Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Architectures
Course
Code
:
CPIS-352
Course
Coordinator:
Dr.
Adnan
Albar
King
Abdul
Aziz
University,
Jeddah
Saudi
Arabia
ADM
Phases
and
Objec?ves
Key
Points
of
the
ADM
Cycle
The
TOGAF
ADM
is
iteraDve.
New
decisions
have
to
be
taken
at
each
iteraDon:
1.
Enterprise
coverage
2.
Level
of
detail
3.
Time
period
4.
Architecture
asset
re-use:
Previous
ADM
iteraDons
Other
frameworks,
system
models,
industry
models,
.
.
.
Decisions
taken
should
be
based
on
competence
and/or
resource
availability,
and
the
value
accruing
to
the
enterprise.
The
ADM
does
not
recommend
the
scope
of
acDvity;
this
has
to
be
determined
by
the
organizaDon
itself.
The
choice
of
scope
is
criDcal
to
the
success
of
the
architecDng
eort.
The
main
guideline
is
to
focus
on
what
creates
value
to
the
enterprise,
and
to
select
horizontal
and
verDcal
scope,
and
project
schedules,
accordingly.
This
exercise
will
be
repeated,
and
future
iteraDons
will
build
on
what
is
being
created
in
the
current
eort,
adding
greater
width
and
depth.
Where
necessary,
use
of
the
ADM
should
be
tailored
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
organizaDon.
This
means
that
some
phases
may
be
omi`ed,
modied,
or
even
addiDonal
procedures
added.
There
are
a
number
of
reasons
for
wanDng
to
tailor
the
ADM
to
the
circumstances
of
an
individual
enterprise.
Some
of
the
reasons
are
outlined
as
follows:
1.
An
important
consideraDon
is
that
the
order
of
the
phases
in
the
ADM
is
to
some
extent
dependent
on
the
maturity
of
the
architecture
discipline
within
the
enterprise
concerned.
For
example,
if
the
business
case
for
doing
architecture
is
not
well
recognized,
then
creaDng
an
Architecture
Vision
is
essenDal;
and
a
detailed
Business
Architecture
needs
to
come
next
to
dene
the
business
case
for
the
remaining
architecture
work,
and
secure
the
acDve
parDcipaDon
of
key
stakeholders
in
that
work.
2.
The
order
of
phases
may
also
be
dened
by
the
business
and
architecture
principles
of
an
enterprise.
For
example,
the
business
principles
may
dictate
that
the
enterprise
be
prepared
to
adjust
its
business
processes
to
meet
the
needs
of
a
packaged
soluDon,
so
that
it
can
be
implemented
quickly
to
enable
fast
response
to
market
changes.
In
such
a
case,
the
Business
Architecture
(or
at
least
the
compleDon
of
it)
may
well
follow
compleDon
of
the
InformaDon
Systems
Architecture.
3.
An
enterprise
may
wish
to
use
or
tailor
the
ADM
in
conjuncDon
with
another
enterprise
architecture
framework
that
has
a
dened
set
of
deliverables
specic
to
a
parDcular
verDcal
sector:
Government,
Defense,
e-Business,
TelecommunicaDons,
etc.
4.
The
ADM
is
one
of
many
corporate
processes
that
make
up
the
corporate
governance
model
for
an
enterprise.
The
ADM
is
complementary
to,
and
supporDve
of,
other
standard
program
management
processes.
The
enterprise
will
tailor
the
ADM
to
reect
the
relaDonships
with,
and
dependencies
on,
the
other
management
processes.
5.
The
ADM
is
being
mandated
for
use
by
a
prime
or
lead
contractor
in
an
outsourcing
situaDon,
and
needs
to
be
tailored
to
achieve
a
suitable
compromise
between
the
contractors
exisDng
pracDces
and
the
contracDng
enterprises
requirements.
6.
The
enterprise
is
a
small-to-medium
enterprise,
and
wishes
to
use
a
cut-down
version
of
the
ADM
that
is
more
a`uned
to
the
reduced
level
of
resources
and
system
complexity
typical
of
such
an
environment.
7.
The
enterprise
is
very
large
and
complex,
comprising
many
separate
but
interlinked
enterprises
within
an
overall
collaboraDve
business
framework,
and
the
architecture
method
needs
to
be
adapted
to
recognize
this.
Such
enterprises
usually
cannot
be
treated
successfully
as
a
single
enDty
and
a
more
federated
approach
is
required.
The
ADM
process
can
also
be
adapted
to
deal
with
a
number
of
dierent
use
scenarios,
including
dierent
process
styles
(e.g.,
the
use
of
iteraDon)
and
also
specic
specialist
architectures
(such
as
security).
Scoping
the
Architecture
Ac?vity
for
your
Organiza?on
Organiza?on
Recommended Reading