47168 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices

RURAL TELEPHONE BANK HISTORICAL COST OF MONEY RATE—FINANCING ACCOUNT—Continued

(a) (b) (c) (c)/Total
Cost of
Fiscal year Advances (a)×(b) Advances
money ($) ($) (%)
(%)

FY 2000 ............................................................................................................... 6.05 31,401,867 1,899,813 0.349

FY 2001 ............................................................................................................... 5.17 55,405,896 2,864,485 0.527
FY 2002 ............................................................................................................... 6.05 60,232,919 3,644,092 0.670
FY 2003 ............................................................................................................... 5.67 55,835,695 3,165,884 0.582
FY 2004 ............................................................................................................... 5.36 67,074,751 3,595,207 0.661

Total advances ...................................................................................... .................... 543,884,534

Cost of money ....................................................................................... .................... ............................ ............................ 5.96

[FR Doc. 06–6970 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am] seeking the input of the public and analysis of the proposal. Representatives
BILLING CODE 3410–15–M other interested parties. The meeting from RUS and Georgia Transmission
will be held from 5 p.m. until 7 p.m., Corporation will be available at the
August 22, 2006, in Fellowship Hall of scoping meeting to discuss RUS’
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE the Bethabara Baptist Church, 4651 environmental review process, describe
Monroe Highway (US 78), Statham, the project, the purpose and need for the
Rural Utilities Service Georgia 30666. proposal, macro corridors under
An Electric Alternative Evaluation consideration, and to discuss the scope
Georgia Transmission Corporation;
and Macro Corridor Study Report, of environmental issues to be
Notice of Intent To Hold a Public
prepared by Georgia Transmission considered, answer questions, and
Scoping Meeting and Prepare an
Corporation, will be presented at the
Environmental Assessment accept comments. Comments regarding
public scoping meeting. The Report will
the proposal may be submitted (orally or
AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA. be available for public review at RUS’
in writing) at the public scoping
ACTION:Notice of intent to hold a public address provided in this notice, at RUS’
Web site: http://www.usda.gov/rus/ meeting or in writing for receipt no later
scoping meeting and prepare an
water/ees/ea.htm, at Georgia than September 22, 2006, to RUS at the
Environmental Assessment (EA).
Transmission Corporation, 2100 East address provided in this notice.
SUMMARY: Rural Utilities Service (RUS), Exchange Place, Tucker, Georgia 30084 Georgia Transmission Corporation
an agency which administers the U.S. and at the following locations: will prepare an environmental analysis
Department of Agriculture’s Rural Walton County Library, 217 West Spring to be submitted to RUS for review from
Development Utilities Programs. RUS information provided in the alternative
Street, Monroe, Georgia 30655; 770
intends to hold a public scoping
267–4630. evaluation and site selection study and
meeting and prepare an Environmental Oconee County Library, 1080 input that may be provided by
Assessment (EA) in connection with Experiment Station Road,
possible impacts related to a project government agencies, private
Watkinsville, Georgia 30677; 706 769– organizations and the public. RUS will
proposed by Georgia Transmission
3950. use the environmental analysis to
Corporation (GTC), with headquarters in
Tucker, Georgia. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: determine the significance of the
The proposal consists of the Stephanie Strength, Environmental impacts of the proposal and may adopt
construction of approximately 7 miles of Protection Specialist, USDA Rural it as its Environmental Assessment for
230 kilovolt (kV) transmission line from Development, Utilities Programs, the proposal. RUS’ Environmental
the proposed East Walton 500/230 kV Engineering and Environmental Staff, Assessment will be available for review
Substation to the proposed Bethabara 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop and comment for 30 days.
Substation. The 230 kilovolt 1571, Washington, DC 20250–1571,
telephone (202) 720–0468. Mrs. Should RUS determine, based on the
transmission line proposal would be Environmental Assessment that the
located in Walton and Oconee Counties, Strength’s E-mail address is
stephanie.strength@wdc.usda.gov. impacts of the construction and
Georgia. The proposed East Walton 500/
operation of the transmission line
230 kV Substation is located in Walton SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Georgia would not have a significant
County and the proposed Bethabara Transmission Corporation proposes to
Substation in Oconee County. This environmental impact, it will prepare a
construct a 230 kilovolt transmission
proposal is a connected action to the finding of no significant impact. Public
line from the proposed East Walton 500/
East Walton-Rockville 500 kV notification of a finding of no significant
230 kV Substation to the proposed
Transmission Line, the East Walton- impact will be published in the Federal
Bethabara Substation. It would require a
Jack’s 230 kV Transmission Line that right-of-way of 100 feet. Guyed and Register and in newspapers with a
was presented at the scoping meetings unguyed concrete or steel poles ranging circulation in the project area.
held on Monday, April 17, 2006, at in height from 80- to 120-feet would Any final action by RUS related to the
Carver Middle School in Monroe, support the East Walton-Bethabara 230 proposal will be subject to, and
Georgia and Tuesday, April 18, 2006, at kV conductors. It is anticipated that the contingent upon, compliance with
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

the Madison Morgan Cultural Center in transmission line would be in service in environmental review requirements as
Madison, Georgia. GTC is requesting 2011. prescribed by RUS’ environmental
RUS provide financing for the proposal. Government agencies, private policies and procedures.
DATES: RUS will conduct one scoping organizations, and the public are invited
meeting in an open house format, to participate in the planning and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:24 Aug 15, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM 16AUN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices
Dated: August 7, 2006.
Mark S. Plank,
Director, Engineering and Environmental
Staff, USDA/Rural Development/Utilities
Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–13411 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–846]
Brake Rotors From the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time
Limit for Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative and New Shipper
Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
C. Begnal or Tom Killiam, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1442 or (202) 482–
5222, respectively.
Background
On May 8, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published
the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on brake rotors
from the People’s Republic of China for
the period April 1, 2004, through March
31, 2005. See Brake Rotors From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of the
2004/2005 Administrative Review and
Preliminary Notice of Intent To Rescind
the 2004/2005 New Shipper Review, 71
FR 26736 (May 8, 2006) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’). The final results of this
administrative review are currently due
by September 5, 2006.
Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department shall issue final results in
an administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 120
days after the date on which the notice
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
of preliminary results is published in
the Federal Register. However, if the
Department determines that it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the specified time period, section
VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:24 Aug 15, 2006 Jkt 208001
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend this deadline to
180 days.
The Department has determined that
completion of the final results within
the originally anticipated time limit,
September 5, 2006, is impracticable.
The Department requires additional
time to analyze the parties’ responses to
the supplemental questionnaires issued
on June 22, 2006, as well as to address
the concerns of the interested parties as
raised in their June 19, 2006 briefs, June
27, 2006 rebuttal briefs, July 17, 2006
comments on bentonite and coal
powder usage, and July 24, 2006,
rebuttal comments on this issue.
Consequently, it is not practicable to
complete the review within the time
specified under the Act. Therefore, the
Department is extending the time limit
for completion of these final results by
45 days to October 20, 2006, in
accordance with Section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Additionally, on April 29, 2005,
Shanxi Zhongding Auto Parts Co., Ltd.
agreed to waive the time limits of its
new shipper review, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.214(j)(3), and to have its review
conducted concurrently with the 2004/
2005 administrative review of this order
for the period April 1, 2004, through
March 31, 2005. Therefore, the final
results of this new shipper review will
also be extended by 45 days to October
20, 2006.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 10, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–13474 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–827)
Certain Cased Pencils from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Gemal Brangman, AD/
CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
47169
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–
3773, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2005, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on certain
cased pencils from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the
period December 1, 2004, through
November 30, 2005. See Antidumping
or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding,
or Suspended Investigation;
Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 70 FR 72109 (December 1,
2005). On December 30, 2005, the
petitioners1 requested an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
for Tianjin Custom Wood Processing
Co., Ltd. (‘‘TCW’’).2 On January 3, 2006,
Orient International Holding Shanghai
Foreign Trade Corp. (‘‘SFTC’’) requested
an administrative review of its sales. On
February 1, 2006, the Department
published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
cased pencils from the PRC with respect
to these companies. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 5241
(February 1, 2006) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
On February 14, 2006, SFTC
withdrew its request for review.
In response to the Department’s
February 8, 2006, quantity and value
questionnaire, TCW stated on February
22, 2006, that it had no exports, sales or
entries of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR.
On July 24, 2006, the Department
placed on the record a list of
manufacturers/exporters of the subject
merchandise for which the Department
initiated administrative reviews, and for
which U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) suspended
liquidation of subject entries during the
period of review. See the July 24, 2006,
memorandum from Brian Smith to the
file entitled, ‘‘2004–2005 Administrative
Review of Certain Cased Pencils from
the People’s Republic of China: CBP List
of Exporters’’ (‘‘July 24, 2006,
Memorandum’’).
1 The petitioners are Sanford L.P., Musgrave
Pencil Company, RoseMoon Inc., and General
Pencil Company.
2 The petitioners also requested a review for
China First Pencil Company, Ltd., Shanghai Three
Star Stationary Industry Corp, and its affiliates
Shanghai First Writing Instrument Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai Great Wall Pencil Co., Ltd., and China
First Pencil Fang Zheng Co.
16AUN1