Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices 51885

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section DEPARTMENT OF STATE conviction, and a finding that


38(g)(4) of the AECA (22 U.S.C. 2778) appropriate steps have been taken to
[Public Notice 5931]
and Section 127.11 of the ITAR prohibit mitigate any law enforcement concerns,
the issuance of export licenses or other Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the
approvals to a person, or any party to Statutory Debarment Under the Arms AECA. Unless export privileges are
the export, who has been convicted of Export Control Act and the reinstated, however, the person remains
violating the AECA and certain other International Traffic in Arms debarred.
U.S. criminal statutes enumerated at Department of State policy permits
Regulations
debarred persons to apply to the
Section 38(g)(1)(A) of the AECA and
ACTION: Notice. Director, Office of Defense Trade
Section 120.27 of the ITAR. A person
Controls Compliance, for reinstatement
convicted of violating the AECA is also SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that beginning one year after the date of the
subject to statutory debarment under the Department of State has imposed debarment. Any decision to grant
Section 127.7 of the ITAR. statutory debarment pursuant to reinstatement can be made only after the
In August 2004, ESI was convicted of § 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in statutory requirements under Section
one count of violating Section 38 of the Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR 38(g) (4) of the AECA have been
AECA and the ITAR. Mr. Andrew Parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted satisfied.
Adams, then president of ESI, separately of violating or conspiring to violate Exceptions, also known as transaction
pled guilty to one count of violating 18 Section 38 of the Arms Export Control exceptions, may be made to this
U.S.C. Section 1361 by attempting to Act, as amended, (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C. debarment determination on a case-by-
commit depredation against property 2778). case basis at the discretion of the
manufactured for the United States. DATES: Effective Date: Date of conviction Assistant Secretary of State for Political-
as specified for each person. Military Affairs, after consulting with
Count one of Mr. Adams’ indictment
the appropriate U.S. agencies. However,
(02–CR–262) alleges that he attempted FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
such an exception would be granted
to export a defense article specifically David Trimble, Director, Office of
only after a full review of all
designed or modified for use in the S– Defense Trade Controls Compliance,
circumstances, paying particular
65 Sikorsky military helicopter. Bureau of Political-Military Affairs,
attention to the following factors:
Subsequently, the Department of State Department of State (202) 663–2980.
Whether an exception is warranted by
statutorily debarred ESI (see 70 FR 189, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section overriding U.S. foreign policy or
September 30, 2005). Because Mr. 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C. national security interests; whether an
Adams is affiliated with the debarred 2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of exception would further law
entity, the presumption of denial for State from issuing licenses or other enforcement concerns that are
licenses or other State authorizations approvals for the export of defense consistent with the foreign policy or
was applied to him as well. articles or defense services where the national security interests of the United
applicant, or any party to the export, has States; or whether other compelling
Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA permits been convicted of violating certain
termination of debarment after circumstances exist that are consistent
statutes, including the AECA. In with the foreign policy or national
consultation with the other appropriate implementing this provision, Section
U.S. agencies and after a thorough security interests of the United States,
127.7 of the ITAR provides for and that do not conflict with law
review of the circumstances ‘‘statutory debarment’’ of any person enforcement concerns. Even if
surrounding the conviction and a who has been convicted of violating or exceptions are granted, the debarment
finding that appropriate steps have been conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons continues until subsequent
taken to mitigate any law enforcement subject to statutory debarment are reinstatement.
concerns. The Department of State has prohibited from participating directly or Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the
determined that ESI has taken indirectly in the export of defense AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR,
appropriate steps to address the causes articles, including technical data, or in the following persons are statutorily
of the violations and to mitigate any law the furnishing of defense services for debarred as of the date of their AECA
enforcement concerns. Therefore, in which a license or other approval is conviction:
accordance with Section 38(g)(4) of the required. (1) Leib Kohn, May 22, 2007, U.S.
AECA, the debarment against ESI was Statutory debarment is based solely District Court, District of Connecticut,
rescinded, effective July 30, 2007. The upon conviction in a criminal Case # 3:04CR125.
presumption of denial for licenses or proceeding, conducted by a United (2) Electro-Glass Products, July 13,
other State authorizations applied to Mr. States Court, and as such the 2007, U.S. District Court, District of
Adams has also been lifted. The effect administrative debarment procedures Pennsylvania, Case# 06–00117–001.
of this notice is that ESI and Mr. Adams outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not As noted above, at the end of the
applicable. three-year period following the date of
may participate without prejudice in the
The period for debarment will be conviction, the above named persons/
export of defense articles and defense
determined by the Assistant Secretary entities remain debarred unless export
services subject to Section 38 of the for Political-Military Affairs based on privileges are reinstated.
AECA and the ITAR. the underlying nature of the violations, Debarred persons are generally
Dated: August 22, 2007. but will generally be for three years ineligible to participate in activity
Stephen D. Mull, from the date of conviction. At the end regulated under the ITAR (see e.g.,
of the debarment period, export sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Acting Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau


of Political-Military Affairs Department of privileges may be reinstated only at the Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the
State. request of the debarred person followed ITAR, any person who has knowledge
[FR Doc. E7–17902 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am] by the necessary interagency that another person is subject to
consultations, after a thorough review of debarment or is otherwise ineligible
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
the circumstances surrounding the may not, without disclosure to and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:06 Sep 10, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM 11SEN1
51886 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices

written approval from the Directorate of MOUs. Such a meeting will be DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Defense Trade Controls, participate, scheduled in the future at which time a
directly or indirectly, in any export in public session will be held. Office of the Secretary
which such ineligible person may The Committee’s responsibilities are
benefit therefrom, or have a direct or Aviation Proceedings; Agreements
carried out in accordance with Filed the Week Ending July 6, 2007
indirect interest therein.
provisions of the Convention on
This notice is provided for purposes The following Agreements were filed
Cultural Property Implementation Act
of making the public aware that the with the Department of Transportation
persons listed above are prohibited from (19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.). The U.S.-
Cambodia MOU, the U.S.-Honduras under the sections 412 and 414 of the
participating directly or indirectly in Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49
activities regulated by the ITAR, MOU, the designated lists of restricted
categories, the text of the Act, and U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures
including any brokering activities, and governing proceedings to enforce these
in any export from or temporary import related information may be found at
provisions. Answers may be filed within
into the United States of defense http://exchanges.state.gov/culprop.
21 days after the filing of the
articles, related technical data, or The meeting on October 4–5 will be application.
defense services in all situations closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Docket Number: OST–2007–28672.
covered by the ITAR. Specific case 552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h). Date Filed: July 3, 2007.
information may be obtained from the Parties: Members of the International
Dated: August 31, 2007.
Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District Air Transport Association.
Courts mentioned above, and by citing C. Miller Crouch,
Subject: TC12 North Atlantic, Canada,
the court case number provided. Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational USA-Europe, Expedited Composite
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
Dated: August 27, 2007. Resolutions, Intended effective date:
[FR Doc. E7–17871 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am] July 1, 2007.
Michael W. Coulter,
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Renee V. Wright,
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
State.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7–17905 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. E7–17847 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
[Public Notice 5930]

DEPARTMENT OF STATE Advisory Panel to the United States


Section of the North Pacific DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Public Notice 5906]
Anadromous Fish Commission; Notice Office of the Secretary
Notice of Meeting of the Cultural of Public Meeting
Property Advisory Committee Notice of Applications for Certificates
The Advisory Panel to the United of Public Convenience and Necessity
In accordance with the provisions of States Section of the North Pacific and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed
the Convention on Cultural Property Anadromous Fish Commission will Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q)
Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 et meet on September 27, 2007, via During the Week Ending July 6, 2007
seq.) (the Act) there will be a meeting of conference call. This session will
the Cultural Property Advisory involve discussion of the Fifteenth The following Applications for
Committee on Thursday, October 4, Annual Meeting of the North Pacific Certificates of Public Convenience and
2007, from approximately 9 a.m. to 5 Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier
Anadromous Fish Commission, to be
p.m., and on Friday, October 5, from Permits were filed under Subpart B
held on October 8–12, 2007 in
approximately 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., at the (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department
Valdivostok, Russia. The discussion will of Transportation’s Procedural
Department of State, Annex 44, Room begin at 3:30 p.m. EST and is open to
840, 301 4th St., SW., Washington, DC. Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et
the public. seq.). The due date for Answers,
At this meeting the Committee will
conduct its ongoing review function Requests for the conference call-in Conforming Applications, or Motions to
with respect to the Memorandum of phone number or for further information Modify Scope are set forth below for
Understanding Between the on the meeting should be directed to each application. Following the Answer
Government of the United States of Ms. Nicole M. Ricci, Office of Marine period DOT may process the application
America and the Government of the Conservation (OES/OMC), Room 2758, by expedited procedures. Such
Kingdom of Cambodia Concerning the U.S. Department of State, Washington, procedures may consist of the adoption
Imposition of Import Restrictions on DC 20520–7818. Ms. Ricci can be of a show-cause order, a tentative order,
Khmer Archaeological Material; and, reached by telephone at (202) 647–1073 or in appropriate cases a final order
with respect to the Memorandum of or by Fax (202) 736–7350. without further proceedings.
Understanding with the Government of Docket Number: OST–2007–28657.
Dated: August 28, 2007. Date Filed: July 2, 2007.
the Republic of Honduras Concerning
the Imposition of Import Restrictions on David A. Balton, Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Archaeological Material from the Pre- Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Applications, or Motion to Modify
Columbian Cultures of Honduras. This Fisheries, Department of State. Scope: July 23, 2007.
meeting is for the Committee to satisfy [FR Doc. E7–17879 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am] Description: Application of McCall
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

its ongoing review responsibility of the BILLING CODE 4710–05–P Aviation, Inc., requesting authority to
effectiveness of agreements pursuant to operate scheduled passenger service as
the Act and will focus its attention on a commuter air carrier.
Article II of the MOUs. This is not a Docket Number: OST–2007–28675.
meeting to consider extension of the Date Filed: July 3, 2007.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:06 Sep 10, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM 11SEN1

Potrebbero piacerti anche