Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Notices 77083
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rule-
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2006–70 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2006–70. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s MESBIC Ventures, Inc. had previously
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be 20416.
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Phlx. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–Phlx–2006–70 and should be
submitted on or before January 12, 2007. [PUBLIC NOTICE 5652]
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.48
Florence E. Harmon,
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–21906 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
48 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Dec 21, 2006 Jkt 211001
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Notice Seeking Exemption Under
Section 312 of the Small Business
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest;
Alliance Enterprise Corporation
License No. 03/03–5066
Notice is hereby given that Alliance
Enterprise Corporation, 2435 North
Central Expressway, Suite 200,
Richardson, TX 75080, a Federal
Licensee under the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, as amended
(‘‘the Act’’), in connection with the
financing of a small concern, has sought
an after-the-fact exemption under
Section 312 of the Act and Section
107.730, Financings which Constitute
Conflicts of Interest of the Small
Business Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules
and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730).
Alliance Enterprise Corporation
provided a $500,000 loan to M68
Technologies, Inc. (M68) on May 20,
2005.
The financing is brought within the
purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the
Regulations because M68 is an
Associate of Alliance Enterprise
Corporation, inasmuch as sister SBIC
invested in M68 and owned 51.5
percent of the common stock. MESVIC
Ventures, Inc. and Alliance Enterprise
Corporation are associates of each other
since they are under common control in
accordance with the definition
contained in Section 107.50(4) of the
Regulations. Both SBICs are wholly-
owned by Pacesetter/MVHC, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that any
interested person may submit written
comments on the transaction to the
Associate Administrator for Investment,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC
Dated: October 31, 2006.
Jaime Guzman-Fournier,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Investment.
[FR Doc. E6–21983 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Culturally Significant Object Imported
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Hans
Holbein The Younger’s Robert
Cheseman’’
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the object ‘‘Hans
Holbein The Younger’s Robert
Cheseman,’’ imported from abroad for
temporary exhibition within the United
States, is of cultural significance. The
object is imported pursuant to a loan
agreement with the foreign owners or
custodians. I also determine that the
exhibition or display of the exhibit
object at The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los
Angeles, California, from on or about
January 16, 2007, until on or about April
22, 2007, and at possible additional
venues yet to be determined, is in the
national interest. Public Notice of these
Determinations is ordered to be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit object, contact Wolodymyr
Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: (202) 453–8050). The
address is U.S. Department of State, SA–
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700,
Washington, DC 20547–0001.
Dated: December 15, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E6–21963 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5651]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition; Determinations:
‘‘Venice and the Islamic World, 828–
1797’’
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Venice and
the Islamic World, 828–1797’’, imported
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1
 77084 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Notices
from abroad for temporary exhibition
within the United States, are of cultural
significance. The objects are imported
pursuant to loan agreements with the
foreign owners or custodians. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at The
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,
New York, from on or about March 26,
2007, until on or about July 8, 2007, and
at possible additional venues yet to be
determined, is in the national interest.
Public Notice of these Determinations is
ordered to be published in the Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr
Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: (202) 453–8050). The
address is U.S. Department of State, SA–
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700,
Washington, DC 20547–0001.
Dated: December 15, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E6–21964 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice To Rescind a Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS); Bannock County, ID
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Rescind Notice of Intent to
prepare an EIS.
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that the
Notice of Intent (NOI) published on May
3, 2006 to prepare an EIS for a proposed
highway project in Bannock County,
Idaho is being rescinded.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edwin B. Johnson, Field Operations
Engineer, Federal Highway
Administration, 3050 Lakeharbor Lane,
Suite 126, Boise, Idaho 83703,
Telephone: (208) 334–9180, ext. 116, or
Mr. Dennis Clark, Environmental
Section Manager, Headquarters, Idaho
Transportation Department, P.O. Box
7129, Boise, Idaho 83703–1129,
Telephone: (208) 334–8203.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FHWA, in cooperation with the
Idaho Transportation Department (ITD),
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Dec 21, 2006 Jkt 211001
is rescinding the NOI to prepare an EIS
for a project that has been proposed to
provide a new access point along
Interstate 15 (I–15) in Bannock County,
Idaho. The NOI is being rescinded
because ITD and FHWA have
determined that the project will have no
significant impacts and an EIS is not
necessary or appropriate for the
environmental evaluation.
The I–15 Environmental Study began
in June 2004. Initial projects indicated
that an Environmental Assessment (EA)
would be an appropriate level of
documentation for project impacts.
Additional environmental scans and
screening did not reveal significant
impacts to support a change in the level
of documentation. Alternatives were
developed and advanced into further
screening where actual footprints were
evaluated for impacts within the project
limits. One of the alternatives showed
greater impacts than others being
evaluated during the continued
screening process. In response to that
finding it was thought that an EIS would
be the best method to discuss impacts
from this alternative. Consequently, an
NOI was published on May 3, 2006.
A public meeting was held on June
22, 2006 to solicit comments from the
public on alternatives being considered.
An additional screening analysis was
performed in conjunction with the
public meeting. Based upon the results
of that screening analysis and public
comments received on this analysis,
some of the alternatives were dropped
from further analysis due to potential
significant impacts to the built and
natural environment as well as to traffic
operations. At this point in the project
development process, no significant
human or natural environmental
impacts are evident in the I–15
Environmental Study project that would
require an EIS. If, at any point in the EA
process, it is determined that the action
is likely to have a significant impact on
the environment, the preparation of an
EIS will be required.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action and all
significant issues are identified,
comments and suggestions are invited
from all interested parties regarding this
action to rescind the NOI published
May 3, 2006 for the highway project in
Bannock County, Idaho. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed
action should be directed to the FHWA
or ITD at the addresses provided above.
[Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Research,
Planning, and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
Federal programs and activities apply to the
program.]
Issued on December 12, 2006.
Stephen A. Moreno,
Division Administrator, Boise, Idaho.
[FR Doc. 06–9779 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Value Pricing Pilot Program
Participation, Fiscal Years 2007–2009
AGENCY:Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; solicitation for
participation.
SUMMARY: This notice invites State and
local governments and other public
authorities to apply to participate in the
Value Pricing Pilot (VPP) program and
presents guidelines for program
applications. This notice supersedes
two previous notices about the VPP
program under the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
published in the Federal Register on
January 6, 2006 (71 FR 970), and July
17, 2006 (71 FR 40578). The primary
purpose of superseding the previous
notices with this new notice is to shift
the focus on the types of VPP program
projects being solicited to achieve
consistency with the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) National
Strategy to Reduce Congestion on
America’s Transportation Network
(DOT Congestion Initiative), announced
on May 16, 2006.1 This national strategy
contains a number of elements that
involve pricing, thus warranting a
reconsideration of the types of projects
solicited for VPP program participation.
This solicitation aligns the VPP program
with the DOT Congestion Initiative by
together seeking to support metropolitan
areas in systemically progressing toward
implementation of broad congestion
pricing strategies in the near term. This
notice also describes the statutory basis
for the VPP program and specifies all of
the steps necessary to apply for funding
and, where applicable, tolling authority
1 Speaking before the National Retail Federation’s
annual conference on May 16, 2006, in Washington,
DC, former U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman
Mineta unveiled a new plan to reduce congestion
plaguing America’s roads, rail, and airports. The
National Strategy to Reduce Congestion on
America’s Transportation Network includes a
number of initiatives designed to reduce
transportation congestion. The transcript of these
remarks is available at the follwoing URL: http://
www.dot.gov./affairs/minetasp051606.htm.
22DEN1