Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

45982 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules

for a location to examine the regulatory TABLE 1.—REPLACEMENT inspections of the inboard flap
evaluation. trunnions for any wear marks and of the
For airplanes sliding panels for any cracking at the
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 identified in the long edges, and corrective actions if
Do the following action—
service bulletin
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation as— necessary. These actions resulted from
safety, Safety. reports of wear damage to the inboard
(1) Group 1 Replace the rotomolded duct flap trunnions after incorporation of the
The Proposed Amendment airplanes. between the transition terminating modification, and certain
duct of the right cooling airplanes were inadvertently excluded
Accordingly, under the authority pack and the mix manifold from the applicability in the original
delegated to me by the Administrator, with a new duct made of NPRM. This new action revises the first
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part aluminum. supplemental NPRM by adding
39 as follows: (2) Group 2 Replace the rotomolded
airplanes. ducts of the mix manifold
airplanes that were recently added to
system with new ducts the type certificate data sheet. We are
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS proposing this second supplemental
made from Kevlar and
DIRECTIVES aluminum. NPRM to detect and correct wear of the
inboard flap trunnions, which could
1. The authority citation for part 39 Alternative Methods of Compliance lead to loss of flap surface control and
continues to read as follows: (AMOCs) consequently result in the flap
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. (g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft detaching from the airplane. A detached
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to flap could result in damage to the tail
§ 39.13 [Amended] approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in of the airplane.
2. The Federal Aviation accordance with the procedures found in 14 DATES: We must receive comments on
CFR 39.19. this supplemental NPRM by September
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 (2) To request a different method of
by adding the following new compliance or a different compliance time
10, 2007.
airworthiness directive (AD): for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on addresses to submit comments on this
BOEING: Docket No. FAA–2007–28943;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–011–AD.
any airplane to which the AMOC applies, proposed AD.
notify your appropriate principal inspector • DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://
Comments Due Date (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local for sending your comments
(a) The FAA must receive comments on FSDO.
this AD action by October 1, 2007. electronically.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30, • Government-wide rulemaking Web
Affected ADs 2007. site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
(b) None. Ali Bahrami, and follow the instructions for sending
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, your comments electronically.
Applicability
Aircraft Certification Service. • Mail: U.S. Department of
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767– [FR Doc. E7–16095 Filed 8–15–07; 8:45 am] Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
300F series airplanes, certificated in any 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
category; as identified in Boeing Special W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Attention Service Bulletin 767–21–0192, Washington, DC 20590.
dated March 23, 2006. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Unsafe Condition • Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
Federal Aviation Administration the ground floor of the West Building,
(d) This AD results from a report of failures 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
of the duct joint seal of the mix manifold 14 CFR Part 39 Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
system. We are issuing this AD to prevent air
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25658; Directorate
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
conditioning leakage into the mix manifold
Identifier 2006–NM–054–AD] Federal holidays.
bay. Such leakage could decrease the air flow
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
to the flight compartment and main cabin or RIN 2120–AA64 Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France,
could allow smoke into the flight
for service information identified in this
compartment in the event of a fire in the Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model second supplemental NPRM.
main cabin or forward cargo compartment. A318, A319, A320, and A321 Airplanes
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Compliance AGENCY: Federal Aviation Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
(e) You are responsible for having the Administration (FAA), Department of International Branch, ANM–116,
actions required by this AD performed within Transportation (DOT). Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
the compliance times specified, unless the ACTION: Supplemental notice of 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
actions have already been done. proposed rulemaking (NPRM); Washington 98057–3356; telephone
reopening of comment period. (425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
Replacement
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(f) Within 36 months after the effective SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an earlier
date of this AD, do the applicable action supplemental NPRM for an Comments Invited
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

specified in Table 1 of this AD in accordance airworthiness directive (AD) that We invite you to submit any relevant
with the Accomplishment Instructions of applies to certain Airbus Model A318, written data, views, or arguments
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin A319, A320, and A321 airplanes. The regarding this proposal. Send your
767–21–0192, dated March 23, 2006. first supplemental NPRM would have comments to an address listed in the
superseded an existing AD that ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
currently requires repetitive detailed number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2006–25658;

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:19 Aug 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM 16AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules 45983

Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–054– Actions Since First Supplemental Revision 04, dated November 6, 2001,
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. NPRM Was Issued on Model A321–211 and –231 airplanes,
We specifically invite comments on the Since we issued the first except those on which Airbus
overall regulatory, economic, supplemental NPRM, Airbus has issued Modification 26495 has been
environmental, and energy aspects of Service Bulletin A320–57–1133, accomplished in production. Airbus
this second supplemental NPRM. We Revision 02, including Appendix 01, notes that ‘‘* * * the modification
will consider all comments received by dated December 12, 2006. (We referred introduced by Service Bulletin A320–
the closing date and may amend this to Airbus Service Bulletin A320–57– 27–1117 has not been confirmed
second supplemental NPRM in light of 1133, Revision 01, dated August 7, satisfactory; this is the reason why
those comments. 2006, in the first supplemental NPRM as additional inspections have been
the appropriate source of service defined in Service Bulletin A320–57–
We will post all comments submitted,
information for accomplishing certain 1133 and a final fix to this last
without change, to http://dms.dot.gov,
proposed actions.) The changes in inspection under definition.’’ Airbus
including any personal information you adds that Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
provide. We will also post a report Revision 02 are minor, and no
additional work is necessary for 27–1117 was issued to provide
summarizing each substantive verbal terminating action of another inspection
contact with FAA personnel concerning airplanes modified by the previous
issues; Revision 02 adds airplanes and specified in Airbus Service Bulletin
this proposed AD. Using the search A320–27–1108, Revision 04, dated
function of that Web site, anyone can recommends contacting Airbus for
certain corrective actions. We have November 22, 1999, for Model A321
find and read the comments in any of airplanes. Airbus notes that if there are
our dockets, including the name of the changed the applicable sections in the
second supplemental NPRM to refer to still Model A321–211 and –231
individual who sent the comment (or airplanes that are pre-modification
signed the comment on behalf of an Revision 02 as the appropriate source of
service information for accomplishing 26495 on which Airbus Service Bulletin
association, business, labor union, etc.). A320–27–1117 has not been done, the
You may review the DOT’s complete certain proposed actions. In addition,
we have changed paragraph (j) of the inspections specified in Airbus Service
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Bulletin A320–27–1108, Revision 04,
second supplemental NPRM to provide
Register published on April 11, 2000 should continue to be performed until
credit for accomplishing applicable
(65 FR 19477–78), or you may visit the final fix is available.
actions before the effective date of the
http://dms.dot.gov. We agree with Airbus, we have
AD in accordance with Revision 01 of
that service bulletin. determined that the subject
Examining the Docket
modification is not adequate to address
You may examine the AD docket on Comments the identified unsafe condition.
the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in We have considered the following Therefore, for that reason, and the
person at the Docket Operations office comments on the first supplemental reasons provided by Airbus, we have
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday NPRM. removed paragraphs (h) and (i) from the
through Friday, except Federal holidays. second supplemental NPRM and
Request to Expand Applicability reidentified subsequent paragraphs
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located on the Airbus asks that we add Model A321– accordingly.
ground floor of the West Building at the 212, –213, and –232 airplanes to the
Difference Between Proposed Rule and
street address stated in the ADDRESSES applicability specified in paragraph (c)
Service Bulletin
section. Comments will be available in of the first supplemental NPRM. Airbus
states that the AD should be applicable Service Bulletin A320–57–1133,
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
to all Model A318, A319, A320, and Revision 02, specifies to contact the
Management System receives them.
A321 airplanes that have received manufacturer for instructions on how to
Discussion Airbus Modification 26495 in repair certain conditions, but this
production or Airbus Service Bulletin proposed AD would require repairing
The FAA issued a supplemental A320–27–1117 in service. those conditions using a method
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) We agree with Airbus for the reasons approved by the FAA, or the European
(‘‘the first supplemental NPRM’’) to provided, and because those airplanes Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its
amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD were added to Revision 9 of the U.S. delegated agent), or the Direction
that supersedes AD 2006–04–06, type certificate data sheet (TCDS) on Générale de l’Aviation Civile (DGAC)
amendment 39–14487 (71 FR 8439, March 23, 2007. In addition, Airbus (or its delegated agent). In light of the
February 17, 2006). The existing AD Model 318–121 and –122 airplanes were type of repair that would be required to
applies to certain Airbus Model A318, added to Revision 10 of the TCDS on address the unsafe condition, and
A319, A320, and A321 airplanes. The May 31, 2007; therefore, we have also consistent with existing bilateral
first supplemental NPRM was published added those airplanes to the airworthiness agreements, we have
in the Federal Register on March 6, applicability in the second determined that, for this proposed AD,
2007 (72 FR 9880). The first supplemental NPRM. We have changed a repair approved by the FAA, the
supplemental NPRM proposed to paragraph (c) of the second EASA, or the DGAC would be
continue to require repetitive detailed supplemental NPRM accordingly. acceptable for compliance with this
inspections of the inboard flap proposed AD.
trunnions for any wear marks and of the Request To Remove Certain
sliding panels for any cracking at the Requirements Clarification of Alternative Method of
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

long edges, and corrective actions if Airbus asks that we remove the new Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph
necessary. The first supplemental requirement specified in paragraph (h) We have revised this action to clarify
NPRM also proposed to revise the of the first supplemental NPRM. Airbus the appropriate procedure for notifying
original NPRM by including airplanes states that it does not concur with the the principal inspector before using any
that were inadvertently excluded from new requirement to apply Airbus approved AMOC on any airplane to
the applicability. Service Bulletin A320–27–1117, which the AMOC applies.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:19 Aug 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM 16AUP1
45984 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules

FAA’s Determination and Proposed supplemental NPRM; therefore, we have Costs of Compliance
Requirements of the Second determined that it is necessary to reopen
Supplemental NPRM the comment period to provide The following table provides the
additional opportunity for public estimated costs for U.S. operators to
Certain changes discussed above comment on the second supplemental comply with the second supplemental
expand the scope of the first NPRM. NPRM.

ESTIMATED COSTS
Number of
Average labor
Action Work hours Parts Cost per airplane U.S.-registered Fleet cost
rate per hour airplanes

Modification in AD 14 $80 The manufacturer $1,120 ...................... 768 $860,160.


2006–04–06. states that it will
supply required
parts to operators
at no cost.
Detailed inspection in 2 80 None ......................... $160, per inspection 768 $122,880, per in-
AD 2006–04–06. cycle. spection cycle.
General visual in- 1 80 None ......................... $80, per inspection 754 $60,320, per inspec-
spection (new pro- cycle. tion cycle.
posed action).

Authority for This Rulemaking on a substantial number of small entities Applicability


Title 49 of the United States Code under the criteria of the Regulatory (c) This AD applies to the airplanes
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue Flexibility Act. identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of
this AD, certificated in any category.
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, We prepared a regulatory evaluation (1) Airbus Model A318–111, –112, –121,
Section 106, describes the authority of of the estimated costs to comply with and –122 airplanes on which Airbus
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, this supplemental NPRM and placed it Modification 26495 has been incorporated in
Aviation Programs, describes in more in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES production.
detail the scope of the Agency’s section for a location to examine the (2) All Airbus Model A319–111, –112,
authority. –113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and –133
regulatory evaluation. airplanes; Model A320–111 airplanes; Model
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII, List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 A320–211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
section, Congress charges the FAA with safety, Safety. Unsafe Condition
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in The Proposed Amendment (d) This AD results from a determination
air commerce by prescribing regulations that certain airplanes must be included in the
for practices, methods, and procedures Accordingly, under the authority applicability of the AD, and that the
the Administrator finds necessary for inspection type must be revised. We are
delegated to me by the Administrator, issuing this AD to detect and correct wear of
safety in air commerce. This regulation the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part the inboard flap trunnions, which could lead
is within the scope of that authority 39 as follows: to loss of flap surface control and
because it addresses an unsafe condition consequently result in the flap detaching
that is likely to exist or develop on PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS from the airplane. A detached flap could
products identified in this rulemaking DIRECTIVES result in damage to the tail of the airplane.
action. Compliance
1. The authority citation for part 39
Regulatory Findings (e) You are responsible for having the
continues to read as follows: actions required by this AD performed within
We have determined that this the compliance times specified, unless the
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
proposed AD would not have federalism actions have already been done.
implications under Executive Order § 39.13 [Amended]
13132. This proposed AD would not Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006–
2. The Federal Aviation 04–06
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 Modification
national Government and the States, or by removing amendment 39–14487 (71 (f) For Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
on the distribution of power and FR 8439, February 17, 2006) and adding –115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes; Model
responsibilities among the various the following new airworthiness A320–111 airplanes; Model A320–211, –212,
levels of government. directive (AD): –214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and
For the reasons discussed above, I Model A321–111, –112, and –131 airplanes;
AIRBUS: Docket No. FAA–2006–25658; except those on which Airbus Modification
certify that the proposed regulation: Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–054–AD.
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 26495 has been accomplished in production:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

Comments Due Date Within 18 months after January 8, 2001 (the


action’’ under Executive Order 12866; effective date of AD 2000–24–02, amendment
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the (a) The FAA must receive comments on 39–12009), modify the sliding panel driving
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures this AD action by September 10, 2007. mechanism of the flap drive trunnions, in
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
3. Will not have a significant Affected ADs A320–27–1117, Revision 02, dated January
economic impact, positive or negative, (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006–04–06. 18, 2000; or Revision 04, dated November 6,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:05 Aug 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM 16AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules 45985

2001. As of the effective date of this AD, only specified in Figures 5 and 6, as applicable, Compliance Times
Revision 04 may be used. of the service bulletin; except as provided by (l) Where Airbus Service Bulletins A320–
Note 1: Accomplishment of the paragraphs (l), (m), and (n) of this AD. Repeat
57–1133, dated July 28, 2005; Revision 01,
modification required by paragraph (f) of this the inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 4,000 flight hours. Accomplishing the dated August 7, 2006; and Revision 02, dated
AD before January 8, 2001, in accordance
general visual inspection required by this December 12, 2006; specify replacing the
with Airbus Service Bulletin A320–27–1117,
dated July 31, 1997; or Revision 01, dated paragraph terminates the detailed inspection sliding panel at the next opportunity if
June 25, 1999; is acceptable for compliance requirement of paragraph (g) of this AD. damaged, replace it within 600 flight hours
with that paragraph. Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a after the inspection required by paragraph (g)
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual or (h) of this AD, as applicable.
Detailed Inspections examination of an interior or exterior area, (m) If any damage to the trunnion is found
(g) For Model A318–111 and –112 installation, or assembly to detect obvious during any inspection required by paragraph
airplanes; Model A319–111, –112, –113, damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of (g) or (h) of this AD, before further flight, do
–114, –115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes; inspection is made from within touching the corrective actions specified in Airbus
Model A320–111 airplanes; Model A320– distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror Service Bulletin A320–57–1133, Revision 01,
211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233 may be necessary to ensure visual access to dated August 7, 2006; or Revision 02, dated
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, and all surfaces in the inspection area. This level December 12, 2006.
–131 airplanes: At the latest of the applicable of inspection is made under normally
times specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), available lighting conditions such as Grace Period Assessment
and (g)(3) of this AD, do a detailed inspection daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
of the inboard flap trunnions for any wear (n) Where Airbus Service Bulletins A320–
droplight and may require removal or 57–1133, dated July 28, 2005; Revision 01,
marks and of the sliding panels for any opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
cracking at the long edges, and do any dated August 7, 2006; and Revision 02, dated
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
corrective actions, as applicable, by December 12, 2006; specify contacting the
proximity to the area being checked.’’
accomplishing all of the applicable actions manufacturer for a grace period assessment
specified in the Accomplishment (1) For airplanes on which the detailed
after replacing the trunnion or flap, contact
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320– inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
57–1133, dated July 28, 2005; Revision 01, AD has been done before the effective date
of this AD: Inspect before accumulating 4,000 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA;
dated August 7, 2006; or Revision 02, dated the Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile
December 12, 2006; except as provided by total flight hours on the inboard flap
trunnion since new, or within 4,000 flight (or its delegated agent for the grace period
paragraph (n) of this AD. As of the effective
date of this AD, only Revision 02 may be hours after accomplishing the most recent assessment.
used. Any corrective actions must be done at inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
No Reporting Requirement
the compliance times specified in Figures 5 AD, whichever occurs later.
and 6, as applicable, of the service bulletin; (2) For airplanes other than those (o) Although Airbus Service Bulletins
except as provided by paragraphs (k), (l), and identified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD: A320–57–1133, dated July 28, 2005; Revision
(m) of this AD. Repeat the inspection Inspect at the latest of the applicable times 01, dated August 7, 2006; and Revision 02,
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,000 specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i), (h)(2)(ii), dated December 12, 2006; specify to submit
flight hours until the inspection required by and (h)(2)(iii) of this AD. certain information to the manufacturer, this
paragraph (h) of this AD is done. (i) Before accumulating 4,000 total flight AD does not include that requirement.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a hours on the inboard flap trunnion since
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive new. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
examination of a specific item, installation, (ii) Within 4,000 flight hours after (p)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or accomplishing paragraph (f) of this AD. ANM–116, has the authority to approve
irregularity. Available lighting is normally (iii) Within 600 flight hours after the
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
supplemented with a direct source of good effective date of this AD.
(i) Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320– accordance with the procedures found in 14
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
57–1133, Revision 02, dated December 12, CFR 39.19.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
2006, specifies to contact the manufacturer (2) To request a different method of
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be for instructions on how to repair certain compliance or a different compliance time
required.’’ conditions: Before further flight, repair using for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
(1) Before accumulating 4,000 total flight a method approved by the Manager, 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
hours on the inboard flap trunnion since International Branch, ANM–116, Transport any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
new. Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European notify your appropriate principal inspector
(2) Within 4,000 flight hours after Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
accomplishing paragraph (f) of this AD. delegated agent), or the Direction Générale de Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
(3) Within 600 flight hours after March 24, l’Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated
FSDO.
2006 (the effective date of AD 2006–04–06). agent).
Actions Done Using Previous Issues of Related Information
New Requirements of This AD
Service Information (q) French airworthiness directive F–2005–
General Visual Inspections (j) Accomplishing the modification 139, dated August 3, 2005, also addresses the
(h) For all airplanes: At the time specified required by paragraph (f) of this AD before subject of this AD.
in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, as the effective date of this AD, in accordance Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 31,
applicable, do a general visual inspection of with Airbus Service Bulletin A320–27–1117,
2007.
the inboard flap trunnions for any wear Revision 03, dated August 24, 2001, is
marks and of the sliding panels for any acceptable for compliance with the Ali Bahrami,
cracking at the long edges, and do all requirements of that paragraph. Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
applicable corrective actions by (k) Accomplishing the inspections and Aircraft Certification Service.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

accomplishing all of the applicable actions corrective actions required by paragraph (h) [FR Doc. E7–16094 Filed 8–15–07; 8:45 am]
specified in the Accomplishment of this AD before the effective date of this
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320– AD, in accordance with Airbus Service
57–1133, Revision 02, dated December 12, Bulletin A320–57–1133, dated July 28, 2005;
2006; except as provided by paragraphs (i) or Revision 01, dated August 7, 2006; is
and (o) of this AD. All corrective actions acceptable for compliance with the
must be done at the compliance times requirements of that paragraph.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:19 Aug 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM 16AUP1