Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
NOTES
Members present: Jeff Klein, Kevin Fitzgerald, Sally Maldonado, Heath Chasanov, Donna Johnson, Jason
Conway, Bill Doolittle, Ken Hutchins, Jay Owens, Gerri Marshall, Chantel Janiszewski, Penny Schwinn,
Ryan Reyna. Members absent: Ed Emmett, Joe Jones, Sharon DiGirolamo, David Ring, Theodore Boyer.
Member-at-large: Mark Holodick.
Jay Owens and Heath Chasanov were recognized for representing the AFWG during interviews with
various media outlets. The WBOC TV story on the new accountability system may be seen here:
http://www.wboc.com/story/28005593/del-considering-giving-schools-letter-grades
and the news article featuring Heaths quotes may be read here: http://www.wdde.org/72897-reportcard-grading-delaware-public-schools-coming
Part A metrics
Ryan led the continued discussion regarding Part A business rules. The following recommendations have
been made by the AFWG:
On track to Graduate
Average Daily Attendance (ES and MS only)
Definition: Total number of days of attendance for all students divided by the total number of
school days in a given year.
Students included: A student is counted present only when he/she is actually at school, present
at another activity sponsored by the school as part of the schools program, or personally
supervised by a member of staff.
On track in 9th grade (HS only)
Provide a bonus for schools whose at-risk students are on track
Extend deadline beyond June 30 (potentially July 31)
Account for extended graduation timelines delineated in students IEPs, which district will
identify during the appeals process
Student level data for at-risk students (as mentioned above) must be available prior to the
beginning of the school year
Participation rate
Include some level of gradation for rates below 95%
Provide a bonus for rates above 95%
Academic achievement
Consider counting AL 4 as higher value than AL 3
Closing achievement gaps
Support super subgroup in the methodology
Part B metrics
Ryan led the continued discussion regarding Part B metrics. The following summarizes the
recommendations for each metric:
Postsecondary outcomes
Use % enrolled (NSC data) with disclaimer regarding data source
Kindergarten Readiness
No decision at this point in time with further discussion needed. Please note that this measure
was strongly supported in the survey.
Dropout rate
No decision at this point in time with further discussion needed as to whether or not we include.
Narrative report
The AFWG was asked to consider what information should be included in this section (i.e. areas
to be highlighted by schools) and provide recommendations. This will be revisited.
Growth Model
Andrew and Brad from Education Analytics facilitated a discussion regarding the following decision
points:
Where we are and where we want to be
Recap of past discussions
o Model as it stands (school impact on student growth)
o What does this look like in terms of data
Small schools and statistical noise
Standard errors data
Peer effects
Reporting scale
Growth model aggregation
o Many measures, one school
Intro to scoring / standard setting
Initial recommendations include:
Providing information to schools by grade level, but OK with aggregation for accountability
Support shrinkage, or minimizing statistical noise in terms of small sample sizes
Communicate the growth methodology very clearly with external stakeholders
Next Steps
Current Federal
Accountability - Adequate
Yearly Progress
2) Postsecondary outcomes
4) Social-Emotional Learning
6) Dropout rate
7) Kindergarten Readiness