Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Learners Name:
Assessors Name:
Assessors
Signature:
Date Issued:
Centre No:
10562
Date:
First Submission
Date:
Final Submission
Feedback Date:
Learner Declaration
I declare that all the work submitted for this assignment is my own work or, in the
case of group work, the work myself and other members of the group in which I
worked, and that no part of it has been copied from any source.
I understand that if any part of the work submitted for this assignment is found to be
plagiarised, none of the work submitted will be allowed to count towards the
assessment of the assignment.
Signature______________________________ Date_________________________
Internal verification:
IV Name:
Signature
:
Date:
Assessor
Name:
Signature
:
Date:
Achieve
d
Com
ment
M1
M2
M3
Evaluate terms in
contracts with reference
to their meaning and
effect and present the
answer to familiar and
unfamiliar audience
that,
Y/N
in addition to the pass
and
merit criteria, the learner
is
able to:
D1
D2
D3 Critically evaluate
how a business can be
vicariously liable
support your answer
with a case law
M1
Effective judgements have
been made
M2
A range of sources of
information has been used
M3
The appropriate structure
and approach has been
used
D1
Realistic improvements
have been proposed
against defined
characteristics for success
D2
The unforeseen has been
accommodated
D3
Problems have been
solved
General comments
Overall Grade
Pass/Merit/Distinction/Referral
Assessors
Signature
Date
Candidate
Signature
Date
context.
Q1.1 Explain the importance of the essential elements required for the
formation of a valid contract by answering the short questions in the context of
the following case.
Case scenario:
James had a Television that he wished to sell. After discussing with friends of his
intention, John showed interest and asked James if he would actually sell the
Television to him. James said yes and told John that he would like to sell it at 200.
John agrees and pays James the 200 for the Television.
Questions:
(a)
(b)
(i)
Offer
(ii)
Acceptance
(iii)
Consideration
(c)
(d)
(e)
Do you think it was necessary for James and John to have signed a document
for the sale transaction? Motivate your answer
failed to pay Rebecca the next day. On the third day when
Rebecca asked Mariam the 20, Mariam said that there was no contract between the
two of them because she did not sign any document in relation to the transaction
between them on the Economic Textbook.
Questions:
(a) Was there a valid contract between Mariam and Rebecca in relation to the
transaction between them on the Economics Textbook? Justify your answer giving
reasons for the validity or otherwise of the contract.
(b) What could be the case if the transaction were in relation to Rebecca selling her
house to Mariam?
(c) Do all contracts have to be in writing and signed by the parties involved?
(d) Give an example of a contract type that has to be in writing and signed by the
parties and witnessed and attested.
(e) Produce a sample contract that has to be, according to statutory regulation,
concluded in a written form.
(f) State two different types of contract and explain the differences between them
(The answers will be your evidence to AC 1.2)
the shop). She was very angry and disappointed claiming that she had bought the
watch when she sent the payment for the advertised price on the 14 th of April 2013.
(a) Do you think the shop was right in selling the watch to Mrs. Hudson on the 19 th
of April 2013?
(b) Was there a contract of sale between the shop and Martha on the 14 th of April
when she sent the 40 as payment for the wrist watch?
(c) Was contract of sale with Mrs. Hudson on the 19 th of April 2013 a valid
contract? (Explain your answer using law on the elements of a valid contract).
(d) Can Martha claim her 40 back?
(The answers will be your evidence to AC 2.1)
Q 2.2 Apply the law on terms in different contracts by answering the short
questions (a - b) in the context of the following case.
Case scenario:
Ali was employed by Jackson in a construction firm. In this contract of employment
he agreed to an exclusion clause that the company would not be liable in the event of
any injury caused to him in the course of his employment. Ali signed the document,
agreeing to the exclusion clause on any injuries at work. Three months later, Ali had
his finger cut off when he was busy operating a quarry machine at work.
This
needed surgery which was very expensive. On this matter, Jackson claimed that
since Ali had agreed to the terms of the contract, the company would not be liable for
the cost involved in the specialist surgery required.
(a) What are the statutory provisions in English law on exclusion clauses in
relation to this case?
(b) If Ali should bring an action in court to challenge Jacksons position, what
principles of law and legislation can be applied in order that Ali wins his case?
(The answers will be your evidence to AC 2.2)
Q 2.3.
(a)
(i)
Fundamental term
(ii)
Condition
(iii)
Warranty
(iv)
In nominate terms
(b)
(i)
Condition
(ii)
Warranty
Note: (You may use some decided cases for your answers)
(The answers will be your evidence to AC 2.3)
LO3. Understand principles of liability in Negligence in business situations
Q 3.1 Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability in the context of the
following case:
Scenario
Khalid works for Pizza Zone in London, UK.
customers who place orders in and around East London. On the 17 th of May 2013,
Khalid went to deliver Pizza ordered by a customer in Bow in East London.
way back he decided to drive to Woolwich to see his friends.
On his
Woolwich, Khalid had an accident and the car was seriously damaged. Pizza Zone
told Khalid that the company was not liable for any expenses incurred in repairing the
car.
Questions:
(a)
Explain the principles of law governing the case in the scenario above
(b)
Do you think the Pizza Zone firm could be held liable for the costs from the
accident? Motivate your answer.
(c)
What is Vicarious Liability and how can you use this principle in the law of tort
in Khalid s situation?
Q 3.2.
small stone chip flew into his eyes and he got injured in his left eye.
The company
argued that they were not liable because they had supplied all employees with
protective goggles. In fact at the time of Johns injury he had his protective goggles
beside him but was not wearing it.
Question:
(a) Discuss this case and decide whether the Company or John should be liable
using your understanding of vicarious liability and decided cases.
(The answers will be your evidence to AC 3.2)
LO4. Be able to apply principles of liability in negligence in business
situations
Q 4.1 Apply the elements of the tort of negligence and defences in the
following business situation.
Case scenario:
The Michel family booked into a hotel for a weekend. Mr. and Mrs. Michel and their
boy aged 4 years were having lunch one fine afternoon by the pool side. Their 4 year
old boy, without their noticing wandered away from where they were sitting and fell
into a pit dug by contractors the previous day and got injured.
which read DANGER! NO PERSONS ALLOWED BEYOND THIS POINT but there
was no perimeter barrier or fence surrounding this pit. The Michel family was angry
and demanded an explanation. The hotel management argued that there was an
unfinished work and a notice had been put clearly warning people not to go behind
that point of notice.
Questions:
(a)
(b)
Do you think the hotel had done its work well in warning by notice that no one
Plagiarism/Collusion
Any act of plagiarism or collusion will be seriously dealt with according to the
regulations.
In this context the definition and scope of plagiarism are presented below:
Plagiarism is presenting somebody elses work as your own, It includes copying
information directly from the Web or books without referencing the material;
submitting joint coursework as an individual effort; copying another students
coursework; stealing coursework from another student and submitting it as your
own work.
Collusion is working collaboratively with another learner to produce work that is
submitted as the individual learners work.
Suspected acts of plagiarism or collusion will be investigated and if found to have
occurred will be dealt with according to the college procedure.
Guideline
Ensure that all work had been proof-read and checked prior to
submission.
Ensure that the layout of your documents is in a professional format.
Ensure that all references are quoted at the end of any
question/document submitted (preferred: Harvard referencing).
Ensure that you back-up your work regularly and apply version
control to your documents.