Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Outline
Arup
IRM
Approach
IRM Tool
Arup
Arup Background
Collaborations
Clinton Climate Positive Projects
C40 Memorandum of Understanding
World Economic Forum
Arup
IRM
Approach
Urban Metabolism
Organic model for thinking about material and energy flows in cities dates to 1965
(Wolman, A.)(1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 179-190.
Spatially-linked Integrated Resource Management (IRM)
New Partners for Smart Growth 2010 | Seattle, WA | January 2010 | ARUP
Urban Metabolism
(a) Supply
of housing
Land Use
Schedule
Reduction in
potable demand
through rainwater
harvest
Water
Reduction
in potable
water
demand
through
recycling
Employment:
Recycling(??)
Social
(a) Employment
demand
Potable water
demand
Passenger
Transport
distance
(based on
density)
Travel
demand
Passenger
Transport
Waste water
Energy
demand
by type
Per capita
energy
demand excl.
transport /
logistics
Reduction in
energy demand
through embedded
renewables
Energy
Additional
Land Area for
Biomass
production
Energy
from Wind
Freight
movement
(Logistics)
Energy recovery
from tonnes /
composition
waste
incineration(?)
Generation of
biogas
Agricultural
production
(External
Area)
Consumption
(Food,
goods, etc)
Tonnes of
goods moved
Production of
sewage
effluent
Additional
Land Area for
Food
production
Wind
Turbines
Demand for
consumables
(food, etc)
Freight
transport
distance (based
on density)
POPULATION
Non-potable
water demand
(treated
wastewater)
Land area
required for
turbines
Employment generated
(external): Agricultural
production
Tonnes of
waste
moved
Biomass / Biofuel
production
(External Area)
Employment generated
(external): Biomass
production
Fuel source
energy
supply
Waste
output
Waste
management
WATER
WEATHER
ENERGY
LANDSCAPE
HUMAN
COMFORT
TRANSPORT
ECONOMY
SOCIETY
MATERIAL
WASTE
CARBON
RATING
SYSTEMS
Normal practice
Best practice
No
attention
Acknowledge
problems
Design
principles
Management
process
Were wasting
resources. Our
reputation is at risk.
Ad hoc attention to
sustainability issues.
We design individual
strategies, each with
sustainability
elements.
We use integrated,
holistic design to
optimise
sustainability
Legal Compliance
Early Adopter
Market Leader
Global Leader
Emission factors,
trip length, %
material
s
Design life, material
consumption
water
Water consumption
rates
carbon transportation
Emission rates
Generation
Composition
energy
Supply
waste
land use
Landtake Density
Units
compare baseline
and design across
multiple indicators
Water
consumption/
wastewater
generation
CO2
emissions
(indirect,
direct,
mobile)
compare baseline
with design
compare
alternatives
Waste
generated
& diverted
Embodied
Carbon in
Materials
VMTs
detect hotspots
of resource
consumption
across the plan
Emission factors,
trip length, %
material
s
Design life, material
consumption
water
Water consumption
rates
carbon transportation
Emission rates
Generation
Composition
energy
Supply
waste
land use
Landtake Density
Units
compare baseline
and design across
multiple indicators
Water
consumption/
wastewater
generation
CO2
emissions
(indirect,
direct,
mobile)
compare baseline
with design
compare
alternatives
Waste
generated
& diverted
Embodied
Carbon in
Materials
VMTs
detect hotspots
of resource
consumption
across the plan
Emission factors,
trip length, %
material
s
Design life, material
consumption
water
Water consumption
rates
carbon transportation
Emission rates
Generation
Composition
energy
Supply
waste
land use
Landtake Density
Units
compare baseline
and design across
multiple indicators
Water
consumption/
wastewater
generation
CO2
emissions
(indirect,
direct,
mobile)
compare baseline
with design
compare
alternatives
Waste
generated
& diverted
Embodied
Carbon in
Materials
VMTs
detect hotspots
of resource
consumption
across the plan
Emission factors,
trip length, %
material
s
Design life, material
consumption
water
Water consumption
rates
carbon transportation
Emission rates
Generation
Composition
energy
Supply
waste
land use
Landtake Density
Units
compare baseline
and design across
multiple indicators
Water
consumption/
wastewater
generation
CO2
emissions
(indirect,
direct,
mobile)
compare baseline
with design
compare
alternatives
Waste
generated
& diverted
Embodied
Carbon in
Materials
VMTs
detect hotspots
of resource
consumption
across the plan
IRM
model
Develop
strategies
IRM
model
Refine
strategies
Optimize
Strategies
- Plan evolution
- Performance
optimization
GIS Integration
Arup
IRM
Approach
IRM Tool
Projects
Transportation
Economics
Financial Feasibility
Nevada Institution
Nevada Institution
Nevada Institution
Nevada Institution
Nevada Institution
Summary
Quantitative and integrated approach to sustainable
development and design
Outputs for Scope 1, 2 and 3 Carbon emissions classified by
WRI protocol
Outputs for density, waste, energy, water & wastewater
Provides output in non-technical language (marketability)
Slide 58
New Partners for Smart Growth 2010 | Seattle, WA | January 2010 | ARUP
Acknowledgements
Engin Ayaz, Aidan Hughes, Jake Levitas for co-authoring the presentation
Adam Friedberg, Andrew Egleton, Damien McCloud, Jessen Page, Mark Shorett, Sarah
Gillhespy, and numerous other Arup consultants, designers, engineers and planners for
their contribution to the development of the IRM approach and its use on various projects.
All material of