Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Maria Leissner then began the panel discussion by pointing out how
timely this event turned out to be: three days before (on 17 November)
the Council of the EU approved a six-page document, “Conclusions on
Democracy Support in the EU’s External Relations,” that affirms the
EU’s commitment to democracy support and aims to improve the
coherence, complementarity, and coordination of EU democracy
support policies. Leissner described the report as a response to the
need to redefine what democracy support is all about, and provide an
alternative to the Iraq War model. This approach stresses “democracy
and human rights as integral parts of development.” It is also meant to
be a more humble, less preachy approach, where partners are treated
as equals and the EU leads by example. Leissner asserted that the
Conclusions will change the way the EU conducts democracy support
(and development), and would serve well as a strategy or inspiration
for US democracy support policy. When other panelists pointed out
that the practical effects of the Conclusions have yet to be seen,
Leissner said that the document was “a beginning, but a good
beginning.”
Next, Pia Bungarten stressed the shared values, motivations, and goals
of EU and US democracy support, but said that there were not enough
fora for discussion and constructive debate. Larry Garber brought a
realistic point of view to the discussion and noted that in some areas,
national security and other vital interests are involved, which often
affects democracy support, and that such nuances must be kept in
mind. The panelists all seemed to see some possibility of increased
convergence and cooperation between the US and EU on democracy
support policies. They also stressed the idea of democracy support
rather than democracy promotion, supporting partner countries in
establishing democracy rather than pushing democracy on unwilling
nations.