Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PRA Officer, NASA Headquarters, 300 E public record. Research and Education Experience)
Street, SW., JE0000, Washington, DC Application.
Gary Cox,
20546, (202) 358–1350, Walter.Kit- OMB Number: 2700–XXXX.
Acting Deputy Chief Information Officer. Type of Review: New Collection.
1@nasa.gov. [FR Doc. 07–2585 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am] Affected Public: Individuals or
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BILLING CODE 7510–13–M households.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:52 May 23, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM 24MYN1
29186 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 100 / Thursday, May 24, 2007 / Notices
Estimated Number of Respondents: conducted, but no later than the next initiators are introduced by the proposed
2000. outage, which is scheduled for fall 2007. alternative manner of performing rod
Estimated Time per Response: 2 The licensee indicated the need for position verification. The proposed change
the amendment is due to the does not affect the reactor protection system
hours. or the reactor control system. Hence, no new
Estimated Total Annual Burden unanticipated recent additional failure failure modes are created that would cause a
Hours: 4000. of the Turkey Point Unit 3 Analog RPI new or different kind of accident from any
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0. for control rod G–5 in Control Rod Bank accident previously evaluated.
A. Additionally, there is a concern that Therefore, operation of the facility in
IV. Request for Comments exercising the movable incore detectors accordance with the proposed amendments
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether every 8 hours (90 times per month) to would not create the possibility of a new or
the proposed collection of information comply with the compensatory actions different kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated.
is necessary for the proper performance required by the current Action 3. Will operation of the facility in
of the functions of NASA, including Statement a. of TS 3.1.3.2 will result in accordance with this proposed change
whether the information collected has excessive wear. involve a significant reduction in a margin of
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of Before issuance of the proposed safety?
NASA’s estimate of the burden license amendment, the Commission No. The bases of Specification 3.1.3.2 state
(including hours and cost) of the will have made findings required by the that the operability of the rod position
proposed collection of information; (3) Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended indicators is required to determine control
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and (the Act) and the Commission’s rod positions and thereby ensure compliance
with the control rod alignment and insertion
clarity of the information to be regulations. limits. The proposed change does not alter
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the The Commission has made a the requirement to determine rod position
burden of the collection of information proposed determination that the but provides an alternative method for
on respondents, including automated amendment request involves no determining the position of the affected rods.
collection techniques or the use of other significant hazards consideration. Under As a result, the initial conditions of the
forms of information technology. the Commission’s regulations in Title 10 accident analysis are preserved and the
Comments submitted in response to of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 consequences of previously analyzed
CFR), Section 50.92, this means that accidents are unaffected.
this notice will be summarized and
Therefore, operation of the facility in
included in the request for OMB operation of the facility in accordance
accordance with the proposed amendments
approval of this information collection. with the proposed amendment would would not involve a significant reduction in
They will also become a matter of not (1) involve a significant increase in the margin of safety.
public record. the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2) The Commission is seeking public
Gary Cox, create the possibility of a new or comments on this proposed
Acting Deputy Chief Information Officer. different kind of accident from any determination. Any comments received
[FR Doc. E7–9956 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am] accident previously evaluated; or (3) within 30 days after the date of
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P involve a significant reduction in a publication of this notice will be
margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR considered in making any final
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
NUCLEAR REGULATORY analysis of the issue of no significant
issue the amendment until the
COMMISSION hazards consideration, which is
expiration of 60 days after the date of
presented below:
publication of this notice. The
[Docket No. 50–250] 1. Will operation of the facility in Commission may issue the license
accordance with this proposed change amendment before expiration of the 60-
Florida Power and Light Company; involve a significant increase in the
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of day period provided that its final
probability or consequences of an accident
Amendment to Facility Operating previously evaluated?
determination is that the amendment
License, Proposed No Significant No. The proposed change provides an involves no significant hazards
Hazards Consideration Determination, alternative method for verifying rod position consideration. In addition, the
and Opportunity for a Hearing of control rod M–6 and G–5. The proposed Commission may issue the amendment
change meets the intent of the current prior to the expiration of the 30-day
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory specification in that it ensures verification of comment period should circumstances
Commission (the Commission) is position of the control rod once every eight change during the 30-day comment
considering issuance of an amendment (8) hours. The proposed change provides period such that failure to act in a
to Facility Operating License No. DPR– only an alternative method of monitoring timely way would result, for example,
31, issued to Florida Power and Light control rod position and does not change the
assumption or results of any previously
in derating or shutdown of the facility.
Company (the licensee), for operation of evaluated accident. Should the Commission take action
the Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Unit 3, Therefore, operation of the facility in prior to the expiration of either the
located in Miami-Dade County, Florida. accordance with the proposed amendment comment period or the notice period, it
The proposed amendment would would not involve a significant increase in will publish in the Federal Register a
revise Technical Specifications (TSs) 3/ the probability or consequences of an notice of issuance. Should the
4.1.3.1, 3/4.1.3.2, and 3/4.1.3.6 to allow accident previously evaluated. Commission make a final No Significant
the use of an alternate method of 2. Will operation of the facility in Hazards Consideration Determination,
determining rod position for the control accordance with this proposed change create any hearing will take place after
rods G–5 and M–6, which have the possibility of a new or different kind of
issuance. The Commission expects that
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:52 May 23, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM 24MYN1