Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
European Union
Research
in Economics
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Directorate-General for Research
Directorate L – Science, economy and society
Unit L.2 – Research in the economic, social sciences and humanities - Prospective
Contact: Domenico Rossetti di Valdalbero
European Commission
Office SDME 7/34
B-1049 Brussels
Tel. (32-2) 29-62811
Fax (32-2) 29-62137
E-mail: domenico.rossetti-di-valdalbero@ec.europa.eu
http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ssh/
cover_EU research in economics:Layout 1 4/09/08 11:25 Page 3
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Freephone number:
00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
LEGAL NOTICE:
Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be
made of the following information.
The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views
of the European Commission.
A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet.
It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu).
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008
ISBN 978-92-79-09457-6
ISSN 1018-5593
DOI 10.2777/8473
© European Communities, 2008
Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
Printed in Belgium
PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER
cover_EU research in economics:Layout 1 4/09/08 11:25 Page 5
European Commission
EUR 23474- European Union Research in Economics - Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities -
Growth, Employment and Competitiveness in a Knowledge Society
ISBN 978-92-79-09457-6
ISSN 1018-5593
DOI 10.2777/8473
cover_EU research in economics:Layout 1 4/09/08 11:25 Page 6
cover_EU research in economics:Layout 1 4/09/08 11:25 Page 7
Our priced publications are available from EU Bookshop (http://publications.europa.eu) where you can place an order with the
sales agent of your choice.
The Publications Office has a worldwide network of sales agents. You can obtain their contact details by sending a fax to
(352) 29 29-42758.
cover_EU research in economics:Layout 1 4/09/08 11:25 Page 8
KI-NA-23474-EN-C
This brochure describes EU projects mostly coming from the activity entitled "Growth, employment and competi-
tiveness in a knowledge society" of the Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities Programme. The focus of this
publication is on the European knowledge society (Lisbon Agenda) but it covers also issues related to policy evaluation
and economic governance. The projects included in this brochure aim at answering the following questions: How to
succeed in the age of globalisation? What are the impacts of research and innovation on growth and employment?
How does internationalisation affect the localisation of knowledge-intensive activities of firms? What is the overall
importance of service industries in European growth? How can the intangible assets be measured? What is the
optimal public spending distribution? How is "entrepreneurship" evolving in Europe?
EUROPEAN UNION RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS - 2007-2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
-1-
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
225408 Monetary, fiscal and structural policies with Prof. Domenico DELLI GATTI 32
POLHIA heterogeneous agents
-2-
FOREWORD
A major element of the renewed Lisbon strategy is the globalisation issue. Economic structures are
changing in accordance with the differential productivity of sectors and competition within Europe and
with third countries. Economic growth is still the final objective of the Lisbon agenda and knowledge
is confirmed as a main pillar for its achievement. In this context, the "Education – Knowledge –
Innovation" triangle has to be strengthened.
In 2007-2008, the economic component of the European Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities
(SSH) research programme attempts, among others, to answer the following questions: How to
succeed in the age of globalisation? What are the impacts of research and innovation on growth and
employment? How does internationalisation affect the localisation of knowledge-intensive activities of
firms? What is the overall importance of service industries in European growth? How can the
intangible assets be measured? What is the optimal public spending distribution? How is
"entrepreneurship" evolving in Europe?
These are some of the issues tackled in this brochure that describes EU projects mostly coming from
the activity entitled "Growth, employment and competitiveness in a knowledge society". The focus of
this publication is on the European knowledge society (Lisbon Agenda) but it covers also issues
related to policy evaluation and economic governance. This activity builds on existing socio-economic
research projects from the sixth Framework Programme, of which "EU KLEMS" (a project on
productivity in the EU) is a good example.
In 2007-2008, the European Commission has selected around 40 research projects concerning the
knowledge economy. With an average of 7 teams per project and taking into consideration that some
teams are involved in different projects, about 250 research organisations of the European and
international socio-economic research community are working in this field.
Three elements characterise European economic research in the seventh Framework Programme:
Firstly, the clear orientation to address major societal challenges; Secondly - and it is a major novelty -
methods, tools and databases are explicitly recognised as crucial elements to make progress in socio-
economic sciences; Thirdly, EU economic research offers fundamental scientific support to European
policies.
Scientific excellence, policy relevance, stocktaking of past and current research, as well as
dissemination of research results are guiding principles for EU economic research. The "clusters" of
research projects included in this brochure should encourage knowledge cross-fertilization among
European research teams and enlighten EU policy-makers on subjects like the new Lisbon agenda, the
future EU financial perspectives and the next Research Framework Programme.
Jean-Michel BAER
-3-
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
GLOBINN
The overall purpose of the GLOBINN project is to The GLOBINN project aims to bring together leading
improve our understanding of the changing nature EU scholars involved in studying each of these
of internationalization of Europe’s innovation modes largely in isolation to focus on an integrated
systems by studying the international knowledge analysis.
sourcing strategies of European firms and their
effect on performance. The starting premise of the In the first instance this analysis will map the trends
project is that Europe’s knowledge resources and in the growth of each of these modes with an
its role in the global economy will be increasingly emphasis on whether internationalization of
shaped by the ability of EU firms to source innovation in European firms is an intra EU or extra
knowledge internationally. EU phenomenon.
Firms can employ three modes in The second focal point will be the organisational and
internationalizing their innovative activities: (a) managerial issues which influence the strategies of
the global trading of technology based services EU firms in seeking international sources of
and licensing as firms seek to exploit the global knowledge, and have an impact on their on
markets for their technologies; (b) international innovation and economic performance. Both of these
collaborative agreements and strategic alliances as are essential for analysing the implications for
firms seek out international partners for their national and EU-level policies.
knowledge generating activities; and (c) the
international dispersal of their own R&D and Indeed the underlying rationale for the GLOBINN
technology creating activities as they seek out project is that devising appropriate policies requires a
new regions and resources in different parts of the deeper understanding of each of the three modes and
world. the firms level processes and strategies.
-4-
The changing nature of internationalization of innovation in Europe: impact on firms and the
implications for innovation policy in the EU
GLOBINN
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Brunel University
Brunel Business School
Suma ATHREYE
UK - Uxbridge
Universiteit Maastricht
Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT)
Geert. DUYSTERS
NL - Maastricht
-5-
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
SCIFI-GLOW
In 2000, EU leaders committed to the objective of How does globalization influence the answer to these
making Europe "the most dynamic and questions? Finally, how can policy influence the
competitive knowledge-based economy in the innovation process?
world, capable of sustainable economic growth,
with more and better jobs, greater social cohesion This project aims at answering these questions,
and respect for the environment." without forgetting their implications in terms of
income inequality and volatility, which impacts on
They drew up the "Lisbon agenda" to achieve this the political sustainability of the innovation
goal by 2010. dynamics.
The central strategy was based on policies to To do this, the first part of the project will focus more
encourage investment in knowledge. Knowledge specifically on the knowledge sector itself. This
as a public good with potential spillovers is the second part of the project will look at the "bigger
rationale behind intellectual property protection picture", looking at the overall organization of firms
and subsidies for investments in innovations that in the global knowledge economy, as well as its
will potentially lead to high spillovers. implications on markets and inequality.
University research that creates basic knowledge The third part will contain a summary and policy
is a leading example of this. But research shows recommendations: while the project brings together
that spillovers are also generated from private researchers at the frontier of academic knowledge on
firms’ R&D and that firms can therefore benefit these topics, its outcomes will be highly policy-
from the presence of more innovative and more relevant.
productive firms.
We plan to end the project with a summary and set of
But which universities and which firms are more policy conclusions on research and innovation in the
innovative? global knowledge economy.
-6-
Science, innovation, firms and markets in a globalized world
SCIFI-GLOW
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Department of Economics
Dalia MARIN
DE - Munich
Universiteit Maastricht
Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT)
Luc SOETE
NL - Maastricht
-7-
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
PEGGED
The long-standing US-EU partnership and definition of its self-interest, a correspondingly clear
dominance of a range of international institutions sense of purpose and objectives, and the internal
(IMF, World Bank, Security Council, etc.) is coherence and institutional capacity to exercise
rapidly breaking down under the impact of leadership. Now is the time for Europe to project a
shifting interdependencies and power vision of how the global system should evolve, and to
relationships. act.
In this sense, global economic governance is at a The project begins with four research domains:
crucial crossroads. If a more complex and multi- a) macroeconomic adjustment and governance;
polar world is now emerging, interwoven with b) the integration of markets for finance and
bilateral agreements and a proliferation of investment; c) the integration of markets for trade in
regional efforts of uncertain outcome and goods and services; d) migration and the mobility of
dimensions, it is unclear how co-operation will be labour.
organised in the future and by whom.
These are questions where a combined analysis by
Global economic governance is riddled with political scientists and economists is necessary if
worrisome uncertainties, yet this offers clear workable and real-world policy solutions are to be
opportunities for an alliance between scholars developed and prevail.
pushing the bounds in terms of analysis, and EU
policy entrepreneurs in terms of action. Ultimately, the legitimacy of global governance
depends on input and representation in the decision-
Europe must play a major part in the reform and making process of global governance, and on the
reinforcement of global governance mechanisms, output or policy outcome in terms of growth,
but in order to do so the EU requires a clear distribution, and compensation for the losers.
-8-
Politics, economics and global governance: the European dimensions
PEGGED
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Centre for Economic Policy Research
Richard PORTES
UK - London
University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam School for Social Science Research
Geoffrey UNDERHILL
NL - Amsterdam
-9-
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
AEGIS
The proposed research project will study the At the macro level, it will study the link between
interactions between knowledge, economic knowledge entrepreneurship, economic growth and
growth and social well-being in Europe. It focuses social well-being, also extending to the socio-
on knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship as a economic processes that help transform the “animal
necessary mechanism and an agent of change spirits” (John Maynard Keynes) into a self-
mediating between the creation of knowledge and reinforcing process for broader societal prosperity.
its transformation into economic activity.
The way the broader socio-economic environment
Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship is stokes “animal spirits” and benefits from them will
perceived here in as a core interface between two be studied within the contexts of various shades of
interdependent ystems: the knowledge generation capitalism in Europe and elsewhere, expanding
and diffusion system, on the one hand, and the beyond the growth accounting and endogenous
productive system, on the other. Both systems growth approaches and issues to novel concepts of
shape and are shaped by the broader social context knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in growth and,
– including customs, culture, and institutions – further, into the underlying issues of social wellbeing
thus also pointing at the linkage of entrepreneur- such as inclusion, cohesion, equity, opportunities,
ship to that context. and social care. Finally, at the policy level, the
project will take a systemic approach aiming at an
The project has three main objectives (research organic integration of diverse sets of policies that
thrusts). At the micro level, it purports to study in influence the creation and growth of innovative
depth the very act of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial ventures based on knowledge
entrepreneurship, its defining characteristics, generation and diffusion.
boundaries, scope and incentives.
- 10 -
Advancing knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and innovation for growth and social
well-being in Europe
AEGIS
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi Aalborg University
CESPRI Department of Business Studies
Prof. Franco MALERBA Prof. Bent DALUM
IT - Milan DK - Aalborg
- 11 -
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
INGINEUS
INGINEUS addresses the evolution of global INGINEUS studies the determinants of this process
production networks (GPNs) into global and analyses its implications both for the EU and its
innovation networks (GINs), and the impact this emerging partner countries in the developing world.
new process of global capitalism has on
knowledge intensive activities in the EU. First, it looks at the changing strategies of MNCs and
the conditions under which it is favourable for them
Global sourcing and assembly arrangements have to offshore R&D and other knowledge-intensive parts
been around for some three decades. They were of their production process.
principally based on efficiency considerations.
Thus, multinational firms (MNCs) outsourced Second, it focuses on the evolving local capabilities
parts of production processes to manufacturers in in selected developing countries that allow them to
Asia and other low-cost locations around the claim increasingly complex parts of global value
globe, while retaining the most knowledge chains at much higher levels of technological
intensive assets in the home country. sophistication than hitherto.
This is no longer the case. MNCs increasingly Third, it analyses the consequences of the formation
scout the globe for locations where the right mix of GINs in the global economy and differentiates
of local competences allows them to tap into among their static and dynamic effects on growth,
sophisticated parts of value chains. This is not employment, and competitiveness in the EU.
limited to advanced economies but more and more
involves firms and regions in selected developing Finally, based on these insights, it derives policy
countries that position themselves as attractive recommendations that would allow the EU to benefit
knowledge-intensive locations in their own right. from the positive features of this process while
mitigating its adverse consequences.
- 12 -
Impact of networks, globalisation, and their interaction with EU strategies
INGINEUS
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
- 13 -
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
EFIGE
The chances of European countries to grow, The main questions addressed by the project are:
prosper and provide well being to their citizens What are the features of European firms that
rest on the ability of their firms to become successfully compete in international markets?
successful traders and producers in foreign To what extent do they contribute to productivity and
markets within and outside the EU. employment?
Does access to foreign market enhance firm
This project examines the pattern of performance through a learning process?
internationalisation of European firms. With a Why are some countries more successful in
clear focus on defining adequate and effective international trade and FDI?
policy measures, it looks at the broad factors What are the policies that can improve a nation’s
constraining or enhancing companies' foreign foreign trade performance?
operations, like growth in size and productivity; Does integration within the Single Market foster
type of ownership and corporate governance; productivity improvements?
access to financial markets; innovation; the Has the euro led to a wider participation of firms in
macroeconomic environment. cross-border business?
What policies can promote the participation of other
It will do so by combining theoretical and European firms that are currently excluded from
empirical research at the frontier of the academic international markets?
and policy debate with the gathering of new data What are the gains and the adjustments involved in
through a cross country survey. reducing barriers to trade and foreign direct
investment (FDI)?
What policies can best maximise gains and smooth
adjustments?
- 14 -
European firms in a global economy: internal policies for external competitiveness
EFIGE
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Departamento de Economía
Prof. Klaus DESMET
ES - Getafe
UniCredit S.p.A.
Ms. Enrica Elena BELLI
IT – Roma
- 15 -
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
WIOD
How has the increase in Chinese exports of textile b) Taking the dynamics of internationalization into
products affected the employment of low skilled account requires a time series (1995-2006) of such
workers in German retail trade? What would be linked IO tables, in current and constant international
the effects of a change in the European Union’s prices.
agricultural policy on global CO2 emissions?
c) Taking the effects of internationalization into
Economic and environmental policies are consideration requires that other relevant information
designed at a detailed level of industries and is appended. These so-called satellite accounts
products, while production is characterized by an include labor data for different skill types, investment
interdependent structure. Due to globalization, flows, and environmental and resources data.
these interdependencies cross borders and the
inclusion of trade is more than ever essential. The first part of the project constructs such a unique
Analyzing policy issues therefore requires an all database. The second part of the project applies the
encompassing database. Its construction is at the database to analyze the international interaction of
heart of this project and the following three socio-economic and environmental objectives from a
aspects are crucial. policy perspective. These are applications that use the
database by directly employing IO and econometric
a) Input-output (IO) tables provide a description techniques, and applications that use large-scale
of the interdependent production structure. Taking models that employ the database.
the reach of internationalization into full -
consideration requires a worldwide set of national The project builds on several previous, EU-sponsored
IO tables (covering at least 80% of world GDP) projects and is carried out by Europe’s leading
that are fully linked through bilateral trade data. experts in IO theory, data construction, interindustry
models, and policy applications.
- 16 -
World input-output database: construction and applications
WIOD
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS)
European Commission - Joint Research Center
Mr. Peter KIND
ES - Sevilla
Centrale Recherche SA
Prof. Paul ZAGAME
FR – Paris
- 17 -
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
INNOS&T
This project aims to develop and collect novel Second, we will carry out two complementary survey
science and technology indicators covering data collections in US and Japon, PatVal-US and
Europe, Japan and the United States. PatVal-JP, by using the questionnaire developed for
European inventors.
These indicators will be used in empirical models
that can contribute to improve European, national Third, the project will develop indicators for
and regional policies on the following four topics: industry-science links based on patent citations to
a) Economic use of patents, i.e. unused patents science for all OECD countries, over time, across
and strategic patents, licensing, entrepreneurship; industries, by firms and by firms to universities and
b) Science-industry linkages and innovation public research institutions. These indicators will be
performance; validated through the results of the PatVal-EU II
c) Gender, education and mobility of inventors; survey.
d) Economic value of patents.
Fourth, we will build complementary indicators at the
The project will carry out the following four sets level of patents (citations, oppositions, etc.),
of activities aimed at the creation of new inventors, companies, regions, sectors, that will be
indicators. integrated with the survey data.
First, we will carry out a new survey data The resulting integrated datasets will be used in
collection, PatVal-EU II, which will build on the empirical models and policy assessments on the four
previous PatVal-EU I survey of inventors. The topics of this project. In particular, the project will
new survey will interview inventors of about develop adequate empirical methods that take
30,000 EPO patents in 20 European countries and simultaneously into account a variety of factors
will ask questions about the inventors, the affecting the impact of policies.
invention process, the motivations to patent, the
use and the value of the patent, the links between
science and patented inventions.
- 18 -
Innovative S&T indicators combining patent data and surveys:
empirical models and policy analyses
INNOS&T
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Institute for Innovation Research, Technology Management and Entrepreneurship (Inno-Tec)
Dietmar HARHOFF
DE - Munich
Universidad de Navarra
Business School (IESE)
Department General Management
Bruno CASSIMAN
ES - Barcelona
- 19 -
Globalisation and knowledge economy, evaluation of EU policies
DEMETER
The Lisbon Agenda of increasing competitiveness can be used for the ex ante evaluation of research and
of European countries by the «knowledge» has innovation policies at sectoral and European level.
focussed attention on RTD and education policies.
The method of the project will be a wide scope one.
The evaluation of such policies is in the state of It will be based on micro, meso and macro
the art very difficult; if there exist quantifications economics,in order to give deep insight on the RTD
of RTD increase on economic performance at a incentives and the RTD performance. It will be
firm or sectoral level, the assessment of such grounded on Scientific and Technique and Innovation
performance on a whole community or a group of (STI) indicators and new databases that take into
countries is less frequent; the link between RTD account all the activities related to RTD (and not only
and economic performance has, during the last RTD expenses), the knowledge spillovers between
decades,changed a lot, rising a doubt on the activities and countries and also other forms of
former estimations:for instance the knowledge intangible capital.
spillovers between countries linked to RTD has
increased, the services activities linked to RTD as These insights will be used to modify the production
increased also much and then the measurement of block and demand of the two large scale detailed
RTD did change in significance. economic coverage models that have a good track
record: the econometric model NEMESIS and the
The importance of other forms of intangible general equilibrium one GEM-E3 that will produce
capital (Human, ICT, Organisational capital…) macro and detailed indicators in order to assess RTD
has modified the link between RTD and and innovation policies in terms of STI indicators,
innovation. competitiveness, growth, employment, budget
deficits, welfare, environment, sustainable
The overall objective of this proposal is to build a development.
system of tools based on applied modelling that
- 20 -
Development of methods and tools for evaluation of research
DEMETER
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Universiteit Maastricht
UNU-MERIT
Luc SOETE
NL - Maastricht
- 21 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
INNODRIVE
It is widely recognised that intellectual assets are We envisage doing this both at firm-level and at
major determinants of the generation of national level. At the micro-level the present project
innovation and thus in the enhancement of will improve our insight into the contributions of
growth, employment and competitiveness of the intangibles to the growth of firms by exploiting the
EU. potential of recently established linked employer-
employee datasets and implementing a performance
The importance of R&D and innovation is also based methodology to analyse how firms use
explicitly acknowledged in the “Lisbon process”. knowledge and human capital to increase their
However, our knowledge of the contribution of productivity and how mobile workers react to these
intangibles to economic performance is still processes.
incomplete.
At the national-economy level we will expand the
While firms undoubtedly are at the centre of traditional growth accounting framework by
innovation and productivity growth, their including, in capital formation, estimates of the
activities are hard to analyse empirically. investment in intangibles which, hitherto, have been
counted as current expenditure in the conventional
Furthermore, at the macro-level the national national accounts.
accounts data on capital formation focus primarily
on fixed investment and have only recently This research will thus explore hitherto uncharted
attempted to measure investment in intangibles territories in EU socio-economic research.
such as software, mineral exploration and artistic
creations. This research project will deliver new foundations for
the formulation of policies to strengthen growth and
The aim of this research project is to reduce our employment in the EU by providing new “beyond-
ignorance by providing new data on intangibles the-state-of-the-art” estimates of intangibles’
and new estimates of the capacity of intangible contribution to economic performance.
capital to generate growth.
- 22 -
Intangible capital and innovations: drivers of growth and location in the EU
INNODRIVE
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Economics Institute
Stepan JURAJDA
CZ – Prague
- 23 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
IAREG
The objective of IAREG is to analyse the role The main result expected in the project is the guide of
played by intangible assets (IA) in the generation policy recommendations and the dissemination of
of innovation, competitiveness and consequently this guide among regional, national and European
economic growth and increases in productivity at policy makers.
regional level with a special emphasis on the
geographical space in which such processes occur. To ensure the achievement of the proposed
objectives, the project is structured in 8
The specific objectives of the project will be: workpackages.
a) To develop new indicators for improving the The first block of workpackages, comprised by
measuring of some of the IA that we consider to WP1,WP2 and WP3 will research on the impact of
have the most influence in the generation of different intangible assets on innovation, regional
economic development. economic growth and productivity, both at a
theoretical but especially at the empirical level.
b) To analyse how IA and their interaction define
the environment affecting firms’ location. WP4 and WP5 will analyse the role of spatial
To measure the role of regional externalities in the knowledge flows (knowledge diffusion) as a
generation of IA and in determining local transmission mechanism from IA to innovation and
economic performances in Europe and in the growth.
diffusion of knowledge.
WP6 will be devoted to the development of a guide
c) To provide decision makers with policy
of policy recommendations for stimulating intangible
recommendations in order to support them in the
investment and economic growth.
future design and implementation of regional
innovation strategies.
WP7 will focus on the broad dissemination of the
results achieved in the project, specially of the policy
recommendations guide.
- 24 -
Intangible assets and regional economic growth
IAREG
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Università degli Studi di Cagliari/Cirem
North South Economic Research Centre (Crenos)
Raffaele PACI
IT - Cagliari
University of Pécs
Center for Research in Economic Policy, Faculty of Business and Economics
Attila VARGA
HU - Pécs
Tampereen Yliopisto
Hannele AUFFERMANN
FI - Tampere
Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien
Institute of Regional and Environmental Economy
Edward M. BERGMAN
AT - Vienna
University of Sussex
Science and Technology Policy Research (SPRU)
Simona IAMMARINO
UK – Falmer, Brighton
University Of Tartu
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Maaja VADI
EE - Tartu
University of Hannover
Institute of Economic and Cultural Geography
Javier REVILLA DIEZ
DE - Hannover
- 25 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
COINVEST
We aim to understand the contributions of Given the issue’s importance, we believe our work
intangible investments to innovation, will make a considerable contribution.
competitiveness, growth and productivity in
Europe. Some knowledge investment is counted as such in the
key economic measures such as GDP (e.g. software).
Such a project is, we feel, vital to help EU policy However, R&D and other knowledge investment
formation and deepen our understanding of some (like investment in human capital via training,
of the most crucial questions facing EU economic investment in reputation capital, investment in
policy. organisational capital etc) are all treated as day-to-
day expenses, not investment.
The reason is simple. Currently, (almost all)
intangible investments are either not measured, or Thus, under current conventions, investment and
treated as an intermediate input into production so GDP in an economy whose businesses spend €1 more
they are assumed to produce no durable assets for on almost all knowledge investment is the same as an
firms or economies. economy whose businesses turn up their air-
conditioning.
Does this matter? In practice, most knowledge
investments involve intangible spending. And, the Therefore, we have put together a small-scale but
Lisbon agenda aims to make the EU “the most focused team comprising some of Europe’s (and the
competitive and dynamic knowledge-driven world’s) leading experts on these questions, spanning
economy by 2010 (our italics)”. Thus we are in business, policy and measurement interests.
the difficult position of having perhaps the major
EU policy aspiration backed by almost no data or The project will collect data on a wide range of
measures. knowledge investment, at macro and micro levels,
incorporate these into macro and micro performance
This project will set out a method and collect the measures and thus greatly improve our understanding
data required. of knowledge-driven economies and firms and
policy.
- 26 -
Competitiveness, innovation and intangible investment in Europe
COINVEST
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
- 27 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
The contribution of public and private services to European growth and welfare,
and the role of public-private innovation networks
SERVPPIN
Services are the dominant economic sector in b) Understanding service innovation and how public-
modern economies and are a crucial component of private sector interactions function, and how they can
competitiveness strategy and welfare in Europe. be better managed to increase performance.
In the pastpublic and private services have been c) Understanding the characteristics of successful
studied in isolation of one another. At best this is public-private service networks which have a high
misleading. impact on growth and welfare.
At worst it produces a false understanding of the The achievement of these objectives will be
drivers, dynamics, and impact of services. undertaken by theoretical and empirical research that
is cross-country and cross-sector.
The ServPPIN project addresses this problem by
analyzing public and private services, and their This will be supported by in-depth case studies
impact on growth and welfare. covering major service types: health, transport, and
knowledge intensive services.
In particular, it focuses on service innovation and
on public-private innovation networks because The expected outputs of the project are the
these are an important organizational mode for development of new knowledge/ improved scientific
developing, producing, and delivering new and understanding of services, improved policy
improved services. prescriptions, and the dissemination of this new
knowledge to business leaders and policy makers. In
They work by establishing and enhancing order to diffuse knowledge effectively, the project
complementarities and synergies between public has set up a stakeholder
and private organizations.
International Expert Reference Group that comprises
The research objectives of the project are: enterprises, professional associations and public
institutions.
a) Identifying and understanding the links
between public and private services and economic The aim is to affect policy in services, including EU
growth and welfare. policies.
- 28 -
The contribution of public and private services to European growth and welfare,
and the role of public-private innovation networks
SERVPPIN
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Roskilde University
Communication, Business and Information Technologies
Jon SUNDBO
DK - Roskilde
University of Bremen
Economics Department
Andreas PYKA
DE - Bremen
Universiteit Utrecht
Urban and Regional Research Centre
Koen FRENKEN
NL - Utrecht
Univerza V Ljubljani
Faculty of Social Sciences-Centre of International Relations
Metka STARE
SI – Ljubljana
- 29 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
SELUSI
Companies that don’t innovate lose their contracting, competitive strategy and organizational
competitive edge. design.
This is one certainty companies in an increasingly As we better understand who social entrepreneurs in
competitive, complex environment face, and Europe are and how they evolve over time, we can
which is further driven home by the 2005 re- start to address more effectively how their
launch of the Lisbon Strategy. intelligence can be optimally mobilized to accelerate
service innovation.
But how should a Philips, IMEC or say a leading
company in high-tech or knowledge-based We will pilot-test at least one concrete, new
services innovate their service function? innovation strategy (match-making model) through a
series of action-orientated workshops that will
This project will bring forward emerging social involve academics, social entrepreneurs and leading
entrepreneurs as a powerful, yet so far untapped companies.
source of ‘external’ intelligence, ideas and
technologies, and will advance a concrete strategy Finally, through our unique blend of fundamental and
for how companies can access and leverage this applied research, we will be able to formulate public
intelligence in their service innovation processes. policy initiatives in the following four domains: a)
the area of emerging social entrepreneurship both at
To do so, we will first rigorously analyse the the EU and member state levels, b) that of service
founding decisions of 800 emerging social innovation and competitiveness particularly at the EU
entrepreneurs based in Western as well as Central level, c) areas of both emerging social
and Eastern European countries. entrepreneurship and services innovation in European
welfare states versus emerging market economies,
This will allow us to systematically dissect the and d) our “SELUSI”-Innovation Strategy at the
rising phenomenon of social entrepreneurship global level.
along a number of dimensions, including financial
- 30 -
Social entrepreneurs as "lead users" for service innovation
SELUSI
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
University of Navarra
IESE Business School
Johanna MAIR
ES - Barcelona
I-Propeller Cvba
Johan MOYERSOEN
BE - Dilbeek
Global Institute
Jody ONO
US – Washington DC
Advisor
Social Enterprise Initiative
Harvard Business School and Kennedy School of Government
Herman B. LEONARD
US - Boston
- 31 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
POLHIA
It is almost a commonplace that macro-economic Monetary and fiscal policies affect in different ways
policies, if well conducted, are a stability-enhancing different people just as structural policies do.
device. By providing a non-inflationary environ- Structural policies, in turn, can have macro-
ment, they “keep in order” the backstage of a movie economic consequences through externalities.
in which the actors - firms and households - Hence macro and micro policies are strictly
determine long run growth by means of intertwined: they can reinforce (or interfere with)
saving/investment decisions. In this view aggregate each other.
outcomes can be improved upon by means of
micro-economic or structural policies such as The research group will exploit a wide range of
labour and product market deregulation, investment tools. At the level of model building the
in human capital, etc. development of macro-economic frameworks in the
New Keynesian tradition will be paralleled and
The scope of macro-economic policies, however, is complemented by the use of Agent based models,
much wider. For instance, monetary policy affects which are appropriate for the exploration of
business fluctuations and growth through financial heterogeneous agents environments. Empirical
factors which are certainly no less important than research will be carried out by means of
inflation, as the sub-prime crisis has emphasized. econometric models and experiments to study, for
instance, the formation of expectations.
POLHIA aims at exploring the role of macro-
economic policies in this wider sense and the nexus POLHIA aims at providing new insights for the
of macro-economic and micro-economic/structural implementation of both macro-economic policies
policies in an heterogeneous agents setting. Modern and structural policies and for rethinking policy
macro-economic thinking goes beyond the coordination or coherence, which emerges first
Representative Agent assumption because agents between monetary and fiscal policies and second
are indeed different - in terms for e.g. of real and between micro and macro policies.
financial conditions, labour market status, technical
capabilities, expectations, market power - and this The dissemination of results to policy-makers will
heterogeneity is crucial for macro-economic be mostly oriented towards central bankers and
outcomes. European and national officials in charge of fiscal
and structural policies.
- 32 -
Monetary, fiscal and structural policies with heterogeneous agents
POLHIA
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Faculty of Economics and Business
Cars H. HOMMES
NL - Amsterdam
- 33 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
MONFISPOL
This project contributes to the evaluation of Systematic models comparison is made possible
macroeconomic policy by advancing the analysis of thanks to a database of macroeconomic models
optimal fiscal and monetary policy in monetary currently in use in policy making institutions around
union such as the European one. the world. New numerical tools are added to
DYNARE that provide the computation of optimal
This work will result in the addition of new policy, either under commitment, in a timeless
numerical tools, specially designed for the perspective or under discretion, for a general class
computation of optimal policy in large macro- of nonlinear models.
econometric models. Such multi-country models are
necessary to take into account the diversity of the Particular attention is given to correct linear
countries making now the European Union. quadratic approximation of these models.
Extensions are proposed to deal with partial
These new tools for the computation of optimal information.
policy will be added to DYNARE, a public domain
platform for the simulation and estimation of These tools shall also permit to perform Bayesian
dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models estimation of models under the assumption that the
(DSGE) that is increasingly used in policy making policies followed were optimal. Special emphasis is
institution and in academic research alike. placed on the definition of priors. Given the
complexity of the numerical computations, we stress
New models are proposed to analyze the speed of computation and the development of
contribution of optimal policy to smooth shocks in a parallel algorithms. Altogether, this project should
union of heterogeneous countries with rigidities in represent a very significant step forward towards
labour and financial markets. In that framework, better models and better tools for the formulation of
special attention is given to the dynamics of public macroeconomic policies.
debt.
- 34 -
Modelling and implementation of optimal fiscal and monetary policy algorithms in
multi-country econometric models
MONFISPOL
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
London Metropolitan University
Business School
Joseph PEARLMAN
UK – London
- 35 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
FINESS
The main purpose of FINESS is to get a clear The comparative approach undertaken by FINESS is
understanding of the implications of ongoing especially useful to uncover catalysts and bottlenecks
financial market integration in Europe on in the architecture of financial systems.
economic growth, employment and competiti-
veness, to identify likely future paths of the By investigating unique datasets, the role of the
development and to draw policy relevant financial structure, i.e., the banking sector, markets
conclusions. for private equity and venture capital, for improving
efficiency and sustainable expansion of start ups and
Several main breakthroughs will be achieved established firms is studied.
throughout the project.
The impacts of different degrees of financial
On the macroeconomic level, the role of financial integration on the portfolio decisions of households
systems and their transmission channels on are explored with simulation models.
growth will be explored by innovative and tailor
made econometric techniques, taken dynamic Topics specifically related to the transition period of
interactions between financial, product and labour the New Member States as well as the gender
markets into account. dimension in turning impulses from the financial
system into efficiency and growth are covered by the
A range of indicators to measure the degree of project.
financial integration will be constructed, and their
development in time will be addressed. By fulfilling its goals, FINESS will provide in-depth
knowledge on the relationship between financial
Moreover, insights into the working of financial systems and sustainable economic growth in a
institutions will be provided for the changing environment.
microeconomic level.
- 36 -
Financial systems, efficiency and stimulation of sustainable growth
FINESS
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
University of Cambridge
Faculty of Economics
Sean HOLLY
UK - Cambridge
Ghent University
Financial Economics
Rudi VANDER VENNET
BE - Gent
- 37 -
Intangible investments, service-oriented economy and macro-economic policies
VICO
The aim of the VICO project is to assess the VC/PE sector in Europe, namely: a) the design of a
impact of Venture Capital and Private Equity mix of multi-level policy schemes targeting seed and
(VC/PE) financing on the economic performance pre-seed capital; b) exit mechanisms for VC/PE
of European innovative entrepreneurial ventures investors; and c) the European integration of the
as they are reflected by their innovation output, VC/PE sector and the internationalization of VC/PE
employment, growth, and competitiveness, and investors.
the role VC/PE investors play in helping these
firms bridge their resource and competence gap The project will benefit from a unique combination
beyond the provision of financing. of qualitative (survey analyses and case studies) and
quantitative empirical methodologies.
Particular attention will be devoted to the
institutional variety of VC/PE investors in Europe. As to these latter, the project will build and use a
micro and macro cross-country panel type dataset
We will consider factors affecting both the with a rather long longitudinal dimension and wide
demand for and the supply of VC/PE financing, at coverage of EU countries so as to overcome some of
micro and macro level. In particular, we will the key weaknesses of the extant empirical literature.
analyze how the effects of VC/PE financing on
the economic performance of portfolio companies The consortium is a blend of well known scientists
are moderated by i) the characteristics of the from different disciplines (i.e. finance, innovation
investor, ii) the characteristics of invested firms, economics, entrepreneurship, management, policy
and iii) the characteristics of the business and science).
institutional environment in which firms operate.
Several of them have already collaborated in EU
In addition, we will examine specific open issues promoted research projects (such as the VCFUN
that play a crucial role for the development of the project promoted by the PRIME Network of
Excellence).
- 38 -
Financing entrepreneurial ventures in Europe : impact on innovation,
employment growth and competitiveness
VICO
Institutions/Partners/Country/Town
Politecnico di Milano
Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering
Massimo Gaetano COLOMBO
IT - Milan
Universiteit Gent
Faculty Economics and Business Administration
Bart CLARYSSE
BE - Gent
- 39 -