0.004x + 4.603
R2 = 0.951
4.61
4.6
Time, week
GA
MD
MS
4. Conclusion
Gum arabic was found to be better wall material for
encapsulation of cardamom oleoresin as compared to
maltodextrins and modified starch. The protection offered
to cardamom constituents was very clear from the experiment carried out in this work, although the same cannot be
said for total volatiles. The free flowing nature of all these
microcapsules is of advantage to the food processing
Fig. 6. SEM of the microcapsules prepared from (a) gum Arabic, (b) maltodextrin and (c) Hi-Cap.
References
Angadi, V. G., Ravikumar, G., Rajeevalochan, A. N., Kumar, P., &
Shankaranarayana, K. H. (2002). UV-spectroscopic method for
identifying high cineole yielders in eucalyptus hybrid oil samples,
FAFAI, 3738.
Balassa, L. L., & Fanger, G. O. (1971). Microencapsulation in Food
Industry. CRC Critical Reviews Food Technology, 2, 245265.
Bertolini, A. C., Siani, A. C., & Grosso, C. R. F. (2001). Stability of
monoterpenes encapsulated in gum arabic by spray drying. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 780785.
Brennand, C. P., & Heinz, D. E. (1970). Effects of pH and temperature on
volatile constituents of cardamom. Journal of Food Science, 35, 533
537.
Buffo, R. A., Probst, K., Zehentbauer, G., Luo, Z., & Reinneccius, G. A.
(2002). Effect of agglomeration on the properties of spray-dried
encapsulated flavors. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 17, 292299.
Cai, Y. Z., & Corke, H. (2000). Production and properties of spray dried
amaranthus betacyanins pigments. Journal of Food Science, 65, 1248
1252.
Fagen, H. J., Kolen, E. P., & Hussong, R. V. (1955). Spectrophotometer
method for determining piperine in oleoresin of black pepper. Journal
of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 3, 860862.
Gilbertson, G. (1971). Oleoresin as flavor ingredients. The Flavour
Industry, 43, 403405.
Goubet, I., Leouere, J. L., & Voilley, A. J. (1998). Retention of aroma
compounds by carbohydrates: Influence of their physicochemical
characteristics and their physical stateA review. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46, 19811990.
Govindarajan, V. S., Narasimhan, S., Raghuveer, K. G., & Lewis, Y. S.
(1982). Cardamom-production, technology, chemistry and quality.
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 9(2), 227326.
Jung, J. M., & Sung, T. K. (2000). A new method for analysis of capsaicinoids content in microcapsules. Korean Journal of Food Science and
Technology, 32, 4249.
Maleeny, R. T. (1961). A method of analysis of nonvolatile encapsulated
substances. Journal of American Chemical Society, 5, 448450.
Mathai, C. K. (1985). Quality evaluation of the Agmark grades of
cardamom Elleteria cardamomum, 36, 450452.
315