Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Considerations; Failure
Mechanisms; Inspection Methods
Gerard B. Hawkins
Managing Director
Contents
Design principles
Recent developments in metallurgy
Failure mechanisms
Monitoring and inspection techniques
From an operator's viewpoint
-how can you maximize tube life ?
-- what can you do if a tube fails ?
Introduction
Stress,
T1
T2
T3
Temperatures, T
Time, t
T4
P = T (log (t) + K)
50,000
1000
where T = temperature
t = time
K = constant
10,000
5,000
1,000
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
P (Larson-Miller Parameter)
25
26
100
50
+20C
(+36F)
20
10
5
850
900
950
1000
Temperature oC
1050
1100
Deg C
860
880
900
925
950
975
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
10 years
5 years
2.5 years
11 Months
4.5 month
2 Months
4 weeks
5.5 days
1 day
8 hours
2 Hours
Methodology
Where
Calculation of Ni
TUBE B
oC
oF
900 1652
Temp
Range
Temp
Range
(oC)
(oF)
890 1634
TUBE A
880 1616
870 1598
860 1580
850
0
Time
Time
Spent
Spent
(Hours) (Hours)
ni
ni
Tube A Tube B
3950
350
1150
890-900 1634-1652
1850
900-910 1652-1670
5600
12900
12900
Contents
Design principles
Recent developments in metallurgy
Failure mechanisms
Monitoring and inspection techniques
Metallurgical Developments
HK40
25 Cr / 20 Ni
Metallurgical Developments
HP Modified
25 Cr / 35 Ni + Nb
Metallurgical Developments
Microalloy
25 Cr / 35 Ni + Nb + Ti
Creep Strength
Add
Add
Ni, Cr, C
Nb
Microalloy
Additions
Improved
Carbides
Improved
Carbides
Low Carbon
Stainless
Wrought
Pipes
1960
HK40
HP Mod
Microalloys
25/20
Cr/Ni
25/35/1
Cr/Ni/Nb
25/35/1 plus
Cr/Ni/Nb
additions
1975
Year
1985
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Tube Material
IN 519
HP Microalloy
0.012
20
35
HK40
HP Nb Mod
15
10
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
Tube Material
Tube Material
Steel Mould
5-6 metres long
(Spinning at high speed)
Pouring
Cup
End Plate
Internal Coating
Liquid Stream
Drive Rollers
Solidified Tube
Tube microstructure
Primary carbides
Austentite grains
As-Cast condition
Network of primary carbides
0.1mm
Aged condition
Secondary carbides precipitation
Fabrication
Contents
Design principles
Recent developments in metallurgy
Failure mechanisms
Monitoring and inspection techniques
From an operator's viewpoint
-how can you maximise tube life ?
-- what can you do if a tube fails ?
Creep Damage
Creep Strain
Rupture
I, II, III:
Creep Ranges
Exposure Time
Micro-fissures (x 250)
Thermal gradients
Others
Thermal shock
Stress corrosion cracking
Dissimilar weld cracking
Tube support system
Creep Rupture
Contents
Design principles
Recent developments in metallurgy
Failure mechanisms
Monitoring and inspection techniques
From an operator's viewpoint
-how can you maximise tube life ?
-- what can you do if a tube fails ?
NDT
Visual examination
Tube diameter (or circumference) measurement
Ultrasonic attenuation
Radiography
Metallurgical examination
Visual Examination
Prior to shut-down
Hot tubes, hot spots, leaks
Bulges, distortion, scale, colour, staining
Can indicate overheating
Adequate access (scaffolding) needed
Use TV camera to look at bore
Cracking often starts in bore
Ultrasonic Testing
7
10
X1 X2
5
4
2
6
3
6
1
Sketch of the inspection system
1
2
3
4
5
Inspected tube
Emitting probe
Receiving probe
Probe assembly
Water feed
6
7
8
9
10
Water chamber
Ultrasonic pulser
Amplifier
Analog gate
Recorder
Ultrasonic Attenuation
Creep Strain
Damage
Parameter
A
B
C
D
Corresponding
Action in Plant
- observe
- observe, fix
inspection intervals
- limited service until
replacement
- plan immediate
replacement
Rupture
D
C
B
I, II, III:
Creep Ranges
Exposure Time
Ultrasonic Attenuation
Excellent in principle
Poor track record in practice
Tends to fail sound tubes
Difficult to calibrate
Best to use repeat tests
Look for deterioration
Manufacturers recommend radiography of
suspect areas
Scaffolding not needed
Radiography
Metallurgical Examination
mean life
52 years
last failure
242 years
Surface replication
Time consuming
Spot result on surface, means creep damage
is through wall
Conventional ultrasonic inspection of dissimilar
welds is recommended
New - Laser mapping of tube bore
Extremely high accuracy
PHOTODETECTOR
FOCUSING LENS
IMAGED SPOT
IMAGING LENS
INSPECTION
RANGE
TARGET SURFACE
OBJECT SPOT
LOTIS Limitations
Pigtail Nipping
X
Header
Inlet
Pigtail
X X = Nip
poisitons
Before
nip
Leak
After
nip
Impingement on
refractory and other
tubes
Header
X
Outlet Pigtail
Pinched Tube
Row of Steam
Reformer
Tubes
Conclusions
Conclusions
The future
Tube metallurgy improvements have reached a
plateau
Nothing new on the horizon
Future improvements are more likely to be in smart
coatings to improve heat transfer
PU
T
U
O
T
TUBE LIFE
P RO
D UC
T IO N
M AI
NT E
NA N
CE