Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PETROLEUM SOCIETY
CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF MINING, METALLURGY & PETROLEUM
ABSTRACT
A new method and software have been developed to
identify promising reservoir candidates for production
improvement using DWS technology. DWS employs dual
completion in wells affected by excessive water problem.
The bottom completion drains the water and keeps the
top completion open to oil inflow. The system has proven
to be effective by increasing oil rate, particularly when
the drained water not contaminated with oil can be
disposed off without further processing. Decision on
using DWS must be based upon pre-evaluation of
reservoir candidates through a theoretical comparison
of DWS and conventional well performances. Analytical
modeling, to date, would predict oil productivity
performance but has fallen short of precision in
forecasting conditions for clean (oil-free) water
INTRODUCTION
Well optimization methods aim to maximize
hydrocarbon production from a well. For reservoirs,
underlain with water, the maximum water-free
production rate is defined as the critical flow rate. Water
affects the well productivity by decreasing oil mobility
and degrades the tubing performance by increasing the
hydrostatic gradient.
PI o =
qo
.....................................................(1)
( p R - p wf )
The inflow performance of the top completion of dualcompleted wells is complicated by interference with
bottom completion production rate (Fig. 6). Although
0.088
PI o DWS
..............................(7)
PI o- DWS
dY =
Y
Y
Y
dX 1 +
dX 2 + ...... +
dX i .. (3)
X 1
X 2
X i
k
1.51 v
kh
=
h(pc
M 0.927
ho
0.068
0.037
ho
hw
.........(8)
0.0087
0.203
Dp
)
p
R
k
3.52M 0.048 v
kh
PIR =
r k
PI o = Cf 1 ( M ) f 2 e f 3 v
rw k h
f 5 ( h( Pc )/ ho )f 6 (Dp / p R )
0.0402
k h
1.344 v o
k h hw
=
0.0136
0.0179
0.203
h(pc )
Dp
0.949 re
M
pR
rw
ho
ho
f 4 *
hw .. .. (5)
0.069
h(pc
ho
0.536
ho
hw
0.017
Dp
pR
0.176
.....(11)
r
k
d ln(OPI ) = a1d ln(M ) + a2 d ln e + a3d ln v +
r
w
kh .. ... .(6)
h
a4 d ln o + a5d ln ( h(pc )/ ho )+ a6 d ln (Dp / pR )
hw
kv
vertical permeability
mobility ratio
PIo
CONCLUSIONS
PIR
pR
pwf
qo
oil Rate
re
drainage radius
rw
well radius
Xi
ith predictor
response
pressure drawdown
REFERENCES
1. Gilbert, W.E.: Flowing and Gas Lift Well Performance,
API Drilling and Production Practice, 1954, Dallas, Texas,
126-157
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
This study is part of an LSU research program
Downhole Water Sink Technology Initiative (DWSTI)
funded by Joint Industry Project (JIP) for the application
and development of the Downhole Water Sink
Technology for water control in petroleum wells.
Authors would like to express appreciation to the
DWSTI JIP for supporting this study
NOMENCLATURE
ai
sensitivity coefficient
ho
hw
h(pc)
kh
horizntal permeability
M, lw/lo
6
2
kv/kh
0.6
0.2
ho/hw
0.5
2.5
re/rw
3490
1745
h(Pc)/ho
0
0.4
DP/Pr
0.05
0.083
M, lw/lo
kv/kh
ho/hw
H(Pc)/ho
DP/Pr
6
4
2
0.8
0.4
0.1
2.5
1
0.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.0500
0.1333
0.1667
PIRavg
kv/kh
kv/kh
ho/hw
ho/hw
h(Pc)/ho
h(Pc)/ho
DP/Pr
M+
2.150
2.48
-7.19
-40.67
36.45
16.73
-15.38
10.53
-19.77
M-
2.035
4.07
-7.39
-41.25
45.57
12.16
-15.28
5.11
-8.52
DP/Pr
2.190
-43.37
44.96
13.80
-15.15
5.52
-10.99
1.942
-37.93
34.69
13.31
-12.72
10.01
-16.77
1.238
3.23
-7.17
7.01
-10.89
2.965
17.04
-16.61
7.95
-12.87
kv/kh
kv/kh
ho/hw
ho/hw
2.408
5.30
-9.39
1.792
23.63
-0.64
h(Pc)/ho
h(Pc)/ho
+ and - indicates the maximum and minimum values of factors considered in this study (Table 2). The values
indicate the percent change against each experiment from its mean (PIRavg column) calculated for each row. Larger
absolute values indicate larger effects.
TABLE 3. Productivity Improvement Ratios and % Response Change against Its Predictors
6000
Varying WC
WC= 0.2
Pwf, psi
5800
IPR
WC= 0.1
5600
WC= 0
5400
5200
5000
300
1.6
1.4
OPI, bpd/psi
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.8
1.2
0.2
0.2
0
0
0
200
900
400
600
800
FIGURE 4. Oil productivity index (PIo) and water cut responses for a conventional well
6400
Tubing Performance
Curve
qbot=0 bpd
6200
qbot=200 bpd
6000
qbot=500 bpd
qbot=800 bpd
5600
5400
Inflow Perf.
0
200
500
800
5200
5000
0
100
200
0
200
500
800
300
Increasing
WC
0.258
0.173
0.061
0.006
400
500
600
700
800
900
800-1000
600-800
400-600
200-400
1000
0-200
800
90
600
75
0
60
45
400
,b
15
0
2000 1600 1200 800
to
30
200
pd
400
Pressure
Drawdown, psia
Pwf, psi
5800
Qbot, bpd
FIGURE 6. Pressure drawdown at top completion pressure response
2.4
1.2-1.8
1.8
0.6-1.2
0-0.6
1.2
top
10
y
da
/
l
bb
60
Qbot, bbl/day
45
500
30
1000
1500
2000
15
75
0.6
90
OPI, bpd/psi
1.8-2.4