Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. 4223 August 19, 1908
NICOLAS LUNOD, ET AL., plaintiffs-appellees,
vs.
HIGINO MENESES, defendant-appellant.
T. Icasiano, for appellant.
R. Salinas, for appellee.
TORRES, J.:
On the 14th of March, 1904, Nicolas Lunod,
Juan de la Vega, Evaristo Rodriguez, Fernando
Marcelo, Esteban Villena, Benito Litao, Ventura
Hernandez, and Casimiro Pantanilla, residents of
the town of Bulacan, province of the same name,
filed a written complaint against Higino
Meneses, alleging that they each owned and
possessed farm lands, situated in the places
known as Maytunas and Balot, near a small lake
named Calalaran; that the defendant is the
owner of a fish-pond and a strip of land situated
in Paraanan, adjoining the said lake on one side,
and the River Taliptip on the other; that from
time immemorial, and consequently for more
than twenty years before 1901, there existed
and still exists in favor of the rice fields of the
plaintiffs a statutory easement permitting the
flow of water over the said land in Paraanan,
which easement the said plaintiffs enjoyed until
the year 1901 and consisted in that the water
collected upon their lands and in the Calalaran
Lake flow through Paraanan into the Taliptip
River. From that year however, the defendant,
without any right or reason, converted the land
in Paraanan into a fishpond and by means of a
dam and a bamboo net, prevented the free
passage of the water through said place into the
Taliptip River, that in consequence the lands of
the plaintiff became flooded and damaged by the
stagnant waters, there being no outlet except
through the land in Paraanan; that their
plantation were destroyed, causing the loss and
damages to the extent of about P1,000, which
loss and damage will continue if the obstructions
to the flow of the water are allowed to remain,
preventing its passage through said land and
injuring the rice plantations of the plaintiffs.
They therefore asked that judgment be entered
against the defendant, declaring that the said
tract of land in Paraanan is subject to a statutory
easement permitting the flow of water from the
property of the plaintiffs, and that, without
prejudice to the issuing of a preliminary
injunction, the defendant be ordered to remove
and destroy the obstructions that impede the
passage of the waters through Paraanan, and
dominant estates.
For the above reasons, and accepting the
findings of the court below in the judgment
appealed from in so far as they agree with the
terms of this decision, we must and do hereby
declare that the defendant, Higino Meneses, as
the owner of the servient estate, is obliged to
give passage to and allow the flow of the waters
descending from the Calalaran Lake and from
the land of the plaintiffs through his lands in
Paraanan for their discharge into the Taliptip
River; and he is hereby ordered to remove any
obstacle that may obstruct the free passage of
the waters whenever there may be either a small
or large volume of running water through his
lands in the sitio of Paraanan for their discharge
into the Taliptip River; and in future to abstain
from impeding, in any manner, the flow of the
waters coming from the higher lands. The
judgment appealed from is affirmed, in so far as
it agrees with decision, and reversed in other
respects, with the costs of this instance against
the appellants. So ordered.