Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices 11413

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s communications relating to the comments on the proposed rule change,
Statement on Comments on the proposed rule change between the as amended, from interested persons.
Proposed Rule Change Received From Commission and any person, other than
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Members, Participants or Others those that may be withheld from the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
The Exchange has not solicited, and public in accordance with the
the Proposed Rule Change
does not intend to solicit, comments on provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in Nasdaq proposes to assess a fee for
this proposed rule change. The unsuccessful appeals under Rule 11890.
Exchange has not received any the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be Nasdaq expects to implement the
unsolicited written comments from proposed rule change as of March 1,
members or other interested parties. available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the ISE. All 2007.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the comments received will be posted The text of the proposed rule change
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for without change; the Commission does is available on the Nasdaq’s Web site at
Commission Action not edit personal identifying http://www.nasdaq.com, at Nasdaq’s
information from submissions. You Office of the Secretary, and at the
The foregoing rule change has become
should submit only information that Commission’s Public Reference Room.
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act15 and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)16 you wish to make available publicly. All II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
thereunder. At any time within 60 days submissions should refer to File Statement of the Purpose of, and
of the filing of such proposed rule Number SR–ISE–2007–13 and should be Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
change, the Commission may summarily submitted on or before April 3, 2007. Change
abrogate such rule change if it appears For the Commission, by the Division of In its filing with the Commission,
to the Commission that such action is Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Nasdaq included statements concerning
necessary or appropriate in the public authority.17
the purpose of and basis for the
interest, for the protection of investors, Florence E. Harmon,
proposed rule change and discussed any
or otherwise in furtherance of the Deputy Secretary. comments it received on the proposed
purposes of the Act. [FR Doc. E7–4504 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] rule change. The text of these statements
IV. Solicitation of Comments BILLING CODE 8010–01–P may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared
Interested persons are invited to summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
submit written data, views, and SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE and C below, of the most significant
arguments concerning the foregoing, COMMISSION aspects of such statements.
including whether the proposed rule
[Release No. 34–55413; File No. SR– A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
change is consistent with the Act. NASDAQ–2007–013]
Comments may be submitted by any of Statement of the Purpose of, and
the following methods: Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Change
Electronic Comments
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of 1. Purpose
• Use the Commission’s Internet Proposed Rule Change as Modified by
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Nasdaq is amending Rule 11890,
Amendment No. 1 to Assess a Fee for
rules/sro.shtml); or which covers the breaking of trades
Unsuccessful Appeals Under Rule
• Send an e-mail to rule- 11890
determined to be clearly erroneous, to
comments@sec.gov. Please include File add a new Rule 11890(c)(4) that would
No. SR–ISE–2007–13 on the subject March 7, 2007. assess a fee of $500.00 for unsuccessful
line. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the appeals of clearly erroneous
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 adjudications.
Paper Comments Rule 11890(c) provides that the losing
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
• Send paper comments in triplicate notice is hereby given that on February party may appeal decisions made by
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, 27, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market Nasdaq officers on whether or not to
Securities and Exchange Commission, LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed break trades. Appeals are heard by the
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., with the Securities and Exchange Market Operations Review Committee
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the (‘‘MORC’’), a committee of up to 15
All submissions should refer to File proposed rule change as described in volunteers who are not affiliated with
Number SR–ISE–2007–13. This file Items I, II, and III below, which Items Nasdaq. Each appeal is heard by a panel
number should be included on the have been substantially prepared by of two or three MORC members who
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Nasdaq. Nasdaq submitted the proposed must take time from their work or
Commission process and review your rule change under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of personal activities to prepare for and
comments more efficiently, please use the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) hear the appeal. In addition, appeals
only one method. The Commission will thereunder,4 which renders the proposal take significant staff time to perform a
post all comments on the Commission’s effective upon filing with the number functions including: processing
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ Commission. On March 1, 2007, the the appeal, contacting the
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the counterparties, communicating with
submission, all subsequent proposed rule change. The Commission MORC members to determine
availability, preparing briefing materials
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

amendments, all written statements is publishing this notice to solicit


with respect to the proposed rule on the circumstances of the trade(s) and
change that are filed with the 17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). communicating the MORC’s decision to
Commission, and all written 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). the parties. Nasdaq estimates that on
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. average the appeals process takes from
15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). four to five person-hours to complete
16 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). including staff and panel time.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:58 Mar 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1
11414 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices

Nasdaq is concerned that some members by filing appeals that lack Commission process and review your
members have abused the appeals merit. comments more efficiently, please use
process by appealing all decisions in only one method. The Commission will
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
which they are involved regardless of post all comments on the Commission’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
merit or the value of shares at issue. Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
During December 2006 and January Nasdaq does not believe that the rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
2007, five firms were responsible for proposed rule change will result in any submission, all subsequent
44% of all appeals. Two appeals were burden on competition that is not amendments, all written statements
for odd lot amounts, including one necessary or appropriate in furtherance with respect to the proposed rule
appeal for just 50 shares. Of the appeals of the purposes of the Act. change that are filed with the
during this two-month period, 77% of C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Commission, and all written
appeals were upheld by the MORC and communications relating to the
Statement on Comments on the
23% resulted in trade adjustments. proposed rule change between the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
These statistics suggest that parties are Commission and any person, other than
Members, Participants or Others
overusing and abusing the appellate those that may be withheld from the
system because there is no downside Written comments were neither public in accordance with the
risk. A number of the appeals involve solicited nor received. provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
trades that do not meet the numerical III. Date of Effectiveness of the available for inspection and copying in
thresholds and other factors used in Proposed Rule Change and Timing for the Commission’s Public Reference
adjudicating clearly erroneous filings set Commission Action Room. Copies of such filing also will be
forth in IM–11890–4 and IM–11890–5. available for inspection and copying at
As a result, the MORC is often serving The foregoing rule change has become the principal office of the Nasdaq. All
as a redundant decision maker in cases effective pursuant to Section comments received will be posted
where the outcome is not legitimately in 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 8 and paragraph without change; the Commission does
question. This is not the role Nasdaq (f)(2) of Rule 19b–49 thereunder. At any not edit personal identifying
intended when it established the time within 60 days of the filing of the information from submissions. You
appeals process using the MORC. proposed rule change, the Commission should submit only information that
In order to reduce the number of may summarily abrogate such rule you wish to make available publicly. All
frivolous appeals and to preserve change if it appears to the Commission submissions should refer to File
Nasdaq’s ability to attract qualified that such action is necessary or Number SR–NASDAQ–2007–013 and
persons to serve on the MORC, Nasdaq appropriate in the public interest, for should be submitted on or before April
is proposing a modest fee of $500.00 the protection of investors, or otherwise 3, 2007.
that will be levied only in cases where in furtherance of the purposes of the For the Commission, by the Division of
the MORC upholds the Nasdaq officer’s Act.10 Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
decision. Firms would not be charged IV. Solicitation of Comments authority.11
for successful appeals. Nasdaq believes Florence E. Harmon,
Interested persons are invited to
that this fee will encourage members to Deputy Secretary.
submit written data, views, and
consider whether the facts and arguments concerning the foregoing, [FR Doc. E7–4506 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am]
economic value at stake merit appellate including whether the proposed rule BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
consideration. Nasdaq notes that NYSE change is consistent with the Act.
Arca Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’) Comments may be submitted by any of
recently adopted a similar $500.00 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
the following methods:
appellate fee in order to reduce apparent COMMISSION
abuses of the appeals process on that Electronic Comments [Release No. 34–55412; File No. SR–NASD–
exchange.5 • Use the Commission’s Internet 2007–015]
2. Statutory Basis comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Nasdaq believes that the proposed • Send an e-mail to rule- National Association of Securities
rule change is consistent with the comments@sec.gov. Please include File Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,6 in Number SR–NASDAQ–2007–013 on the Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
general, and with Section 6(b)(4) of the subject line. Rule Change To Amend NASD Rules
Act,7 in particular, in that the proposed 1012 (General Provisions) and 1013
rule change provides for the equitable Paper Comments (New Member Application and
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and • Send paper comments in triplicate Interview) To Require an Applicant for
other charges among members and to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Membership To Submit an Application
issuers and other persons using any Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Manner Prescribed by NASD
facility or system which Nasdaq 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC March 7, 2007.
operates or controls. Nasdaq believes 20549–1090.
that the modest fee of $500 for an Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
All submissions should refer to File Securities Exchange Act of 1934
unsuccessful appeal under Rule 11890 Number SR–NASDAQ–2007–013. This
will be equitably assessed against (‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
file number should be included on the notice is hereby given that on February
members that impose burdens on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

time of Nasdaq staff and MORC 20, 2007, the National Association of
8 15
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
5 SecuritiesExchange Act Release No. 54655 9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
with the Securities and Exchange
(October 26, 2006), 71 FR 64596 (November 2, 2006) 10 For the purposes of calculating the 60-day
(SR–NYSEArca–2006–48). abrogation period, the Commission considers the
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
proposed rule change to have been filed on March
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 1, 2007, when Amendment No. 1 was filed. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:58 Mar 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1

Potrebbero piacerti anche