Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
the new law. Tolerances are considered measures when EPA concludes its 51042). In response to requests from
reassessed once the safety finding has cumulative assessment of the several stakeholders, this action extends
been made or a revocation occurs. EPA organophosphate pesticides. both comment periods for 30 days.
has reviewed and made the requisite DATES: EPA must receive your
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
safety finding for the ODM tolerances, comments on or before November 28,
Taking this Action?
pending completion of the 2005.
organophosphate cumulative Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA as amended,
assessment. directs that, after submission of all data ADDRESSES: Identify your comments,
Although the ODM IRED was signed concerning a pesticide active ingredient, data and information relating to the
on August 5, 2002, certain components ‘‘the Administrator shall determine Agency’s draft Strategy; by Docket ID
of the document, which did not affect whether pesticides containing such No. OW–2002–0020. Identify all other
the final regulatory decision, were active ingredient are eligible for comments, data and information
undergoing final editing at that time. reregistration,’’ before calling in relating to the August 29, 2005 notice by
These components, including the list of product-specific data on individual end- Docket ID No. OW–2004–0032. Submit
additional generic data requirements, use products and either reregistering your comments, data and information
summary of labeling changes, products or taking other ‘‘appropriate by one of the following methods:
appendices, and other relevant regulatory action.’’ A. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
information, have been added to the Section 408(q) of the FFDCA, 21 http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
ODM IRED document. In addition, U.S.C. 346a(q), requires EPA to review on-line instructions for submitting
subsequent to signature, EPA identified tolerances and exemptions for pesticide comments.
several minor errors and ambiguities in residues in effect as of August 2, 1996, B. Agency Web site: http://
the document. These additions or to determine whether the tolerance or www.epa.gov/edocket. EDOCKET, EPA’s
changes do not alter the conclusions exemption meets the requirements of electronic public docket and comment
documented in the 2002 ODM IRED. section 408(b)(2) or (c)(2) of the FFDCA. system, is EPA’s preferred method for
Label language and use parameters for This review is to be completed by receiving comments, data, and
use of ODM on lettuce were altered August 3, 2006. information. Follow the on-line
based on submission of additional instructions for submitting comments.
List of Subjects C. E-mail: OW–Docket@epa.gov.
information that affected the risk
conclusions for this use. Label changes Environmental protection, Pesticides D. Mail: Water Docket, Environmental
are described in detail in the ‘‘Label and pests. Protection Agency, Mailcode: 4101T,
Changes Summary Table’’ in section 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Dated: October 19, 2005. Washington, DC 20460, Attention
V.D. of the ODM IRED and in the
‘‘Amendment to the 2002 Oxydemeton- Debra Edwards, Docket ID No. OW–2004–0032. For
methyl IRED,’’ which are included in Director, Special Review and Reregistration comments, data, and information on the
the public docket for ODM. Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. draft Strategy, use Docket ID No. OW–
EPA is applying the principles of [FR Doc. 05–21365 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am] 2002–0020.
public participation to all pesticides BILLING CODE 6560–50–S E. Hand Delivery: Water Docket, EPA
undergoing reregistration and tolerance Docket Center, EPA West, Room B102,
reassessment. The Agency’s Pesticide 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Tolerance Reassessment and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Washington, DC, Attention Docket ID
Reregistration; Public Participation AGENCY No. OW–2004–0032. Use Docket ID No.
Process, published in the Federal [OW–2004–0032; FRL–7988–5]
OW–2002–0020 for comments, data, and
Register on May 14, 2004 (69 FR 26819) information on the draft Strategy. Such
(FRL–7357–9), explains that in RIN 2040–AE76 deliveries are only accepted during the
conducting these programs, EPA is Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
Extension of Comment Period for the special arrangements should be made
tailoring its public participation process
Preliminary 2006 Effluent Guidelines for deliveries of boxed information.
to be commensurate with the level of
Program Plan Instructions: Direct your comments,
risk, extent of use, complexity of issues,
and degree of public concern associated AGENCY: Environmental Protection data, and information to Docket ID No.
with each pesticide. Due to its uses, Agency (EPA). OW–2004–0032. For comments, data,
risks, and other factors, ODM was ACTION: Extension of comment period. and information on the draft Strategy,
reviewed through the full 6-Phase use Docket ID No. OW–2002–0020.
public participation process. Through SUMMARY: EPA is extending the EPA’s policy is that all comments, data,
this process, EPA worked extensively comment period for the Agency’s and information received will be
with stakeholders and the public to completed 2005 annual review and included in the public docket without
reach the regulatory decisions for ODM. pending 2006 annual reviews of existing change and may be made available
The reregistration program is being effluent limitations guidelines and online at http://www.epa.gov/edocket,
conducted under Congressionally pretreatment standards under the Clean including any personal information
mandated time frames, and EPA Water Act (CWA) sections 301(d), provided, unless the material includes
recognizes the need both to make timely 304(b), 304(g), and 307(b), and the information claimed to be Confidential
decisions and to involve the public. Preliminary 2006 Effluent Guidelines Business Information (CBI) or other
Since all issues related to this pesticide Program Plan under CWA section information whose disclosure is
were resolved through consultations 304(m). EPA is also extending a second restricted by statute. Do not submit
with stakeholders before issuing the comment period on the draft Strategy through EDOCKET, regulations.gov, or
ODM IRED Amendment, the Agency is for National Clean Water Industrial e-mail information that you consider to
issuing the ODM IRED and ODM IRED Regulations (‘‘draft Strategy’’) (67 FR be CBI or otherwise protected. The EPA
Amendment without a comment period. 71165; November 29, 2002). EPA EDOCKET and the federal
Decisions presented in this IRED may be noticed the start of these comment regulations.gov Web sites are
supplemented by further risk mitigation periods on August 29, 2005 (70 FR ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Oct 25, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1
61820 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
means EPA will not know your identity 304(m). EPA also opened a second consumed in Portugal, Spain, Germany
or contact information unless you comment period on the draft Strategy and Italy, with smaller amounts
provide it in the body of your comment. for National Clean Water Industrial anticipated to be sold in other European
If you send an e-mail comment directly Regulations (‘‘draft Strategy’’) (see 67 FR countries, Africa and Latin America.
to EPA without going through 71165, November 29, 2002). The August Interested parties may submit comments
EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your e- 29, 2005 notice describes: (1) The on this transaction by e-mail to
mail address will be automatically Agency’s 2005 annual review of existing economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail
captured and included as part of the effluent limitations guidelines and to 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Room
comment that is placed in the public pretreatment standards under the Clean 1238, Washington, DC 20571, within 14
docket and made available on the Water Act (CWA) sections 301(d), days of the date this notice appears in
Internet. If you submit an electronic 304(b), 304(g), and 307(b); (2) EPA’s the Federal Register.
comment, EPA recommends that you review of indirect dischargers without Helene S. Walsh,
include your name and other contact categorical pretreatment standards to
Director, Policy Oversight and Review.
information in the body of your identify potential new categories for
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM [FR Doc. 05–21353 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am]
pretreatment standards under CWA
you submit. If EPA cannot read your sections 304(g) and 307(b); and (3) the BILLING CODE 6690–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Oct 25, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1