Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
INTRODUCTION
Acute postoperative pain is a complex, still unresolved phenomenon strictly related to postoperative morbidity and to a
chronic postsurgical pain syndrome.1,2 The impact of uncontrolled acute or subacute pain is far-reaching as well, with
numerous psychosocial and functional consequences that
significantly impact overall patient quality of life.37 Regional
analgesia and multimodal therapy, significantly diminishing
opioid requirements, and adverse effects incidence have transformed postoperative care, improving patients outcome and
enhancing their recovery.813 Continuous peripheral local anesthetic administration is a rational approach to control pain as
part of such multimodal strategies to reduce both peripheral
nociceptive input (and central sensitization) and peripheral
neuroinflammatory response that could be related to severe
postoperative pain and increased risk of persistent postoperative pain.1416 Unfortunately, this approach could be affected
Correspondence to: Ennio Tasciotti (Telephone: +8327552548; Fax:
+7134417438; E-mail: etasciotti@houstonmethodist.org)
This article contains supplementary material available from the authors upon
request or via the Internet at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 103, 37243732 (2014)
C 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association
3724
3725
ing absorbance of the pellet on a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR Spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc, Walthman, MA). The
spectra were reported after background subtraction, baseline
correction, and binomial smoothing (11 points) using OMNIC
software (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc, Walthman, MA). The
morphology of the MPs was characterized by optical microscope
(Nikon Eclipse TS 100, Nikon Instrument Inc., Melville, NY),
fluorescent microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE 2000-E, Nikon Instrument Inc., Melville, NY), confocal laser microscope (Leica
MD 6000, Leica Microsystem, Inc., Buffalo Groove, IL), and
finally scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI Quanta 400
ESEM FEG, FEI, Hillsboro, OR) under a voltage of 5 KV.
Samples were sputtered with platinum (5 nm) by a Plasma
Sciences CrC-150 Sputtering System (Torr International, Inc.,
New Winsdor, NY) before SEM analysis.
Cytoxicity Analysis of PLGAChi Particles
The effect of empty PLGAChi MPs on the viability of cells was
determined by an Alamar Blue assay.43 Bone-marrow-derived
mesenchymal stem cells (mBM-MSCs) from mouse were isolated as previously reported for other species,44,45 and the absence of mycoplasma contamination was determined using the
MycoAlert mycoplasma detection kit (Lonza, Rockland, Maine).
The cells (105 cells/well) were cultured on 24-well plates with
500 :L of Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium/well. The mBMMSCs were treated with 50 :g/mL MPs and cellular viability was evaluated at days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Cellular metabolic
TM
assay (Invitactivity was quantified via the AlamarBlue
rogen, Carlsbad, CA). At each time point, culture medium
was removed and replaced with 500 :L of complete medium
TM
reagent and incubated for 2 h at
with 10% AlamarBlue
3726
v6.02 for Windows. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant: **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01.
Flow Cytometry
RESULTS
Synthesis and Characterization of PLGAChi
Cytotoxicity
Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stems cells at step 3 were
incubated with small and big PLGAChi for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days.
At the end of each time point (1, 3, 5, and 7 days), AlamarBlue test demonstrated no difference in mBM-MSC viability
(p > 0.05) from untreated control cells (Fig. 2a). At the end
of 7 days in culture, the cells reached confluency and halted
their growth. The lack of overall MP cytotoxicity on mBM-MSC
populations was complimented by a conspicuous absence of effect on individual MSC cellular morphology by SEM analysis
(Fig. 2b).
Figure 1. Characterization of PLGAChi MPs. SEM imaging of PLGA (a and b) and PLGAChi (c and d). FT-IR spectra of PLGAChi
in comparison with PLGA and bare Chi (e). Z-potential of PLGAChi particles, PLGA, and Chi (f). All the tree characterization techniques
confirmed the presence of Chi on the surface of the MPs.
Taraballi et al., JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 103:37243732, 2014
DOI 10.1002/jps.24190
3727
Figure 2. Cell viability and proliferation. (a) AlamarblueR metabolic assay was used to investigate the differences in metabolic activity of
mBM-MSC grown in the presence of 50 :g/mL of PLGAChi in comparison with control over 7 days of culture (n = 3). Simultaneously, (b) optical
microscope and SEM images of cell culture at different magnification were performed to evaluate cell morphology (IIV). These results show
that the presence of MPs in culture neither affected the growth curve, nor the morphology of the mBM-MSC in comparison with the control
(*p < 0.05).
Figure 3. (a) Flow cytometric analysis shows the uptake of PLGAChi by J774. (a) Cell untreated (I) and cell following the treatment with
(II) small PLGAChi gel, (III) small PLGAChi, (IV) big PLGAChi gel, and (V) big PLGAChi 30 (n = 3). The cells have been labeled by F4/80
(green) and the MPs have been labeled by Rhodamine B (red). The flow analysis shows a decrease of double positive cells that confirm the hiding
effect of Pluronic F-127 gel. (b) SEM images of PLGAChi uptake by J774. Small PLGAChi are completely internalized after 24 h (I) rather
than the big PLGAChi (II).
Macrophage Uptake
After we incubated J774 cells with small and big PLGA
Chi particles loaded with Rhodamine B, the uptake of MPs
by macrophages was measured by flow cytometric analysis
(Fig. 3a). J774 macrophages treated with Rhodamine B-loaded
DOI 10.1002/jps.24190
PLGAChi MPs showed increased granularity over incubation time, strictly dependent on MP size. Twice as many
cells internalized small PLGAChi (12.49%) as compared with
big PLGAChi (6.49%). SEM evaluation confirmed these findings, with small PLGAChi nearly completely internalized by
J774, whereas big PLGAChi appeared to be too large to be
Taraballi et al., JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 103:37243732, 2014
3728
Figure 4. Confocal microscopy images taken at 60x. J774 cells cultured for 24 h were stained for WGA (green), Rodhamine B-labeled PLGAChi
(red) and nuclei (blue). (a) shows small PLGAChi MPs internalized by J774. (b) and (c) are the lateral and three-dimensional projection of the
same picture to confirm the internalization of the MPs, respectively. (df) are the same projection for big PLGAChi.
DISCUSSION
Although the presence of at least mild-to-moderate postoperative pain is almost universally expected, improvements in
managing acute pain would significantly improve patient care
and satisfaction, diminish the prevalence of chronic pain syndromes, and ease the overwhelming economic burden that currently plagues society from acute/chronic pain.48 BP is a widely
used amide anesthetic capable of providing local analgesia for
approximately 8 h, but hyperalgesia sets in thereafter once
the drugs effect wanes, thus limiting early functional recovery
and typically necessitating narcotic supplementation for full
DOI 10.1002/jps.24190
3729
Figure 5. Citokines released by J774 macrophages exposed for 24 h to 0.4 mg/mL of MPs. Inflammatory citokines have been quantified by
ELISA assays for big and small PLGAChi particles outside or inside pluronic gel: IL-6 (a) and TNF-" (b). (n = 6). (**p = 0.05; ***p = 0.01).
3730
Figure 6. Seven-day release kinetics of BP from PLGAChi MPs. (a) BP released at different pH. (b) BP released from PLGAChi MPs
embedded in Pluronic gel. (c) BP released from different layers: outer Chi layer and internal PLGA layer.
postoperatively after uncomplicated ambulatory surgery, making a 7-day BP release particularly promising.53,54 Lastly, it is
known that pH variances exist in normal and inflamed tissue;
and differences in environmental pH alter the duration of local
anesthetic effect as well as degradation rates of polymers.5557
We illustrated that, although a lower pH predictably quickened
drug release from PLGAChi, our delivery systems pluronic gel
carrier improves release consistency via a pH-protective effect.
This feature expands the potential for applying our BP delivery
system brazenly in both normal and inflamed tissues, such as
in wound after surgery.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrate for the first time that it is possible to
encapsulate BP in a gel-based PLGAChi-MP to achieve several
days of prolonged local drug release, and that such a formulaTaraballi et al., JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 103:37243732, 2014
This work was supported by the Cullen Trust for Health Care
Foundation (project ID: 18130014) and the Brown Foundation
(project ID: 18130011) to Dr. Tasciotti. The work was supported
by Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2010-2318370) and Dr. Corradetti by Fondazione Marche/ISSNAF Post-Doc Fellowship.
DOI 10.1002/jps.24190
REFERENCES
1. Allegri M, Clark MR, De Andres J, Jensen TS. 2012. Acute and
chronic pain: Where we are and where we have to go. Minerva Anestesiol 78:222235.
2. Benhamou D, Berti M, Brodner G, De Andres J, Draisci G, MorenoAzcoita M, Neugebauerg EAM, Schwenkh W, Torresi LM, Vielj E.
2008. Postoperative analgesic therapy observational survey (PATHOS):
A practice pattern study in 7 central/southern European countries. Pain
136:134141.
3. Macrae WA. 2008. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J
Anaesth 101:7786.
4. Davies HT, McLeod G, Bannister J, Macrae WA. 1999. Obstacles in
organisation of service delivery reduce potential of epidural analgesia.
BMJ 319:14991500.
5. Burckhardt CS, Jones KD. 2005. Effects of chronic widespread pain
on the health status and quality of life of women after breast cancer
surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:30.
6. Perkins FM, Kehlet H. 2000. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery.
A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 93:11231133.
7. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH,
Smith WC. 2001. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88:11221126.
8. Caraceni A, Portenoy RK. 1999. An international survey of cancer
pain characteristics and syndromes. Pain 82:263274.
9. Crews JC. 2002. Multimodal pain management strategies for officebased and ambulatory procedures. JAMA 288:629632.
10. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. 2002. Multimodal strategies to improve
surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630641.
11. Trabulsi EJ, Patel J, Viscusi ER, Gomella LG, Lallas CD. 2010.
Preemptive multimodal pain regimen reduces opioid analgesia for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Urology 76:11221124.
12. Steyaert A, Lavandhomme P. 2013. Postoperative opioids: Let us
take responsibility for the possible consequences. Eur J Anaesthesiol
30:5052.
13. Kessler ER, Shah M, Gruschkus SK, Raju A. 2013. Cost and quality
implications of opioid-based postsurgical pain control using administrative claims data from a large health system: Opioid-related adverse
events and their impact on clinical and economic outcomes. Pharmacotherapy 33:383391.
14. Mendoza TR, Chen C, Brugger A, Hubbard R, Snabes M, Palmer
SN, Zhang Q, Cleeland CS. 2004. Lessons learned from a multiple-dose
post-operative analgesic trial. Pain 109:103109.
15. Berger JV, Deumens R, Goursaud S, Schafer S, Lavandhomme
P, Joosten EA, Hermans E. 2011. Enhanced neuroinflammation and
pain hypersensitivity after peripheral nerve injury in rats expressing
mutated superoxide dismutase 1. J Neuroinflammation 8:33.
16. Ventham NT, Hughes M, ONeill S, Johns N, Brady RR, Wigmore
SJ. 2013. Systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous local
anaesthetic wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 100:12801289.
17. Eltzschig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR. 2003. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 348:319332.
18. Epstein-Barash H, Shichor I, Kwon AH, Hall S, Lawlor MW, Langer
R, Khoane DS. 2009. Prolonged duration local anesthesia with minimal
toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:71257130.
19. Weinberg GL. 2010. Treatment of local anesthetic systemic toxicity
(LAST). Reg Anesth Pain Med 35:188193.
20. Karpie JC, Chu CR. 2007. Lidocaine exhibits dose-and timedependent cytotoxic effects on bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro.
Am J Sports Med 35:16211627.
21. Murphy MB, Khaled S, Fan D, Yazdi IK, Sprintz M, Buchanan RM,
Smid CA, d, Weiner BK, Ferrari M, Tasciotti E. 2011. A multifunctional
nanostructured platform for localized sustained release of analgesics
and antibiotics. Eur J Pain Supplements 5:423432.
22. Le Corre P, Est`ebe JP, Clement R, Du Plessis L, Chevanne
F, Ecoffey C, Le Verge R. 2002. Spray-dryed bupivacaine-loaded
DOI 10.1002/jps.24190
3731
microspheres: In vitro evaluation and biopharmaceutics of bupivacaine following brachial plexus administration in sheep. Int J Pharm
238:191203.
23. Kranokpiraksa P, Pavcnik D, Kakizawa H, Uchida BT, Jeromel M,
Keller FS, Rosch J. 2010. Hemostatic efficacy of chitosan-based bandage
for closure of percutaneous arterial access sites: An experimental study
in heparinized sheep model. Radiol Oncol 44:8691.
24. Distler JH, Huber LC, Gay S, Distler O, Pisetsky DS. 2006. Microparticles as mediators of cellular cross-talk in inflammatory disease.
Autoimmunity 39:683690.
25. Kohane DS, Lipp M, Kinney RC, Lotan N, Langer R. 2000. Sciatic
nerve blockade with lipidproteinsugar particles containing bupivacaine. Pharm Res 17:12431249.
26. Marcet JE, Nfonsam VN, Larach S. 2013. An extended paIn relief trial utilizing the infiltration of a long-acting Multivesicular liPosome foRmulation Of bupiVacaine, EXPAREL (IMPROVE): A Phase IV
health economic trial in adult patients undergoing ileostomy reversal.
J Pain Res 6:549.
27. Richard BM, Newton P, Ott LR, Haan D, Brubaker AN, Cole PI,
Ross PE, Rebelatto MC, Nelson KG. 2012. The safety of EXPARELR
(bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) administered by peripheral nerve block in rabbits and dogs. J Drug Deliv 2012. vol. 2012,
Article ID 962101, 10 pages, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/962101
28. Grant GJ, Barenholz Y, Bolotin EM, Bansinath M, Turndorf H,
Piskoun B, Davidson EM 2004. A novel liposomal bupivacaine formulation to produce ultralong-acting analgesia. Anesthesiology 101:133
137.
29. Champion JA, Katare YK, Mitragotri S. 2007. Particle shape: A
new design parameter for micro-and nanoscale drug delivery carriers.
J Control Release 121:39.
30. Champion JA, Walker A, Mitragotri S. 2008. Role of particle size in
phagocytosis of polymeric microspheres. Pharm Res 25:18151821.
31. Horisawa E, Kubota K, Tuboi I, Sato K, Yamamoto H, Takeuchi H,
Kawashima Y. 2002. Size-dependency of DL-lactide/glycolide copolymer
particulates for intra-articular delivery system on phagocytosis in rat
synovium. Pharm Res 19:132139.
32. Jackson JK, Springate CM, Hunter WL, Burt HM. 2000. Neutrophil
activation by plasma opsonized polymeric microspheres: Inhibitory effect of Pluronic F127. Biomaterials 21:14831491.
33. Morel O, Morel N, Hugel B, Jesel L, Vinzio S, Goichot B, Bakouboula B, Grunebaum L, Freyssinet JM, Toti F. 2005. The significance
of circulating microparticles in physiology, inflammatory and thrombotic diseases]. Rev Med Intern 26:791801.
34. Vandorpe J, Schacht E, Dunn S, Hawley A, Stolnik S, Davis
SS, Illum L. 1997. Long circulating biodegradable poly(phosphazene)
nanoparticles surface modified with poly(phosphazene)-poly(ethylene
oxide) copolymer. Biomaterials 18:11471152.
35. Owens DE III, Peppas NA. 2006. Opsonization, biodistribution,
and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 307:93
102.
36. Shi C, Zhu Y, Ran X, Wang M, Su Y, Cheng T. 2006. Therapeutic
potential of chitosan and its derivatives in regenerative medicine. J
Surg Res 133:185192.
37. Seeherman H, Li R, Wozney J. 2003. A review of preclinical program
development for evaluating injectable carriers for osteogenic factors. J
Bone Joint Surg 85:96108.
38. Di Martino A, Sittinger M, Risbud MV. 2005. Chitosan: A versatile
biopolymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering. Biomaterials 26:5983
5990.
39. Chou T-C, Fu E, Wu C-J, Yeh J-H. 2003. Chitosan enhances platelet
adhesion and aggregation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 302:480
483.
40. Sivakumaran D, Maitland D, Hoare T. 2011. Injectable microgelhydrogel composites for prolonged small-molecule drug delivery.
Biomacromolecules 12:41124120.
41. Hoare T, Young S, Lawlor MW, Kohane DS. 2012. Thermoresponsive nanogels for prolonged duration local anesthesia. Acta Biomaterialia 8:35963605.
Taraballi et al., JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 103:37243732, 2014
3732
42. Fan D, De Rosa E, Murphy MB, Peng Y, Smid CA, Chiappini C, Liu
X, Simmons P, Weiner BK, Ferrari M, Tasciotti E. 2012. Mesoporous
silicon-PLGA composite microspheres for the double controlled release
of biomolecules for orthopedic tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater
22:282293.
43. Taraballi F, Wang S, Li J, Lee FYY, Venkatraman SS, Birch WR,
Teoh SH, Boey FY, Ng KW. 2012. Understanding the nano-topography
changes and cellular influences resulting from the surface adsorption
of human hair keratins. Adv Healthc Mater 1:513519.
44. Lange-Consiglio A, Corradetti B, Meucci A, Perego R, Bizzaro
D, Cremonesi F. 2013. Characteristics of equine mesenchymal stem
cells derived from amnion and bone marrow: In vitro proliferative and multilineage potential assessment. Equine Vet J 45:737
744.
45. Lovati AB, Corradetti B, Consiglio AL, Recordati C, Bonacina E,
Bizzaro D, Cremonesi F. 2011. Comparison of equine bone marrow-,
umbilical cord matrix and amniotic fluid-derived progenitor cells. Vet
Res Commun 35:103121.
46. Wang Y, Li P, Kong L. Chitosan-modified PLGA nanoparticles with
versatile surface for improved drug delivery. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech
2013:18.
47. Tabata Y, Ikada Y. 1988. Effect of the size and surface charge of
polymer microspheres on their phagocytosis by macrophage. Biomaterials 9:356362.
48. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. 2006. Persistent postsurgical pain:
Risk factors and prevention. Lancet 367:16181625.
DOI 10.1002/jps.24190