51840 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control
Association
Notice is hereby given that, on June
15, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control
Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Bestguide Group Limited, Kowloon,
Hong Kong-China; Coresystem
Technology Limited, Kowloon, Hong
Kong-China; CustomFlix Labs, Inc.,
Scotts Valley, CA; Dong Kwang Display
Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of
Korea; Estorage Technology Co., Ltd.,
Taipei, Taiwan; and Tonfunk GmbH
Ermsleben, Falkenstein/Harz, Germany
have been added as parties to this
venture. Also, Taiwan Thick-Film Ind.
Corp., Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN has
withdrawn as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and DVD CCA
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on March 21, 2007. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31856).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 07–4431 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:06 Sep 10, 2007 Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Glass Technology
Development Corporation
Notice is hereby given that, on June
15, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Glass Technology
Development Corporation (‘‘FTDC’’) has
filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objective of the venture. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to
actual damages under specified
circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: A O Smith Corporation,
Florence, KY; EIC Group North
America, Lewisville, TX; Ferro
Corporation, Cleveland, OH; Hanson
Industries, Lynchburg, VA; Henkel
Surface Technologies, Madison Heights,
MI; KMI Systems, Inc., Crystal Lake, IL;
Mapes and Sprowl Steel, Elk Grove
Village, IL; Pemco Corporation,
Baltimore, MD; Porcelain Industries,
Dickson, TN; Roesch, Inc., Belleville, IL;
and URS Corporation, Franklin, TN.
Glass Technology Development
Corporation’s general area of planned
activity is to conduct joint research
necessary to develop and demonstrate
commercially viable technology for
manufacturing products using new
porcelain enamel coating technology
developed by the United States
Government.
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 07–4437 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—IMS Global Learning
Consortium, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on August
7, 2007, pursuant to section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), IMS Global Learning
PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
Consortium, Inc. has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recover of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, K12, Inc., Herndon, VA has
been added as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and IMS Global
Learning Consortium, Inc. intends to file
additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On April 7, 2000, IMS Global
Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its
original notification pursuant to section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR
55283).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on June 15, 2007. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on July 24, 2007 (72 FR 40331).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 07–4439 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
At of 1993—Interactive Advertising
Bureau
Notice is hereby given that, on June 5,
2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Interactive
Advertising Bureau (‘‘IAB’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
additions or changes to its standards
development activities. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
IAB is currently developing Online
Advertising Creative Delivery ‘‘Best
Practices’’ Guidelines, Insertion Order
and eBusiness Standards and Lead
Generation Data Delivery ‘‘Best
11SEN1