Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
lOMoARcPSD
lOMoARcPSD
Content
1. Introduction to the Global Economy.......................................................................... 2
2. Comparative Advantage............................................................................................. 4
3. The Standard Trade Model ........................................................................................ 6
4. The Hecksher-Ohlin and Other Trade Theories......................................................... 8
5. Trade Restrictions: Tariffs ....................................................................................... 10
6. Nontariff Trade Barriers and the Political Economy of Protectionism.................... 11
7. Economic Integration ............................................................................................... 14
8. Growth and Development with International Trade ................................................ 17
9. International Resource Movements and MNCs ....................................................... 20
10. Balance of Payments .............................................................................................. 23
11. The Foreign Exchange Market and Exchange Rates ............................................. 25
12. Exchange rate determination.................................................................................. 27
13. Automatic Adjustments with Exchange Rates ....................................................... 28
14. Adjustment policies ............................................................................................... 30
15. Exchange rates, European Monetary Systems and Macroeconomic Policy .......... 32
16. The International Monetary System: Past, Present, Future.................................... 35
1
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
2
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
3
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
2. Comparative Advantage
Basis for trade: The forces that encourage trade between nations. Adam Smith
considers this absolute advantage, David Ricardo uses comparative advantage.
Gains from trade: Increase in consumption in a nation as a result of specialization in
production and trading.
Pattern of trade: commodities imported and exported by a nation.
Mercantilism
Mercantilism was a theory that was developed in the seventeenth and eighteenth
century when countries such as England, the Netherlands and Spain had become
modern national states. Mercantilists believed that to become rich and powerful, they
had to export more than was imported. The export surplus would lead to an inflow of
precious metals such as gold and silver. Trade barriers were created to restrict import.
Mercantilism believes a state can only gain something at the loss of others and
therefore promotes economic nationalism. Nowadays, we don't measure in gold and
silver but in flows of goods and satisfaction.
Absolute advantage
Most states voluntarily trade with each other. Adam Smith believed this to be because
of absolute advantage: a state is more efficient than another state in the production of
one commodity, but less efficient in a second commodity. The two states can then
specialize and the output of both commodities will rise, leading to gains. Absolute
disadvantage: a state is less efficient in producing a commodity than another state.
Comparative advantage
Law of comparative advantage: even if one nation is less efficient than the other
nation in the production of both commodities, there is still basis for mutually
beneficial trade. A state should specialize in the product with the least absolute
disadvantage (comparative advantage) and import the commodity with the most
comparative disadvantage (comparative disadvantage).
Wheat
Cloth
US
6
4
UK
1
2
The US would not trade 6W for less than 4C because they can produce that
themselves. The UK's wheat is the comparative disadvantage, cloth is the
comparative advantage. It has an absolute disadvantage on both commodities. Why
can a state still export? Using the above table as an example, the UK's cloth price is
lower than in the US and the price of wheat will be lower in the US.
Labor theory of value: the cost/price of a commodity is determined or can be
inferred from its labor content.
1. Labor is the only factor of production / labor is used in the same fixed proportion
with all commodities.
2. Labor is homogeneous.
Production costs other than labor costs did not affect the relationship between
productivity and export shares (see page 41, case study 2-3).
4
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
Opportunity Cost
Opportunity cost theory: the cost of a commodity is the amount of a second
commodity that must be given up to release just enough resources to produce one
more unit of the first commodity.
Looking at the table on the previous page, this is the opportunity cost for the US:
1 Wheat = 2/3 Cloth. The opportunity cost of wheat is two-thirds of a unit of cloth.
Production possibility frontier
This curve shows all combinations of two commodities a nation can produce by
utilizing all of its resources with the best technology available. This is what it usually
looks like.
5
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
6
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
7
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
H-O theorem: deals with and predicts pattern of trade. "A nation will export
the commodity whose production requires the intensive use of the nation's
relatively abundant and cheap factors, and import the commodity which uses
relatively scarce and expensive factors".
The difference in relative factor abundance (factor endowments) are
considered the basis for international trade and comparative advantage. It is
also called the factor-proportions or factor-endowment theory.
Stolper-Samuelson theorem: free international trade reduces the real income of the
nation's relatively scare factor and increases the real income of the nation's relatively
abundant factor.
Testing the Hecksher-Ohlin theory
When the model was tested, the results were the opposite of what the H-O model
predicted. This was called the Leontief paradox. This happened because Leontief
only used physical capital and ignored human capital (health, job training, education).
Returns to scale
Even if two nations face identical conditions, there is still a basis for mutually
beneficial trade: increasing returns to scale, the production situation where output
grows proportionately more than the increase in inputs or factors for production. For
example, you double the input but the output grows more than double.
As a single worker specializes in making a commodity, their productivity goes up and
a larger scale of production allows a nation to make specialized machines to speed up
production. This also leads to outsourcing: moving parts abroad rather than
producing them at home to keep costs down in a global world economy. This has been
the source for an international economy of scale.
8
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
Differentiated products are products with slight differences. Producers can specialize
on a few variants instead of many different products. Intra-industry trade ensures
other international companies will produce these variants, so consumers will have
more choice.
Intra-industry trade is based on product differentiation and economies of scale. Trade
based on comparative advantage is more likely to happen when differences between
nations are larger, but intra-industry trade is more likely to happen when these
differences are smaller! The first also only returns the nation's scarce factor while
intra-industry trade leads to gains on all factors.
Technological gap model
This model is a hypothesis that a portion of international trade is based on the
introduction of new products or processes. Industrialized countries innovate, and the
innovator will export their new product. They have a temporary monopoly based on
patents and copyrights.
Product cycle model: New, innovative products will become standardized and can be
produced in other nations with less skilled labour. Product cycle: 1. introduction 2.
expansion 3. standardization and imitation 4. imitators underselling the nation in third
markets 5. foreigners underselling innovating firms in their home market.
(Undersell = sell at a lower price)
Innovative products are most often made in rich nations because the opportunities are
greater, there is a large market which makes feedback possible and there is a need to
provide services.
Transportation
Transportation or logistics costs are the costs for transport and storage. A product will
only be traded if the price difference between nations is larger than the cost for
transport. Products that are not traded because the price difference is too small are
called nontraded goods and services.
Environmental standards: the level of pollution accepted in various countries. Trade
can be affected by this: nations can have lax rules on environmental pollution, which
results in lower costs and more companies willing to move. Strong anti-pollution
regulations are difficult to implant: rich countries have the money and technology to
be cleaner, but poor countries have other needs and less resources.
9
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
10
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
lOMoARcPSD
12
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
13
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
7. Economic Integration
Forms of economic integration
Preferential trade arrangements: loosest form of economic integration,
provides lower barriers to trade among participating nations than on trade with
non-participating nations.
Free trade area: removes all barriers on trade among members, but nations
maintain their own barriers with non-members.
Customs union: removes all trade among members and harmonizes trade
policies towards the rest of the world.
Common market: removes all trade barriers, harmonizes trade policies and
allows the free movement of labour and capital among member nations.
Economic union: removes all trade barriers, harmonizes trade policies, allows
free movement of labour and capital among member nations and
harmonizes/unifies the monetary, fiscal and tax policies of members.
New forms to stimulate trade: duty-free zones/free economic zones: areas set up to
attract foreign investments by allowing raw materials and semi-products duty free.
Trade creation: occurs when some domestic production in a member of the customs
union is replaced by lower cost imports from another member nation. Increases
welfare. Trade diversion: lower cost imports from outside the union are replaced by
higher cost imports from another union member. This reduces welfare.
Besides the above mentioned effects, there are several dynamic benefits.
Increased competition: Without a customs union, producers are likely to glow
sluggish and complacent behind trade barriers. When trade barriers are
eliminated, they are forced to become more efficient and grow.
Economies of scale: Possible effect, but also possible without being in a
customs union. Plants (factories) may grow when a country has a high export.
Stimulus to investment: Companies can take advantage of a large market and
meet increased competition. Tariff factories: companies moving inside a
customs union to avoid non-member tariffs.
Better utilization of economic resources, due to free movement of labour and
capital.
The European Union
- Treaty of Rome 1957, founded as the 'European Common Market' in 1958.
First countries: West Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxemburg.
Common external tariff was the average of tariffs of all these countries in 1957.
1968: free trade in industrial goods in the EU, common price for agricultural products
1970: reduced restrictions on movement of labour and capital
1971: generalized tariff preferences on import of (semi-)manufactured products from
developing nations.
1975: Lom convention, eliminated most trade barriers on imports from 46
developing nations in Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (former colonies of EU countries)
1993: removal of all restrictions on free flow of goods, services and resources
2000: Cotonou Agreement. 2008: New partnership agreements (NPAs) based on
reciprocity. Same content as Lom convention.
14
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
Common agricultural policy: consumers had to pay more as farm prices are relatively
high. It sets variable import levies (import duties on imports of agricultural
commodities, equal to difference between higher EU prices and low world prices.)
The formation of the EU increased trade due to the large, growing market and
reduction of tariffs. Other developments of the EU:
1. Common value-added tax system (VAT or btw)
2. Commission: proposes laws, monitors compliance of treaties+administers policies.
3. Council of Ministers makes final decisions but only on recommendation of the
Commission. European Parliament (elected every five years, not much power) and
Court of Justice (rules on constitutionality of decisions of Commissions and Council).
4. Plans have been drawn for a full monetary union.
The European Free Trade Association
1960: the EFTA was made by the outer seven nations: United Kingdom, Austria,
Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland, with Finland joining in 1961.
It achieved free trade in industrial goods in 1967, but there were few reductions on
agricultural trade barriers. On top of that, each nation maintained their own tariffs.
Trade deflection: the entry of imports from the rest of the world into the low-tariff
member of a free trade area to avoid the higher tariffs of other members. It joined the
EU in 1994 to form the European Economic Area.
US Free Trade Agreements and the NAFTA
In 1985, the USA negotiated a free trade agreement with Israel, the first bilateral trade
agreement signed by the US. It reduced tariffs and non-tariff barriers. In 1989, a free
trade agreement went into effect between Canada and the US.
The NAFTA took effect in 1994, leading to free trade in goods and services over the
entire North American area. It was signed by the USA, Canada and Mexico. It is
designed to reduce barriers to cross-border investment in the three countries.
NAFTA led to an increase in jobs, doubled trade (Mexico benefited much more due to
its smaller economy) and minimal harm to workers in the USA. Mexico's agricultural
production reduced, while industry grew.
Attempts in developing countries
1. Central American Common Market in 1960, dissolved 1969, restarted 1990.
2. Latin American Free Trade Association (LAFTA) 1960 by Mexico and most
of South America.
3. Southern Common Market (Mercosur) formed by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay
and Uruguay 1991. Became a customs Union in 1995.
4. Free trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) 1998, 34 democratic areas of North
and South America.
5. Caribbean Free Trade Association (CARIFTA) in 1968, became common
market (CARICOM) in 1973.
6. East African Economic Community 1967.
7. West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEMOA-WAEMU).
8. Southern Africa Development Community (SADC)
9. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Common market 1977.
China joined in 2010 and created the Asia Free Trade Area (AFTA).
15
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
Most unions fail due to uneven benefits for member states and the lack of states that
are willing to give up their sovereignty.
16
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
lOMoARcPSD
18
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
Export-oriented industrialization
Advantages
1. Overcomes smallness of domestic market and allows of economies of scale
2. Production of manufactured goods for export requires/stimulates efficiency in
economy.
3. Expansion of manufactured exports is not limited by growth of domestic markets.
Disadvantages
1. Difficult to compete with efficient industries from developed nations.
2. Developed nations protect their industries producing simple labour-intensive
commodities and have an advantage.
Most developing nations chose import substitution, which generally failed due to
inefficient industries and high prices, excessive capital intensity and little labour
absorption and the neglect of other sectors resulting in a decline in earnings. Most
nations now focus on export-oriented industrialization, such as the BRICs.
Current problems in developing nations
1. Poverty in developing countries.
2. Foreign debt problem in developing countries. The IMF has measures to reduce
imports and cut inflation, wage increases and domestic programs.
3. Trade problems of developing countries. Developed countries experiences slow
growth, large unemployment and too much trade protection, leading to less imports
from developed countries.
Newly-industrialized countries (NIC): Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan.
Export pessimism: feeling that developing countries' exports to developed countries
cannot grow rapidly due to the latter's protectionism.
Uruguay Round, 1994: reduction in trade restrictions and protectionism.
Doha Round 2001: prevented from completion due to disagreements, should've dealt
with the trade demands of developing countries.
New International Economic Order (NIEO):
1. Renegotiation of the foreign debt of developing countries and reduction in interest
payments
2. Establishment of international commodity agreements
3. Preferential access in developed nation's markets to all manufactured exports of
developing nations.
4. Removing trade barriers on agricultural products
5. Increasing the transfer of technology to developing nations and regulating MNCs
6. Increase the yearly flow of foreign aid
7. Allowing developing nations a greater role in international decision making.
19
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
20
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
Balance of payment
A foreign investment increases foreign expenditures and cause a deficit (more foreign
expenditures than receipts). However, the receiving country may increase their import
of parts and products from the investing country in 5-10 years, which is considered
the 'payback' period.
Taxes go down in the investing country. The taxes are often lower which leads to
more investments in another country. Many countries signed the double-taxation
agreement (avoiding double taxation on equal grounds), they can ask a much lower
tax percentage. Example: Host UK 25% tax, Investor US 35%, US can only ask 10%
tax.
Long-term effects are uncertain. There are developing countries that have greater
receipts than expenditures but still face balance-of-payments difficulties.
Reasons for the existence of multinational corporations
1. Competitive advantage of a global network of production and distribution by
vertical and horizontal integration, economies of scale etc.
2. Have greater access to international capital markets
3. Concentrate departments in nations best suited for these purposes, like R&D in
advanced nations
4. Large size allows them to shop around in poor countries to find cheap labour
MNCs are often oligopolies selling differentiated products, technological gap and
product cycle models and with economies of scale.
Problems of MNCs in investing country
1. Loss of jobs due to MNCs investing in labour in other nations. However,
employment increases in managerial and technical jobs.
2. Export of advanced technology combined with cheaper foreign factors may
undermine technological advantage due to copies (hard to do since R&D
departments are located in rich nations)
3. Avoid tax revenues due to moving to other low-tax areas.
4. MNCs can avoid local monetary policies and make government control
harder. However, most nations do place restrictions on MNCs.
Problems of MNCs in host country (receiving)
1. MNCs dominate the economy, Americanisation of tastes
2. MNC may not want to export to a nation considered an enemy of the home
nation
3. Host countries leech off of home nations' R&D developments, while MNCs
also use up local talents in host country which prevents them from setting up
new businesses that may help a developing nation
Many host nations regulate MNCs to avoid these effects. A nation like China only
allows joint ventures and has set rules for the transfer of technology etc. It can also
nationalize foreign production facilities but this might lead to a low flow of direct
foreign investments.
21
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
22
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
lOMoARcPSD
24
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
25
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
26
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
27
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
28
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
29
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
lOMoARcPSD
This works with high international financial flows. The improvement in the balance of
payments would lead to official purchases of the foreign currency with the domestic
currency to prevent an appreciation of the nation's currency.
Policy mix for internal and external balance
Inflation and surplus: both monetary and fiscal policies should be used but in
appropriate 'dosages'.
Recession and surplus: Monetary policy for external balance.
Recession and deficit: expansionary fiscal policy and contractionary monetary policy.
Inflation and deficit: contractionary fiscal policy, may need monetary policy.
Effect of policies on internal balance under flexible exchange rates
Expansionary monetary policy, money supply is increased.
1. Interest rate falls
2. Financial assets flow out + investment and income rise > current account worsens
3. Currency depreciates
4. Current account improves
5. Income rises more
Expansionary fiscal policy: government spending rises or taxes fall
1. Interest rate rises + production/income rise
2. Financial assets flow in + current account worsens
3. Currency may appreciate
4. Income expansion is reduced.
With fixed exchange rates, fiscal policy is effective and monetary policy is ineffective
for an internal imbalance. Monetary policy is effective with flexible exchange rates.
Correcting unemployment with inflation
Cost-push inflation: price rises in the face of high unemployment, recession and
slow growth. To recover, a state has three goals: full employment, price stability and
balance of payments equilibrium.
Direct controls, divided in:
Trade controls: tariffs, quotas, advance deposits on imports and more restrictions on
international trade
exchange control: restrictions on international capital flows, intervention in forward
markets, multiple exchange rates and exchange rates (see chapter 5)
The most common exchange control is multiple exchange rates: different exchange
rates enforced by developing nations for each class of imports depending on the
usefulness of imports.
31
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
32
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
33
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
Dollarization: situation where another nation adopts another nation's currency as its
legal tender. This term is used even when it's not the dollar that is adopted. Good
candidates are small open economies who's dominant trade partner is either the USA
or Europe. Benefits:
1. avoiding cost of exchanging currency for dollars.
2. Facing an inflation and interest rate similar to US.
3. Avoiding foreign exchange crises and need for foreign exchange/trade controls.
4. Fostering budgetary discipline and encouraging more international financial
integration.
Downsides:
1. cost of replacing the domestic currency with the dollar
2. loss of independence of monetary/exchange rate policies
3. loss of its central bank as a lender of last resort to bail out domestic banks and other
financial institutions.
Adjustable pegs, crawling pegs and managed floating
Adjustable pegs: system under which exchange rates or par values are periodically
changed to correct balance-of-payment disequilibria.
Crawling peg system: system under which par values or exchange rates are changed
by very small preannounce amounts at frequent and clearly specified intervals until
the equilibrium exchange rate is reached. Destabilizing speculation is discouraged
because of the small, short-term changes in rate that neutralize any profit.
Managed floating exchange rate system/dirty float: policy of intervention in
foreign exchange markets by monetary authorities to smooth out short-run
fluctuations without attempting to affect the long-run trend in exchange rates.
Leaning against the wind: a nation's monetary authorities supply, out of
international reserves, a portion of any short-run excess demand for foreign
exchange in the market and absorb a portion of any short-run excess supply of
foreign exchange in the market. This avoids depreciation and appreciation of
currencies.
Most of the world has had a floating exchange rate system of sorts due to the collapse
of the Bretton Woods system.
International macroeconomic policy coordination
In this world, nations are becoming increasingly interdependent. They have to work
together: international macroeconomic policy coordination becomes more desirable. It
means that nations create modifications of national economic policies in recognition
of international interdependence.
There are still several obstacles: one is a lack of believe in the functioning of the
international monetary system, another is a lack of agreement on the precise policy
mix required. And how do we distribute gains from successful policy coordination
and spread the cost of negotiating and policing agreements?
34
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
35
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
36
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
37
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)
lOMoARcPSD
38
Verspreiden niet toegestaan | Gedownload door Irish Beltran (icbeltran@yahoo.com)