Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Dan Brown, U.S. Environmental copyrighted material, is not placed on Requirements Differ?
Protection Agency, EPA New England the Internet and will be publicly f. How Do the Reporting Requirements
Regional Office, One Congress Street, available only in hard copy form. Differ?
Suite 1100 (mail code CAP), Boston, MA Publicly available docket materials are g. What Are the Title V Permit
02114–2023. available either electronically in http:// Requirements for Area Sources?
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Apr 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM 24APR1
20896 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
h. How Does Maine’s Regulation Address source dry cleaning facilities to register C. EPA Determination of Rule
the General Provisions at 40 CFR Part 63, with the State and to comply with Equivalency
Subpart A?
control technology, leak detection and 1. What Are the Major Differences
2. What Is EPA’s Action Regarding Chapter
125? strict work practice standards to reduce Between Chapter 125 and the Dry
3. How Do Amendments to the Dry perchloroethylene emissions from their Cleaning NESHAP?
Cleaning NESHAP Affect This operations. Chapter 125 contains certain
Rulemaking? requirements that differ from the Dry a. How Do the Applicability
III. Summary of EPA’s Action Cleaning NESHAP. As explained below, Requirements Differ?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13045 however, EPA has determined that The Dry Cleaning NESHAP classifies
B. Executive Order 13211 Chapter 125 is no less stringent than the dry cleaning sources as major sources
C. Executive Order 13175 Dry Cleaning NESHAP as applied to based on either annual
D. Executive Order 13132 area sources. A copy of Chapter 125 is perchloroethylene (perc) emissions or
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act available upon request or for public annual perc consumption. Major
F. Unfunded Mandates sources are those sources that: (1) Emit
inspection at EPA’s New England
G. Submission to Congress and the or have the potential to emit more than
Comptroller General Regional Office at the address listed
above. 10 tons per year of perc to the
H. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act atmosphere, or (2) consume greater than
I. Petitions for Judicial Review B. What Requirements Must a State Rule 8000 liters (2100 gallons) of perc for
Meet To Substitute for a Section 112 dry-to-dry machines or greater than
A. Background and Purpose Rule? 6800 liters (1800 gallons) of perc for
Under CAA section 112(l), EPA may transfer machines or transfer and dry-to-
approve State or local rules or programs Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA requires dry machines. 40 CFR 63.320(g).
to be implemented and enforced in that a State’s NESHAP program contain The Dry Cleaning NESHAP exempts
place of certain otherwise applicable adequate authorities to assure certain area sources from specified
Federal rules, emissions standards, or compliance with each applicable requirements based on perc
requirements. The Federal regulations Federal requirement, adequate resources consumption levels and the types of dry
governing EPA’s approval of State and for implementation, and an expeditious cleaning machines used at the source.
local rules or programs under section compliance schedule. These are also For example, an existing area source
112(l) are located at 40 CFR part 63, requirements for an adequate operating consisting of only dry-to-dry machines
subpart E. See 58 FR 62262 (November permits program under 40 CFR part 70. is exempt from specified operating
26, 1993), as amended by 65 FR 55810 On October 18, 2001, EPA promulgated standards and testing, monitoring,
(September 14, 2000). Under these full approval of ME DEP’s operating reporting and recordkeeping
regulations, a State air pollution control permits program. See 66 FR 52874. requirements of the Dry Cleaning
agency has the option to request EPA’s Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3), interim or NESHAP if the facility’s total perc
approval to substitute a State rule for final title V program approval satisfies consumption is less than 140 gallons
the applicable Federal rule (e.g., the the criteria set forth in § 63.91(d) for per year. 40 CFR 63.320(d). Similarly,
National Emission Standards for ‘‘up-front approval.’’ Accordingly, ME an existing area source consisting of
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)). DEP has satisfied the up-front approval only transfer machine systems is exempt
Upon approval by EPA, the State agency criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). from these same requirements if the
is authorized to implement and enforce facility’s total perc consumption is less
its rule in place of the Federal rule. Additionally, the ‘‘rule substitution’’ than 200 gallons per year. 40 CFR
EPA promulgated the Dry Cleaning option requires EPA to ‘‘make a detailed 63.320(e). In addition, the Dry Cleaning
NESHAP on September 22, 1993. See 58 and thorough evaluation of the State’s NESHAP exempts all coin-operated
FR 49354 (codified at 40 CFR part 63, submittal to ensure that it meets the machines from the requirements of the
subpart M, ‘‘National Perchloroethylene stringency and other requirements’’ of rule. 40 CFR 63.320(j).
Air Emission Standards for Dry 40 CFR 63.93. 58 FR at 62274. A rule Chapter 125 of the Maine Department
Cleaning Facilities’’). On August 12, will be approved if EPA finds: (1) The of Environmental Protection regulations
2003, EPA received ME DEP’s request to State and local rules are ‘‘no less requires all area source dry cleaners to
implement and enforce ‘‘Chapter 125: stringent’’ than the corresponding comply with the requirements of the
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaner Federal regulations, (2) the State and rule, regardless of their perc
Regulation’’ in lieu of the Dry Cleaning local government has adequate consumption levels. Chapter 125,
NESHAP as applied to area sources. ME authorities to implement and enforce section 1. According to Maine’s 2001
DEP’s request for approval was the rules, and (3) the schedule for annual emissions inventory data, about
submitted pursuant to the provisions of implementation and compliance is ‘‘no 70% of dry cleaners in Maine use less
40 CFR part 63, subpart E. On less stringent’’ than the deadlines than 140 gallons of perc per year. Under
September 15, 2003, EPA determined established in the otherwise applicable the Federal rule, these area source dry
that Maine’s submittal was complete. Federal rule. 40 CFR 63.93(b). After cleaners would be exempt from
Maine adopted Chapter 125 in 1991 to numerous operating standards and
reviewing ME DEP’s partial rule
regulate dry cleaning facilities that are testing, monitoring, reporting and
substitution request and equivalency
area sources of perchloroethylene in the recordkeeping requirements of the Dry
demonstration for the Dry Cleaning
State of Maine. See Maine Chapter 125 Cleaning NESHAP. Under Chapter 125,
of the Department of Environmental NESHAP as it applies to area sources, however, these smaller area sources are
Protection Regulations. Chapter 125 was EPA has determined this request meets subject to the same standards that apply
all the requirements necessary for
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
revised in 1997 and 2003 to coincide to larger area sources. As such, Chapter
more closely with the Dry Cleaning approval under CAA section 112(l) and 125 imposes perc emission control
NESHAP and to remove sections 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93. requirements on a significantly larger
referring to obsolete practices and number of area sources than does the
equipment. Chapter 125 requires area Dry Cleaning NESHAP. In addition,
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Apr 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM 24APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 20897
Chapter 125 contains no exemption for cartridge is removed from the filter 63.320(b) and 63.324(b). The
coin-operated machines. These housing, it must be placed in a sealed certification must contain a calculation
applicability provisions are more container which does not allow the of the source’s yearly perc solvent
stringent than the applicability solvent in the filter to be emitted to the consumption limit and the source’s
provisions of the Dry Cleaning atmosphere, and must be disposed in compliance status with each applicable
NESHAP. accordance with State and federal requirement of the Dry Cleaning
requirements.’’ Id. These requirements NESHAP. 40 CFR 63.324(b)(1) through
b. How Do the Requirements for
for the handling of cartridge filters are (3). This certification is a one-time
Transfer Machines Differ?
more specific and more stringent than requirement.
A transfer machine system is a the requirements of the Dry Cleaning Chapter 125 requires the owner or
multiple-machine dry cleaning NESHAP. operator of any new source to submit,
operation in which washing and drying The Dry Cleaning NESHAP also within 30 days of startup, a calculation
are performed in different machines. requires area sources to conduct weekly of the facility’s perc solvent
The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires inspections for perceptible leaks. Area consumption limit based on a 12-month
owners and operators of new transfer sources with lower perc consumption rolling total limit and an indication of
machine systems to eliminate any levels, however, are required to conduct compliance status. Chapter 125, section
emissions of perc from clothing transfer such leak detections only biweekly. 40 6.B. Chapter 125 also requires the owner
between the washer and the dryer of CFR 63.322(k) through (l). Chapter 125 or operator of any dry cleaning facility
transfer machine systems. 40 CFR requires all dry cleaners, regardless of to submit an annual registration
63.322(b)(2). In addition, the Dry their perc consumption levels, to containing information about the
Cleaning NESHAP allows for existing perform weekly inspections for facility’s total perc consumption for
transfer machine systems and sets perceptible leaks. Chapter 125, sections each of the previous twelve months, a
certain control standards and other 3.C(3) and 4.D. certification of the facility’s status as a
requirements for existing transfer As such, the work practice standards major or area source, and an estimate of
machine systems. See, e.g., 40 CFR of Chapter 125 are more stringent than the waste that was shipped off-site,
63.322(a). Clothing transfer emissions the Dry Cleaning NESHAP. among other things. Chapter 125,
are a significant portion of the overall section 125.6.A. These reporting
e. How Do the Testing and Monitoring
emissions from transfer machine requirements allow ME DEP to
Requirements Differ?
systems. inventory and track annual perc
Chapter 125 prohibits the use and The Dry Cleaning NESHAP states that, consumption and emissions for all area
installation of all transfer machines. when a carbon adsorber is used to source dry cleaners. As such, the
Chapter 125, section 3.B(4). As such, comply with the operating standards of reporting requirements of Chapter 125
Chapter 125 is more stringent than the the rule, the concentration of perc in the are more stringent than the
Dry Cleaning NESHAP. exhaust of the carbon adsorber must be corresponding requirements of the Dry
equal to or less than 100 parts per Cleaning NESHAP.
c. How Do the Requirements for million (ppm) by volume and must be
Refrigerated Condensers Differ? measured with a colorimetric detector g. What Are the Title V Permit
The Dry Cleaning NESHAP prohibits tube that is designed to measure a Requirements for Area Sources?
any source that has a refrigerated concentration of 100 ppm by volume of Chapter 140.1.D(2) of Maine’s
condenser on a dry-to-dry machine, perc in the air to an accuracy of ±25 regulations exempts area sources from
dryer, or reclaimer from using the same ppm. 40 CFR 63.323(b). the requirement to obtain a title V
refrigerated condenser coil for the Chapter 125 requires that any carbon operating permit if EPA exempts these
washer that is used by a dry-to-dry adsorber used at a dry cleaning machine sources. Chapter 140, section 140.1.D(2).
machine, dryer, or reclaimer. 40 CFR reduce perc emissions to no more than On December 19, 2005, EPA
63.322(f). Only transfer machine 50 ppm by volume and that the perc permanently exempted five categories of
systems have separate dry-to-dry concentration be measured with a area sources subject to NESHAPs from
machine, dryer, or reclaimer systems. colorimetric detector tube designed to the title V operating permit program,
Because Chapter 125 prohibits the use measure 10–500 ppmv of perc with an including area source perchloroethylene
or installation of transfer machines at accuracy of ±5 ppm. Chapter 125, dry cleaners. 70 FR 75320 (December
dry cleaning facilities (Chapter 125, section 4.A(1). Chapter 125 also requires 19, 2005). Therefore, both Federal law
section 3.B(4)), this requirement is that the sampling port for monitoring and Maine’s regulation at Chapter 140
inapplicable and does not affect the within the exhaust outlet of the carbon exempt area source dry cleaners from
stringency of the rule. adsorber be easily accessible. Chapter title V permitting requirements. Major
125, section 4.A(2). As such, the source dry cleaners in Maine are still
d. How Do the Work Practice Standards
requirements of Chapter 125 for required to obtain title V operating
Differ?
reduction and measurement of perc permits.
The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires concentrations in carbon adsorber
all dry cleaning facilities to ‘‘drain h. How Does Maine’s Regulation
exhaust are more stringent than the
cartridge filters in their housing, or Address the General Provisions at 40
corresponding requirements of the Dry
other sealed container, for a minimum CFR Part 63, Subpart A?
Cleaning NESHAP.
of 24 hours, or treat such filters in an Chapter 125 contains requirements
equivalent manner, before removal from f. How Do the Reporting Requirements that are generally equivalent to or more
the dry cleaning facility.’’ 40 CFR Differ? stringent than the General Provisions at
63.322(i). Chapter 125 requires that the The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires 40 CFR part 63, subpart A. EPA notes
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
cartridges be drained in the filter the owner or operator of any dry that Chapter 125 does not contain a
housing for at least 24 hours or as cleaning facility constructed or requirement that corresponds to the
approved by DEP and EPA. Chapter 125, reconstructed after September 22, 1993, notification requirement in 40 CFR
section 3.C(1). In addition, the rule to file a certification of compliance 63.9(j), which states that any change in
requires that ‘‘[w]hen any filtration status within 30 days of startup. 40 CFR the information provided to EPA under
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Apr 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM 24APR1
20898 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the applicable notification requirements revised alternative requirements are received will then be addressed in a
‘‘shall be provided to the Administrator equivalent to the more stringent subsequent final rule based on the
in writing within 15 calendar days after amendments. proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
the change.’’ As explained above, In accordance with these second comment period on this rule.
however, Chapter 125 requires all dry requirements, upon EPA’s finalization Any parties interested in commenting
cleaning facilities to submit annual of any amendments to the Dry Cleaning should do so at this time. If no such
reports containing specific information NESHAP that increase its stringency, comments are received, the public is
about perc consumption, major or area EPA will determine whether these advised that this rule will be effective
source status, and compliance with the amendments necessitate a revision to on June 23, 2006 and no further action
requirements of the rule. Any changes Maine’s alternative requirements. If so, will be taken on the proposed rule.
in such reported information must, we will notify ME DEP of the need to
therefore, be included in the next submit a revised equivalency IV. Statutory and Executive Order
annual report to ME DEP and EPA. demonstration in accordance with the Reviews
Given the more-detailed and regular requirements of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13045
reporting requirements of Maine’s E. In any event, the more stringent
NESHAP amendments will apply until The Office of Management and Budget
regulation, EPA has determined that the
reporting requirements of Chapter 125 EPA publishes in the Federal Register a has exempted this regulatory action
are, taken as a whole, more stringent determination as to the equivalency of from Executive Order 12866, entitled
than the requirements of subpart A. Maine’s requirements to the more ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review.’’
stringent amendments. This rule is not subject to Executive
2. What Is EPA’s Action Regarding Order 13045, entitled, ‘‘Protection of
Chapter 125? III. Summary of EPA’s Action Children from Environmental Health
After reviewing ME DEP’s request for Pursuant to section 112(l) of the CAA Risks and Safety Risks,’’ because it is
approval of ‘‘Chapter 125: and 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93, EPA is not an ‘‘economically significant’’ action
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaner approving ME DEP’s request to under Executive Order 12866.
Regulation,’’ EPA has determined that implement and enforce ‘‘Chapter 125: B. Executive Order 13211
Maine’s regulation meets all of the Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaner
requirements necessary for partial rule Regulation’’ in place of the Federal Dry This rule is not subject to Executive
substitution under section 112(l) of the Cleaning NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
CAA and 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93. subpart M, as it applies to area sources Regulations That Significantly Affect
Chapter 125, taken as a whole, is no less in Maine. This approval makes Chapter Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
stringent than the Federal Dry Cleaning 125 federally enforceable and FR 28355 (May 22,2001)) because it is
NESHAP as applied to area sources. consolidates the compliance not a significant regulatory action under
Therefore, EPA hereby approves requirements for area source dry Executive Order 12866.
Maine’s request to implement and cleaners in Maine into one set of C. Executive Order 13175
enforce Chapter 125 in place of the Dry regulations. Major source dry cleaning
Cleaning NESHAP for area sources in facilities remain subject to the Federal Executive Order 13175, entitled
Maine. As of the effective date of this requirements at 40 CFR part 63, subpart ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
action, Chapter 125 is enforceable by M and the Title V permitting Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
EPA and by citizens under the CAA. requirements of 40 CFR part 70. Area 67249, November 6, 2000), requires EPA
Although ME DEP has primary source dry cleaning facilities are exempt to develop an accountable process to
responsibility to implement and enforce from Title V permitting requirements as ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
Chapter 125, EPA retains the authority of December 19, 2005. 70 FR 75320. tribal officials in the development of
to enforce any requirement of the rule EPA views this approval of Maine’s regulatory policies that have tribal
upon its approval under CAA 112. CAA request to implement and enforce implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
section 112(l)(7). Chapter 125 in place of the Dry Cleaning implications’’ is defined in the
NESHAP for area sources as a Executive Order to include regulations
3. How Do Amendments to the Dry noncontroversial action, given that the that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
Cleaning NESHAP Affect This state program has been effective for one or more Indian tribes, on the
Rulemaking? several years and is, taken as a whole, relationship between the Federal
On December 21, 2005 (70 FR 75884), more stringent than the Dry Cleaning Government and the Indian tribes, or on
EPA proposed amendments to the dry NESHAP. EPA anticipates no adverse the distribution of power and
cleaning NESHAP. Under § 63.91(e)(3), comments. Therefore, EPA is publishing responsibilities between the Federal
if EPA amends or otherwise revises a this direct final rule without prior Government and Indian tribes.’’
promulgated section 112 rule or proposal. However, in the proposed This final rule does not have tribal
requirement in a way that increases its rules section of this Federal Register implications. This action allows the
stringency, EPA will notify any state publication, EPA is publishing a State of Maine to implement equivalent
with a delegated alternative of the need separate document that will serve as the state requirements in lieu of pre-existing
to revise its equivalency demonstration. proposal for this action should relevant Federal requirements as applied only to
EPA will consult with the state to set a adverse comments be filed. This action area source drycleaners. This action will
time frame for the state to submit a will be effective on June 23, 2006, not have substantial direct effects on
revised equivalency demonstration. EPA without further notice, unless EPA tribal governments, on the relationship
will then review and approve the receives relevant adverse comments by between the Federal Government and
revised equivalency demonstration May 24, 2006. Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
according to the procedures in 40 CFR If EPA receives such comments, then power and responsibilities between the
part 63, subpart E. More stringent it will publish a timely withdrawal in Federal Government and Indian tribes,
NESHAP amendments to a delegated the Federal Register informing the as specified in Executive Order 13175.
alternative apply to all sources until public that this direct final rule will not Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
EPA determines that the approved or take effect. All public comments apply to this rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Apr 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM 24APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 20899
approval does not create any new Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
requirements, I certify that this action 104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 (d) * * *
will not have a significant economic note) directs EPA to use voluntary (6) Maine Regulations Applicable to
impact on a substantial number of small consensus standards in its regulatory Hazardous Air Pollutants (March 2006).
entities. activities unless to do so would be Incorporation By Reference approved
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:20 Apr 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM 24APR1
20900 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
for § 63.99(a)(19)(iii) of subpart E of this any corresponding documents may be E. Small Business Regulatory
part. accessed at GSA’s Web site at http:// Enforcement Fairness Act
* * * * * www.gsa.gov/fmr. This final rule is exempt from
DATES: Effective Date: May 24, 2006. Congressional review under 5 U.S.C.
Subpart E—[Amended] 801 since it relates solely to agency
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
■ 3. Section 63.99 is amended by adding Regulatory Secretariat, Room 4035, GSA management and personnel.
paragraph (a)(19)(iii) to read as follows: Building, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 102–39
208–7312, for information pertaining to
§ 63.99 Delegated Federal authorities. Government property management,
status or publication schedules. For
(a) * * * Reporting and recordkeeping
clarification of content, contact Mr.
(19) * * * requirements, and Government
Robert Holcombe, Office of
(iii) Affected area sources within property.
Governmentwide Policy, Office of
Maine must comply with the Maine Travel, Transportation, and Asset Dated: April 14, 2006.
Regulations Applicable to Hazardous Management (MT), at (202) 501–3828 or David L. Bibb,
Air Pollutants (incorporated by e-mail at Robert.Holcombe@gsa.gov. Acting Administrator of General Services.
reference as specified in § 63.14) as Please cite Amendment 2006–02, FMR
described in paragraph (a)(19)(iii)(A) of case 2006–102–3. ■ For the reasons set forth in the
this section: preamble, GSA amends 41 CFR part
(A) The material incorporated into the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 102–39 as set forth below:
Maine Department of Environmental A. Background
Protection regulations at Chapter 125 PART 102–39—REPLACEMENT OF
pertaining to dry cleaning facilities in In the years since 41 CFR part 102– PERSONAL PROPERTY PURSUANT
the State of Maine’s jurisdiction, and 39 was published as a final rule, the TO THE EXCHANGE/SALE AUTHORITY
approved under the procedures in references to other regulations which
migrated from the Federal Property ■ 1. The authority citation for 41 CFR
§ 63.93 to be implemented and enforced part 102–39 continues to read as
in place of the Federal NESHAP for Management Regulations (FPMR) (41
CFR chapter 101) to the Federal follows:
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning
Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR Authority: 40 U.S.C. 503 and 121(c).
Facilities (subpart M of this part),
effective as of December 19, 2005, for chapter 102) became outdated. Also,
§ 102–39.45 [Amended]
area sources only, as defined in Public Law 107–217 revised and
recodified certain provisions of the ■ 2. Amend § 102–39.45 in paragraph (l)
§ 63.320(h).
Federal Property and Administrative by removing ’’40 U.S.C. 484(i) and
(B) [Reserved]
Services Act of 1949 (Property Act). For adding ’’40 U.S.C. 548 in its place.
* * * * *
example, the Property Act provisions ■ 3. Amend § 102–39.75 by revising
[FR Doc. 06–3855 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am] and topics previously found at 40 U.S.C. paragraph (b) to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 471–514 will now generally be found at
40 U.S.C. 101–705. This revised § 102–39.75 What information am I
required to report?
regulation updates the title 40 U.S.C.
GENERAL SERVICES citations to reflect the changes made by * * * * *
ADMINISTRATION Public Law 107–217. Additionally, in (b) Submit your report electronically
the intervening years since these three or by mail to the General Services
41 CFR Part 102–39 regulations were published, several Administration, Office of Travel,
agencies have moved or changed names. Transportation and Asset Management
[FMR Amendment 2006–02; FMR Case (MT), 1800 F Street, NW., Washington,
2006–102–3] Finally, updating or clarifying revisions
were made where the revisions are seen DC 20405.
RIN 3090–AI26 as administrative or clerical in nature. [FR Doc. 06–3845 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–S
Federal Management Regulation; B. Executive Order 12866
Replacement of Personal Property The General Services Administration
Pursuant to the Exchange/Sale (GSA) has determined that this final DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Authority rule is not a significant regulatory action
AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide for the purposes of Executive Order National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Policy, General Services Administration 12866. Administration
(GSA). C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 50 CFR Part 648
ACTION: Final rule.
This final rule is not required to be [Docket No. 051209329–5329–01; I.D.
SUMMARY: The General Services published in the Federal Register for 041406A]
Administration is amending the Federal comment. Therefore, the Regulatory
Management Regulation (FMR) language Flexibility Act does not apply. Fisheries of the Northeastern United
that pertains to personal property by States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and
D. Paperwork Reduction Act Butterfish Fisheries; Closure of the
correcting references to outdated or
superceded provisions of law or The Paperwork Reduction Act does Quarter II Fishery for Loligo Squid
regulation; correcting text to be in not apply because the changes to the AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
conformance with revised laws, FMR do not impose information Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
regulation, or Federal agency collection requirements that require the Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
responsibilities; and clarifying text approval of the Office of Management Commerce.
where the intended meaning could be and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et
ACTION: Closure.
updated or made clearer. The FMR and seq.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Apr 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM 24APR1