Advanced Media Group Letter To The Editor of Lancaster Newspapers September 6, 2015 Full Version

Stan J.
Caterbone
MOVANT
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
717-459-7588 Fax
September 6, 2015
Lancaster Newspapers
8 West King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
RE: Letter to the Editor
Dear Editor,
I would like to address the current state of affairs regarding myself, Stan J.
Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group with specific regards to your obligation to
the community of Lancaster Pennsylvania as it relates to your violations of the ethics
of a news organization.
You have the responsibility of reporting on events and affairs that affect the
citizens and the community of Lancaster; irregardless of adverse consequences to
your employees; to your partners; to your friends; or to your political allies. I have
visited your headquarters on numerous occasions with Press Releases from the
Advanced Media Group, my solely owned company, and have received nothing but
harassment and abuse. I have been attempting to bring to the general public
important factual information concerning but not limited to the following:
My Organized Stalking legislation, which I have been presenting to

members of the State Assembly in Harrisburg.
My efforts as MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus
Corpus case in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia.
The current dire activities of local law enforcement, local hospitals,
local psychiatrists, state agencies, and federal authorities as it relates
to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control with specific regards to discredit my
VICTIMIZATION and that of several of my family members.
The current use of CIA tactics where body doubles are being used
in the streets of Lancaster causing confusion and propaganda to the
general public and the community of Lancaster.
Given my record in the Federal and State Courts, this situation has the
potential to cause a social rift in this community that may be comparable to what
other cities have since witnessed, such as Ferguson, Missouri or Baltimore, Maryland.
I am speaking of my current Criminal Allegations concerning the leadership and the
patrol officers of the Lancaster City Police Department.
Page 2
You, and you alone, are putting persons in harms way by promoting and
fostering an environment of the wild west, where there is no rule of law. And yet
you present yourself as a Faith Based Conservative organization with a general bias
towards those of the Republican party. Your philanthropic efforts and activities do
not fool me for a moment. I know who you really are. You are promoting a silent
secular agenda for this community. I hope you can prove me wrong.
The Lancaster City Safety Coalition Cameras only see what they want you to
see. As to the fact that you are a DEFENDANT in U.S. District Court, Case No. 052288 and 06-4650 bears no consequence in relieving you of your moral and ethical
responsibility to report these activities to the Lancaster Community for the purpose
of preventing dire collateral damage when these events are disclosed in another
manner; for example criminal indictments, or the release of Lisa Michelle Lambert
from incarceration.
Please do not forget my DOCUMENTED RECORD with regards to the
following:
My Federal False Claims Act of ISC.

My activities with regards to the development and revitalization of
Downtown Lancaster, Excelsior Place, Brunswick Movie Theater, and my
UPS Store.
My activism and legal suit concerning the Marriott and Lancaster
Convention Center.
My efforts to bring national musicians to the Clipper Stadium, with
specific contractual talks with Sara McLaughlin.
The Lisa Michelle Lambert Case.
My Amicus for the Meagan Lippiatt Case.
My Amicus for the ACLU v. the NSA case in the District Court of
Eastern Michigan.
Now my advise is to report on the attached PRESS RELEASE. This will at least
calm the situation and the social ills that you may or may not be privy to.
I remain,
Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1250 Fremont Street
7/6/2015
FAX
To:
Phone:
Fax Contact List

Not Available
Company Name:
Fax:
Fax Contact List
Fax Contact List
From: Stan Caterbone

Phone: (717) 669669-2163
Company Name: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Fax: (717) 459-7588
Number of Pages: 66 Plus Cover

Urgent: Yes
Action Requested: Quick Settlement
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 669-2163
(717) 459-7588 Fax
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Advanced Media Group Press Release For Organized
Stalking and Directed Energy Devices
2. Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus of May 22, 20141
U.S. District Court Docket
3. Stan J. Caterbone Cover Page of Amicus
4. Stan J. Caterbone Recorded Amicus in U.S. District Court
5. ORDER of U.S. District Court Judge Paul Diamond of
May 22, 2014
scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Page 1
Monday, July 06, 2015
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Page 2
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Page 3
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Page 4
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Page 5
Hon. P. Michael Sturla

8 North Queen Street
Suite 1100 The Griest Building
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-3157
Fax: (717) 295-7816
Hon. P. Michael Sturla
120 Main Capitol Building
PO Box 202096
Harrisburg, PA 17120-2096
(717) 787-3555
Fax: (717) 705-1923
Hon. Bryan Cutler
207 East State Street
Quarryville, PA 17566
(717) 786-4551
Fax: (717) 786-3645
Hon. Bryan Cutler
147A East Wing
PO Box 202100
(717) 783-6424
Fax: (717) 772-9859
Hon. John M. Perzel
7518 Frankford Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19136
(215) 331-2600
Fax: (215) 708-3135
Hon. John M. Perzel
PO Box 202172
(717) 787-2016
Fax: (717) 783-7225
Hon. Michael H. O'Brien
610 North 2nd Street
(215) 503-3245
Fax: (215) 503-7850
Hon. Michael H. O'Brien
107 East Wing
PO Box 202175
(717) 783-8098
Fax: (717) 780-4787
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

852 Village Rd.,Municipal
Bldg
P.O. Box 268
Lampeter, PA 17537
(717) 464-5285
Fax: (717) 295-7817
Hon. Matthew E. Baker

115 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202068
(717) 772-5371
Fax: (717) 705-1850
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

432 Irvis Office Building
PO Box 202043
(717) 783-6422
Fax: (717) 787-7731
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Judiciary, Chairman
645 Penn Street, 2nd Floor
Reading, PA 19601
(610) 376-1529
Fax: (610) 378-4406
Hon. Katie True

2938 Columbia Avenue
Manor West Commons, Suite
501
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-5050
Fax: (717) 295-5053
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

106 Irvis Office Building
PO Box 202127
(717) 787-3525
Fax: (717) 772-5401
Hon. Katie True

7 East Wing
PO Box 202041
(717) 705-7161
Fax: (717) 705-1946
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver,
Health & Human Services,
Chairman
2839 West Girard Avenue
(215) 684-3738
Fax: (215) 235-4629
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver
34E East Wing
PO Box 202195
(717) 787-3480
Fax: (717) 783-0684
Hon. Matthew E. Baker
Health & Human Services,
Chairman74 Main Street
Wellsboro, PA 16901
(570) 724-1390
Fax: (570) 724-2168
Page 6
Hon. Ron Marsico

Judiciary, Chairman
4401 Linglestown Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
(717) 652-3721
Fax: (717) 652-6276
Hon. Ron Marsico
218 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202105
(717) 783-2014
Fax: (717) 705-2010
Hon. Camille Bud George,
Environmental Resources &
Energy, Chairman
275 Spring Street
Houtzdale, PA 16651
(814) 378-6279
Fax: (814) 765-0609
Hon. Camille Bud George
38B East Wing
PO Box 202074
(717) 787-7316
Fax: (717) 783-8236
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Environmental Resources &
Energy, Chairman
302 Seneca Street
Oil City, PA 16301
(814) 677-6363
Fax: (814) 676-1653
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson
PO Box 202064
(717) 783-8188
Fax: (717) 705-1945
Lloyd K. Smucker (R)
Senate District 13
Lancaster (part) and York (part)
Counties.
Senate Box 203013
Harrisburg, PA 17120-3013 185
Main Capitol
(717) 787-6535
D.O. ADDRESS:
44 North Christian Street
Suite 100
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 397-1309
lsmucker@pasen.gov
http://senatorsmucker.com
Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Senate District 15
Dauphin (part) and York
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203015
173 Capitol Building
(717) 787-6801
D.O. ADDRESS:
916-B Park Plaza
North River Road
Halifax, PA 17032
(717) 896-7714
jpiccola@pasen.gov:
http://www.piccola.org
Michael W. Brubaker (R)

Senate District 36
Chester (part) and Lancaster
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203036
16 East Wing
(717) 787-4420
FAX: (717) 783-3156
D.O. ADDRESS:
301 East Main Street
Lititz, PA 17543
(717) 627-0036
mbrubaker@pasen.gov
http://senatorbrubaker.com
Page 7
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Page 8
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Page 9
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
1 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?12332875607261-L_1_0-1
CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R
United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:14-cv-02559-PD
LAMBERT v. BISSONETTE et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND
Cause: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Date Filed: 05/02/2014

Date Terminated: 05/22/2014
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus:
(General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT
represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY H.
GONZALEZ IBRAHIM
P.O. BOX 1025
CHADDS FORD, PA 19317
215-568-1943
Email: jeremyibrahim.esq@verizon.net
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Respondent
LYNN BISSONETTE
SUPERINTENDENT,
MCI-FRAMINGHAM
Respondent
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
LANCASTER COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
PENNSYLVANIA
V.
Movant
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
PRO SE
6/28/2015 9:08 AM
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?12332875607261-L_1_0-1
Date Filed
# clear Docket Text
05/02/2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number

100526.), filed by LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover
Sheet)(ks, ) (Entered: 05/05/2014)
05/22/2014
CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA

MICHELLE LAMBERT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON
5/22/14. 5/22/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd) (Entered:
05/22/2014)
05/22/2014
ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S

COUNSEL. ACCORDINGLY HER HABEAS PETITION IS DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A COUNSELED
MOTION FOR RELIEF. COUNSEL SHOULD BE PREPARED TO ADDRESS
WHETHER PETITIONER MUST SEEK PERMISSION FROM THE COURT OF
APPEALS BEFORE FILING A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS
PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/22/14.
5/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND
E-MAILED. (jpd) (Entered: 05/23/2014)
06/23/2015
BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP IN SUPPORT OF LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT'S
HABEAU CORPUS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(jpd) (Entered: 06/25/2015)
or
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
06/28/2015 09:07:01
PACER
Login:
am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Billable Pages: 1
Search
Criteria:
5:14-cv02559-PD
Cost:
0.10
6/28/2015 9:08 AM
Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 52
1o: c.;1erK
t-'age
LUl::>-Uf-Ul u:::i:ob:U4 {GMI)
or b
"
17174597588 From: Stan Caterbone
FAX COVER SHEET

TO
Clerk
COMPANY
Clerk of Courts USED
FAX NUMBER
12155976390
FROM
Stan Caterbone
DATE
2015-07-01 09:51:08 GMT
RE
LambertAmicusCase No.5: 14-cv-02559-PD
COVER MESSAGE
July 1, 2015
PleaseReviewAttached
StanJ. Caterbone
717-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
WWW.EFAX.COM
To: Clerk
:lU1 o-u1-u1 U!::l:oo:U4 (GM 1J
Page 2 of 6
Prim
https: //us-111g6.mai I. yahoo. com/neo/1 aunch? .rand=fc.o7k02vt72oo

Subject:
HATE CRIMES?
From:
Stan J. Caterbone (scaterbone@live.com)
To:
bearingc@police.co.Jancaster.pa.us;
Date:
Wednesday, July 1, 2 015 4 :51 AM
July 1, 2015
To:
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Police Department

Detective James R Zahm, County Detective/SERT Commander
Detective Michael Landis, Chief Detective of Lancaster County
Detective Larry Ma1tin, County of Lancaster
Detective William Chalfant, County of Lancaster
cc:
Mr. Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney

Mr. Kieth Sadler, Chief of Police, Lancaster City Police Department
Mr. Richard Gray, Lancaster City Mayor
Ms. Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Attorney General
U.S. Attorney General of the United States
Re:
Computer and Cellphone Hacking
I. Tam a Federal Whistleblmver as defined by the law regarding Tnternational Signal & Control or TSC
(1987)
2. l am a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control or Targeted Individual (Tl)
3. My father and brother were the same
4. I do have ~)'nthetic telepathy (full time since 2005)
5. I have met with or commwlicated with all of you regarding my computericellphone hacking on several
occasions
6. Thave followed your instructions on how to proceed in enlisting a private firm to scan my computer
7. My complaints have been well articulated and my evidence to the same have been well documented
8. I have always presented myselfin a respected manner and have been civil in our meeting.-;
9. My complaints have been rebuffed by all of you
10. Your actions have put my life and property in a dire state-of-affairs
l l. The Gang Stalkers have taken note of your actions and have demonstrated that they feel you have
supported their attitude that if it is legal for you to harass me that they have the same legal right to do
the same
12. 111e computer/cellphone hacking has caused me undo in1luence, stress, and problems filing my
Amicus in the US. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 5: I 4-cv-02559-PD,
Lisa Michell Lambert Habeus Corpus

13. As of June 23, 2015 I am formally and officially named as a Pa11.y in the above mentioned case as the
Movant
14. The above constitute OBSTRUCTTON OF DUE PROCESS, a federal crime
15. I am officially considered DISABLED by the Social Security Administration (SSA) as of December I,
2005 and was awarded benefits due to the same since April of 2008, which places my situation under the
American Disabilities Act of 1990 \Vhich prohibits Discrimination ofall kinds
16. The SSA has awarded me benefits for the illness and symptoms of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com
l of 2
7/1/201.5 5:1.8 AM
1o: 1,.;1erK
Print
!-'age
:.!Ulo-ur-01 09:56:04 (GMT)
or b
https://us-nig6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=fco7k02vt72oo
l 7. Since May l 2, 2015 or about my life has been under threat and harassment, as well as that of my family
l 8. There is more reason to believe that according to Federal Statutes LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT's
Habeus Corpus will be successful and she will be released from prison in the near future
19. You all have no one to blame but yourselves for the consequences of you actions and you all have proven
my case as defined in my Amicus filing
20. Your actions are directly defined in the C01NTELPRO definitions, which is illegal under U.S. law
21. Your actions are clearly in line with the US. Sponsored Mind Control mandamus operandi which has a
goal of pushing the victim, or Targeted Individual (TI) to suicide
22. I have provide the County of Lancaster, including you, with my documentation of all of the above
ALL OF THE ABOVE DOC'.m'IENTATION CAN BE VIE\\''ED Al~D DO\\'NLOADED BY VISITING

MY LIBRARY OF DOCUMENTS AT 1HE FOLLO\VL.~G LINK: bttps://www.scribd.com
/stan5j.5caterbone'?tah=documents OR BY VISITING W\\l\V.SCRTBD.COM AND SEARCHING FOR
STAN J. CATERBONE
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media Group are victims of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged In litigation in both Federal and Stat~ courts seeking financial
remedies and a resolution of his Civil Uberties and his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing
the financial firm the he founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whlstieblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer and local start-up
International Signal & Control, Pie., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S.
history, some $1 Biiiion and selling arms to Irag via South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa MicheUe Lambert.
2 of2
7/l/201.5 5:18 AM
2010-01-01
0~:00:04
(C;;M 1 J
111
t4::i~t::i!j!j
i-rom:
~tan
c...;ateroone
To: Clerk
Page 5 of 6
2015-07-01 09:56:04 (GMT)

~:~'**'~ct'.*-*tH:1::!>;i:;F,*****~*:1'~::$.:f.*;~*+***~'***'*'**
C US T D ~ E R AGR E E ME NT
:f:'!'***"'**~'*************'i'tt~***********"'~***
Ver tzori ~i!i re-1 es.s

HOO Fruitville Pike
Lancaster.I PA
17601~4098
(7'17) 291M6591
www ~ veri zonw ire 1'ess, com
Ord.er Nuu1ber ~
Order Locat'ion~
42'!303
04598 01
PS.
04596 01
Hece1ve Loc?ition~
Hece!pt Data/Time:
Rep:
D6/j0/~?.015 17; 37 ET
schoctt~EGG40
51
Rt:!Jl$ter.~
L~ne 1
Mob 11 e Nwnbe r:
C7H)
Device IO:
68:l~Zit33
3588200527475810
s-e14sooooo11005s~rsas
ICC.ID:
~~-~-~-~~---~----------
Date of AcHvattcn:
k~Clnt.ract .End Date .:
Ot)/30/20 t 5
Line Access:
LOYAL TY UNL T'l\Lk i; TXT
1GB $SO
$50 .C!O iriont h'ly

Cost Per- Month
Oec.1ine Equf.pment
Protection
$0,00
The iPhone 1s conflgurr;v:1 to Nork only

V.i;rfzon
\~ith tt1e iidrnh:ss se:r~'ices {1f

~~i r"t~ less~ a.nd may not. 1,~1ork or!
attother
carri.er"s nch1or-k, aven after- .completion
of your contn1ct term.
Please
Note~ F-~at.ures
and services
may net be cumpatib1e with
an
deviteEL
A 'i/ar1z.on ~1li re1ess SIM may tn1ly be

usr:d ilith devices certHled for use on
Verizon Wi re12ss~; n(~t{~~ork ~
YCli ean c\1gc~ \ f o/OUr device 15

certlfiKi at
...i1.um~L..\i.8l.J...~n.;,'J.W.JsE.1.t3S$..,..i:..'1r1~~!.C.tif.leddav1.c.e
To: Clerk
Page 6 ot 6
:.!Ulo-U/-Ul U!::l:oo:U4 (GM I)
****~*************************************
PAYMENT
R E C E I P T
Verizon Wireless
1700 Fruit.ville Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601-4093
(717) 291-6591
wv1w. verizonwireless. com
427303
04593 01
Order Number:
Order Location:
Order Type:
Receive Location:
Receipt Date/Time:
Rep:
Register:
PS
04598 01
06/30/2015 17:37 ET
schocti-EGG40
51
Pmt 1 of 1
Payment Type:
Retail
Price
Item
Tot.al Due *:
Total Savings:
This Payment
Sale
Price
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Customer Recycling Disclosure:

Electronic waste should be recycled or
disposed of properly. contact http://
www.depweb.stat.e.pa.us or
1-800-346-4242 for information.
Return Policy:
New and Certified Pre-Owned merchandise
items may only be returned or exchanged
within 14 days (07/14/2015).
You are permitted to make one exchangt'!.
A restocking fee of $35($70 for Net.books,
Tablets and Notebooks) applies to any
return or exchange of a wireless device

(excluding Hawaii) .
.See verizon~Jireless. com/returnpolicy for
complete details.
To receive a credit for the act:ivation
fee, cancellations must occur within
3 days of activation of service.
Thank You
The NEW Mv Verizon.
All The Tools.
All The Features.

More Convenience.
Visit verizonwi:r:eless.com for moi:-e.
**************************************
Visit www.Verizonwirelesssurvey.com to
tell us about. your experience.
****No .Signature Required****
Ill Ill II llll II Illllll II llllllllll 1111111111111111

VZJD4598010000427303
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT,
Petitioner,
v.
LYNN BISSONETTE, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 14-2559
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED that
Jeremy Ibrahim, Esq. is appointed as Petitioners Counsel.
Accordingly, her
Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice to

Petitioners right to file a counseled Motion for relief.
Petitioners Counsel should be prepared to address whether Petitioner must
seek permission from the Court of Appeals before filing a second or successive
habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. 2244, 2254.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond

_________________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.

Advanced Media Group Letter To The Editor of Lancaster Newspapers September 6, 2015 Full Version

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Advanced Media Group Letter To The Editor of Lancaster Newspapers September 6, 2015 Full Version

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Stan J.

My Organized Stalking legislation, which I have been presenting to

My Federal False Claims Act of ISC.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Fax Contact List

Fax Contact List

Fax Contact List

From: Stan Caterbone

Number of Pages: 66 Plus Cover

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Monday, July 06, 2015

Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Monday, July 06, 2015

Monday, July 06, 2015

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Monday, July 06, 2015

Hon. P. Michael Sturla

Hon. Scott W. Boyd

Hon. Matthew E. Baker

Hon. Scott W. Boyd

Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Hon. Katie True

Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

Hon. Katie True

Hon. Ron Marsico

Monday, July 06, 2015

Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Michael W. Brubaker (R)

Monday, July 06, 2015

Richmond council passes resolution

May 20, 2015

Monday, July 06, 2015

dumb ideas, Bates said.

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Monday, July 06, 2015

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

United States District Court

Date Filed: 05/02/2014

represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

# clear Docket Text

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number

CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA

ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S

BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND

PACER Service Center

am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 4 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 5 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 6 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 7 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 8 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 9 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 10 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 11 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 12 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 13 of 52