Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Chlorpyrifos is the chemical to be more concerned about from what Ive learned. It is a broad-spectrum
organophosphate that disrupts the nervous systems of target and non-target organisms through several potential
routes (direct contact, ingestion, and inhalation). Common trade names include Dursban, Govern, Lorsban,
Pilot, Warhawk, and Yuma. It was first registered for us in the US in 1965 but has been banned for residential,
pet, & indoor insecticide use in 1997 due to health concerns. It is moderately toxic to humans and exposure to
this chemical has been linked to neurological effects, chronic developmental disorders, and autoimmune
disorders. Exposure to it during pregnancy is bad news for a fetus - Wikipedia does a nice job of summarizing
some of the human health concerns: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorpyrifos. Other groups of mammals (e.g.,
rats, rabbits) do not seem to be as susceptible as humans. It is highly toxic to aquatic life, some beneficial
insects (especially bees), and some birds.
Some of the bird groups that have shown the most susceptibility to chlorpyrifos include blackbirds (especially
common grackles & red-winged blackbirds), pheasants, quail, domesticated chickens, common pigeons
(formerly known as rock doves), house sparrows, mallards, and American robins. There may be additional
species that are susceptible to it but that havent been studied closely yet, so Im providing you with a list of
birds that have been shown to be susceptible to the chemical rather than a list of birds that can tolerate it.
Ive also attached a PDF of the powerpoint that I printed out and brought with me to the field day in case its
helpful. I hope Ive answered your questions.
Nicole Davros, Ph.D., Upland Game Project Leader
Farmland Wildlife Populations & Research Group
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
35365 800th Avenue, Madelia, MN 56062
507-642-8478 x 225
Nicole.Davros@state.mn.us
We would like to thank Dr. Davros for her information regarding chemicals and wildlife.
The PDF powerpoint is the 2nd attachment to our email.
As been stated before, habitat loss is a problem for many forms of wildlife, but when it comes to
chemicals we seem to look the other way, this information necessitates that we rethink our position when
it comes to chemicals on crop fields.