Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
INTRODUCTION
Protein supplementation is often important
to improve livestock performance, and this
needs to be done with respect to the
requirements of the animal in addition to the
balance of other nutrients available. Soya
bean meal and fish meal have been widely
and successfully used as conventional
protein sources for livestock. However, the
prices of these protein sources have been
escalating continuously in recent times,
while availability is often erratic. The
problem has been worsened due to the
increasing competition between human and
livestock for these protein ingredients as
food. According to Odunsi (2003) the rapid
growth of human and livestock population,
which is creating increased needs for food
and feed in developing countries, demand
that alternative feed resources must be
identified and evaluated.
The recommended policy is to
identify and use locally available feed
106
The Effects of
The Bioscientist: Vol. 1(1):106-108, May, 2013.
Available online at http://www.bioscientistjournal.com
Result:
Figure 1:
mean of average weight gained
600
Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Treatment 3
500
Experimental treatment:
The rabbits were divided into three groups;
T1, T2 and T3. T1 received millet mash
residue 98%, soya bean meal 0%, Moringa
leaf meal 0%, calcium phosphate 1%,
vitamin-mineral premix 0.5% and salt 0.5%,
serving as the control group. T2 received
millet mash residue 78%, soya bean meal
20%, Moringa leaf meal 0%, calcium
phosphate 1%, vitamin-mineral premix 0.5%
and salt 0.5%. T3 received millet mash
residue 78%, Soya bean meal (SBM) 0%,
Moringa leaf meal 20%, calcium phosphate
1%, vitamin-mineral premix 0.5% and salt
0.5%. The experiment was replicated three
times.
Data collection and analysis:
The initial weights of the experimental
animals
were
taken
before
the
commencement of the experiment, with the
administration of the treatment starting one
week after. The body weights were taken
weekly for six weeks. The weights were
determined using electronic sensitive
weighing balance.
The results were subjected to analysis of
variance, the specific differences in
treatment means were determined using
Least Significant Difference (LSD), (Steel
and Torrie, 1990).
Weight in grams
400
300
200
100
0
Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Treatment 3
Treatment D iets
107
The Effects of
The Bioscientist: Vol. 1(1):106-108, May, 2013.
Available online at http://www.bioscientistjournal.com
References
Bamikole, M. A., Ikhatua, M. I., Ikhatua,
U.J. and Ezenwa, I. V. (2005).
Nutritive value of mulberry (Moru
spp) leaves in growing rabbits in
Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of
Nutrition, 4(4): 231 236.
Booth, F. E. M. and Wickens, G. E. (1988).
Non-timber uses of selected arid
zone trees and shrubs in Africa.
108